Professional development leadership (PDL) can potentially align organizational goals and professional norms, thereby increasing the performance of professional employees in public organizations. Public management research has largely overlooked this type of leadership behavior, however, which may be due to the fact that it remains conceptually under-developed. This article presents a refined conceptualization of PDL based on theorizing and the abductive analysis of 31 interviews with managers and professionals in public organizations. The ambition of PDL is to facilitate a shared understanding of professional quality within the scope of organizational goals and to influence others to realize this understanding in practice. Core behaviors are attempts to create alignment between organizational goals and professional norms, to develop professional knowledge, and to activate professional knowledge and norms in practice. The conceptualization comprises a steppingstone for systematic research on PDL, and public managers may find inspiration as to how they can address professional norms and knowledge in their leadership practice.
AbbottA. (1983). Professional ethics. American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 855–885.
2.
AbbottA. (1988). The system of professions. University of Chicago Press.
3.
AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.BroL. L.Holm-PetersenC. (2018). Achieving high quality through transformational leadership: A qualitative multilevel analysis of transformational leadership and perceived professional quality. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 51–72.
4.
AndersenL. B.PedersenL. H. (2012). Public service motivation and professionalism. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 46–57.
5.
BoyneG. A. (2003). What is public service improvement?Public Administration, 81(2), 211–227.
6.
BrehmJ.GatesS. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. The University of Michigan Press.
7.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
8.
CecchiniM.HarritsG. S. (2022). The professional agency narrative—Conceptualizing the role of professional knowledge in frontline work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 41–57.
9.
DurkheimE. (1992). Professional ethics and civic morals. Routledge. (Original work published 1890–1900).
10.
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132.
11.
EvansT. (2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. The British Journal of Social Work, 41, 368–386.
12.
EvansT. (2016). Professional discretion in welfare services: Beyond street-level bureaucracy. Routledge.
13.
EvettsJ. (2014). The concept of professionalism: Professional work, professional practice and learning. In BillettS.HarteisC.GruberH. (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 29–56). Springer.
14.
FreidsonE. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. University of Chicago Press.
15.
GailmardS. (2010). Politics, principal–agent problems, and public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 35–45.
16.
GoodeW. J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 25(6), 902–914.
17.
GrønC. H.BroL. L.AndersenL. B. (2020). Public managers’ leadership identity: Concept, causes, and consequences. Public Management Review, 22, 1696–1716.
18.
GreenleafR. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
19.
GrimenH. (2008). Profesjon og kunnskap. In MolanderA.TerumL.I. (Eds.), Profesjonsstudier (pp. 71–86). Universitetsforlaget.
20.
HarrisonS. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy and professionalism in health services. In HupeP.HillM.BuffatA. (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 61–78). Policy Press.
21.
HarritsG. S. (2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and professionalism. In HupeP. (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 193–208). Edward Elgar.
22.
HaterJ. J.BassB. M. (1988). Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695–702.
23.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841.
24.
JakobsenM.JacobsenC. B.SerritzlewS. (2019). Managing the behaviour of public frontline employees through change-oriented training: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 556–571.
25.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA. L.. . . WürtzA. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.
26.
JohnsonT. (1972). Professions and power. The Macmillan Press.
27.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
28.
Le GrandJ. (2003). Motivation, agency and public policy. Oxford University Press.
29.
LemoineG. J.HartnellC. A.LeroyH. (2019). Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 148–187.
30.
MøllerA. M. (2021). Deliberation and deliberative organizational routines in frontline decision-making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 471–488.
31.
MacDonaldK. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. SAGE.
32.
McGivernG.CurrieG.FerlieE.FitzgeraldL.WarningJ. (2015). Hybrid manager-professionals’ identity work: The maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Administration, 93(2), 412–432.
33.
MoonK. K.ChristensenR. K. (2022). Moderating diversity, collective commitment, and discrimination: The role of ethical leaders in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32, 380–397.
34.
MoynihanD.LanduytN. (2009). How do public organizations learn? Bridging cultural and structural perspectives. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1097–1105.
35.
NagtegaalR.TummersL.NoordegraadM.BekkersV. (2019). Nudging healthcare professionals towards evidence-based medicine: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2), 1–20.
36.
NicoliniD. (2009). Articulating practice through the interview to the double. Management Learning, 40(2), 195–212.
37.
NoordegraafM. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39, 761–785.
38.
NoordegraafM. (2011). Risky business: How professionals and professional fields (must) deal with organizational issues. Organization Studies, 32, 1349–1371.
39.
NoordegraafM. (2016). Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services. Administration & Society, 48(7), 783–810.
40.
NoordegraafM.SchneiderM. M. E.Van RensenE. L. J.BoselieJ. P. P. E. F. (2016). Cultural complementarity—Reshaping professional and organizational logics in developing frontline medical leadership. Public Management Review, 18(8), 1111–1137.
41.
ParkinF. (1974). Strategies of social closure in class formation. In ParkinF. (Ed.), The social analysis of class structure (pp. 2–18). Tavistock Publications.
42.
ParsonsT. (1939). The professions and social structure. Social Forces, 17(4), 457–467.
43.
RaelinJ. A. (1986). The clash of culture. Harvard Business School Press.
44.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
45.
SchönD. (1981). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Ashgate.
46.
SchottC.Van KleefD.NoordegraafM. (2016). Confused professionals?: Capacities to cope with pressures on professional work. Public Management Review, 18(4), 583–610.
47.
Schwartz-SheaP.YanowD. (2011). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes (Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods). Routledge.
48.
SehestedK. (1996). Professioner og offentlige strukturændringer [Professions and public structural changes]. AKF Forlaget.
49.
SimonH. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). Free Press.
50.
ThomsenM. K.JensenU. T. (2020). Service professionals’ response to volunteer involvement in service production. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 220–239.
51.
TorfingJ.AndersenL. B.GreveC.KlausenK. K. (2020). Public governance paradigms: Competing and co-existing (Policy, Administrative and Institutional Change Series). Edward Elgar.
52.
Van KnippenbergD.SitkinS. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
53.
VoxtedS. (2019). Frontline managers: A re-examination of their role in talent management. In AdamsenB.SwailesS. (Eds.), Managing talent (pp. 123–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95201-7_7
54.
WalkerR. M.JungC. S.BoyneG. A. (2013). Marching to different drummers? The performance effects of alignment between political and managerial perceptions of performance management. Public Administration Review, 73, 833–844.
55.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society. An outline of interpretive sociology (RothG.WittichC., Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
56.
WintertonJ. (2007). Training, development, and competence. In BoxallP. J.WrightP. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of human resource management (pp. 324–343). Oxford University Press.
57.
YuklG. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
58.
YuklG. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66–85.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
