Professional development leadership (PDL) aims to facilitate a shared understanding of professional quality and to influence employees to realize this understanding in practice. PDL can be important in overcoming clashes between managerial and professional logics and influencing professional work to support organizational goal attainment. This article develops and validates two PDL measurement scales on different subsamples of surveys of public managers (n = 385) and their employees (n = 3,865): a 9-item dimensional scale and a 4-item global scale. The paper thus serves as a stepping stone for future research on PDL.
AcockA. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata: Revised edition. Stata Press.
2.
AkerjordetK.SeverinssonE. (2008). Emotionally intelligent nurse leadership: A literature review study. Journal of Nursing Management, 16(5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00893.x
3.
AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.BroL. L.Holm-PetersenC. (2018). Achieving high quality through transformational leadership: A qualitative multilevel analysis of transformational leadership and perceived professional quality. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017747270
4.
AndersenL. B.PedersenL. H. (2012). Public service motivation and professionalism. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.635278
5.
Anderson-ButcherD.ConroyD. E. (2002). Factorial and criterion validity of scores of a measure of belonging in youth development programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(5), 857–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316402236882
6.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.JungD. I.BersonY. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
9.
CecchiniM.HarritsG. S. (2022). The professional agency narrative: Conceptualizing the role of professional knowledge in frontline work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab021
10.
DeVellisR. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Sage.
11.
FreidsonE. (2004). Professionalism: The third logic. Reprint. Polity Press.
12.
GoodallA. H.BäkerA. (2015). A theory exploring how expert leaders influence performance in knowledge-intensive organizations. In WelpeI. M.WollersheimJ.RingelhanS.OsterlohM. (Eds.), Incentives and performance: Governance of research organizations (pp. 49–67). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_4.
13.
GrønC. H.BroL. L.AndersenL. B. (2020). Public managers’ leadership identity: Concept, causes, and consequences. Public Management Review, 22(11), 1696–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645875
14.
HinkinT. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
15.
JacobsenC. B.AndersenL. B. (2015). Is leadership in the eye of the beholder? A study of intended and perceived leadership practices and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 75(6), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12380
16.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA.-L.JacobsenC. B.LadenburgJ.NielsenP. A.SalomonsenH. H.Westergård-NielsenN.WürtzA. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716667157
17.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
18.
KjeldsenA. M.AndersenL. B. (2023). Leader-employee gap in verbal transactional leadership and distributed leadership: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211039004
LundC. S. (2022). Professional development leadership in public organizations: A refined conceptualization. Public Personnel Management, 51(4), 516–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/00910260221118576.
21.
LundC. S.AndersenL. B. (2022). Professional development leadership in turbulent times. Public Administration, 101(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12854.
22.
MacCallumR. C.RoznowskiM.NecowitzL. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111(3), 490–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490.
23.
McGivernG.CurrieG.FerlieE.FitzgeraldL.WaringJ. (2015). Hybrid manager–professionals’ identity work: The maintenance and hybridization of medical professionalism in managerial contexts. Public Administration, 93(2), 412–432.
MeursT.NoordegraafM. (2022). Adapted agency: How connected (Dutch) police professionals rework their professional capabilities. Journal of Professions and Organization, 9, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joac008
26.
NoordegraafM. (2016). Reconfiguring professional work: Changing forms of professionalism in public services. Administration & Society, 48(7), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713509242
27.
NoordegraafM. (2020). Protective or connective professionalism? How connected professionals can (still) act as autonomous and authoritative experts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 7(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joaa011
28.
PacheA.-C.SantosF. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In LounsburyM.BoxenbaumE. (Eds.), Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (pp. 3–35). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB014
29.
SchottC.van KleefD.NoordegraafM. (2016). Confused professionals? Capacities to cope with pressures on professional work. Public Management Review, 18(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1016094
30.
SchottC.van RoekelH.TummersL. G. (2020). Teacher leadership: A systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual framework. Educational Research Review, 31, 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
33.
TummersL.KniesE. (2016). Measuring public leadership: Developing scales for four key public leadership roles. Public Administration, 94(2), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12224
34.
van LoonN. M. (2017). Does context matter for the type of performance-related behavior of public service motivated employees?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(4), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15591036
35.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Development of a public service motivation measurement scale: Corroborating and extending Perry’s measurement instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167.
36.
WalkerR. M.JungC. S.BoyneG. A. (2013). Marching to different drummers? The performance effects of alignment between political and managerial perceptions of performance management. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12131.
37.
WilliamsL. J.VandenbergR. J.EdwardsJ. R. (2009). Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903065683.
38.
YuklG. (2002). Leadership in organisations. Prentice Hall.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
