Despite the growing interest of research on public service motivation (PSM), limited studies have considered the interaction between street-level bureaucrats and citizens. This study examined the impact of citizen feedback on PSM among street-level bureaucrats. Anchoring on the social exchange theory, this research posits that citizen feedback plays a pivotal role in influencing PSM. Using a vignette–survey experiment in the context of urban service provisions in Magelang city, Indonesia, this study empirically tested the causal relationship between citizen feedback and PSM. The finding reveals empirical evidence that positive citizen feedback enhances PSM, while, conversely, negative feedback diminishes PSM. These results underscore the importance of citizen feedback as an alternative managerial tool to motivate street-level bureaucrats who directly engage in service delivery. Public managers can also use these findings as a starting point to design a citizen feedback handling system in public service delivery.
Anderfuhren-BigetS.VaroneF.GiauqueD. (2014). Policy environment and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12026
2.
AqliZ.UjiantoSyafi’iA. (2019). Public employees’ risk aversion and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of ethical leadership, work culture and public service motivation. Public Administration Issues, 2019(6), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-7-22
BaekgaardM.BaethgeC.Blom-HansenJ.DunlopC. A.EsteveM.JakobsenM.KisidaB.MarvelJ.MoseleyA.SerritzlewS.StewartP.ThomsenM. K.WolfP. J.MortonR.SerritzlewS. (2015). Conducting experiments in public management research: A practical guide. International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1024905
5.
BaldwinR. (2014). From regulation to behaviour change: Giving nudge the third degree. Modern Law Review, 77(6), 831–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12094
6.
BarrowsS.HendersonM.PetersonP. E.WestM. R. (2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American School Districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(3), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw028
BelleN.CantarelliP. (2015). Monetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13520460
9.
BenartziS.BeshearsJ.MilkmanK. L.SunsteinC. R.ThalerR. H.ShankarM.Tucker-RayW.CongdonW. J.GalingS. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging?Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501
Blom-HansenJ.MortonR.SerritzlewS. (2015). Experiments in public management research. International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1024904
BurgersC.EdenA.EngelenburgM. D.Van BuninghS. (2015). How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.038
14.
CaillierJ. G. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. Federal Government Agency. American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011409394
15.
CaillierJ. G. (2020). Testing the influence of autocratic leadership, democratic leadership, and public service motivation on citizen ratings of an agency head’s performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 43(4), 918–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1730919
16.
ChaudhryS. J.LoewensteinG. (2019). Thanking, apologizing, bragging, and blaming: Responsibility exchange theory and the currency of communication. Psychological Review, 126(3), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000139
17.
ChristensenR. K.PaarlbergL.PerryJ. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12796
18.
ClarkA. F. (2016). Toward an entrepreneurial public sector: Using social exchange theory to predict public employee risk perceptions. Public Personnel Management, 45(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026016669169
19.
CocciaM.BenatiB. (2018). Rewards in public administration: A proposed classification. Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 5(2), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1453/jsas.v5i2.1648
20.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
21.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
22.
DowdingK.JohnP. (2011). Voice and choice in health care in England: Understanding citizen responses to dissatisfaction. Public Administration, 89(4), 1403–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01960.x
23.
EmersonR. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1976), 335–362.
24.
FlorczakC.RasmussenS. H. R.JensenU. T.StritchJ. M.ChristensenK.NørgaardA. S.KlemmensenR. (2023). Exploring the foundational origins of public service motivation through the lens of behavioral genetics. Public Administration, 101(3), 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12837
25.
GoetteL.TripodiE. (2020). Does positive feedback of social impact motivate prosocial behavior? A field experiment with blood donors. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 175, 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.04.014
GopalanM.PirogM. A. (2017). Applying behavioral insights in policy analysis: Recent trends in the United States. The Policy Studies Journal, 45(S1), S82–S114.
28.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
29.
GrantA. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393–417.
30.
GrimmelikhuijsenS.JilkeS.OlsenA. L.TummersL. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609.This
31.
HameduddinT.EngbersT. (2022). Leadership and public service motivation: A systematic synthesis. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 86–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2021.1884150
32.
HanY. (2018). Is public service motivation changeable? Integrative modeling with goal-setting theory. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1262871
33.
HarariM. B.HerstD. E. L.ParolaH. R.CarmonaB. P. (2017). Organizational correlates of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of two decades of empirical research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw056
34.
HomansG. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
35.
JamesO.JilkeS. R.Van RyzinG. G. (2017). Behavioural and experimental public administration: Emerging contributions and new directions. Public Administration, 95(4), 865–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12363
36.
JamesO.MoseleyA. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12066
37.
jamovi. (2021). The jamovi project (Version 2.2) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
38.
JensenU. T.VestergaardC. F. (2017). Public service motivation and public service behaviors: Testing the moderating effect of tenure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw045
39.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB. E.AndersenL. B.CeraseF. P.ChristensenR. K.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP.LiuB.PalidauskaiteJ.PedersenL. H.PerryJ. L.RitzA.TaylorJ.De VivoP. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus027
40.
KipfelsbergerP.HerhausenD.BruchH. (2016). How and when customer feedback influences organizational health. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2014-0262
41.
KlugerA. N.DenisiA. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
KowalskiR.EsteveM.Jankin MikhaylovS. (2020). Improving public services by mining citizen feedback: An application of natural language processing. Public Administration, 98(4), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12656
44.
LeighA. (2018). Randomistas: How radical researchers are changing our world. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.12987/9780300240115
45.
LimJ. Y.MoonK. K. (2021). Transformational leadership and employees’ helping behavior in public organizations: Does organizational structure matter. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977565
46.
LiuB.DuL.WenH.BoF. (2012). Public service motivation of public-versus private-sector employees in a Chinese context. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40(9), 1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.9.1409
47.
LiuB.PerryJ. L. (2016). The psychological mechanisms of public service motivation: A two-wave examination. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X14549672
48.
MarquesT. M. G. (2021). Research on Public Service Motivation and Leadership: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1741615
49.
MensahJ. K.AmegaviG. B. (2024). Experimental public service motivation research: A systematic review and future directions. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(3), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2106493
50.
MigchelbrinkK.Van de WalleS. (2020). When will public officials listen? A vignette experiment on the effects of input legitimacy on public officials’ willingness to use public participation. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13138
51.
MinelliA.RuffiniR. (2018). Citizen feedback as a tool for continuous improvement in local bodies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0010
MussagulovaA.van der WalZ. (2021). “All still quiet on the non-Western front?” Non-Western public service motivation scholarship: 2015–2020. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1836977
54.
NasrL.BurtonJ.GruberT. (2018). Developing a deeper understanding of positive customer feedback. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-07-2016-0263
55.
NasrL.BurtonJ.GruberT.KitshoffJ. (2014). Exploring the impact of customer feedback on the well-being of service entities. Journal of Service Management, 25(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-01-2014-0022
56.
OsborneS.ChewC.McLaughlinK. (2009). Developing the marketing function in UK Public Service Organizations: The contribution of theory and practice. Public Money & Management, 29(1), 35–42.
PerryJ.HonghendemA.WiseL. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
59.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303
60.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Public Service: Callings, Commitments and Contributions, 7, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497957
61.
PerryJ. L.BrudneyJ. L.CourseyD.LittlepageL. (2008). What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00881.x
62.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
63.
PotipiroonW.FordM. T. (2017). Does public service motivation always lead to organizational commitment? Examining the moderating roles of intrinsic motivation and ethical leadership. Public Personnel Management, 46(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017717241
64.
PratamaA. B. (2023). The social interface of smart city development: An empirical study in Magelang City, Indonesia. University of Bonn. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11811/11019
65.
PratamaA. B.NurhidayahA. (2019). Does public service motivation matter to employees’ performance and organizational commitment in sub-district offices?Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 23, 1–15.
66.
PuspasariA.SuriptoS.HidayatT. M. (2022). A reward system model for high-performing state civil apparatus in Indonesia. Kne Social Sciences, 2022(6), 1381–1391. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i9.11022
67.
RavallionM. (2020). Should the randomistas (continue to) rule? In BedecarratsF.GuerinC. I.RoubaudD. F. (Eds.), Randomized control trials in the field of development: A critical perspective (pp. 47–78). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865360.003.0003
68.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505.Public
69.
RyanR. M.RigbyC. S.PrzybylskiA. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8
SteinerP. M.AtzmüllerC.SuD. (2016). Designing valid and reliable vignette experiments for survey research: A case study on the fair gender income gap. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 7(2), 52–94. https://doi.org/10.2458/jmmss.5185
72.
SukhumvitoJ. P.YuniawanA.KusumawardhaniA.UdinU. (2020). Public service motivation, work attitudes, and job performance: An empirical study. Calitatea, 21(175), 113–119.
73.
SusantoE. (2021). Does love of money matter for innovative work behavior in public sector organizations? Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2020-0028
74.
TaylorJ. (2014). Public service motivation, relational job design, and job satisfaction in local government. Public Administration, 92(4), 902–918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02108.x
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697
77.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887970
78.
Van der WalZ. (2015). “All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2015.1041223
79.
Van RyzinG. G.JilkeS. R. (2017). Survey experiments for public management research. In Van RyzinG. G.JamesO.JilkeS. R. (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 57–164). Cambridge University Press.
80.
VerbeetenF. H. M. (2008). Performance management practices in public sector organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863996
81.
WardK. D. (2014). Cultivating public service motivation through AmeriCorps Service: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12155
82.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup009
83.
YudiatmajaW. E. (2019). How does public service motivation contribute to service orientation? Testing mediation models. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v9i2.2180
84.
YudiatmajaW. E.EdisonE.SulistiowatiR.SamnuzulsariT.MalekJ. A. (2021). Linking religiosity and employee performance in the public sector: Does public service motivation matter?Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 11(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v11i2.5353
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
