Effect of replacement strike-face material on the ballistic performance of multi-ply soft armor targets

Abstract

In this study, the impact-face material of a multi-ply soft armor system was varied to different ratios and tested for the effects on the ballistic performance. It is known that the first few layers of multi-ply soft armor material typically fail inelastically near the system ballistic limit and can be replaced with a “sacrificial” material with other more desirable properties. Previous studies have determined that the ballistic performance of these hybrid systems is largely dependent on the amount of high-performance backing material. However, the extent to which the high-performance fabric can be replaced has yet to be fully quantified and examined. Materials of different properties, namely stainless steel mesh, Makrolon® polycarbonate sheets, and cotton, were used as replacement frontal material for 840 d Twaron® panels, and the hybrid panels were impacted by O1 tool steel right-circular cylinder projectiles fired using a single-stage smooth-bore gas gun. Results show that the ballistic performance is maintained up to a frontal material ratio of about 40%, and off-axis material properties play a role in energy dissipation.

Keywords

ballistic limit soft armor high-performance fabric shear strength strike face

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Roylance

Wilde

Tocci

. Ballistic impact of textile structures. Text Res J 1973; 43: 34–41.

Cunniff

. An analysis of the system effects in woven fabrics under ballistic impact. Text Res J 1992; 62: 495–509.

Cunniff PM. A design tool for the development of fragmentation protective body armor. In: 18th international symposium on ballistics, November 1999, pp. 1295–1302. IBS.

Cunniff PM. Decoupled response of textile body armor. In: 18th international symposium on ballistics, November 1999, pp. 814–821. IBS.

Cunniff

. A semiempirical model for the ballistic impact performance of textile-based personnel armor. Text Res J 1996; 66: 45–59.

Phoenix

Porwal

. A new membrane model for the ballistic impact response and V50 performance of multi-ply fibrous systems. Int J Solids Struct 2003; 40: 6723–6765.

Flanagan

Zikry

Wall

et al.

An experimental investigation of high velocity impact and penetration failure modes in textile composites. J Compos Mater 1999; 33: 1080–1103.

Nguyen

Ryan

Cimpoeru

et al.

The effect of target thickness on the ballistic performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene composite. Int J Impact Eng 2015; 75: 174–183.

Prosser A. Penetration of nylon ballistic panels by fragment-simulating projectiles Part II: mechanism of penetration. Text Res J 1988; 58: 161–165.

10.

Walker JD. Constitutive model for fabrics with explicit static solution and ballistic limit. In: 18th international symposium on ballistics, San Antonio, Texas, 1999, pp.1231–1238. IBS.

11.

Walker JD. Ballistic limit of fabrics with resin. In: 19th international symposium of ballistics, Interlaken, Switzerland, May 2001, pp.1409–1414. IBS.

12.

Hudspeth MC. Multi-axial Failure of High-Performance fiber During Transverse Impact. PhD Thesis, Purdue University West Lafayette, USA, 2016.

13.

Alesi AL. Composite personnel armor (No. TR-CP-5). Report, Quartermaster Research and Engineering Command, US Army Natick, USA, December 1957.

14.

NIJ Standard-0115.00:2000. Stab resistance of personal body armor.

15.

NIJ Standard–0101.06:2008. Ballistic resistance of personal body armor.

16.

Chocron

King

Bigger

et al.

Impacts and waves in Dyneema HB80 strips and laminates. J Appl Mech 2013; 80: 31806–31806.

17.

Yang

Chen

. Investigation of failure modes and influence on ballistic performance of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE) uni-directional laminate for hybrid design. Compos Struct 2017; 174: 233–243.

18.

MIL-STD-662F:1997. V50 ballistic test for armor.

19.

Walker

Chocron

. Why impacted yarns break at lower speed than classical theory predicts. J Appl Mech 2011; 78: 51021–51021.

20.

Hudspeth

Nie

Chen

. Dynamic failure of Dyneema SK76 single fibers under biaxial shear/tension. Polymer (Guildf) 2012; 53: 5568–5574.

21.

Mayo

Wetzel

. Cut resistance and failure of high-performance single fibers. Text Res J 2014; 84: 1233–1246.

22.

Hudspeth

Chen

Zheng

. Why the Smith theory over-predicts instant rupture velocities during fiber transverse impact. Text Res J 2016; 86: 743–754.

23.

Sun

Hudspeth

Chen

. Biaxial shear/tension failure behavior of Spectra single fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2016; 88: 286–294.

24.

Hudspeth

Spatola

et al.

The effects of off-axis transverse deflection loading on the failure strain of various high-performance fibers. Text Res J 2016; 86: 897–910.

25.

Hudspeth

Chu

Jewell

et al.

Effect of projectile nose geometry on the critical velocity and failure of yarn subjected to transverse impact. Text Res J 2017; 87: 953–972.