The Effectiveness of Monetary and Promotion Rewards in the Public Sector and the Moderating Effect of PSM (PSM-Reward Fit or PSM Crowding Out): A Survey Experiment
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2022
The Effectiveness of Monetary and Promotion Rewards in the Public Sector and the Moderating Effect of PSM (PSM-Reward Fit or PSM Crowding Out): A Survey Experiment
To what extent does public service motivation (PSM) affect how monetary rewards and promotion opportunities motivate government officials? This study offers an answer to this question through a survey experiment conducted with a sample of city government officials in Florida. The experimental results demonstrate that both monetary and promotion reward treatments positively motivate officials with low PSM. However, as the level of PSM increases, the positive treatment effect of the monetary reward decreases and converges on 0. Conversely, the positive effect of the promotion opportunity treatment not only decreases but becomes negative, indicating that PSM crowding out is taking place.
AlonsoP.LewisG. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 363–380.
2.
AmmonsD. N.CoeC.LombardoM. (2001). Performance-comparison projects in local government: Participants’ perspectives. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 100–110.
3.
AmmonsD. N.RoenigkD. J. (2014). Benchmarking and interorganizational learning in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 309–335.
4.
ArgyrisC. (1985). Strategy, change and defensive routines. Pitman.
5.
ArgyrisC. (1992). On organizational learning. Blackwell.
6.
AronowP. M.BaronJ.PinsonL. (2019). A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Political Analysis, 27(4), 572–589.
7.
BelléN.CantrarelliP. (2015). Menetary incentives, motivation, and job effort in the public sector: An experimental study with Italian government executives. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(2), 99–123.
8.
BenabouR.TiroleJ. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Review, 96(5), 1652–1678.
9.
BorstR. T. (2018). Comparing work engagement in people-changing and people-processing service providers: A mediation model with red tape, autonomy, dimensions of PSM, and performance. Public Personnel Management, 47(3), 287–313.
10.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 685–712.
11.
BrightL. (2005). Public employees with high levels of public service motivation: Who are they, where are they and what do they want?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(2), 138–155.
12.
BrightL. (2009). Why do public employees desire intrinsic workplace opportunities?Public Personnel Management, 38(3), 15–37.
13.
ButlerD. M.VoldenC.DynesA. M.ShorB. (2017). Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Political Science, 61, 37–49.
14.
CrewsonP. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(4), 499–518.
15.
Dal BóE.FinanF.RossiM. A. (2013). Strengthening state capabilities: The role of financial incentives in the call to public service. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 1169–1218.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
18.
DeMaioT. J. (1984). Social desirability and survey. Surveying Subjective Phenomena, 2, 257–281.
19.
BelléN. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance for public employees in Italy. Public Administration Review, 73, 143–153.
20.
BelléN. (2014). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 109–136.
21.
BelléN. (2015). Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: A randomized field experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 230–241.
22.
EllicksonM. C. (2002). Determinants of job satisfaction of municipal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 31(3), 343–358.
23.
FischerR. (2008). Rewarding seniority: Exploring cultural and organizational predictors of seniority allocations. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(2), 167–186.
24.
FrancoisP. M.Vlassopoulos, . (2008). Pro-social motivation and the delivery of social services. Cesifo Economic Studies, 54(1), 22–54.
25.
FrankS. A. G. B.Lewis,. (2004). Government employees working hard or hardly working?The American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 36–51.
26.
FrantH. (1996). High-powered and low-powered incentives in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), 365–381.
27.
FreyB. S. (1997). Not just for the money. Edward Elgar.
28.
FreyB. S. (2002). How does pay influence motivation? In FreyB. S.OsterlohM.. (Eds.), Successful management by motivation: Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic incentives (pp. 3–26). Springer-Verlag.
29.
FreyB. S.HombergF.OsterlohM. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34(7), 949–972.
30.
FreyB. S.Oberholzer-GeeF. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding- out. American Economic Association, 87(4), 746–755.
31.
GeorgellisY.IossaE.TabvumaV. (2011). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473–493.
32.
GneezyU.ListJ. A. (2006). Putting behavioral economics to work: Testing for gift exchange in labor markets using field experiments. Econometrica, 74(5), 1365–1384.
33.
GneezyU.RustichiniA. (2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 791–810.
34.
GrantA. M.BerryJ. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96.
35.
HatryH. P. (1999). Performance measurement. Urban Institute.
36.
HauserD. J.EllsworthP. C.GonzalezR. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary?Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 998.
37.
HombergF.McCarthyD.TabvumaV. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 711–722.
38.
HoustonD. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–728.
39.
HoustonD. J. (2009). Motivating knights or knaves? Moving beyond performance-related pay for the public sector. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 43–57.
40.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2014). Performance management in the public sector: Does it decrease or increase innovation and performance?International Journal of Public Administration37(14): 1011–1023.
41.
JacobsenC. B.JensenL. E. (2017). Why not “just for the money”? An experimental vignette study of the cognitive price effects and crowding effects of performance-related pay. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(3), 551–580.
42.
JacobsenC. B.HvitvedJ.AndersenL. B. (2014). Command and Motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 790–806.
43.
JilkeS.Van de WalleS.KimS. (2016). Generating usable knowledge through an experimental approach to public administration. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 69–72.
44.
KarlK. A.SuttonC. L. (1998). Job values in today’s workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), 515–527.
45.
KelloughJ. E.LuH. (1993). The paradox of merit pay in the public sector: Persistence of a problematic procedure. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13(2), 45–64.
46.
KiN. (2021). Public service motivation and government officials’ willingness to learn in public sector benchmarking process. Public Management Review, 23, 610–623.
47.
KimS. (2009). Revising Perry’s measurement scale of public service motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 39(2), 149–163.
48.
KjeldsenA. M.JacobsenC. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899–926.
49.
KwonI. (2012). Motivation, discretion, and corruption. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 765–794.
50.
LahT. J.PerryJ. L. (2008). The diffusion of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 in OECD countries: A tale of two paths to reform. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 282–299.
51.
LazearE. P.GibbsM. (2014). Personnel economics in practice. John Wiley.
52.
LazearE. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361.
53.
LepperM.GreeneD. (1978). The hidden costs of reward: New perspectives on the psychology of human motivation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
LepperM.GreeneD.NisbettR. (1973). Undermining children’s interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification hypothesis.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137.
55.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
56.
McGrathJ. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25(2), 179–210.
57.
MoynihanD. P. (2008). The normative model in decline? Public service motivation in the age of governance. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of the public service (pp. 247–267). Oxford University Press.
58.
MoynihanD. P. (2010). A workforce of cynics? The effects of contemporary reforms on public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 24–34.
NeumannO. (2019). “Giving something back to society”: A study exploring the role of reciprocity norms in public service motivation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(2), 159–184.
61.
NgoyeB.SierraV.YsaT.AwanS. (2020). Priming in behavioral public administration: Methodological and practical considerations for research and scholarship. International Public Management Journal, 23(1), 113–137.
62.
OsterlohM.FreyB. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organizational Studies, 11(5), 538–550.
63.
OsterlohM.FreyB. S.FrostJ. (2001). Managing motivation, organization and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3), 231–239.
64.
PedersenM. J. (2015). Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 734–746.
65.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
66.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 471–488.
67.
PerryJ. L.EngbersT. A.JunS. Y. (2009). Back to the future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69(1), 39–51.
68.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
69.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.
70.
RaineyH. G. (1979). Perceptions of incentives in business and government: Implications for civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 440–448.
71.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
72.
SchottC.NeumannO.BaertschiM.RitzA. (2019). Public service motivation, prosocial motivation and altruism: Towards disentanglement and conceptual clarity. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(14), 1200–1211.
73.
StazykE. C. (2012). Crowding out public service motivation? Comparing theoretical expectations with empirical findings on the influence of performance-related pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(3), 1–23.
74.
VallerandR. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360AcademicPress.
75.
VogelD.KrollA. (2016). The stability and change of PSM-related values across time: Testing theoretical expectations against panel data. International Public Management Journal, 19(1), 53–77.
76.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation. John Wiely.
77.
WalkerR. M.BrewerG. A.LeeM. J.PetrovskyN.Van WitteloostuijnA. (2019). Best practice recommendations for replicating experiments in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 609–626.
78.
WardK. D. (2014). Cultivating public service motivation through AmeriCorps service: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 114–125.
79.
WeibelA.RostK. M.OsterlohM.. (2010). Pay for Performance in the Public Sector—Benefits and (Hidden) Costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412.
80.
WeibelA.RotaS. (2002). Fairness as a motivator. In FreyB. S.OsterlohM. (Eds.), Successful management by motivation: Balancing intrinsic and extrinsic incentives (pp. 171–189). Springer-Verlag.
81.
WrightB. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54–64.
82.
WrightB. E.GrantA. M. (2010). Unanswered questions about public service motivation: Designing research to address key issues of emergence and effects. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 691–700.
83.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K. (2010). Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction-selection-attrition model. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 155–176.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
