During use, textile items can develop unpleasant odors that arise from many different sources, both internal and external to the human body. Laundering is not always effective at removing odors, with odor potentially building up over time due to incomplete removal of soils and odorous compounds and/or malodors transferred during the laundering process. Textile odor can lead to consumer dissatisfaction, particularly as there are high expectations that clothing and textile products meet multiple aesthetic and functional needs. The problem of odor in textiles is complex and multi-faceted, with odorous volatile compounds, microorganisms, and precursors to odor, such as sweat, being transferred to, and retained by, fabrics. This article reviews the literature that specifically relates to odor within textiles. Methods for evaluating odor in textiles, including methods for collecting odor on textile substrates, as well as sensory and instrumental methods of odor detection, were reviewed. Literature that examined differences among fabrics that varied by fabric properties were reviewed. As well, the effectiveness of specific odor controlling finishing technologies to control malodor within textiles was also examined.
HenkinRI. Body odor. JAMA J Am Med Assoc1995; 273: 1171–1172.
2.
Labows JN and Preti G. Human semiochemicals. In: Van Toller SD (ed.) Fragrance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume. London: Elsevier Applied Sciences, 1992, pp. 69–90.
3.
HammondCJ. Chemical composition of household malodours – an overview. Flavour Fragr J2013; 28: 251–261.
4.
DenawakaCJFowlisIADeanJR. Source, impact and removal of malodour from soiled clothing. J Chromatogr A2016; 1438: 216–225.
5.
CallewaertCVan NevelSKerckhofFM, et al.Bacterial exchange in household washing machines. Front Microbiol2015; 6: 1381–1381.
6.
GattlenJAmbergCZinnM, et al.Biofilms isolated from washing machines from three continents and their tolerance to a standard detergent. Biofouling2010; 26: 873–882.
7.
MunkSMünchPStahnkeL, et al.Primary odorants of laundry soiled with sweat/sebum: Influence of lipase on the odor profile. J Surfactants Deterg2000; 3: 505–515.
8.
MunkSJohansenCStahnkeLH, et al.Microbial survival and odor in laundry. J Surfactants Deterg2001; 4: 385–394.
9.
NagohYTobeSWatanabeT, et al.Analysis of odorants produced from indoor drying laundries and effects of enzyme for preventing malodor generation. Tenside Surfactants Deterg2005; 42: 7–12.
10.
McQueenRHMoranLJCunninghamC, et al.The impact of odour on laundering behaviour: An exploratory study. Int J Fash Des Technol Educ2020; 13: 20–30.
11.
TakeuchiKYabukiMHasegawaY. Review of odorants in human axillary odour and laundry malodour: The importance of branched C7 chain analogues in malodours perceived by humans. Flavour Fragr J2013; 28: 223–230.
12.
TroccazMStarkenmannCNiclassY, et al.3-Methyl-3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol as a major descriptor for the human axilla-sweat odour profile. Chem Biodivers2004; 1: 1022–1035.
13.
StarkenmannCNiclassYTroccazM, et al.Identification of the precursor of (S)-3-methyl-3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, the sulfury malodour of human axilla sweat. Chem Biodivers2005; 2: 705–716.
14.
NatschASchmidJFlachsmannF. Identification of odoriferous sulfanylalkanols in human axilla secretions and their formation through cleavage of cysteine precursors by a C-S lyase isolated from axilla bacteria. Chem Biodivers2004; 1: 1058–1072.
15.
HasegawaYYabukiMMatsukaneM. Identification of new odoriferous compounds in human axillary sweat. Chem Biodivers2004; 1: 2042–2050.
16.
ZengX-NLeydenJJLawleyHJ, et al.Analysis of characteristic odors from human male axillae. J Chem Ecol1991; 17: 1469–1492.
17.
de Lacy Costello B, Amann A, Al-Kateb H, et al. A review of the volatiles from the healthy human body. J Breath Res 2014; 8: 014001.
18.
DormontLBessièreJ-MCohuetA. Human skin volatiles: A review. J Chem Ecol2013; 39: 569–578.
19.
StapletonKHillKDayK, et al.The potential impact of washing machines on laundry malodour generation. Lett Appl Microbiol2013; 56: 299–306.
20.
KaurRKukkarDBhardwajSK, et al.Potential use of polymers and their complexes as media for storage and delivery of fragrances. J Control Release2018; 285: 81–95.
21.
McQueenRHLaingRMBrooksHJL, et al.Odor intensity in apparel fabrics and the link with bacterial populations. Text Res J2007; 77: 449–456.
22.
McQueenRHLaingRMDelahuntyCM, et al.Retention of axillary odour on apparel fabrics. J Text Inst2008; 99: 515–523.
23.
FerdenziCSchaalBRobertsSC. Human axillary odor: Are there side-related perceptual differences?Chem Senses2009; 34: 565–571.
24.
RobertsSCKralevichAFerdenziC, et al.Body odor quality predicts behavioral attractiveness in humans. Arch Sex Behav2011; 40: 1111–1117.
25.
CurranAMRabinSIPradaPA, et al.Comparison of the volatile organic compounds present in human odor using SPME-GC/MS. J Chem Ecol2005; 31: 1607–1619.
26.
McQueenRHHarynukJJWismerWV, et al.Axillary odour build-up in knit fabrics following multiple use cycles. Int J Cloth Sci Technol2014; 26: 274–290.
27.
de la MataAPMcQueenRHNamSL, et al.Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic profiling and chemometric interpretation of the volatile profiles of sweat in knit fabrics. Anal Bioanal Chem2017; 409: 1905–1913.
28.
KleppIGBuckMLaitalaK, et al.What’s the problem? Odor-control and the smell of sweat in sportswear. Fash Pract2016; 8: 296–317.
29.
CallewaertCDe MaeseneireEKerckhofF-M, et al.Microbial odor profile of polyester and cotton clothes after a fitness session. Appl Environ Microbiol2014; 80: 6611–6619.
30.
KubotaHMitaniANiwanoY, et al.Moraxella species are primarily responsible for generating malodor in laundry. Appl Environ Microbiol2012; 78: 3317–3324.
31.
LeydenJJKennethMDMcGinleyJ, et al.The microbiology of the human axilla and its relationship to axillary odor. J Invest Dermatol1981; 77: 413–416.
32.
McQueenRHLaingRMWilsonCA, et al.Odor retention on apparel fabrics: Development of test methods for sensory detection. Text Res J2007; 77: 645–652.
33.
ChungHSeokHJ. Populations of malodor-forming bacteria and identification of volatile components in triolein-soiled cotton fabric. Fibers Polym2012; 13: 740–747.
34.
ObendorfSKKimJKonizRF. Measurement of odor development due to bacterial action on antimicrobial polyester fabrics. AATCC Rev2007; 7: 35–40.
35.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 17299-1: 2014 Textiles – Determination of deodorant property: Part 1 General principle, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2014.
36.
LeeY-HLeeS-GHwangE-K, et al.Dyeing properties and deodorizing/antibacterial performance of cotton/silk/wool fabrics dyed with myrrh (Commiphora myrrha) extract. Text Res J2017; 87: 973–983.
37.
LeeY-HKimA-LParkY-G, et al.Colorimetric assay and deodorizing/antibacterial performance of natural fabrics dyed with immature pine cone extract. Text Res J2018; 88: 731–743.
38.
Abdul-BariMMMcQueenRHNguyenH, et al.Synthetic clothing and the problem with odor: Comparison of nylon and polyester fabrics. Cloth Text Res J2018; 36: 251–266.
39.
ZhuLLiuYDingX, et al.A novel method for textile odor removal using engineered water nanostructures. RSC Adv2019; 9: 17726–17736.
40.
HugginsGRPretiG. Vaginal odors and secretions. Clin Obstet Gynecol1981; 24: 355–377.
Cortez-PereiraCSBabyARKanekoTM, et al.Sensory approach to measure fragrance intensity on the skin. J Sens Stud2009; 24: 871–901.
43.
SchieberlePHofmannT. Evaluation of the character impact odorants in fresh strawberry juice by quantitative measurements and sensory studies on model mixtures. J Agric Food Chem1997; 45: 227–232.
44.
YlimakiGHawryshZJHardinRT, et al.Response surface methodology in the development flour yeast breads: Sensory evaluation of rice. J Food Sci1991; 56: 751–755.
45.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 6658:2017 Sensory analysis – Methodology – General guidance, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2017.
46.
American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E1207 – Standard Guide for Sensory Evaluation of Axillary Deodorancy, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2009.
47.
NatschADerrerSFlachsmannF, et al.A broad diversity of volatile carboxylic acids, released by a bacterial aminoacylase from axilla secretions, as candidate molecules for the determination of human-body odor type. Chem Biodivers2006; 3: 1–20.
48.
LawlessHTHeymannH. Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices., 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2010.
49.
McGinley MA and McGinley CM. Methods for odor evaluation of textiles and other materials. In: AATCC International Conference Proceedings. Research Triangle, NC: AATCC, Wilmington, NC, 28–30 March 2017, pp. 250–264.
50.
HammerTRBerner-DannenmannNHoeferD. Quantitative and sensory evaluation of malodour retention of fibre types by use of artificial skin, sweat and radiolabelled isovaleric acid. Flavour Fragr J2013; 28: 238–244.
51.
Wood WE and Beaverson NJ. Malodor absorbent polymer and fiber. Patent US 8,241,747 B2, USA, 2009.
52.
La Fortune JM. Odor control absorbent article and method. Patent US 6,867,343 B2, USA, 2005.
53.
McGee T, Purzycki KL and Sgaramella RP. Process for maintaining fragrance perception in the presence of an absorbent material. Patent US 6,803,033 B2, USA, 2002.
54.
MillerRW. Subjective property characterization by ‘quad’ analysis: An efficient method for conducting paired comparisons. Text Res J2002; 72: 1041–1051.
55.
RathinamoorthyRThilagavathiG. Axillary odour studies on alkali-treated knitted polyester fabric. Int J Cloth Sci Technol2017; 29: 251–261.
56.
XuYMcQueenRWismerW. A preliminary study on the collection and detection of axillary odor within textiles. J Text Apparel, Technol Manag2013; 8: 1–13.
57.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 8586:2012 Sensory analysis - General guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2012.
58.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5495:2005 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Paired comparison test, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2005.
59.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4120:2004 Sensory analysis – Methodology – Triangle test, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2004.
60.
WorchTLêSPunterP. How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts. Food Qual Prefer2010; 21: 309–318.
61.
ShakoorjavanSAkbariSKishMH, et al.Correlation of sensory analysis with a virtual sensor array data for odour diagnosis of fragrant fabrics. Measurement2016; 90: 396–403.
62.
Li S. Recent developments in human odor detection technologies. J Forensic Sci Criminol 2014; 1: 1–12.
63.
Prokop-PriggeKAGreeneKVaralloL, et al.The effect of ethnicity on human axillary odorant production. J Chem Ecol2015; 42: 33–39.
64.
SteinhartHStephanABuckingM. Advances in flavor research. J High Resolut Chromatogr2000; 23: 489–496.
65.
SnowNHSlackGC. Head-space analysis in modern gas chromatography. TrAC Trends Anal Chem2002; 21: 608–617.
66.
Sithersingh MJ and Snow NH. Headspace-gas chromatography. In: Poole CF (ed.) Gas Chromatography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012, pp. 221–233.
67.
Bazemore R. Sample preparation. In: Goodner K and Rousseff R (eds) Practical analysis of flavor and fragrance materials. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2011, pp. 23–44.
68.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 17299-3: Textiles – Determination of deodorant property: Part 3 Gas chromatography method, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2014.
69.
LisovacAShooterD. Volatiles from sheep wool and the modification of wool odour. Small Rumin Res2003; 49: 115–124.
70.
HaraTKyukaAShimizuH. Butane-2,3-dione: The key contributor to axillary and foot odor associated with an acidic note. Chem Biodivers2015; 12: 248–258.
71.
PradaPACurranAMFurtonKG. The evaluation of human hand odor volatiles on various textiles: A comparison between contact and noncontact sampling methods. J Forensic Sci2011; 56: 866–881.
72.
RathinamoorthyRThilagavathiG. GC-MS analysis of worn textile for odour formation. Fibers Polym2016; 17: 917–924.
73.
DewulfJLangenhoveHVWittmannG. Analysis of volatile organic compounds using gas chromatography. TrAC Trends Anal Chem2002; 21: 637–646.
74.
DelahuntyCMEyresGDufourJ-P. Gas chromatography-olfactometry. J Sep Sci2006; 29: 2107–2125.
75.
ChinS-TEyresGTMarriottPJ. Identification of potent odourants in wine and brewed coffee using gas chromatography-olfactometry and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A2011; 1218: 7487–7498.
76.
DuXPlottoABaldwinE, et al.Evaluation of volatiles from two subtropical strawberry cultivars using GC–olfactometry, GC-MS odor activity values, and sensory analysis. J Agric Food Chem2011; 59: 12569–12577.
77.
PeresFJelenHHMajacherMM, et al.Characterization of aroma compounds in Portuguese extra virgin olive oils from Galega Vulgar and Cobrançosa cultivars using GC–O and GC × GC–ToFMS. Food Res Int2013; 54: 1979–1986.
78.
TakeuchiKHasegawaYIshidaH, et al.Identification of novel malodour compounds in laundry. Flavour Fragr J2012; 27: 89–94.
79.
RuzsanyiVMochalskiPSchmidA, et al.Ion mobility spectrometry for detection of skin volatiles. J Chromatogr B2012; 911: 84–92.
80.
LindingerWHanselAJordanA. On-line monitoring of volatile organic compounds at pptv levels by means of proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) medical applications, food control and environmental research. Int J Mass Spectrom Ion Process1998; 173: 191–241.
81.
SmithDŠpanělP. Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) for on-line trace gas analysis. Mass Spectrom Rev2005; 24: 661–700.
82.
DenawakaCJFowlisIADeanJR. Evaluation and application of static headspace–multicapillary column-gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry for complex sample analysis. J Chromatogr A2014; 1338: 136–148.
83.
Von HartungenEWisthalerAMikovinyT, et al.Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) of carboxylic acids. Int J Mass Spectrom2004; 239: 243–248.
84.
RichterTMBremerPJSilcockP, et al.Textile binding and release of body odor compounds measured by proton transfer reaction–mass spectrometry. Text Res J2018; 88: 2559–2567.
85.
YaoLLaingRMBremerPJ, et al.Measuring textile adsorption of body odor compounds using proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry. Text Res J2015; 85: 1817–1826.
86.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 17299-2:2014 Textiles – Determination of deodorant property: Part 2 Detector tube method, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2014.
87.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 17299-5: Textiles – Determination of deodorant property: Part 5 Metal-oxide semiconductor sensor method, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2014.
88.
LoutfiACoradeschiSManiGK, et al.Electronic noses for food quality: A review. J Food Eng2015; 144: 103–111.
89.
ArshakKMooreELyonsGM, et al.A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens Rev2004; 24: 181–198.
90.
AmeerQAdelojuSB. Polypyrrole-based electronic noses for environmental and industrial analysis. Sensors Actuators B Chem2005; 106: 541–552.
91.
BaldwinEABaiJPlottoA, et al.Electronic noses and tongues: Applications for the food and pharmaceutical industries. Sensors2011; 11: 4744–4766.
92.
NimmermarkS. Use of electronic noses for detection of odour from animal production facilities: A review. Water Sci Technol2001; 44: 33–41.
93.
Asadi FardPShakoorjavanSAkbariS. The relationship between odour intensity and antibacterial durability of encapsulated thyme essential oil by PPI dendrimer on cotton fabrics. J Text Inst2018; 109: 832–841.
94.
EzaTSMAhmadWYWAhmadMN. The activated carbon as anti-odour coated and pigment printed fabric. 2012 IEEE Business, Eng Ind Appl Colloq2012, pp. 210–215.
95.
HaeringerDGoschnickJ. Characterization of smelling contaminations on textiles using a gradient microarray as an electronic nose. Sensors Actuators B Chem2008; 132: 644–649.
96.
York RK. Studies on textile stabilization of environmental malodors for sensory and electronic nose analyses. PhD Thesis, University of Manitoba, Canada, 2005.
97.
Rae Systems. Gas Detection Tubes and Sampling Handbook., 2nd ed. San Jose, CA: Rae Systems Inc, 2013.
98.
AmemiyaTNakanishiT. Deodorization for ethanethiol by cotton and wool fabrics mordant dyed with congo red and copper (II) sulfate. Text Res J2018; 88: 1056–1064.
99.
KobayashiYNakanishiTKomiyamaJ. Deodorant properties of wool fabrics dyed with acid mordant dyes and a copper salt. Text Res J2002; 72: 125–131.
100.
ChenC-CWangC-CYehJ-T. Improvement of odor elimination and anti-bacterial activity of polyester fabrics finished with composite emulsions of nanometer titanium dioxide-silver particles-water-borne polyurethane. Text Res J2010; 80: 291–300.
101.
HwangE-KLeeY-HKimH-D. Dyeing, fastness, and deodorizing properties of cotton, silk, and wool fabrics dyed with gardenia, coffee sludge, Cassia tora. L., and pomegranate extracts. Fibers Polym2008; 9: 334–340.
102.
YenM-SChenJ-CChenC-C. Degree of crosslinking and physical properties of dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea/acrylic acid crosslinked cotton fabrics after treatment with various metallic salts. J Appl Polym Sci2005; 97: 584–594.
103.
HuismanMAMorrisMA. A study of the removal of synthetic sebum from durable-press fabrics using a liquid-scintillation technique. Text Res J1971; 41: 657–661.
104.
MettanandaCVRCrownEM. Quantity and distribution of oily contaminants present in flame-resistant thermal-protective textiles. Text Res J2010; 80: 803–813.
105.
ChiYSObendorfSK. Aging of oily soils on textiles. Chemical changes upon oxidation and interaction with textile fibers. J Surfactants Deterg1998; 1: 371–380.
106.
TeufelLPipalASchusterKC, et al.Material-dependent growth of human skin bacteria on textiles investigated using challenge tests and DNA genotyping. J Appl Microbiol2010; 108: 450–461.
107.
TakashimaMShiraiFSageshimaM, et al.Distinctive bacteria-binding property of cloth materials. Am J Infect Control2004; 32: 27–30.
108.
Ballantine DS, Martin SJ, Ricco AJ, et al. Materials characterization. In: Ballantine DS, Martin SJ, Ricco AJ, et al. (eds) Applications of Modern Acoustics, Acoustic Wave Sensors. San Diego: Academic Press, 1997, pp. 150–221.
109.
DoDD. Adsorption analysis: Equilibria and kinetics, London: Imperial College Press, 1998.
110.
Bishop DP. Physical and chemical effects of domestic laundering processes. In: Carr CM (ed.) Chemistry of the Textiles Industry. Dordrecht: Springer, 1995, pp. 125–172.
111.
MurtaghJ. Body odour. Aust Fam Physician1994; 23: 1591–1591.
112.
WangJLuXWangJ, et al.Quantitative and sensory evaluation of odor retention on polyester/wool blends. Text Res J2019; 89: 2729–2738.
113.
Abdul-Bari MM. Retention of odorous compounds by textile materials. Masters Thesis, University of Alberta, Canada, 2018.
114.
GaoYCranstonR. Recent advances in antimicrobial treatments of textiles. Text Res J2008; 78: 60–72.
115.
WindlerLHeightMNowackB. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobials for textile applications. Environ Int2013; 53: 62–73.
116.
Lacasse K and Baumann W. Finishing. In: Textile Chemicals: Environmental Data and Facts. Berlin: Springer, 2004, pp. 373–483.
117.
FrattarelliDPowersLDoshiD, et al.Holistic management of textile odor using novel silver-polymeric complexes. AATCC J Res2018; 5: 7–16.
118.
MaoBJMurphyL. Durable freshness for textiles. AATCC Rev2001; 1: 28–31.
119.
RathinamoorthyRThilagavathiGBrindhaS, et al.Odour control studies on apparel fabrics finished with methanol extract of Terminalia chebula. Fibers Polym2014; 15: 1669–1676.
McQueen RH and Ehnes B. Antimicrobial textiles and infection prevention: Clothing and the inanimate environment. In: Bearman G, Munoz-Price S, Morgan DJ, et al. (eds) Infection Prevention. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2018, pp. 117–126.
122.
WalterNMcQueenRHKeelanM. In vivo assessment of antimicrobial-treated textiles on skin microflora. Int J Cloth Sci Technol2014; 26: 330–342.
123.
McQueenRHKeelanMXuY, et al.In vivo assessment of odour retention in an antimicrobial silver chloride-treated polyester textile. J Text Inst2013; 104: 108–117.
124.
Trogolo JA. Odor control textiles: Is “antimicrobial” enough? In: AATCC Book of Papers, AATCC International Conference & Exhibition. Charleston, SC: AATCC, 2011.
125.
West H, Elston C and DeJong D. Reducing odor in absorbent products. Patent US 7,175,741 B2, USA, 2007.
126.
Brunner CR. Odor emissions. Hazardous Air Emissions from Incineration. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1985, pp. 66–76.
127.
Chen JY. Activated carbon. In: Chen JY (ed.) Activated Carbon Fiber and Textiles. Duxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 3–20.
128.
Giraudet S and Le Cloirec P. Activated carbon filters for filtration-adsorption. In: Chen JY (ed.) Activated Carbon Fiber and Textiles. Duxford, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 211–243.
129.
AkhmetovaASalievTAllanIU, et al.A comprehensive review of topical odor-controlling treatment options for chronic wounds. J Wound, Ostomy Cont Nurs2016; 43: 598–609.
130.
McQueen RH. Odour control of medical textiles. In: Bartels VT (ed.) Handbook of Medical Textiles. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing, 2011, pp. 387–416.
131.
Hu S-H, Edens RL, Lindsay JD, et al. Coated activated carbon. Patent US 6,740,406 B2, USA, 2004.
Bailly RL. Odor absorbing wrap. Patent US 4,539,982, USA, 1985.
134.
Vickers TW. Odor-absorbing clothing article. Patent US 5,678,247, USA, 1997.
135.
EzaTSMWan AhmadWYAhmadMR, et al.Effectiveness of activated carbon produced from coconut and oil palm shells as anti-odour on textile fabrics. Indian J Fibre Text Res2014; 39: 190–195.
136.
Maesen T and Marcus B. The zeolite scene: An overview. In: Van Bekkum H, Flanigen EM, Jacobs PA, et al. (eds) Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001, pp. 1–9.
137.
Flanigen EM. Zeolites and molecular sieves: An historical perspective. In: Van Bekkum H, Flanigen EM, Jacobs PA, et al. (eds) Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001, pp. 11–35.
138.
ErogluNEmekciMAthanassiouCG. Applications of natural zeolites on agriculture and food production. J Sci Food Agric2017; 97: 3487–3499.
139.
LuoJLindseyS. The use of pine bark and natural zeolite as biofilter media to remove animal rendering process odours. Bioresour Technol2006; 97: 1461–1469.
140.
NakaneTGomyoHSasakiI, et al.New antiaxillary odour deodorant made with antimicrobial Ag-zeolite (silver-exchanged zeolite). Int J Cosmet Sci2006; 28: 299–309.
141.
KeshavarziNMashayekhy RadFMaceA, et al.Nanocellulose-zeolite composite films for odor elimination. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015; 7: 14254–14262.
142.
Grancaric AM, Prlic I, Tarbuk A, et al. Activated natural zeolites on textiles: Protection from radioactive contamination. In: Kiekens P and Jayaraman S (eds) Intelligent Textiles and Clothing for Ballistic and NBC Protection. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, pp. 157–176.
143.
GrancaricAMTarbukAKovacekI. Nanoparticles of activated natural zeolite on textiles for protection and therapy. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q2009; 15: 203–210.
144.
OjstršekAHribernikSFakinD. Thermal, mechanical and optical features of aluminosilicate-coated cotton textiles via the crosslinking method. Polymers (Basel)2018; 10: 1–14.
BuschmannHKnittelDSchollmeyerE. New textile applications of cyclodextrins. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem2001; 40: 169–172.
150.
AmmayappanLMosesJJ. An overview on application of cyclodextrins in textile product enhancement. J Text Assoc2009; 70: 9–18.
151.
MartelBMorcelletMRuffinD, et al.Capture and controlled release of fragrances by CD finished textiles. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem2002; 44: 439–442.
152.
Alzate-SanchezDiegoMSmithBJ, et al.Cotton fabric functionalized with a βcyclodextrin polymer captures organic pollutants from contaminated air and water. Chem Mater2016; 28: 8340–8346.
153.
Voncina B and Vivod V. Cyclodextrins in textile finishing. In: Günay M (ed.) Eco-friendly Textile Dyeing and Finishing. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Open, 2013, pp. 53–75.
