Carbon footprint and water footprint assessment of virgin and recycled polyester textiles

Abstract

Recycled polyester textile fibers stemming from waste polyester material have been applied in the textile industry in recent years. However, there are few studies focusing on the evaluation and comparison of the environmental impacts caused by the production of virgin polyester textiles and recycled polyester textiles. In this study, the carbon footprint and water footprint of virgin polyester textiles and recycled polyester textiles were calculated and compared. The results showed that the carbon footprint of the virgin polyester textiles production was 119.59 kgCO₂/100 kg. Terephthalic acid production process occupied the largest proportion, accounting for 45.83%, followed by polyester fabric production process, ethylene production process, paraxylene production process, ethylene glycol production process and polyester fiber production process. The total carbon footprint of waste polyester recycling was 1154.15 kgCO₂/100 kg, approximately ten times that of virgin polyester textiles production. As for the water footprint, it showed that virgin polyester fabric production and recycled polyester fabric production both had great impact on water eutrophication and water scarcity. Chemical oxygen demand caused the largest water eutrophication footprint, followed by ammonia-nitrogen and five-day biochemical oxygen demand. The water scarcity footprint of virgin polyester fabric production and recycled polyester fabric production was 5.98 m³ H₂O_eq/100 kg and 1.90 m³ H₂O_eq/100 kg, respectively. The comprehensive evaluation of carbon footprint and water footprint with the life cycle assessment polygon method indicated that the polyester fabric production process exhibited greater environmental impacts both for virgin polyester and recycled polyester.

Keywords

Recycled polyester textile carbon footprint water footprint environmental impact comprehensive comparison

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Houck

MM.

Identification of textile fibers. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2009.

IHS Markit. Polyester Fibers. Chemical economics handbook 2019, pp.5–31.

Wang

Tang

, et al. Life cycle assessment and the willingness to pay of waste polyester recycling. J. Cleaner Prod 2019; 234: 275–284.

Fan

Tan

Amesimeku

, et al. A novel functional disperse dye doped with graphene oxide for improving antistatic properties of polyester fabric using one-bath dyeing method. Text. Res. J. Text Res J 2020; 90: 655–665.

Pawar

Maiti

Biranje

, et al. A novel green approach for dyeing polyester using glycerine based eutectic solvent as a dyeing medium. Heliyon 2020; 5: e01606.

Cionek C

Nunes

Freitas

, et al. Degradation study of polyester fiber in swimming pool water. Text. Res. J. 2021; 91: 51–61

Zhao

NH.

Carbon footprint assessment and low carbon measures of the polyester textile. Master Thesis, Donghua University, China, 2012.

Pasqua

Michele

Mario

, et al. Environmental analysis of polyester fabric for ticking. J. Cleaner Prod 2018; 172: 735–742.

Ozturk

Karaboyaci

Yetis

, et al. Evaluation of integrated pollution prevention control in a textile fiber production and dyeing mill. J. Cleaner Prod 2015; 88: 116–124.

10.

Gomes

Visconte

LLY

Pacheco

EBAV.

Life cycle assessment of polyethylene terephthalate packaging: An overview. J. Polym. Environ 2019; 27(3): 533–548.

11.

, et al. Removal of disperse dye from alcoholysis products of waste PET fabrics by nitric acid-modified activated carbon as an adsorbent: Kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Text. Res. J. 2020; 90: 2058–2069

12.

Woolridge

Ward

Phillips

, et al. Life cycle assessment for reuse/recycling of donated waste textiles compared to use of virgin material: An UK energy saving perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 2006; 46(1): 94–103.

13.

Shen

Worrell

Patel

MK.

Open-loop recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fibre recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 2011; 55(1): 34–52.

14.

ALPLA. Study confirms the excellent carbon footprint of recycled PET, https://blog.alpla.com/en/press-release/newsroom/study-confirms-excellent-carbon-footprint-recycled-pet/08-17 (2017, accessed 1 May 2019).

15.

Textile Exchange. Threading the needle, https://tax.kpmg.us/content/dam/tax/en/taxwatch/pdfs/2018/kpmg-threading-needle-report.pdf (2018, accessed 1 May 2019).

16.

Wang

LL.

Research and demonstration of carbon footprint and water footprint of textiles and clothes. PhD Thesis, Donghua University, China, 2013.

17.

Feng

Ding

XM.

Application of LCA allocation method to calculation of carbon footprint of textile and apparel products. China Dying & Finishing 2014; 40(13): 39–42, 58.

18.

Hoekstra

AY.

A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA. Ecol. Indic 2016; 66: 564–573.

19.

Yan

Jia

Shan

, et al . Water environmental impact assessment of urban development based on water degradation footprint: a case study of Beijing. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2017; 37(2): 779–785.

20.

Ridoutt

Pfister

A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Global Environ. Change 2010; 20(1): 113–120.

21.

Georgakellos

DA.

Waste packaging management. Life cycle analysis of different packages in Greece and the consequences in the environmental quality. PhD Thesis, University of Piraeus, Greece, 1997.

22.

Georgakellos

DA.

The use of the LCA polygon framework in waste management. Manage. Environ. Qual 2006; 17(4): 490–507.

23.

Daniel

Tsoulfas

Pappis

, et al. Aggregating and evaluating the results of different environmental impact assessment methods. Ecol. Indic 2004; 4(2): 125–138.

24.

Life cycle assessment of terylene textile. Master’s Thesis, Donghua University, China, 2007.

25.

Tang

HR.

Integrated evaluation of environmental, economic and social impacts of waste polyester recycling industry. Master’s Thesis, Shandong University, China, 2019.

26.

Ridoutt

Pfister

A new water footprint calculation method integrating consumptive and degradative water use into a single stand-alone weighted indicator. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2013; 18: 204–217.

27.

Bai

Zhu

, et al. Evaluation of the water footprint of industrial products based on ISO 14046 using cables as an example. Acta Ecol. Sin 2016; 36(22): 7260–7266.

28.

Zhang

Shen

, et al. PET bottles recycling in China: An LCA coupled with LCC case study of blanket production made of waste PET bottles. J. Environ. Manage 2020; 260: 110062.