Smart subjects for a Smart Nation? Governing (smart)mentalities in Singapore

Abstract

Chinese

As visions of smart urbanism gain traction around the world, it is crucial that we question the benefits that an increasingly technologised urbanity promise. It is not about the technology, but bettering peoples’ lives, insist smart city advocates. In this paper, I question the progressive potential of the smart city drawing on the case of Singapore’s Smart Nation initiative. Using the case studies of the smart home and ‘learning to code’ movement, I highlight the limits of such ‘smart’ interventions as they are stunted by the neoliberal-developmental logics of the state, thereby facilitating authoritarian consolidation in Singapore. As such, this paper distinguishes itself from previous works on the neoliberal smart city by situated smart urbanism within the socio-political dynamics of neoliberalism-as-developmental strategy. For smart urbanism to better peoples’ everyday lives, technological ‘solutionism’ needs to be replaced with more human-centric framings and understandings of urban challenges.

Keywords

computational thinking governmentality neoliberal Singapore smart city smart home

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albino

Berardi

Dangelico

(2015) Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22(1): 3–21.

Anttiroiko

(2013) U-cities reshaping our future: Reflections on ubiquitous infrastructure as an enabler of smart urban development. AI & Society 28(4): 491–507.

Balakrishnan

(2016) Opening Speech by Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, Minister-In-Charge of the Smart Nation Initiative at IoT Asia 2016. Prime Minister’s Office, Government of Singapore. Available at: http://www.pmo.gov.sg/opening-speech-dr-vivian-balakrishnan-minister-charge-smart-nation-initiative-iot-asia-2016.

Barns

(2016) Mine your data: Open data, digital strategies and entrepreneurial governance by code. Urban Geography 37(4): 554–571.

Barr

(2006) Beyond technocracy: The culture of elite governance in Lee Hsien Loong’s Singapore. Asian Studies Review 30(1): 1–18.

Buchanan

Russo

Anderson

(2015) The question of energy reduction: The problem (s) with feedback. Energy Policy 77: 89–96.

Carr

(2014) The Glass Cage: Automation and Us. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

Castells

(1997) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Chandler

(2015) A world without causation: Big data and the coming of age of posthumanism. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 43(3): 833–851.

10.

Channelnewsasia (2015a) First batch of smart HDB homes at Punggol Northshore to be launched. Channelnewsasia, 25 May.

11.

Channelnewsasia (2015b) Singapore’s Smart Nation vision enters ‘build’ phase, focus on infrastructure, services. Channelnewsasia, 22 August.

12.

Channelnewsasia (2015c) Hackathons one way of solving future problems: Vivian Balakrishnan. Channelnewsasia, 31 July.

13.

Channelnewsasia (2015d) Smart Nation an opportunity to ‘shift tone of society’: Vivian Balakrishnan. Channelnewsasia, 1 April.

14.

Channelnewsasia (2016) MCI to invest S$120 million in ICT manpower needs. Channelnewsasia, 11 April.

15.

Cheney-Lippold

(2011) A new algorithmic identity soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 164–181.

16.

Chua

(1995) Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. New York: Routledge.

17.

Chua

(2012) Homes turn to smart meters to check power use. The Straits Times, 2 November.

18.

Collier

(2009) Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond ‘governmentality’. Theory, Culture & Society 26(6): 78–108.

19.

Connell

Dados

(2014) Where in the world does neoliberalism come from? Theory and Society 43(2): 117–138.

20.

Crang

(2003) Singapore as an informational hub in a space of global flows. disP-The Planning Review 39(154): 52–57.

21.

Davidson

Gleeson

(2014) The sustainability of an entrepreneurial city? International Planning Studies 19(2): 173–191.

22.

Dean

(2003 [1999]) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: SAGE Publications.

23.

Economic Development Board (EDB) (2015) Facts and Rankings. Economic Development Board, Ministry of Trade and Industry. Available at: https://www.edb.gov.sg/content/edb/en/why-singapore/about-singapore/facts-and-rankings/rankings.html (accessed 28 August 2015).

24.

Ettlinger

(2011) Governmentality as epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101(3): 537–560.

25.

Foucault

(2000) The subject and power. In: Foucault

Faubion

Hurley

(eds) Power: Essential Works of Michel Foucault Vol. III. New York: The New Press, pp. 326–348.

26.

Foucault

(2007) Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

27.

Fougner

(2006) The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation: Is there a future beyond ‘the competition state’? Review of International Studies 32(1): 165–185.

28.

Gabrys

(2014) Programming environments: Environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32(1): 30–48.

29.

George

(2012) Freedom From the Press: Journalism and State Power in Singapore. Singapore: NUS Press.

30.

Goh

(2013) Caregivers soldier on amid tears, toil and burnout. TODAY, 19 October.

31.

Goodspeed

(2015) Smart cities: Moving beyond urban cybernetics to tackle wicked problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8(1): 79–92.

32.

Graham

Marvin

(2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London, New York: Routledge.

33.

Harvey

(1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography 71(1): 3–17.

34.

Hee

Ooi

(2003) The politics of public space planning in Singapore. Planning Perspectives 18(1): 79–103.

35.

Henman

(2013) Governmentalities of Gov 2.0. Information, Communication & Society 16(9): 1397–1418.

36.

(2015) Bound by ethical complexities and socio-material histories: An exploration of household energy consumption in Singapore. Energy Research & Social Science 10: 150–164.

37.

Hobson

(2013) On the making of the environmental citizen. Environmental Politics 22(1): 56–72.

38.

Hollands

(2015) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8(1): 61–77.

39.

Hoon

(1999) Paternalism – A Deweyan perspective. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 13(1): 56–70.

40.

Hornidge

(2010) An uncertain future: Singapore’s search for a new focal point of collective identity and its drive towards ‘knowledge society’. Asian Journal of Social Science 38(5): 785–818.

41.

Horvat

(2016) Why do so many smart people use dumb phones? The Blaze. Available at: http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/why-do-so-many-smart-people-use-dumb-phones/.

42.

Housing Development Board (HDB) (2014) Smart HDB Homes of the Future. Housing Development Board, Ministry of National Development. Available at: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/fi10/fi10296p.nsf/PressReleases/F93B15F80588397748257D500009CE6C?OpenDocument (accessed 27 August 2015).

43.

Housing Development Board (HDB) (2015) Yuhua the First Existing HDB Estate to Go Smart. Housing Development Board, Ministry of National Development. Available at: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/fi10/fi10296p.nsf/PressReleases/2ABDC6FC7CA781F948257E900009ACAB?OpenDocument (accessed 27 August 2015).

44.

Irani

(2015) Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values 40(5): 799–824.

45.

Khansari

Mostashari

Mansouri

(2013) Impacting sustainable behavior and planning in smart city. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning 1(2): 4–61

46.

Kipfer

(2008) How Lefebrve urbanised Gramsci: Hegemony, everyday life and difference. In: Goonewardena

Kipfer

Milgrom

al.

(eds) Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre. New York/London: Routledge, 193–212.

47.

Kitchin

(2014a) Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8(1): 131–136.

48.

Kitchin

(2014b) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79(1): 1–14.

49.

Kitchin

Dodge

(2011) Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

50.

Koh

(2007) Living with globalization tactically: The metapragmatics of globalization in Singapore. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 22(2): 179–201.

51.

Koh

Chong

(2014) Education in the global city: The manufacturing of education in Singapore. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 35(5): 625–636.

52.

Lee

(2014) Transcript of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s Speech at Smart Nation Launch on 24 November. Prime Minister’s Office, Government of Singapore.

53.

Lee

(2015b) Transcript of Speech by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong at Founders Forum Smart Nation Singapore Reception on 20 April 2015. Prime Minister’s Office, Government of Singapore.

54.

Lee

(2015a) This is Singapore’s bold plan to mold the world in its image. Techinasia. Available at: https://www.techinasia.com/singapores-bold-plan-mold-world-image/.

55.

Liow

(2012) The neoliberal-developmental state: Singapore as case study. Critical Sociology 38(2): 241–264.

56.

Lombardi

Vanolo

(2015) Smart city as a mobile technology: Critical perspectives on urban development policies. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar

(ed.) Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp. 147–161.

57.

Luque-Ayala

Marvin

(2015) Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies 52(12): 2105–2116.

58.

Mahizhnan

(1999) Smart cities: The Singapore case. Cities 16(1): 13–18.

59.

March

Ribera-Fumaz

(2014) Smart contradictions: The politics of making Barcelona a Self-sufficient city. European Urban and Regional Studies, published online before print. DOI: 10.1177/0969776414554488.

60.

Marchesoni

Axelsson

Fältholm

et al . (2017) Technologies in older people’s care: Values related to a caring rationality. Nursing Ethics, 24: 125-137.

61.

Mehta

Vasoo

(2002) Organization and delivery of long-term care in Singapore: Present issues and future challenges. Journal of Aging and Social Policy 13(2–3): 185–201.

62.

Miller

Rose

(2008) Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

63.

Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) (2015) Infocomm Media 2025. Report by the Infocomm Media Masterplan Steering Committee. Ministry of Communications and Information. Available at: https://www.mci.gov.sg/~/media/data/mci/docs/imm%202025/infocomm%20media%202025%20full%20report.pdf.

64.

Ministry of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR) and Ministry of National Development (MND) (2014) Our Home, Our Environment, Our Future: Sustainable Singapore Blueprint 2015. Ministry of Environment and Water Resources, Singapore. Available at: http://www.mewr.gov.sg/ssb/files/ssb2015.pdf.

65.

Morozov

(2014) To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.

66.

National Population and Talent Division (NPTD) (2013) A Sustainable Population for a Dynamic Singapore: Population White Paper. National Population and Talent Division, Prime Minister’s Office, Government of Singapore.

67.

Neirotti

De Marco

Cagliano

et al . (2014) Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38: 25–36.

68.

(2015) $3b plan to help seniors stay active. TODAY, 26 August.

69.

Olds

Yeung

(2004) Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy 11(3): 489–521.

70.

Rodan

(2016) Capitalism, inequality and ideology in Singapore: New challenges for the ruling party. Asian Studies Review 40(2): 211–230.

71.

Rose

O’Malley

Valverde

(2006) Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Society 2: 83–104.

72.

Rutherford

(2007) Green governmentality: Insights and opportunities in the study of nature’s rule. Progress in Human Geography 31(3): 291–307.

73.

Sadowski

Pasquale

(2015) The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. First Monday 20(7). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5903/4660.

74.

Shatkin

(2014) Reinterpreting the meaning of the ‘Singapore model’: State capitalism and urban planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1): 116–137.

75.

Shelton

Zook

Wiig

(2015) The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8(1): 13–25.

76.

Sim

B-YJ

(2011) Social studies and citizenship for participation in Singapore: How one state seeks to influence its citizens. Oxford Review of Education 37(6): 743–761.

77.

Söderström

Paasche

Klauser

(2014) Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City 18(3): 307–320.

78.

Soneryd

Uggla

(2015) Green governmentality and responsibilization: New forms of governance and responses to ‘consumer responsibility’. Environmental Politics 24(6): 913–931.

79.

Spinak

Casalegno

(2012) Sustainable and Equitable Urbanism: The Role of ICT in Ecological Culture Change and Poverty Alleviation. In: Ercoskun

(ed.) Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning: Creating Smart Cities. Pennsylvania: IGI Global, pp. 37–58.

80.

Sun

H-LS

(2012) Social reproduction and the limits of a neoliberal approach: The case of Singapore. Citizenship Studies 16(2): 223–240.

81.

Tan

(2012) The ideology of pragmatism: Neo-liberal globalisation and political authoritarianism in Singapore. Journal of Contemporary Asia 42(1): 67–92.

82.

Tan

WHL

Subramaniam

(1999) Scientific societies build better nations. Nature 399(6737): 633–633.

83.

Tan

WHL

Subramaniam

(2000) Wiring up the island state. Science 288(5466): 621.

84.

Tan

WHL

Subramaniam

(2012) Creating smart cities with intelligent transportation solutions: Experiences from Singapore. In: Ercoskun

(ed.) Green and Ecological Technologies for Urban Planning: Creating Smart Cities. Information Science Reference, Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 174–191.

85.

The Straits Times (2015) Coding and programming classes for students to smooth transition to Smart Nation. The Straits Times, 9 February.

86.

TODAY (2008) Like many customers, Madam Teo Meow Eng, 62, was confounded when her electricity…TODAY, 5 August.

87.

TODAY (2015) Smartphone penetration in Singapore the highest globally: Survey. TODAY, 11 February.

88.

TODAY (2016) Global smartphone market shrank annually for first time in first quarter: Strategy Analytics. TODAY, 28 April.

89.

Triantafillou

(2004) Addressing network governance through the concepts of governmentality and normalization. Administrative Theory & Praxis 26(4): 489–508.

90.

Truelove

Carrico

Weber

et al . (2014) Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change 29: 127–138.

91.

Vanolo

(2014) Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51(5): 883–898.

92.

Wee

CJW-L

(2001) The end of disciplinary modernisation? The Asian economic crisis and the ongoing reinvention of Singapore. Third World Quarterly 22(6): 987–1002.

93.

Westskog

Winther

Sæle

(2015) The effects of in-home displays – Revisiting the context. Sustainability 7(5): 5431–5451.

94.

White

(2016) Anticipatory logics of the smart city’s global imaginary. Urban Geography 37(4): 572–589.

95.

Wiig

(2015a) IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19(2–3): 258–273.

96.

Wiig

(2015b) The empty rhetoric of the smart city: From digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography 37(4): 535–553.

97.

Williamson

(2015) Political computational thinking: Policy networks, digital governance and ‘learning to code’. Critical Policy Studies 10(1): 39–58.

98.

Wong

CML

(2012) The developmental state in ecological modernization and the politics of environmental framings: The case of Singapore and implications for East Asia. Nature and Culture 7(1): 95–119.

99.

Wong

(2015) IDA, Microsoft tie up to teach students computer coding. The Straits Times, 2 July.

100.

Yeoh

Huang

(2014) Singapore’s changing demography, the eldercare predicament and transnational ‘care’ migration. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia 2(02): 247–269.

101.

Yun

(1999) The Singapore state takes charge: Strategizing for the new hi-tech service society. European Planning Studies 7(2): 189–205.