Since the passage of the Flammable Fabrics Act Amendment in 1967, there has been considerable interest in the problem of apparel burn injuries and actions which might be taken to reduce them. Decision theory was employed in this study to evaluate alternative courses of action such as protective clothing and education. The results indicate the necessity for improvements in technology for textile fire retardance, if protective clothing is to become a feasible alternative for many consumers. More information concerning the relationship between program costs and effectiveness is also needed, if the decision maker is to select the appropriate course of action.
Federal Trade Commission, Rules and Regulations Under the Flammable Fabrics Act, as amended on May 4, 1967.
2.
FirstReport of the Consumer Advisory Council, Executive Office of the President, Oct. 1963.
3.
Friedman, M. and Savage, L.J., The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk, J. Political Economy64, 279-304 (1948).
4.
Fynn, P.J., Merchants' Views on Flame-Retardant Textiles and Injuries from Burns, Bull N. Y. Acad. Med.43, 735-739 (Aug. 1967 ).
5.
Hopkinson, Tom M., New Battleground: Consumer Interest, Harvard Bus. Rev.42, 97+ (Sept.-Oct. 1964).
6.
National Cotton Council, Market Research Service, Cotton Counts Its Customers, May, 1969.
7.
Rice, Dorothy P., Estimating the Cost of Illness, USHEWPHS Health Economics Series Number 6, PHS Ser. Pub. 947-6, May, 1966.
8.
Rittenbury Max S., Maddos, Rhoda W., Schmidt, Fred H., Ham, William T., and Haynes , Boyd W., "Probit Analysis of Burn Mortality in 1,831 Patients: Comparison with Other Large Series," Annals Surgery164, 123-138 (July 1966).
9.
Schappel, J.W. , Flammability from the Fiber Producers'. Point of View, Modern Textiles Magazine49, 54-60, (July, 1968).
10.
Schaifer, Robert , Introduction to Statistics for Business Decisions , New York, McGraw-Hill, 1961.
11.
Secretary of HEW, A Report to the President and the Congress: Studies of Death, Injuries, and Economic Losses from Accidental Burning of Products, Fabrics, or Related Materials.
12.
Stern, Louis L., Consumer Protection Via Increased Information , J. Marketing31, 48-52 (Apr. 1967 ).
13.
U. S. Department of Agriculture, Cotton Situation, ERS CS-240, March, 1969.
14.
U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Census of Population, 1960, Vol. I, Characteristics of the Population, Part I, U. S. Summary, Washington, 1964.
15.
U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1968, Washington, 1968.
16.
U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Vital Statistics of the United States, 1967, Vol. II—Mortality Part A, Washington, 1969.
17.
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Clothing for Urban Families: Expenditures per Member by Sex and Age, 1960-61, Bulletin No. 1556, ashington, July, 1967.
18.
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Handbook of Labor Statistics, 1969, Bulletin No. 1630, Washington, July 1969.
19.
Yeadon, D.A. , Danna, G.F., Cooper, A.S., and Reeves, W.A., The Effects of Weathering on the Laundering Durability of Fire-Resistant Cotton Fabrics (Summary), Proc. Tenth Cotton Utilization Research Conference, Preliminary Draft, USDA ARS, April 29-May 1, 1970, pp. 111-116.
