Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-9
Patterns of ChatGPT Usage and Perceived Benefits on Academic Performance Across Disciplines: Insights from a Survey of Higher Education Students in the United States
This study investigates the integration and application of ChatGPT among U.S. higher education students across various academic disciplines. Given the recent introduction of ChatGPT in educational contexts, this research aims to understand the specific ways students utilize this tool for academic tasks and their perceived impact on their academic success. Through a comprehensive survey with close-ended and open-ended questions conducted with students from multiple disciplines, our findings reveal uses of ChatGPT commonly adopted across disciplines, such as assistance in brainstorming, writing support, and comprehension of complex material, along with discipline-specific adoptions like coding support and lesson planning. The study also identifies significant variations in usage patterns across disciplines. These results highlight AI's growing role in higher education and its potential to enhance personalized and on-demand learning support. This research contributes to the growing understanding of AI in academia, supporting educators and institutions in effectively integrating ChatGPT into education.
Abu KhurmaO.AlbahtiF.AliN.BustanjiA. (2024). AI ChatGPT and student engagement: Unraveling dimensions through PRISMA analysis for enhanced learning experiences. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep503. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14334
2.
AdamopoulouE.MoussiadesL. (2020). Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006
3.
Al-AdwanA. S.YaseenH.AlsoudA.AbousweilemF.Al-RahmiW. M. (2022). Novel extension of the UTAUT model to understand continued usage intention of learning management systems: The role of learning tradition. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3567–3593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10758-y
4.
AlDreabiH.HalalshehN.AlrawashdehM. N.AlnajdawiA. M.AlsawalqaR. O.Al-ShboulM. (2023). Sustainable digital communication using perceived enjoyment with a technology acceptance model within higher education, in Jordan. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1226718. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1226718
5.
BanduraA. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1(4), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4
6.
BansalG.ChamolaV.HussainA.GuizaniM.NiyatoD. (2024). Transforming conversations with AI—A comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 16(5), 2487–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10236-2
7.
BenottiL.MartnezM. C.SchapachnikF. (2018). A tool for introducing computer science with automatic formative assessment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2682084
8.
ClariziaF.ColaceF.LombardiM.PascaleF.SantanielloD. (2018). Chatbot: An education support system for student. 291–302.
9.
DasS. R.MadhusudanJ. (2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583
10.
DavisF. D. (1989a). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
11.
DavisF. D. (1989b). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219.
12.
DuongC. D.VuT. N.NgoT. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883
13.
DurallE.KaprosE. (2020). Co-design for a competency self-assessment chatbot and survey in science education. 13–24.
14.
FangH.ChengH.SapM.ClarkE.HoltzmanA.ChoiY.SmithN. A.OstendorfM. (2018). Sounding board: A user-centric and content-driven social chatbot. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1804.10202.
15.
FauziF.TuhuteruL.SampeF.AusatA. M. A.HattaH. R. (2023). Analysing the role of ChatGPT in improving student productivity in higher education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14886–14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563
16.
HabibiA.MuhaiminM.DanibaoB. K.WibowoY. G.WahyuniS.OctaviaA. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education learning: Acceptance and use. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100190
17.
HendersonM.SelwynN.AstonR. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
18.
HillJ.FordW. R.FarrerasI. G. (2015). Real conversations with artificial intelligence: A comparison between human–human online conversations and human–chatbot conversations. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.026
19.
HmoudM.SwaityH.HamadN.KarramO.DaherW. (2024). Higher Education Students’ Task Motivation in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Context: The Case of ChatGPT. Information, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033
20.
HollandA.CiachirC. (2024). A qualitative study of students’ lived experience and perceptions of using ChatGPT: Immediacy, equity and integrity. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2350655
21.
KhalifaM.AlbadawyM. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145
22.
KuttyS.ChughR.PereraP.NeupaneA.JhaM.LiL.GunathilakeW.PereraN. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Perspectives of students, educators, and administrators. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.27
23.
LewZ.WaltherJ. B. (2022). Social scripts and expectancy violations: Evaluating communication with human or AI chatbot interactants. Media Psychology, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2084111
24.
LinY.YuZ. (2023). Extending technology acceptance model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic Reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
25.
MaheshwariG. (2024). Factors influencing students’ intention to adopt and use ChatGPT in higher education: A study in the Vietnamese context. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 12167–12195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12333-z
26.
MediaConsortium, N. & EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2013). The NMC horizon report: 2013 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: New MediaConsortium, 12(3), 12–32.
27.
MolnárG.SzütsZ. (2018). The role of chatbots in formal education. 000197–000202.
28.
OkonkwoC. W.Ade-IbijolaA. (2020). Python-Bot: A chatbot for teaching python programming. Engineering Letters, 29(1), 1.
29.
OnalS.Kulavuz-OnalD. (2024). A cross-disciplinary examination of the instructional uses of ChatGPT in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231196
ParkN.JangK.ChoS.ChoiJ. (2021). Use of offensive language in human-artificial intelligence chatbot interaction: The effects of ethical ideology, social competence, and perceived humanlikeness. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106795
32.
RanoliyaB. R.RaghuwanshiN.SinghS. (2017). Chatbot for university related FAQs. 1525–1530.
33.
RöhrigC.HeßD. (2019). Omniman: A mobile assistive robot for intralogistics applications. Engineering Letters, 27(4), 4.
34.
Romero RodríguezJ. M.Ramírez-MontoyaM. S.Buenestado FernándezM.Lara LaraF. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students’ perceived usefulness.
35.
RosliM. S.SalehN. S.Md. AliA.Abu BakarS.Mohd TahirL. (2022). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model for the sustainability of higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified research gaps. Sustainability, 14(18), 11389. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389
36.
RuaneE.BirhaneA.VentresqueA. (2019). Conversational AI: Social and Ethical Considerations. 104–115.
37.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage.
38.
SelwynN.HillmanT.EynonR.FerreiraG.KnoxJ.MacgilchristF.Sancho-GilJ. M. (2020). What’s next for Ed-Tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945
39.
SinhaS.BasakS.DeyY.MondalA. (2020). An educational Chatbot for answering queries. In MandalJ.BhattacharyaD. (Eds.), Emerging technology in modelling and graphics (pp. 55–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_7
StrzeleckiA. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1
42.
SusnjakT. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? arXiv:2212.09292.
WangC.ChenX.YuT.LiuY.JingY. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: A bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02237-1
45.
WinklerR.SöllnerM. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. Academy of Management Annual Meeting (AOM).
46.
XuA.LiuZ.GuoY.SinhaV.AkkirajuR. (2017). A new chatbot for customer service on social media. 3506–3510.
47.
ZhaoJ.SongT.SunY. (2020). APIHelper: Helping junior android programmers learn API usage. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 47(1), 1.
48.
ZouM.HuangL. (2023). To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
