This study applied a convergent mixed methods design to examine familiarity, perceptions, and use of GenAI among undergraduate students by collecting and analyzing quantitative and qualitative data. A total of N = 220 undergraduate students enrolled in education sciences courses in a large research university in the southeastern United States participated in the study by completing a Qualtrics survey that included closed-ended and open-ended items. Findings indicated that students are moderately familiar with GenAI, though many remain in the early stages of understanding its applications. GenAI adoption for academic purposes remains low, with most students interacting with GenAI only occasionally. Students hold neutral to moderately positive perceptions of GenAI, though concerns about its role in academic settings persist. Spearman rank-order correlations revealed that students further along in GenAI adoption tend to use it more frequently. The findings highlight the need for GenAI training and support in guiding students’ use.
AbdullahM.KhaliqH.YaqoobY.MenahalR. S.NaeemP. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine: A cross-sectional study of undergraduate medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceived importance of artificial intelligence. The Professional Medical Journal, 31(10), 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2024.31.10.8317
2.
AbrahamM.EdelmanD. (2024). Personalized: Customer strategy in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press.
3.
AdigunO. T.TijaniF. A.HaihamboC. K.EnockS. L. (2025). Understanding preservice teachers’ intention to adopt and use artificial intelligence in Nigerian inclusive classrooms. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1519472
4.
AlghamdiA. M. (2024). Academic leaders’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence applications in leadership work in light of the Diffusion of Innovation Theory: The impact of possession of digital literacy. Journal of Educational Leadership & Policy Studies, 8(1), 1–28.
5.
AlmassaadA.AlajlanH.AlebaikanR. (2024). Student perceptions of generative artificial intelligence: Investigating utilization, benefits, and challenges in higher education. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385
6.
Belda-MedinaJ.Calvo-FerrerJ. R. (2022). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8427. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178427
7.
BelkinaM.DanielS.NikolicS.HaqueR.LydenS.NealP.GrundyS.HassanG. (2025). Implementing generative GenAI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100407. https://doi.org.auth.lib.niu.edu/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100407
8.
BickmanL. (2020). Improving mental services: A 50-year journey from randomized experiments to artificial intelligence and precision mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 47(5), 795–843.
9.
BiggsJ.TangC. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
BraunV.ClarkeV.RanceN. (2015). How to use thematic analysis with interview data. In VosslerA.MollerN. (Eds.), The counselling and psychotherapy research book (pp. 183–197). Sage.
12.
BreeseJ. L.RebmanC. M.LevkoffS. (2024). State of student perceptions of AI in the United States. Issues in Information Systems, 25(4), 311–321. https://doi.org/10.48009/4_iis_2024_125
13.
BurkhardM. (2022). Student perceptions of AI-powered writing tools: Towards individualized teaching strategies. International Association for the Development of the Information Society.
14.
CaldariniG.JafS.McGarryK. (2022). A literature survey of recent advances in chatbots. Information, 13(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010041
15.
ChanC.LeeK. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60.
16.
ChanC. K. Y.HuW. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
17.
CheahY. H.KimJ. (2025). STEM teachers’ perceptions, familiarity, and support needs for integrating generative artificial intelligence in K-12 education. School Science and Mathematics, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.18334
18.
ClarkeV.BraunV. (2014). Thematic analysis. In MichalosA. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6626–6628). Springer.
19.
CreswellJ.Plano ClarkV. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
20.
DeschenesA.McMahonM. (2024). A survey on student use of generative AI chatbots for academic research. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 19(2), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30512
21.
Educause. (2024). Educause horizon report: Teaching and learning edition. Educause.
22.
EkeD. (2023). Chat GPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, 100060.
23.
EsiyokE.GokcearslanS.KucukerginK. G. (2024). Acceptance of educational use of GenAI chatbots in the context of self-directed learning with technology and ICT self-efficacy of undergraduate students. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(1), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2303557
24.
FarhiF.JeljeliR.AburezeqI.DweikatF.Al-shamiS.SlameneR. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about ChatGPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
25.
FrechetteS. R. (2024). Assessing student perceptions of Artificial Intelligence within the community college system. Issues in Information Systems, 25(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2024_109
GoldingJ.LippertA.NeuschatzJ.SalomonI.BurkeK. (2025). Generative AI and college students: Use and perceptions. Teaching of Psychology, 52(3), 369–380.
28.
GrimusM. (2020). Emerging technologies: Impacting learning, pedagogy, and curriculum development. In YuS.AllyM.TsinakosA. (Eds.), Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum (pp. 127–151). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-98115-06185_8
29.
HaleJ.AlexanderS.WrightS. T.GillilandK. (2024). Generative AI in undergraduate medical education: A rapid review. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 11, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241266697
30.
HanS.KangH. S.GimberP.LimS. (2025). Nursing students’ perceptions and use of generative artificial intelligence in nursing education. Nursing Reports, 15(2), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15020068
IbrahimA. H.AjlouniA. O. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT in supporting special education undergraduates in achieving CEC standards: Students’ perception. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 15(5), 87–119.
33.
JamshedM.AlmashyA.AlbedahF.WardW. U. (2024). Assessing the efficacy of artificial intelligence-enabled EFL learning and teaching in Saudi Arabia: Perceptions, perspectives, and prospects. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 15(6), 1931–1940. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.18
34.
JeongH.HanS.KimK.ParkI.ChoiY.JeonK. J. (2023). Korean Dental hygiene students’ perceptions and attitudes toward artificial intelligence: An online survey. Journal of Dental Education, 87(6), 804–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13189
35.
JiangQ.ZhangJ.WangP.-H.ZhangY. (2024). Technology acceptance and innovation diffusion: Are users more inclined toward AI-assisted design?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 41(13), 8370–8384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2408513
36.
KaswanK. S.DhatterwalJ. S.MalikK.BailyanA. (2023). Generative AI: A review on models and applications. In 2023 International conference on communication, security and artificial intelligence (ICCSA) (pp. 699–704). IEEE.
37.
KimJ.MerrillK.XuK.SellnowD. D. (2020). My teacher is a machine: Understanding students’ perceptions of AI teaching assistants in online education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(20), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1801227
38.
KimmelS. B. (2024). AI-Facilitated critical thinking in an undergraduate project-based service-learning course. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 24(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.21818/001c.122149
39.
KlimovaB.de CamposV. P. L. (2024). University undergraduates’ perceptions on the use of ChatGPT for academic purposes: Evidence from a university in Czech Republic. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2373512
40.
KlineP. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
41.
KoneckiM.BiskupicI. O. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in higher education. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (Vol. 2, pp. 136–141). https://doi.org/10.5220/0012039700003470
42.
KoohangA.SargentC. S.SvanadzeS. (2024). Students’ perceptions of benefits and opportunities of artificial intelligence (AI). Issues in Information Systems, 25(2), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2024_134
43.
KukaL.HörmannC.SabitzerB. (2022). Teaching and learning with AI in higher education: A scoping review. In AuerM. E.PesterA.MayD. (Eds.), Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 456. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04286-7_26
44.
KurshumovaD. A. (2024). A snapshot of Bulgarian school teachers’ familiarity with, use of, and opinions on Artificial Intelligence at the threshold of its incorporation into the educational process. Discover Education, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00225-4
45.
MalikA. R.PratiwiY.AndajaniK.NumertayasaI. W.SuhartiS.DarwisA. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education students' perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296.
46.
McDonaldR. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47.
McElroyS. J.GirdharryK. (2024). Ethics and AI assemblages: A heuristic analysis of undergraduate business student perspectives. Business & Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(4), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906241253198
48.
MendezJ. D. (2024). Student perceptions of artificial intelligence utility in the introductory chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(8), 3547–3549.
49.
Mitchel-VillarrealR.Vilalta-PerdomoE.Salinas-NavarroD. E.Thierry-AnguileraR.GerardouF. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education, as explained by ChatGPT. ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856.
50.
MoorhouseB.YeoM.WanY. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151.
51.
NikoulinaA.CaroniA. (2024). Familiarity, use, and perception of AI-powered tools in higher education. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 13, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.13.169-181
52.
OladokunD.DogaraK.YusufM. (2024). Students’ attitudes and experiences with ChatGPT as a reference service tool in a Nigerian university: A comprehensive analysis of user perceptions. Gamification & Augmented Reality, 2, 1–10. 10. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr202436
53.
OliveiraA.Feyzi BehnaghR.NiL.MohsinahA. A.BurgessK. J.GuoL. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
54.
PatnaikP.BakkarM. (2024). Exploring determinants influencing artificial intelligence adoption, reference to Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Technology in Society, 79, 102750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102750
55.
PellasN. (2023). The effects of generative AI platforms on undergraduates’ narrative intelligence and writing self-efficacy. Education Sciences, 13(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111155
56.
PetriciniT.ZipfS.WuC. (2024). Perceptions about generative AI and ChatGPT use by faculty and students. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 17(2).
57.
PorterB.GrippaF. (2020). A platform for AI-enabled real-time feedback to promote digital collaboration. Sustainability, 12(24), 10243.
58.
RamanR.MandalS.DasP.KaurT.SanjanasriJ. P.NedungadiP.KuhailM. A. (2024). Exploring university students’ adoption of ChatGPT using the diffusion of innovation theory and sentiment analysis with gender dimension. Human Behavior & Emerging Technologies, 2024, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3085910
59.
RogersE. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press of Glencoe.
60.
RogersE. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). The Free Press.
61.
ShahzadM.XuS.AsifM. (2025). Factors affecting generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, use in higher education: An application of the technology acceptance model. British Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 489–513.
62.
SodiyaE. O.JacksB. S.UgwuanyiE. D.AdeyinkaM. A.UmogaU. J.DaraojimbaA. I.LottuO. A. (2024). Reviewing the role of AI and machine learning in supply chain analytics. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0069
63.
SongY.WangS. (2024). A survey and research on the use of artificial intelligence by Chinese design-college students. Buildings, 14(9), 2957. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092957
64.
Stokel-WalkerC.Van NoordenR. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214–216.
65.
SurahmanE.WangT. (2022). Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6), 1535–1553.
66.
TangX.LiX.YiM. (2024). Exploring how acquired diversity of teams influences the innovation diffusion in artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 61(1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1075
67.
UzumcuO.AcilmisH. (2024). Do innovative teachers use AI-powered tools more interactively? A study in the context of diffusion of innovation theory. Technology, Knowledge, and Learning: Learning Mathematics, Science and the Arts in the Context of Digital Technologies, 29(2), 1109–1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09687-1
68.
VacareluM. (2023). Artificial intelligence and higher education legal limits. In Artificial intelligence in higher education and scientific research: Future development (pp. 15–33). Springer Nature.
69.
VintereA.SafiulinaE.PanovaO. (2024). AI-based mathematics learning platforms in undergraduate engineering studies: Analyses of user experiences. Engineering for Rural Development, 23, 1042–1047. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2024.23.TF216
70.
VogelsE. (2023). A majority of Americans have heard of Chat GPT, but few have tried it themselves. Pew Research Center. Retrieved on May 28, 2025, from https://pewrsr.ch/3ICYoIx
71.
WangS.SunZ. (2025). Roles of artificial intelligence experience, information redundancy, and familiarity in shaping active learning: Insights from intelligent personal assistants. Education & Information Technologies, 30(2), 2525–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12895-6
72.
WangX.LiL.TanS.YangL.LeiJ. (2023). Preparing for AI-enhanced education: Conceptualizing and empirically examining teachers’ AI readiness. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107798
73.
WilliamsA. (2024). Comparison of generative GenAI performance on undergraduate and postgraduate written assessments in the biomedical sciences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00485-y
74.
WozneyL.VenkateshV.AbramiP. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
75.
XuW.OuyangF. (2022). A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 4195–4223.
76.
XuanP. Y.FahumidaM. I.HussainM. I.JayathilakeN. T.KhobragadeS.Kyaw SoeH.MoeS.Nu HtayM. N. (2023). Readiness towards artificial intelligence among undergraduate medical students in Malaysia. Education in Medicine Journal, 15(2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2023.15.2.4
77.
ZhengY.WangY.LiuK. S.-X.JiangM. Y.-C. (2024). Examining the moderating effect of motivation on technology acceptance of generative AI for English as a foreign language learning. Education & Information Technologies, 29(17), 23547–23575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12763-3
