Contradictory evidence of the relationship between education funding and student achievement could reflect heterogeneous effects by revenue source or student characteristics. This study examines potential heterogeneous effects of a particular type of local revenue—bond funds for capital investments—on achievement by socioeconomic status. Comparing California school districts within a narrow window on either side of the cutoff of voter support required to pass a general obligation bond measure, I use dynamic regression discontinuity models to estimate effects of passing a bond on academic achievement among low- and high-socioeconomic-status (SES) students. Results consistently suggest that passing a bond increases achievement among low- but not high-SES students. However, these benefits for low-SES students are delayed and emerge six years after an election. Effects are larger in low-income districts and in small districts, where benefits of capital investments are experienced by a larger proportion of students.
AlexanderDebbieLewisLaurie. 2014. Condition of America’s Public School Facilities: 2012–13 (NCES 2014-022). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
2.
AlexanderKarl L.EntwisleDoris R.OlsonLinda Steffel. 2007. “Lasting Consequences of the Summer Learning Gap.” American Sociological Review72(2):167–80.
3.
BakerBruce D.2016. Does Money Matter in Education?Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
BakerBruce D.WeberMark. 2016. “State School Finance Inequities and the Limits of Pursuing Teacher Equity through Departmental Regulation.” Education Policy Analysis Archives24(47):1–33.
6.
BiddleBruce J.BerlinerDavid C.2002. “A Research Synthesis.” Educational Leadership59(8):48–59.
BuckleyJackSchneiderMarkShangYi. 2004. “The Effects of School Facility Quality on Teacher Retention in Urban School Districts.”Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539484.
9.
BurtlessGary. 1996. Does Money Matter?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
California Department of Education. 2013. 2012–13 Academic Performance Index Reports: Information Guide. Sacramento, CA: Author. http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/.
12.
CalonicoSebastianCattaneoMatias D.TitiunikRocio. 2014. “Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Stata Journal14(4): 909–46.
CattaneoMatias D.JanssonMichaelMaXinwei. 2018. “Manipulation Testing Based on Density Discontinuity.” Stata Journal18(1):234–61.
15.
CelliniStephanie RieggFerreiraFernandoRothsteinJesse. 2010. “The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic RD Design.” Quarterly Journal of Economics125(1):215–61.
16.
ChettyRajFriedmanJohn N.RockoffJonah E.2014. “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood.” American Economic Review104(9):2633–79.
17.
ColemanJames S.CampbellErnest Q.HobsonCarol J.McPartlandJamesMoodAlexander M.WeinfeldFrederick D.YorkRobert L.1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
18.
CondronDennis J.RoscignoVincent J.2003. “Disparities Within: Unequal Spending and Achievement in an Urban School District.”Sociology of Education76(1):18–36.
19.
ConlinMichaelThompsonPaul N.2017. “Impacts of New School Facility Construction: An Analysis of a State-Financed Capital Subsidy Program in Ohio.” Economics of Education Review59:13–28.
20.
Costa-GiomiEugenia. 2004. “Effects of Three Years of Piano Instruction on Children’s Academic Achievement, School Performance and Self-Esteem.” Psychology of Music32(2):139–52.
21.
Duran-NaruckiValkiria. 2008. “School Building Condition, School Attendance, and Academic Achievement in New York City Public Schools: A Mediation Model.” Journal of Environmental Psychology28:278–86.
GoncalvesFelipe. 2015. “The Effects of School Construction on Student and District Outcomes: Evidence from a State-Funded Program in Ohio.” SSRN working paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686828.
26.
GreenwaldRobHedgesLarry V.LaineRichard D.1996. “The Effect of School Resources on School Achievement.” Review of Educational Research66(3):361–96.
GunterTraceyShaoJing. 2016. “Synthesizing the Effect of Building Condition Quality on Academic Performance.” Education Finance and Policy11(1):97–123.
29.
HanushekEric A.1989. “The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance.” Educational Researcher18(4):45–65.
30.
HanushekEric A.1996. “School Resources and Student Performance.” In BurtlessG. (Ed.), Does Money Matter? (pp. 43–73). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31.
HanushekEric A.1997. “Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19(2):141–64.
32.
HeuerRuthStullichStephanie. 2011. Comparability of State and Local Expenditures among Schools within Districts: A Report from the Study of School- Level Expenditures. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED527141.
33.
HongKaiZimmerRon. 2016. “Does Investing in School Capital Infrastructure Improve Student Achievement?” Economics of Education Review53:143–58.
34.
HorngEileen Lai. 2009. “Teacher Tradeoffs: Disentangling Teachers’ Preferences for Working Conditions and Student Demographics.” American Educational Research Journal46(3):690–717.
35.
ImbensGuidoLemieuxThomas. 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics142:615–35.
36.
JacksonC. KiraboJohnsonRucker C.PersicoClaudia. 2016. “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics131(1):157–218.
JohnsonSusan MooreKraftMatthew A.PapayJohn P.2012. “How Context Matters in High-Need Schools: The Effects of Teachers’ Working Conditions on Their Professional Satisfaction and Their Students’ Achievement.” Teachers College Record114(10):1–39.
40.
JonesJohn T.ZimmerRon W.2001. “Examining the Impact of Capital on Academic Achievement.” Economics of Education Review20:577–88.
41.
KinneyDaryl W.2008. “Selected Demographic Variables, Music Participation, and Achievement Test Scores of Urban Middle School Students.” Journal of Research in Music Education55(2):145–61.
LafortuneJulienRothsteinJesseSchanzenbachDiane Whitmore. 2016. School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement. Washington, DC: Washington Center for Equitable Growth.
44.
LareauAnnette. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
LeeDavid S.LemieuxThomas. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature48:281–355.
46.
LeuvenEdwinLindahlMikaelOosterbeekHesselWebbinkDinand. 2007. “The Effect of Extra Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils on Achievement.” Review of Economics and Statistics89(4):721–36.
47.
MartorellPacoStangeKevinMcFarlin Jr.Isaac2016. “Investing in Schools: Capital Spending, Facility Conditions, and Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics140:13–29.
48.
MaxwellLorraine E.2016. “School Building Condition, Social Climate, Student Attendance and Academic Achievement: A Mediation Model.” Journal of Environmental Psychology46:206–16.
49.
McCraryJustin. 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics142(2):698–714.
50.
MorganStephen L.JungSol Bee. 2016. “Still No Effect of Resources, Even in the New Gilded Age?” Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences2(5):83–116.
51.
NeilsonChristopher A.ZimmermanSeth D.2014. “The Effect of School Construction on Test Scores, School Enrollment, and Home Prices.” Journal of Public Economics120:18–31.
PaternosterRaymondBrameRobertMazerollePaulPiqueroAlex. 1998. “Using the Correct Statistical Test for the Equality of Regression Coefficients.” Criminology36(4):859–66.
54.
PicusLawrence O.MarionScott F.CalvoNaomiGlennWilliam J.2005. “Understanding the Relationship between Student Achievement and the Quality of Educational Facilities: Evidence from Wyoming.” Peabody Journal of Education80(3):71–95.
55.
RickardNikki S.BambrickCaroline K.GillAnneliese. 2012. “Absence of Widespread Psychosocial and Cognitive Effects of School Based Music Instruction in 10-13-Year-Old Students.” International Journal of Music Education30(1):57–78.
56.
RozaMarguerite. 2010. Educational Economics: Where Do School Funds Go?Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
57.
RozaMargueriteMilesKaren Hawley. 2002. Moving toward Equity in School Funding within Districts. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
58.
SharkeyPatrick. 2010. “The Acute Effect of Local Homicides on Children’s Cognitive Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107:11733–38.
59.
SharkeyPatrickElwertFelix. 2011. “The Legacy of Disadvantage: Multigenerational Neighborhood Effects on Cognitive Ability.” American Journal of Sociology116:1934–81.
60.
SharkeyPatrickSchwartzAmy EllenEllenIngrid GouldLacoeJohanna. 2014. “High Stakes in the Classroom, High Stakes on the Street: The Effects of Community Violence on Students’ Standardized Test Performance.” Sociological Science1:199–220.
TimarThomas B.RozaMarguerite. 2010. “‘A False Dilemma’: Should Decisions about Education Resource Use Be Made at the State or Local Level?” American Journal of Education116(3):397–422.
66.
UlineCynthiaTschannen-MoranMegan. 2008. “The Walls Speak: The Interplay of Quality Facilities, School Climate, and Student Achievement.” Journal of Educational Administration46(1):55–73.
67.
WelshWilliamCoghlanErinFullerBruceDauterLuke. 2012. “New Schools, Overcrowding Relief, and Achievement Gains in Los Angeles: Strong Returns from a $19.5 Billion Investment.” Policy Brief 12-2. Palo Alto, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education. http://www.edpolicyinca.org/sites/default/files/pace_pb_08.pdf.
68.
ZimmerRonJonesJohn T.2005. “Unintended Consequence of Centralized Public School Funding in Michigan Education.” Southern Economic Journal71(3):534–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
