Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Breast cancer is one the most common malignancies and leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women. Recent studies suggested that hypercholesterolemia may be the potential modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. Cholesterol was well-known for its strong association with cardiovascular disease for long. Moreover, solid evidence has been provided by different studies to illustrate the correlation between lipid and incidence in multiple cancers. Although the conclusion remains controversial or sometimes contrary, which may be due to the multifactorial nature of the disease and the disparity of ethnic population, it is critical to elucidate the relationship between specific cholesterol components in certain population and the exact underlying mechanism of the lipid-associated signaling pathway in breast cancer. The implications of dysregulated lipoproteins as therapeutic targets or options for breast cancer provide novel strategies for us in combating with this malignant disease, which may be achieved by manipulating lipid levels with pharmacological compounds.

Keywords

Breast cancer cholesterol lipoprotein cancer risk

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. There were more than 2 million new diagnosed cases in 2018.¹ The etiology for breast cancer includes well-known risk factors such as genetic background, family history of breast cancer, personal history of breast cancer, exposure to estrogen, age.² Beside the above uncontrollable ones, risk factors including diet, weight, exercise which could be controlled by lifestyle modification have received increasing attention due to their roles in breast cancer development.³ Cholesterol level, which is closely related to lifestyle changes, has been reported to be strongly associated with cardiovascular disease for long time. The lipoprotein profile includes total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Cholesterol levels, mostly focused on total form and LDL, are reported to be associated with cancer incidence in multiple cancer types such as prostate,⁴ colorectal⁵ and testicular cancer.⁶ In breast cancer, controversial epidemiologic results have been reported in cholesterol level and breast cancer risk.^7–10 Studies investigating the correlation between antihyperlipidemic agents such as statins and the risk of breast cancer onset are conflicting as well.^11,12 Even for the dietary cholesterol intake, there is no consistent conclusion for its relationship with breast cancer risk.^13–15 The great disparity of results in specific population indicated that biological differences may play a role in the involvement of cholesterol in breast cancer development. Since there is unclear link between cholesterol and breast cancer development, especially in Asian population, it is critical to further delineate by stratifying into total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL.¹⁶ The studies investigating cholesterol and breast cancer risk in Asia were summarized in Table 1. Accumulating evidence supports a close association between dyslipidemia and breast cancer in Asian countries/regions. Most of the investigations suggested higher TC/TG/LDL and lower HDL levels in breast cancer patients than normal individuals. However, there is still great disparity of study results from different centers, which indicated that geographical distribution and ethnic factor may play vital role. Regarding this, two principal questions to be answered before fully elucidation of the relationship between breast cancer and specific lipid profile: (1) What’s the correlation between circulating lipid (e.g. LDL/HDL/VLDL) with breast cancer in specific population? (2) Whether breast cancer heterogeneity including different subtypes may explain the contradictory influence of lipid observed on breast cancer remains largely elusive.

Table 1.

Summary of studies investigating the association of cholesterol level with breast cancer in Asian countries/regions.

Country/region		Sample number	Conclusion	Reference
India	Retrospective	100 NC	LDL/TG/TC↑in BC	Pirmoradi et al.¹⁷
		100 BC
India	Retrospective	146 NC	LDL/TG/TC↑and HDL↓in BC	Samadi et al.¹⁸
		138 BC
India	Retrospective	88 NC	LDL/TG/TC↑in BC	Garcia-Estevez and Moreno-Bueno¹⁹
		113 BC
India	Retrospective	100 NC	LDL/TC/HDL↓in BC	Pushpalatha et al.²⁰
		91 BC
Thailand	Retrospective	154 NC	LDL/TG/VLDL↑in BC	Kitahara et al.²¹
		249 BC
Korea	Prospective	433,115 NC	TC↑ positively associated with BC	Li et al.²²
Chinese	Retrospective	2483 NC	TC/LDL↓ in BC	Parsa et al.²³
		1054 BC
Chinese	Retrospective	1044 BC	TG/HDL↓in BC	Fereidani et al.²⁴
Chinese	Retrospective	1283 NC	TG↑in BC, HDL↓ in postmenopausal BC	Islam et al.²⁵
		1042 BC

New contribution

Cholesterol has major public health importance as a significant etiology for coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. Cholesterol is carried by lipoproteins such as VLDL, LDL, and HDL in circulation, which confer different functions in our body. LDL is well recognized as “bad” cholesterol for its contribution in forming atheromatous plaque, which is a significant risk factor for vascular morbidity and mortality. In contrast, HDL is well known as “good” cholesterol since the inverse correlation between reduced HDL levels and an increased risk of coronary disease and myocardial infarction.

In recent years, accumulating evidence has been revealed that cholesterol metabolism is involved in cancer development. For example, increased cholesterol levels are associated with a higher cancer incidence, and cholesterol-lowering drugs exhibit beneficial effects by reducing the risk and mortality rate in a number of caners such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. In glioblastoma multiforme, regulating cholesterol metabolism via the mevalonate pathway may be a promise novel adjunctive clinical therapy.¹⁷ However, the conclusions remain controversy among different study groups, which suggested that the effect of cholesterol in cancer development may be population specific. Most of the current studies are focusing on the relationship between LDL and cancer, especially the implication of LDL-lowering drugs in cancer treatment. Only limited literature reported on the linkage between HDL and breast cancers. Hence, we are still facing two major challenges before we take cholesterol manipulation into our consideration for breast cancer treatment strategy: (1) To illustrate the correlation between breast cancer and different cholesterol components such as VLDL, LDL, and HDL; (2) To investigate the potential clinical implications of lipid modifying agents especially HDL boosting medication in breast cancer.

In this review article, we have summarized the updated population-based epidemiological data and experimental evidence of different lipoproteins in Asian countries. Contradicting conclusions have been drawn by different research groups among Asian countries on the relationship of TC, TG, LDL, and breast cancer. HDL has been demonstrated a consistent inverse correlation with breast cancer. Only very limited study was reported on HDL as a therapeutic target or option for breast cancer especially in Asian, leaving large gap for clinician and scientists to fill in. Future studies may focus on the following aspects to investigate the potentials of HDL in treating breast cancer: (1) it may serve as desirable molecules for anticancer drugs delivery; (2) Reconstituted HDL nanoparticles may directly delivery cytotoxic anti-cancer agents into cytoplasm via HDL receptor; (3) The potential beneficial effect of HDL-raising drugs such as cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, fibrates, and niacin in treating breast cancer.

TC and breast cancer

TC is the overall amount of cholesterol in circulation including different components including TG, LDL, HDL, and VLDL. According to reported studies both in Asian and Western countries, the impact of TC as a risk factor for breast cancer is still conflicting. Biological signaling molecules may affect modulate cell growth, migration and invasion ability by interacting with cholesterol membrane in breast cancer cells.¹⁸ The cholesterol-derived sex hormone such as estrogen play critical role in the development and pathogenesis of breast cancer.¹⁸ Some groups revealed an inverse association between low serum cholesterol and cancer while no significant correlation found in other groups.^19–23 Other studies suggested that diet pattern contain high cholesterol and refined grain associated with a lower risk of breast cancer.²⁴ A meta-analysis of 13 studies investigating the associations between breast cancer risk and TC revealed the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94, 1.00; dose-response per 1 mmol/l increment).⁹ By contrast, a study including large cohort of over 664,000 patients demonstrated that women above 40 with high cholesterol levels were 45% less likely to develop breast cancer than those without high cholesterol. What’s more, the risk of death was 40% lower in breast cancer patients with high cholesterol.¹⁹ This controversy prompted some authors to look into the use of statins to lower cholesterol. However, no conclusive remark was made in this topic neither.^{11,12,14,15,25} The intrinsic correlation between TC and breast cancer might be masked by the contribution of different components, which makes it necessary to analyze each component individually.

TG and breast cancer

TG consists of three molecules of fatty acid and one molecule of alcohol glycerol, serving as the backbone of many types of lipids. High level of TG has long been considered as risk factor for atherosclerosis since a wide range of TG-containing lipoproteins transport cholesterol in circulation.²⁶ Data from most studies indicated positive association between TG level and breast cancer as listed in Table 1. A study recruiting 464 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients found that patients in the highest tertile of TG (≥1.23 mmol/l) had three times higher overall mortality compared to TNBC patients in the lowest tertile (≤0.82 mmol/l) (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.17–7.63), and the 5-year overall survival was 19% lower in the highest versus lowest tertile of TG (65% vs 84%).²⁷ Similarly, in general breast cancer patients with high levels of TG have been reported to show a poor prognosis.^7,28–30 Apart from the positive association of TG and breast cancer risk, TG is also considered as a prognostic factor for recurrence.³¹ Some experiments have been carried out to investigate the underlying mechanism of TG in breast cancer occurrence and development. The proto-oncogene Src, well-known pro-mitogenic signaling cascades to cause tumors, plays a critical role in TG synthesis, which endows cells with advantages in proliferation and metastasis in breast cancer.³² However contradictory results were reported in other studies. A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies involving 1,189,635 participants and 23,369 breast cancer cases suggested that serum levels of TG may be inversely associated with breast cancer risk.³³ Being the most common lipid found in the body, although the potential underlying mechanism of TG in breast cancer remains to be clarified, TG may function as an oncogenic player by providing energy to cancer cells or regulating cholesterol such as LDL and HDL by means of lipoproteins.

LDL and breast cancer

LDL helps to transport cholesterol which is essential for membrane and synthesis of the steroid hormones to maintain normal function of the cells.³⁴ Being referred as the “bad cholesterol,” LDL is well recognized as a major risk factor for atherosclerosis, predisposing to major cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke.³⁵ LDL receptor was demonstrated significantly upregulated in breast cancer cells to increase LDL uptake as to meet the demand of rapid proliferating cancer cells.³⁶ There was in vitro evidence showed that LDL promoted cell proliferation and migration ability in ER-positive cells³⁷ but not in ER-negative cells,³⁸ suggesting that the role of LDL in breast cancer may be subtype-dependent. In breast cancer cells treated with LDL, oncogenic pathway genes such as pJNK, pAKT, and pERK were upregulated while cell-cell junction-related genes Claudin7 and Ocludin downregulated, resulted in enhanced cell migration and decreased adhesion.^39–43 In fact, one prospective study demonstrated that high plasma LDL levels were associated with HER2-positive breast cells.⁴⁴ Besides in vitro evidence, in animal models of hyperlipidemia, elevated LDL receptor expression was reported to accelerate cholesterol-mediated breast cancer growth, which could be reversed by LDL receptor silencing. This finding highlights the potential importance of LDL in cancer development.⁴⁵ In human breast cancer, LDL receptor was found to be upregulated in HER2 positive and TNBC, both of which were more cholesteryl ester-rich and more progressive with higher Ki-67 expression and tumor necrosis compared with luminal subtype tumors. Therefore, increased LDL internalization due to LDL receptor upregulation led to cholesteryl ester accumulation in vessel endothelial cells, which was believed to be associated with more malignant breast cancer phenotype.⁴⁶ It has become abundantly clear that oxidized LDL which could be absorbed by endothelial cell led to promote the expression of pro-inflammatory genes and recruitment of monocyte into vessel wall, resulting in endothelial dysfunction, and injury.^47–49 During breast cancer carcinogenesis, lipid peroxidation is considered as one of the main reasons causing DNA structural alterations.^50,51 There was a study illustrated that oxidized LDL promoted breast cells viability via PI3K/AKT oncogenic signaling pathways in microRNA-mediated manner.⁵² Oxidized LDL lecithin-like receptor 1 (OLR1) is the main receptor for facilitating the oxidized LDL into breast cancer cells, which also positively correlates to tumor stage and grade.⁵³ OLR1 is demonstrated to play oncogenic role by upregulating NF-κB and inhibiting apoptosis⁵⁴ as well as promoting migration.⁵⁵

VLDL and breast cancer

VLDL particles are produced by the parenchymal cells of the liver and are TG rich. Its function is to carry TG to muscle and adipose tissue for hydrolyzation to provide fatty acids that can be oxidized to produce ATP. Ninety percent of the serum TGs in the fasting state were carried by VLDL.⁵⁶ They can be re-esterified to glycerol and stored as fat when there is no need for energy production, which is main contributor for obesity.⁵⁷ Obesity is one of the most important risk factors for breast cancer which correlated with poor survival rate.^58,59 Epidemiological studies in Asian countries have shown a strong relationship between breast cancer and VLDL.^60–62 Experimental studies demonstrated that VLDL increased breast cancer cell migration and invasion ability by upregulating the mesenchymal markers expression and promoted angiogenic activity through enhanced secretion of angiogenic factors.³⁷ What’s more, VLDL was reported to play oncogenic role in drug-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells.⁶³

HDL and breast cancer

HDL contains a wide spectrum of lipoprotein particles with density ranges from 1 to 1.2 g/ml. The major HDL apolipoproteins are ApoA-I and II, both of which are required for normal HDL biosynthesis. Being the most abundant apolipoprotein in plasma, ApoA-I consist approximately 70% of HDL particles. ApoA-II is synthesized only in liver, constitutes approximately 20% of HDL protein.⁶⁴ It is widely accepted that HDL as “good cholesterol” since multiple epidemiological studies clearly demonstrated that HDL levels are inversely associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease and its thrombotic complications.^65–67 HDL plays a major role in reverse cholesterol transport, removing excess cholesterol from circulation and deliver to liver for metabolic disposal.⁶⁸ Besides cholesterol clearance, HDL enhances its protective effect against cardiovascular disease by other biological properties such as antithrombotic, cytoprotective, anti-inflammatory, vasodilatory and antioxidative functions.^69–72 Cancers including breast cancer show specific alterations in different aspects of metabolism such as lipid metabolism, which lead to dysfunction in structural cell membrane synthesis, lipids energy homeostasis, lipid-related signaling activating inflammation-related pathways. With all the changes mentioned above and considering the multiple functions of HDL, more and more attention is being drawn to the relationship between HDL and cellular processes, including cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, and motility.⁷³ Concerning HDL and breast cancer, discordant results were found in different countries or regions. Most of the studies conducted so far have identified inverse correlation between cancer and HDL, however, some meta-analyses found only a modest, null or even positive correlation between cancer and HDL levels. The reason for this may be due to confounding factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, smoking habit which may reduce HDL levels and prone to cancer development.⁷⁴ A meta-analysis of six prospective studies investigating the associations between HDL levels and the risk of breast cancer found that HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.69, 1.09; dose-response per 1 mmol/l increment).⁹ One prospective study in France found an inverse association between HDL and breast cancer risk.⁷⁵ In contrast, a Mendelian randomization study showed that raised HDL increased the risk of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients from European ancestry.⁷⁶ Meanwhile other studies failed to find any association between HDL and breast cancer risk or survival.^77–79 However, most of the studies demonstrated decreased HDL levels in Asian breast cancer patients (Table 1). Despite the discrepancies in these studies, it is still proposed that HDL functionality might have a bearing on the breast cancer. It is critical to keep in mind that clinical or methodological factors such as study design, geographic variation, follow up length, sample size play unneglectable roles in the result interpretation. For this reason, it may be important to determine the potential underlying mechanisms for the association between HDL and breast cancers by basic scientific research.⁸⁰ Interestingly, HDL and its modified forms were confirmed to be oncogenic in most breast cancer experimental studies according to reported literature.⁸¹ HDL was reported to stimulate proliferation of breast cancer cell lines in dose-dependent manner.^82,83 The most abundant HDL apolipoprotein ApoA-I was found to be inversely associated with breast cancer risk.^62,75,84 Overexpression of ApoA-I in inherited breast cancer mice model showed reduced the levels of oxidized LDL and increased 27-hydroxycholesterol, which could promote tumor growth.⁸⁵ The HDL receptor scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-B1), which mediates cholesterol uptake, was reported to be abundantly expressed in human breast cancer tissue compared with adjacent normal tissue.^86,87 SR-B1 contributes to the tumor development and malignant processes via AKT and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in breast cancer.⁸⁸ ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) that recruits ApoA-I as receptor and mediates cholesterol to HDL, respectively, were identified to play a pivotal role in regulating cholesterol within the cells, which is essential to cell function and survival.^89–91 Although HDL has been identified to be correlated with breast cancer development, very limited study was reported on its implication as a therapeutic target or option for breast cancer especially in Asian, leaving large gap for clinician and scientists to fill in. Having considered the biological and functional properties of HDL, future studies are needed to investigate the potentials of HDL in treating breast cancer in following aspects: (1) HDL may serve as desirable molecules for anticancer drugs delivery due to its affinity and ability to accumulate within cancer cells;^92,93 (2) Reconstituted HDL nanoparticles (rHDL NP)-based formulations to directly delivery cytotoxic anti-cancer agents into cytoplasm via facilitation of HDL receptor SR-B1, may overcome the drug resistance which caused by the pumping units located in the membranes of malignant cells^94–96; (3) The inverse correlation between HDL levels and breast cancer indicated the therapeutic potential of HDL-raising drugs such as cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (e.g. anacetrapib, evacetrapib), fibrates and niacin.⁹⁷ The summarized lipoprotein-associated signaling pathways in breast cancers were listed as Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The lipoprotein-associated signaling pathways in breast cancers.

Conclusions and future challenges

The deregulation of cholesterol homeostasis in breast cancer merits a review of its own. In this article, we summarized population-based epidemiological data and experimental evidence of different lipid components especially in Asian countries. Although conflicting or sometimes contradictory results have been rendered from different institutes, which may be possibly owing to multifactorial nature of the disease, it would be quite challenging to establish a causal relationship between cholesterol and breast cancer in specific Asian population. Large scale retrospective or prospective analysis and mechanistic studies both in vivo and in vitro are needed for fully elucidation of cholesterol’s role in breast cancer development. The lipid manipulation such as HDL-raising agents may provide us novel strategy toward this malignant disease, which still warrant further investigations on basic research and preclinical trials.

Limitations of the review

In this review, we summarized the relationship between TG, TC, LDL, VLDL, HDL, and the occurrence and development in breast cancer, aiming to provide a comprehensive picture in this field. However, inconsistent conclusions were drawn in different studies among various populations or countries. In future study, larger cohort of patients with specific subgrouping such as ethnic group will be more informative for a conclusive relationship between lipid profile and breast cancer. This will help to provide insight into the development of novel strategy for breast cancer prevention and treatment.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions

Yanghui Wei and Jiawei Chen performed literature research and drafted the manuscript. Yao Huang, Weiqin Yang and Juan Chen reviewed the manuscript.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not sought for the present study because this was a review article and did not involve any patients.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not sought for the present study because this was a review article and did not involve any subjects.

ORCID iD

Jiawei Chen

Author biographies

Yanghui Wei, MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China. Dr. Wei is an experienced surgeon with great passion in medical research. He has done a number of studies and published some research articles in the breast cancer field. He is interested in translational research.

Yao Huang, MD, Department of Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China. Dr. Huang is an experienced surgeon with great skill. He is interested in translational research. He has provided guidance to his students.

Weiqin Yang, PhD, School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. Dr. Yang is an experienced medical researcher. Her research field is the mechanism of liver cancer. She has focused on the oncogenesis of liver cancer for years and has published some papers with high impact factor.

Qingnan Huang, MD, Department of Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China. Dr. Huang is an experienced surgeon with great skill. He is interested in translational research.

Yong Chen, MD, Department of Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China. Dr. Chen is an experienced surgeon with great skill. She is interested in breast cancer research. She has some patents in the medical devices.

Kai Zeng, MD, Department of Surgery, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, China. Dr. Dr. Zeng is a young doctor with passion in medical research. He has experience in meta-analysis. And he has published a paper in this field.

Juan Chen, MD, PhD, physician in Department of Medicine & Rehabilitation, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong. She graduated from the University of Hong Kong. She is experienced in basic research.

Jiawei Chen, MD, PhD, surgeon in The 8th Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. He graduated from The Chinese University of Hong Kong. He is experienced in basic research and translational study.

References

Ferlay

Colombet

Soerjomataram

, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019; 144(8): 1941–1953.

Kaminska

Ciszewski

Lopacka-Szatan

, et al. Breast cancer risk factors. Prz Menopauzalny 2015; 14(3): 196–202.

Jones

Fels

West

, et al. Modulation of circulating angiogenic factors and tumor biology by aerobic training in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013; 6(9): 925–937.

Pelton

Freeman

Solomon

. Cholesterol and prostate cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2012; 12(6): 751–759.

Wang

Xuan

, et al. Cholesterol enhances colorectal cancer progression via ROS elevation and MAPK signaling pathway activation. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017; 42%(2%): 729–742.

Wiréhn

Törnberg

Carstensen

. Serum cholesterol and testicular cancer incidence in 45 000 men followed for 25 years. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 1785.

Bahl

Ennis

Tannock

, et al. Serum lipids and outcome of early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 94(2): 135–144.

Sung

Song

. Serum total cholesterol and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal Korean women. Cancer Causes Control 2009; 20(7): 1055–1060.

Touvier

Fassier

His

, et al. Cholesterol and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Nutr 2015; 114(3): 347–357.

10.

Carter

Uppal

Chandran

, et al. Patients with a diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia have a reduced risk of developing breast cancer and lower mortality rates: a large retrospective longitudinal cohort study from the UK ACALM registry. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 644.

11.

Undela

Srikanth

Bansal

. Statin use and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 135(1): 261–269.

12.

Mansourian

Haghjooy-Javanmard

Eshraghi

, et al. Statins use and risk of breast cancer recurrence and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Pharm Pharm Sci 2016; 19(1): 72–81.

13.

Kuzu

Noory

Robertson

. The role of cholesterol in cancer. Cancer Res 2016; 76(8): 2063–2070.

14.

Yang

Zhang

, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that dietary cholesterol intake increases risk of breast cancer. Nutr Res 2016; 36(7): 627–635.

15.

La Vecchia

de Groh

, et al.; Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Dietary cholesterol intake and cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23(2): 491–500.

16.

Nelson

Chang

McDonnell

. Cholesterol and breast cancer pathophysiology. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2014; 25(12): 649–655.

17.

Pirmoradi

Seyfizadeh

Ghavami

, et al. Targeting cholesterol metabolism in glioblastoma: a new therapeutic approach in cancer therapy. J Investig Med 2019; 67(4): 715–719.

18.

Samadi

Ghayour-Mobarhan

Mohammadpour

, et al. High-density lipoprotein functionality and breast cancer: a potential therapeutic target. J Cell Biochem 2019; 120(4): 5756–5765.

19.

Garcia-Estevez

Moreno-Bueno

. Updating the role of obesity and cholesterol in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21(1): 35.

20.

Pushpalatha

Smitha

Gilsa

, et al. Lipid profile in female breast cancer: a study from Kerala, South India. Int J Adv Res 2015; 3: 472–475.

21.

Kitahara

Berrington de Gonzalez

Freedman

, et al. Total cholesterol and cancer risk in a large prospective study in Korea. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(12): 1592–1598.

22.

Liu

, et al. Status of lipid and lipoprotein in female breast cancer patients at initial diagnosis and during chemotherapy. Lipids Health Dis 2018; 17(1): 91.

23.

Parsa

Taravatmanesh

Trevisan

. Is low cholesterol a risk factor for cancer mortality? Eur J Cancer Prev 2018; 27(6): 570–576.

24.

Fereidani

Eini-Zinab

Heidari

, et al. Nutrient patterns and risk of breast cancer among Iranian women: a case- control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19(9): 2619–2624.

25.

Islam

Yang

Nguyen

, et al. Exploring association between statin use and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 296(6): 1043–1053.

26.

Talayero

Sacks

. The role of triglycerides in atherosclerosis. Curr Cardiol Rep 2011; 13(6): 544–552.

27.

Lofterod

Mortensen

Nalwoga

, et al. Impact of pre-diagnostic triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol on breast cancer recurrence and survival by breast cancer subtypes. BMC Cancer 2018; 18(1): 654.

28.

Emaus

Veierod

Tretli

, et al. Metabolic profile, physical activity, and mortality in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 121(3): 651–660.

29.

Llaverias

Danilo

Mercier

, et al. Role of cholesterol in the development and progression of breast cancer. Am J Pathol 2011; 178(1): 402–412.

30.

Mousa

Onur

Utkan

. Is obesity always a risk factor for all breast cancer patients? c-erbB2 expression is significantly lower in obese patients with early stage breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2012; 14(12): 923–930.

31.

Berrino

Villarini

Traina

, et al. Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 147(1): 159–165.

32.

Song

Liu

, et al. Proto-oncogene Src links lipogenesis via lipin-1 to breast cancer malignancy. Nat Commun 2020; 11(1): 5842.

33.

Liu

Gao

. Serum lipids and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS One 2015; 10(11): e0142669.

34.

Dashti

Kulik

Hoek

, et al. A phospholipidomic analysis of all defined human plasma lipoproteins. Sci Rep 2011; 1: 139.

35.

Rosendorff

. Effects of LDL cholesterol on vascular function. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16(Suppl 1): S26–S28.

36.

Pires

Hegg

Freitas

, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor and LDL receptor-related protein 1 (LRP-1) receptor in locally advanced breast cancer. Braz J Med Biol Res 2012; 45(6): 557–564.

37.

Chen

, et al. VLDL and LDL, but not HDL, promote breast cancer cell proliferation, metastasis and angiogenesis. Cancer Lett 2017; 388: 130–138.

38.

Antalis

Uchida

Buhman

, et al. Migration of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells depends on the availability of exogenous lipids and cholesterol esterification. Clin Exp Metastasis 2011; 28(8): 733–741.

39.

dos Santos

Domingues

Matias

, et al. LDL-cholesterol signaling induces breast cancer proliferation and invasion. Lipids Health Dis 2014; 13: 16.

40.

Jiang

Tong

, et al. CXCL13 inhibition induce the apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through blocking CXCR5/ERK signaling pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2018; 22(24): 8755–8762.

41.

Varghese

Samuel

Varghese

, et al. Triptolide decreases cell proliferation and induces cell death in triple negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Biomolecules 2018; 8(4): 163.

42.

Wang

Zhang

Chen

, et al. ERbeta1 inversely correlates with PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway and predicts a favorable prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015; 152(2): 255–269.

43.

Filippi

Picot

Aanei

, et al. Epigallocatechin-3-O-gallate alleviates the malignant phenotype in A-431 epidermoid and SK-BR-3 breast cancer cell lines. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2018; 69(5): 584–597.

44.

Rodrigues Dos Santos

Fonseca

Dias

, et al. Plasma level of LDL-cholesterol at diagnosis is a predictor factor of breast tumor progression. BMC Cancer 2014; 14: 132.

45.

Gallagher

Zelenko

Neel

, et al. Elevated tumor LDLR expression accelerates LDL cholesterol-mediated breast cancer growth in mouse models of hyperlipidemia. Oncogene 2017; 36(46): 6462–6471.

46.

de Gonzalo-Calvo

Lopez-Vilaro

Nasarre

, et al. Intratumor cholesteryl ester accumulation is associated with human breast cancer proliferation and aggressive potential: a molecular and clinicopathological study. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 460.

47.

Mehta

. Antisense to LOX-1 inhibits oxidized LDL-mediated upregulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and monocyte adhesion to human coronary artery endothelial cells. Circulation 2000; 101(25): 2889–2895.

48.

Cominacini

Pasini

Garbin

, et al. Oxidized low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) binding to ox-LDL receptor-1 in endothelial cells induces the activation of NF-kappaB through an increased production of intracellular reactive oxygen species. J Biol Chem 2000; 275(17): 12633–12638.

49.

Mehta

. Upregulation of endothelial receptor for oxidized LDL (LOX-1) by oxidized LDL and implications in apoptosis of human coronary artery endothelial cells: evidence from use of antisense LOX-1 mRNA and chemical inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2000; 20(4): 1116–1122.

50.

Sanchez-Perez

Carrasco-Legleu

Garcia-Cuellar

, et al. Oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Correlation between lipid peroxidation and induction of preneoplastic lesions in rat hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 2005; 217(1): 25–32.

51.

Wiseman

Halliwell

. Damage to DNA by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species: role in inflammatory disease and progression to cancer. Biochem J 1996; 313(Pt 1): 17–29.

52.

Khaidakov

Mehta

. Oxidized LDL triggers pro-oncogenic signaling in human breast mammary epithelial cells partly via stimulation of MiR-21. PLoS One 2012; 7(10): e46973.

53.

Pucci

Polidoro

Greggi

, et al. Pro-oncogenic action of LOX-1 and its splice variant LOX-1Δ4 in breast cancer phenotypes. Cell Death Dis 2019; 10(2): 53.

54.

Khaidakov

Mitra

Kang

, et al. Oxidized LDL receptor 1 (OLR1) as a possible link between obesity, dyslipidemia and cancer. PLoS One 2011; 6(5): e20277.

55.

Wang

Zhao

, et al. Up-regulation of OLR1 expression by TBC1D3 through activation of TNFalpha/NF-kappaB pathway promotes the migration of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2017; 408: 60–70.

56.

Harris

Jacobson

. Chapter 27 - omega-3 fatty acids. In: Ballantyne

(ed.) Clinical lipidology. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 2009, pp.326–338.

57.

Mittendorfer

Yoshino

Patterson

, et al. VLDL triglyceride kinetics in lean, overweight, and obese men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101(11): 4151–4160.

58.

Capasso

Esposito

Pentimalli

, et al. Metabolic syndrome affects breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women: National Cancer Institute of Naples experience. Cancer Biol Ther 2010; 10(12): 1240–1243.

59.

Begum

Richardson

Carmichael

. Obesity in post menopausal women with a family history of breast cancer: prevalence and risk awareness. Int Semin Surg Oncol 2009; 6(1): 1.

60.

Kokoglu

Karaarslan

, et al. Alterations of serum lipids and lipoproteins in breast cancer. Cancer Lett 1994; 82(2): 175–178.

61.

Kumar

Sachdanandam

Arivazhagan

. Studies on the changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins in patients with benign and malignant breast cancer. Biochem Int 1991; 23(3): 581–589.

62.

Chang

Hou

Tsai

, et al. The association between lipid profiles and breast cancer among Taiwanese women. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45(9): 1219–1223.

63.

Siti

Seoparjoo

AMI

Shahrul

. Lipoproteins modulate growth and P-glycoprotein expression in drug-resistant HER2-overexpressed breast cancer cells. Heliyon 2019; 5(4): e01573.

64.

Rader

. Molecular regulation of HDL metabolism and function: implications for novel therapies. J Clin Invest 2006; 116(12): 3090–3100.

65.

Di Angelantonio

Sarwar

Perry

, et al.; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Major lipids, apolipoproteins, and risk of vascular disease. JAMA 2009; 302(18): 1993–2000.

66.

Singh

Rohatgi

. Examining the paradox of high high-density lipoprotein and elevated cardiovascular risk. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(1): 109–112.

67.

Rader

Hovingh

. HDL and cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2014; 384(9943): 618–625.

68.

Toth

. Reverse cholesterol transport: high-density lipoprotein’s magnificent mile. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2003; 5(5): 386–393.

69.

Kontush

Chapman

. Antiatherogenic function of HDL particle subpopulations: focus on antioxidative activities. Curr Opin Lipidol 2010; 21(4): 312–318.

70.

Barter

Nicholls

Rye

, et al. Antiinflammatory properties of HDL. Circ Res 2004; 95(8): 764–772.

71.

Mineo

Deguchi

Griffin

, et al. Endothelial and antithrombotic actions of HDL. Circ Res 2006; 98(11): 1352–1364.

72.

Sugano

Tsuchida

Makino

. High-density lipoproteins protect endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 272(3): 872–876.

73.

Santos

Schulze

. Lipid metabolism in cancer. FEBS J 2012; 279(15): 2610–2623.

74.

Pirro

Ricciuti

Rader

, et al. High density lipoprotein cholesterol and cancer: marker or causative? Prog Lipid Res 2018; 71: 54–69.

75.

His

Zelek

Deschasaux

, et al. Prospective associations between serum biomarkers of lipid metabolism and overall, breast and prostate cancer risk. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29(2): 119–132.

76.

Nowak

Arnlov

. A Mendelian randomization study of the effects of blood lipids on breast cancer risk. Nat Commun 2018; 9(1): 3957.

77.

Chandler

Song

Lin

, et al. Lipid biomarkers and long-term risk of cancer in the Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103(6): 1397–1407.

78.

Borgquist

Butt

Almgren

, et al. Apolipoproteins, lipids and risk of cancer. Int J Cancer 2016; 138(11): 2648–2656.

79.

His

Dartois

Fagherazzi

, et al. Associations between serum lipids and breast cancer incidence and survival in the E3N prospective cohort study. Cancer Causes Control 2017; 28(1): 77–88.

80.

Jafri

Alsheikh-Ali

Karas

. Baseline and on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of cancer in randomized controlled trials of lipid-altering therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55(25): 2846–2854.

81.

Cedo

Reddy

Mato

, et al. HDL and LDL: potential new players in breast cancer development. J Clin Med 2019; 8(6): 853.

82.

Rotheneder

Kostner

. Effects of low- and high-density lipoproteins on the proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro: differences between hormone-dependent and hormone-independent cell lines. Int J Cancer 1989; 43(5): 875–879.

83.

Gospodarowicz

Lui

Gonzalez

. High-density lipoproteins and the proliferation of human tumor cells maintained on extracellular matrix-coated dishes and exposed to defined medium. Cancer Res 1982; 42(9): 3704–3713.

84.

Huang

Stasyk

Morandell

, et al. Biomarker discovery in breast cancer serum using 2-D differential gel electrophoresis/MALDI-TOF/TOF and data validation by routine clinical assays. Electrophoresis 2006; 27(8): 1641–1650.

85.

Cedo

Garcia-Leon

Baila-Rueda

, et al. ApoA-I mimetic administration, but not increased apoA-I-containing HDL, inhibits tumour growth in a mouse model of inherited breast cancer. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 36387.

86.

Pussinen

Karten

Wintersperger

, et al. The human breast carcinoma cell line HBL-100 acquires exogenous cholesterol from high-density lipoprotein via CLA-1 (CD-36 and LIMPII analogous 1)-mediated selective cholesteryl ester uptake. Biochem J 2000; 349(Pt 2): 559–566.

87.

Cao

Murao

Imachi

, et al. A mutant high-density lipoprotein receptor inhibits proliferation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64(4): 1515–1521.

88.

Danilo

Gutierrez-Pajares

Mainieri

, et al. Scavenger receptor class B type I regulates cellular cholesterol metabolism and cell signaling associated with breast cancer development. Breast Cancer Res 2013; 15(5): R87.

89.

Kennedy

Barrera

Nakamura

, et al. ABCG1 has a critical role in mediating cholesterol efflux to HDL and preventing cellular lipid accumulation. Cell Metab 2005; 1(2): 121–131.

90.

Sag

Cekic

, et al. The cholesterol transporter ABCG1 links cholesterol homeostasis and tumour immunity. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 6354.

91.

Smith

Land

. Anticancer activity of the cholesterol exporter ABCA1 gene. Cell Rep 2012; 2(3): 580–590.

92.

Lacko

Nair

Paranjape

, et al. High density lipoprotein complexes as delivery vehicles for anticancer drugs. Anticancer Res 2002; 22(4): 2045–2049.

93.

Kader

Pater

. Loading anticancer drugs into HDL as well as LDL has little affect on properties of complexes and enhances cytotoxicity to human carcinoma cells. J Control Release 2002; 80(1–3): 29–44.

94.

Lin

Chen

, et al. Imaging the cytosolic drug delivery mechanism of HDL-like nanoparticles. Pharm Res 2014; 31(6): 1438–1449.

95.

Yang

Luo

, et al. Nanomedicine to overcome cancer multidrug resistance. Curr Drug Metab 2014; 15(6): 632–649.

96.

Yin

Shen

, et al. Bioreducible micelles with endosomal buffering and multidrug resistance-reversing function enhance anti-tumor efficacy of doxorubicin. J Biomed Nanotechnol 2015; 11(10): 1764–1775.

97.

Kaur

Pandey

Negi

, et al. Effect of HDL-raising drugs on cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-regression. PLoS One 2014; 9(4): e94585.

The significances and clinical implications of cholesterol components in human breast cancer

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

New contribution

TC and breast cancer

TG and breast cancer

LDL and breast cancer

VLDL and breast cancer

HDL and breast cancer

Conclusions and future challenges

Limitations of the review

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent

ORCID iD

Author biographies

References