In higher education, understanding discipline-specific vocabulary can be challenging. Insufficient vocabulary can be a major challenge for students as they begin their university studies. This study examined university undergraduate English language learners’ discipline-specific vocabulary retention when they used an in-house developed mobile app, Books vs Brains@PolyU, in Hong Kong. A total of 159 second language (L2) students from four disciplines participated in the study, and they completed a pre- and posttest consisting of 120 words in four difficulty levels in their chosen disciplines. The results suggested that participants acquired more vocabulary words at the intermediate and advanced levels than at the beginner and elementary ones. The findings improve the understanding of MALL and vocabulary acquisition using apps to facilitate and support learners’ academic studies.
BachmanLFPalmerAS (1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BurstonJ (2014) MALL: the pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning27(4): 344–57.
3.
BurstonJ (2015) Twenty years of MALL project implementation: a meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL27: 4–20. doi:10.1017/S0958344014000159
4.
CanaleMSwainM (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics1:1–47.
5.
CastañedaDAChoMH (2016) Use of game-like application on a mobile device to improve accuracy in conjugating Spanish verbs. Computer Assisted Language Learning29: 1195–204.
6.
ChenCMLeeHMChenYH (2005) Personalized e-learning system using item response theory. Computers & Education44(3): 237–55.
7.
ChenCMChenLCYangSM (2018) An English vocabulary learning app with self-regulated learning mechanism to improve learning performance and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning32(3): 237–60.
8.
ChenCMLiHHuangHB (2019) Effects of a mobile game-based English vocabulary learning app on learners’ perception and learning performance: a case study of Taiwanese EFL learners. ReCALL31(2): 170–88.
9.
CromleyJGAzevedoR (2007) Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology99(2): 311–25.
10.
EhriLCRosenthalJ (2007) Spellings of words: a neglected facilitator of vocabulary learning. Journal of Literacy Research39(4): 389–409.
11.
FolseKS (2006) The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly40(2): 273–93.
12.
Godwin-JonesR (2017) Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology21(2): 3–17.
13.
Godwin-JonesR (2018) Contextualized vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology22(3): 1–19.
14.
HealeyD (2018) Technology enhanced learning environments. In: LiontasJI (ed.) The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0437
15.
JensenE (2005) Teaching with the Brain in Mind. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
16.
KesslerG (2018) Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals51: 205–18.
17.
KiefferMJPetscherYProctorCPSilvermanRD (2016) Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? Modeling the contributions of language comprehension skills to reading comprehension in the upper elementary grades. Scientific Studies of Reading20(6): 436–54.
18.
KimDRueckertDKimDDSeoD (2013) Students’ perceptions and experiences of mobile learning. Language Learning & Technology17(3): 52–73.
19.
LesauxNKKiefferM JKelleyJ GHarrisJR (2014) Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents: evidence from a randomized field trial. American Educational Research Journal51 1159–94.
20.
LiJCumminsJDengQ (2017) The effectiveness of texting to enhance academic vocabulary learning: English language learners’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning30: 816–43.
21.
LinJ JLinH (2019) Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning. doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
22.
MaQ (2017) A multi-case study of university students’ language-learning experience mediated by mobile technologies: a socio-cultural perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning30(3-4): 183–203.
23.
MasraiAMiltonJ (2015) Word difficulty and learning among native Arabic learners of EFL. English Language Teaching8(6): 1–10.
24.
MotallebzadehKGanjaliR (2011) SMS: Tool for L2 Vocabulary Retention and Reading Comprehension Ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research2: 1111–15.
25.
NationISP (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
NationK (2008) Learning to read words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61: 1121–33.
27.
ParibakhtTWescheM (1997) Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In: CoadyJHuckinT (eds) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174–200.
28.
Pareja-LoraAArus-HitaJReadTMartin-MonjeEReadT (2013) Toward mobile assisted language learning apps for professionals that integrate learning into the daily routine. Proceedings of EUROCALL20: 206–10.
29.
PerinD (2013) Literacy skills among academically underprepared students. Community College Review41(2): 118–36.
30.
PurpuraJE (2004) Assessing Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
RoschelleJ (2003) Keynote paper: Unlocking the learner value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning19(3). doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00028.x
32.
Rosell-AguilarF (2016) User evaluation of language learning mobile applications: a case study with learners of Spanish. In: PalalasAAllyM (eds) The International Handbook of Mobile-assisted Language Learning. Beijing: China Central Radio & TV University Press, 545–81.
33.
Rosell-AguilarF (2018) Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: a user evaluation of the Busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning31: 854–881.
34.
SchmittN (2008) Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research12(3): 329–63.
35.
SongYFoxR (2008) Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL20(3): 290–314.
StockwellG (2012) Mobile-assisted language learning. In: ThomasMReindersHWarschauerM (eds) Contemporary Computer-assisted Language Learning. London: Continuum, 201–16.
38.
SungYTChangKELiuTC (2016) The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: a meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education94: 252–74.
39.
VurdienR (2017) Mobile assisted vocabulary acquisition and wikis to enhance writing skills. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching7(2): 1317–339.
40.
WallaceC (2008) Vocabulary: the key to teaching English language learners to read. Education Digest73(9): 36–39.
41.
WongKWangFLNgKKKwanR (2015) Investigating acceptance towards mobile learning in higher education students. In: LiKCWongTLCheungSKSLamJNgKK (eds) Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science (vol. 494, pp 9–19). Berlin: Springer.
42.
YildizA (2012) Teaching vocabulary to young EFL learners through semantic-mapping technique. Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University Institute of Educational Sciences, Samsun, Turkey.
43.
ZouBYanX X (2014) Chinese students’ perceptions of using mobile devices for English learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching4(3): 20–33.
