This article argues for the need for a social justice approach to technical communication research and pedagogy. Given previous calls by scholars in technical and professional communication (TPC) for an attention to diversity, inclusion, and equality, the author examines the place and purpose of social justice in TPC and provides useful approaches for promoting a more genuine and critical interrogation of how work in TPC impacts the human experience.
AgbokaG. Y. (2013) Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly22(1): 28–49.
2.
Jones, N., & Walton, R. (Forthcoming). Using narrative to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice.
3.
BartonB. F.BartonM. S. (1993) Ideology and the map: Toward a postmodern visual design practice. In: BlylerN.ThrallsC. (eds) Professional communication: The social perspective, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press, pp. 49–78.
4.
BellL. A. (2007) Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In: AdamsM.BellL. A.GriffinP. (eds) Teaching for diversity and social justice, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 1–14.
5.
BlylerN. R. (2004) Critical interpretive research in technical communication: Issues of power and legitimacy. In: Kynell-HuntT.SavageG. (eds) Power and legitimacy in technical communication: Strategies for professional statusVol. 2, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 143–166.
6.
BlytheS.GrabillJ. T.RileyK. (2008) Action research and wicked environmental problems exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication22(3): 272–298.
7.
BowL. (2011) Betrayal and other acts of subversion: Feminism, sexual politics, Asian American women's literature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BowdenM. (2004) Technical communication and the role of the public intellectual: A community HIV-prevention case study. Technical Communication Quarterly13(3): 325–340.
9.
BrasseurL. E. (1993) Contesting the objectivist paradigm: Gender issues in the technical and professional communication curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication36(3): 114–123.
10.
BridgefordT. (2004) Story time: Teaching technical communication as a narrative way of knowing. In: BridgefordT.KitalongK. S.SelfeD. (eds) Innovation approaches to teaching technical communication, Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 111–134.
11.
Bridgeford, T., Kitalong, K. S., & Williamson, B. (Eds). (2014). Sharing our intellectual traces: Narrative reflections from administrators of professional, technical, and scientific communication programs. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
12.
CharmazK. (2005) Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice Studies. In: DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 507–536.
13.
CollinsP. H. (1999) Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment, New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
Cox, M. (2010). Concentration exam literature review rhetorical palimpsests: Grappling with professional & LGBTQ identity (ies). Unpublished manuscript.
15.
CrabtreeR. D.SappD. A. (2004) Your culture, my classroom, whose pedagogy? Negotiating effective teaching and learning in Brazil. Journal of Studies in International Education8(1): 105–132.
16.
CrabtreeR. D.SappD. A. (2005) Technical communication, participatory action research, and global civic engagement: A teaching, research, and social action collaboration in Kenya. REFLECTIONS: A journal of rhetoric, civic writing and service learning4(2): 9–33.
17.
Dawson, J. A. (2011, October). Advocacy work in technical communication: Technical communicators on different sides of the environmental sustainability debate. 2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1–2. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087236.
18.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ. (2012) Critical race theory: An introduction, New York, NY: NYU Press.
19.
DraggaS. (1997) A question of ethics: Lessons from technical communicators on the job. Technical Communication Quarterly6(2): 161–178.
20.
DraggaS.VossD. (2001) Cruel pies: The inhumanity of technical illustrations. Technical Communication48(3): 265–274.
21.
DurackK. T. (1997) Gender, technology, and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly6(3): 249–260.
22.
FreireP. (1996) Pedagogy of the oppressed, New York, NY: Continuum.
23.
FreyL. R.PearceW. B.PollockM. A.ArtzL.MurphyB. A. O. (1996) Looking for justice in all the wrong places: On a communication approach to social justice. Communication Studies47: 110–127.
24.
GarciaA. M. (1989) The development of Chicana feminist discourse, 1970–1980. Gender & Society3(2): 217–238.
25.
GoodallH. L. (1994) Casing a promised land, Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
26.
HaasA. M. (2012) Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication26(3): 277–310.
27.
HaasA.TulleyC.BlairK. (2002) Mentors versus masters: Women’s and girls’ narratives of (re) negotiation in web-based writing spaces. Computers and Composition19(3): 231–249.
28.
hooksb. (1981) Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism, Boston, MA: South End Press.
29.
hooksb. (1994) Outlaw culture: Resisting representations, New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
Johnson-EilolaJ. (1996) Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly5(3): 245–270.
31.
JohnsonJ. R.PimentelO.PimentelC. (2008) Writing New Mexico White: A critical analysis of early representations of New Mexico in technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication22(2): 211–236.
32.
Jones, N. (Forthcoming). Narrative inquiry in human centered design: Examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of technical writing and communication.
33.
JonesN.SavageG.YuH. (2014) Tracking our progress: Diversity in technical and professional communication programs. Programmatic Perspectives6(1): 132–152.
34.
KingM. L.JacksonJ. L. (2000) Why we cannot wait, New York, NY: Penguin (Original work published in 1963).
35.
KoerberA. (2000) Toward a feminist rhetoric of technology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication14(1): 58–73.
36.
KoerberA. (2006) Rhetorical agency, resistance, and the disciplinary rhetorics of breastfeeding. Technical Communication Quarterly15(1): 87–101.
37.
LayM. M. (1991) Feminist theory and the redefinition of technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication5(4): 348–370.
MillerC. (1979) A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English40(6): 610–617.
40.
MillerT. P. (1991) Treating professional writing as social praxis. Journal of Advanced Composition11(1): 57–72.
41.
MooreK. (2013) Exposing hidden relations: Storytelling, pedagogy, and the study of policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication43(1): 63–78.
42.
OlesonV. (2005) Early millennial feminist qualitative research: Challenges and contours. In: DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 235–278.
43.
OrnatowskiC. M.BekinsL. K. (2004) What’s civic about technical communication? Technical communication and the rhetoric of “community”. Technical Communication Quarterly13(3): 251–269.
44.
PerkinsJ. M.BlylerN. (1999) Narrative and professional communication, Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
45.
PottsL. (2013) Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation, New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
RudeC. D. (2008) Introduction to the special issue on business and technical communication in the public sphere learning to have impact. Journal of Business and Technical Communication22(3): 267–271.
47.
SappD.SavageG.MattsonK. (2013) After the International Bill of Human Rights (IBHR): Introduction to special issue on human rights and professional communication. Journal of Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization4(1): 1–12.
48.
SavageG. J. (2003) Introduction: Toward professional status in technical communication. Power and Legitimacy in Technical Communication1: 1–12.
49.
ScottJ. B. (2003) Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
50.
ScottJ. B. (2004) Rearticulating civic engagement through cultural studies and service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly13(3): 289–306.
51.
Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (Eds.). (2007). Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. Albany: SUNY Press.
52.
SlackJ. D.MillerD. J.DoakJ. (1993) The technical communicator as author meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication7(1): 12–36.
53.
SmithL. T. (1999) Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples, London, England: Zed Books Ltd.
54.
SmithL. T. (2005) On tricky ground: Researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In: DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) The Sage handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 85–108.
55.
ThompsonI. (1999) Women and feminism in technical communication a qualitative content analysis of journal articles published in 1989 through 1997. Journal of Business and Technical Communication13(2): 154–178.
56.
ThompsonI. (2004) Sex differences in technical communication: A perspective from social role theory. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication34(3): 217–232.
57.
WaltonR.ZralyM.MugenganaJ. P. (2015) Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly24(1): 45–69.
58.
WangY.RodgersR. (2006) Impact of service-learning and social justice education on college students’ cognitive development. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice43(2): 518–539.
59.
WilliamsM. F. (2010) From black codes to recodification: Removing the veil from regulatory writing, Amityville, NY: Baywood.
60.
WilliamsM. F. (2013) A survey of emerging research: Debunking the fallacy of colorblind technical communication. Programmatic Perspectives5(1): 86–93.
61.
Williams, M. F., & Pimentel, O. (Eds.). (2014). Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
62.
YoungI. M. (1990) Justice and politics of difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
