Novel materials for low-risk category personal protective clothing for industrial workwear used in hot workplace environments: improved thermal and moisture management attributes
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2023
Novel materials for low-risk category personal protective clothing for industrial workwear used in hot workplace environments: improved thermal and moisture management attributes
Personal protective clothing (PPC) is required in a variety of sectors and is important from both a safety and a thermal management standpoint. Materials used in PPC play a key role in protection. Extensive research has been conducted on the risk variables that lead to thermal load and the corresponding functional properties of PPC, particularly in high-risk categories. In contrast, despite the fact that employees who wear this type of PPC constitute a major fraction of the industrial workforce, relatively little study has been undertaken on PPC materials in low-risk categories and their thermal management properties. For this study, four new PPC materials were specifically engineered to have improved thermal attributes and were compared with four existing PPC materials of equivalent protection levels, as well as four summer-season civilian materials, to determine the most suitable materials for use in hot outdoor environments. We investigated and compared the thermal management properties of these novel materials, including liquid moisture transfer, thermal and water vapor resistance, and air permeability, to those of current materials used in low-risk PPC as well as civilian materials. The results demonstrated that the new PPC materials had improved thermal and vapor resistance; superior liquid moisture transfer properties; higher air permeability; and were lower in mass and thickness than the existing PPC materials. Furthermore, the new materials compared favorably with the civilian materials in a number of these attributes. The new materials should be included in low-risk PPC designed for use in hot outdoor conditions.
GammonTLeeW-JZhangZ, et al. “Arc flash” hazards, incident energy, PPE ratings and thermal burn injury-A deeper look. IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–9.
2.
National Fire Protection Association. Standard for electrical safety in the workplace, 2002.
3.
AS/NZS 4967:2009. Protective clothing for firefighters – Requirements and test methods for protective clothing used for structural firefighting.
4.
ISO11611:2015. Protective clothing for use in welding and allied processes.
5.
ISO 11612:2015. Protective clothing – Clothing to protect against heat and flame – Minimum performance requirements.
6.
ISO 20471:2013+A1:2016. High visibility clothing – Test methods and requirements.
7.
Standards Australia. AS/NZS 4602.1:2011/Amdt 1:2016 – High visibility safety garments.
8.
BS EN 13758-2:2003. Textiles. Solar UV protective properties. Classification and marking of apparel.
9.
Standards Australia. AS/NZS 4399 – Sun protective clothing- evaluation and classification, 2017.
10.
CampbellRBDiniDA.Occupational injuries from electrical shock and arc flash events. Springer, 2016.
11.
CrownEMAckermanMYDaleJD, et al.
Design and evaluation of thermal protective flightsuits. Part II: instrumented mannequin evaluation. Clothing Text Res J1998;
16: 79–87.
12.
MannionTNichevichA.Ergonomic safety apparel: Research & development project brief. Chevron Australia, Perth, pp. 1–8.
13.
LundgrenKKuklaneKGaoC, et al.
Effects of heat stress on working populations when facing climate change. Ind Health2013;
51: 3–15.
14.
FordJDBerrang-FordL.Climate change adaptation in developed nations: from theory to practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011.
15.
BeldingHHatchT.Index for evaluating heat stress in terms of resulting physiological strains. Heating, Piping Air Cond1955;
27: 129–136.
16.
OlesenBW.Guidelines for comfort. ASHRAE J2000;
42: 41–47.
17.
TaylorNA.Challenges to temperature regulation when working in hot environments. Ind Health2006;
44: 331–344.
18.
GallowaySD.Dehydration, rehydration, and exercise in the heat: rehydration strategies for athletic competition. Can J Appl Physiol1999;
24: 188–200.
19.
BrakeDBatesG.Fluid losses and hydration status of industrial workers under thermal stress working extended shifts. Occup Environ Med2003;
60: 90–96.
20.
DonoghueAM.Occupational health hazards in mining: an overview. Occup Med2004;
54: 283–289.
21.
WongDPChungJWChanAP, et al.
Comparing the physiological and perceptual responses of construction workers (bar benders and bar fixers) in a hot environment. Appl Ergon2014;
45: 1705–1711.
22.
HolmerI.Protective clothing in hot environments. Ind Health2006;
44: 404–413.
23.
ParsonsK.Protective clothing: heat exchange and physiological objectives. Ergonomics1988;
31: 991–1007.
24.
SullivanPJMekjavićIB.Temperature and humidity within the clothing microenvironment. Aviation, Space, Environ Med1992;
63: 186–192.
25.
WachtelTLBerryCCWachtelEE, et al.
The inter-rater reliability of estimating the size of burns from various burn area chart drawings. Burns2000;
26: 156–170.
26.
MahTSongG.Investigation of the contribution of garment design to thermal protection. Part 1: characterizing air gaps using three-dimensional body scanning for women’s protective clothing. Text Res J2010;
80: 1317–1329.
27.
Parsons K. Human thermal environments: The effects of hot, moderate, and cold environments on human health, comfort, and performance, second edn, CRC Press, 2014. London, England.
28.
Dorman LE and Havenith G. The effects of protective clothing on metabolic rate. In: Holmér, Kuklane and Gao (eds.), Environmental Ergonomics, vol. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Environmental Ergonomics. Ystad, Sweden, 2005; pp. 82–85.
29.
HolmérI.Protective clothing and heat stress. Ergonomics1995;
38: 166–182.
30.
CarterBJCammermeyerM.Biopsychological responses of medical unit personnel wearing chemical defense ensemble in a simulated chemical warfare environment. Milit Med1985;
150: 239–249.
31.
LevineLSawkaMNGonzalezRR.Evaluation of clothing systems to determine heat strain. Am Ind Hygiene Assoc J1998;
59: 557–562.
32.
SongGPaskalukSSatiR, et al.
Thermal protective performance of protective clothing used for low radiant heat protection. Text Res J2011;
81: 311–323.
33.
TaylorNALewisMCNotleySR, et al.
A fractionation of the physiological burden of the personal protective equipment worn by firefighters. Eur J Appl Physiol2012;
112: 2913–2921.
34.
BarkerR. Evaluating the heat stress and comfort of firefighter and emergency responder protective clothing. In: Improving comfort in clothing. Elsevier, 2011, pp. 305–319.
35.
Cortés-VizcaínoCBernardTE.Effects on heat stress of a flame-retardant ensemble for aluminum smelters. AIHAJ –Amer Ind Hygiene Assoc2000;
61: 873–876.
36.
HirschlerMM.Analysis of thermal performance of two fabrics intended for use as protective clothing. Fire Mater1997;
21: 115–121.
37.
JinLCaoMLYuW, et al.
New approaches to evaluate the performance of firefighter protective clothing materials. Fire Technol2018;
54: 1283–1307.
38.
SongG.Modeling thermal burn injury protection. Text Protection2005;
261.
39.
SongGMandalSRossiR.Effects of various factors on performance of thermal protective clothing. Thermal protective clothing for firefighters.
Woodhead Publishing:
Cambridge, UK2017, pp.163–182.
40.
LiG.World atlas of oil and gas basins. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
41.
BishopP. Testing for fabric comfort. In: Fabric testing. Elsevier, 2008, pp. 228–254.
42.
LaingACFeldmanFJaliliM, et al.
The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors. J Biomech2011;
44: 2627–2635.
43.
WardiningsihWTroynikovO.Influence of cover factor on liquid moisture transport performance of bamboo knitted fabrics. J Text Inst2012;
103: 89–98.
44.
BackerS.The relationship between the structural geometry of a textile fabric and its physical properties: Part IV: interstice geometry and air permeability. Tex Res J1951;
21: 703–714.
45.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN). EN 1149-3:2004 Protective clothing – Electrostatic properties – Part 3: Test methods for measurement of charge decay, 2004.
46.
ASTM International. ASTM F1959/F1959M-14e1- Standard Test Method for Determining the Arc Rating of Materials for Clothing, 2016.
ISO11092:2014. Textiles – Physiological effects – Measurement of thermal and water-vapour resistance under steady-state conditions (sweating guarded-hotplate test).
49.
HuJLiYYeungK, et al.
Moisture management tester: a method to characterize fabric liquid moisture management properties. Text Res J2005;
75: 57–62.
50.
TroynikovOWardiningsihW.Moisture management properties of wool/polyester and wool/bamboo knitted fabrics for the sportswear base layer. Text Res J2011;
81: 621–631.
51.
YaoBLiYHuJ, et al.
An improved test method for characterizing the dynamic liquid moisture transfer in porous polymeric materials. Polym Testing2006;
25: 677–689.
52.
MorrisG.Thermal properties of textile materials. J Text Inst Trans1953;
44: T449–T476.
53.
NawazNTroynikovOWatsonC.Thermal comfort properties of knitted fabrics suitable for skin layer of protective clothing worn in extreme hot conditions. Trans Tech Publ2011, pp. 184–189.
54.
BarkerRLGuerth-SchacherCGrimesR, et al.
Effects of moisture on the thermal protective performance of firefighter protective clothing in low-level radiant heat exposures. Text R J2006;
76: 27–31.
55.
MatusiakMSikorskiK.Influence of the structure of woven fabrics on their thermal insulation properties. Fibres & Text EastEur2011;
19: 88.
56.
MandalSAnnaheimSCaptA, et al.
A categorization tool for fabric systems used in firefighters’ clothing based on their thermal protective and thermo-physiological comfort performances. Text Res J2019;
89: 3244–3259.
57.
HavenithG.Heat balance when wearing protective clothing. Ann Occup Hyg1999;
43: 289–296.
58.
YooSBarkerRL.Comfort properties of heat-resistant protective workwear in varying conditions of physical activity and environment. Part I: Thermophysical and sensorial properties of fabrics. Text Res J2005;
75: 523–530.
59.
NunneleySA.Heat stress in protective clothing: interactions among physical and physiological factors. Scand J Work, Environ Health1989; 52–57.
60.
Ho C, Fan J, Newton E and Au R. Effects of athletic T-shirt designs on natural ventilation. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel 2016; 20(2): 112–123.
61.
UedaHHavenithG. The effect of fabric air permeability on clothing ventilation. In: Elsevier Ergonomics Book Series. Elsevier, 2005, pp. 343–346.
62.
Dai, XQ and Havenith G. The interaction of clothing ventilation with dry and evaporative heat transfer of jackets: The effect of air and vapor permeability. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 2016; 28(5): 570–581.
63.
KeYHavenithGZhangX, et al.
Effects of wind and clothing apertures on local clothing ventilation rates and thermal insulation. Text Res J2014;
84: 941–952.
64.
HavenithGFogartyABartlettR, et al.
Male and female upper body sweat distribution during running measured with technical absorbents. Eur J Appl Physiol2008;
104: 245–255.
65.
MandalSAnnaheimSGreveJ, et al.
Modeling for predicting the thermal protective and thermo-physiological comfort performance of fabrics used in firefighters’ clothing. Text Res J2019;
89: 2836–2849.
