Learning analytics (LA) has become a critical field for transforming educational practices through data-driven insights. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of LA research in higher education from 2013 to 2023, utilizing the Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Review (SPAR-4-SLR) approach. By leveraging VOS viewer 1.6.20, the analysis maps co-authorship, citation, co-occurrence, and co-citation networks, revealing significant trends and key contributors. The findings highlight a substantial increase in LA publications, with the U.S. emerging as a leading contributor. Key journals include the “British Journal of Educational Technology” and “Computers and Education,” while the University of Edinburgh stands out for its organizational link strength. Dragan Gasevic is notably prominent in co-authorship and co-citation networks. Despite the growth and impact of LA research, much remains technical. This study underscores the urgent need to explore qualitative aspects to fully harness LA's potential and drive meaningful improvements in educational practices globally.
AbrahamsonDorNathanMitchell JWilliams-PierceCaroWalkingtonCandaceOttmarErin R.SotoHortensiaAlibaliMartha W (2020). The future of embodied design for mathematics teaching and learning. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00147
2.
AlJarrahA.ThomasM. K.ShehabM. (2018). Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0083-9
3.
AzconaD.SmeatonA. F. (2017). Targeting at-risk students using engagement and effort predictors in an introductory computer programming course. In Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 361–366). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_27
4.
BachC. (2010). Learning analytics: Targeting instruction, curricula and student support. IMSCI 2010 - 4th international multi-conference on society, cybernetics and informatics, proceedings, Vol. 1, pp. 40–44.
5.
BermanN. B.ArtinoA. R. (2018). Development and initial validation of an online engagement metric using virtual patients. BMC Medical Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1322-z
6.
BodilyR.VerbertK. (2017). Review of research on student-facing learning analytics dashboards and educational recommender systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(4), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2017.2740172
7.
Buenaño-FernandezD.Villegas-ChW.Luján-MoraS. (2019). The use of tools of data mining to decision making in engineering education—A systematic mapping study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 744–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22100
8.
ChattiM. A.MuslimA. (2019). The PERLA framework: blending personalization and learning analytics. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3936
9.
ChenB.PoquetO. (2022). Networks in learning analytics: Where theory, methodology, and practice intersect. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7697
CiasulloM. V.LimW. M.ManeshM. F.PalumboR. (2022). The patient as a prosumer of healthcare: Insights from a bibliometric-interpretive review. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 36(9), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/jhom-11-2021-0401
12.
DawsonS.GaševićD.SiemensG.JoksimovicS. (2014). Current state and future trends. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, New York, NY, USA, pp. 231–240. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2567574.2567585
13.
Di MitriD.SchneiderJ.SpechtM.DrachslerH. (2018). From signals to knowledge: A conceptual model for multimodal learning analytics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12288
14.
DonthuN.KumarS.MukherjeeD.PandeyN.LimW. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Grand View Research. (2024). Education & learning analytics market size, share & trends analysis report by type (Descriptive, Predictive, Prescriptive), by deployment, by component, by end-use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2019–2025. Grand View Research.
19.
HarjuC. (2021). The perceived quality of wooden building materials—A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12764
20.
HossainZ.BumbacherE.BrauneisA.DiazM.SaltarelliA.BliksteinP.Riedel-KruseI. H. (2017). Design guidelines and empirical case study for scaling authentic inquiry-based science learning via open online courses and interactive biology cloud labs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 478–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0150-3
21.
IfenthalerD.GibsonD.PrasseD.ShimadaA.YamadaM. (2021). Putting learning back into learning analytics: Actions for policy makers, researchers, and practitioners. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2131–2150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09909-8
22.
KhousaE. A.AtifY.MasudM. M. (2015). A social learning analytics approach to cognitive apprenticeship. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-015-0021-z
23.
KimY. J.ValienteJ. A. R.IfenthalerD.HarpsteadE.RoweE. (2022). Analytics for game-based learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(3), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7929
24.
KivimäkiV.PesonenJ.RomanoffJ.RemesH.IhantolaP. (2019). Curricular concept maps as structured learning diaries: Collecting data on self-regulated learning and conceptual thinking for learning analytics applications. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.13
25.
KritzingerA.LemmensJ.-C.PotgieterM. (2018). Learning strategies for first-year biology: Toward moving the “murky middle”. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar42. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-10-0211
LohC. S.ShengY.IfenthalerD. (2015). Serious games analytics: Theoretical framework. In LohC.ShengY.IfenthalerD. (Eds.), Serious games analytics. Advances in game-based learning (pp. 3–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05834-4_1
28.
LongP.SiemensG. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. 12 September, pp. 31–40.
29.
LonnS.KoesterB. (2019). Rearchitecting data for researchers: A collaborative model for enabling institutional learning analytics in higher education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.8
30.
LuckinRosemaryCukurovaMutlu (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.v50.6
31.
McKenneyS.MorY. (2015). Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12262
32.
Ndenje-SichalweE.EliaE. F. (2020). Research methodology practices among postgraduate information studies students in Tanzania. IFLA Journal, 47(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220965986
33.
NinkovA.FrankJ. R.MaggioL. A. (2022). Bibliometrics: Methods for studying academic publishing. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11(3), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00695-4
34.
NistorNicolaeBaltesBeateDascăluMihaiMihăilăDanSmeatonGeorgeTrăuşan-MatuŞtefan (2014). Participation in virtual academic communities of practice under the influence of technology acceptance and community factors. A learning analytics application. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.051
35.
OgnjanovicI.GasevicD.DawsonS. (2016). Using non-identifiable data to predict student course selections. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.002
36.
ÖztürkO.KocamanR.KanbachD. K. (2024). How to design bibliometric research: An overview and a framework proposal. Review of Managerial Science, 18(11), 3333–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00738-0
37.
PardoAbelardoSiemensGeorge (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.2014.45.issue-3
38.
PaulJ.LimW.M.O’CassA.HaoA.W.BrescianiS. (2021) Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
39.
PhillipsR.MaorD.Cumming-PotvinW.RobertsP.HerringtonJ.PrestonG.MooreE.PerryL. (2011). Learning analytics and study behaviour: A pilot study. ASCILITE 2011 - the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 2011(1), 997–1007. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/6751/1/learning_analytics.pdf
40.
PhillipsT.OzogulG. (2020). Learning analytics research in relation to educational technology: Capturing learning analytics contributions with bibliometric analysis. TechTrends, 64(6), 878–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00519-y
41.
RamanR.AchuthanK.NairV. K.NedungadiP. (2022). Virtual laboratories- A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11055–11087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11058-9
42.
RecheP. C.Rodríguez-GarcíaA.-M.Gómez GarcíaG.Rodríguez JiménezC. (2020). Learning analytics in higher education: A review of impact scientific literature. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 13, 32–46. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.4584
43.
ReimannP. (2016). Connecting learning analytics with learning research: The role of design-based research. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1210198
44.
RobinsonA. C.AndersonC. L.QuinnS. D. (2020). Evaluating geovisualization for spatial learning analytics. International Journal of Cartography, 6(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2020.1735034
45.
RogatenJ.RientiesB. C. (2018). Which first-year students are making most learning gains in STEM subjects?Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1484671
46.
SarsfieldM.ConwayJ. (2018). What can we learn from learning analytics? A case study based on an analysis of student use of video recordings. Research in Learning Technology, 26. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2087
47.
SedrakyanGayaneMalmbergJonnaVerbertKatrienJärveläSannaKirschnerPaul A (2020). Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 105512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.004
48.
SiemensGeorge (2013). Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213498851
49.
SladeSharonPrinslooPaul (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
50.
TalanT.DemirbilekM. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Learning Analytics Based on Web of Science Database. Informatics in Education, 22(1), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.02
51.
TsaiYi-ShanRatesDiegoMoreno-MarcosPedro ManuelMuñoz-MerinoPedro JJivetIoanaScheffelMarenDrachslerHendrikDelgado KloosCarlosGaševićDragan (2020). Learning analytics in European higher education—Trends and barriers. Computers & Education, 155, 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933
52.
Van Den BeemtA.BuijsJ.Van Der AalstW. M. P. (2018). Analysing structured learning behaviour in massive open online courses (MOOCs): An approach based on process mining and clustering. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3748
53.
WilliamsonBen (2014). Governing software: networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924527
54.
WilliamsonBen (2019). Policy networks, performance metrics and platform markets: Charting the expanding data infrastructure of higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2794–2809. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.v50.6
55.
WinneP. H.TengK.ChangD.LinM. P.-C.MarzoukZ.NesbitJ. C.PatzakA.RakovićM.SamadiD.VytasekJ. (2019). Nstudy: Software for learning analytics about processes for self-regulated learning. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.7
56.
XingWanliGaoFei (2018). Exploring the relationship between online discourse and commitment in Twitter professional learning communities. Computers & Education, 126, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
