Although a key component in English language teaching programs, English textbooks have been criticized for not offering classroom learners adequate opportunity for learning authentic language (Bardovi-Harlig, 2001; Grant and Starks, 2001; Wong, 2002; Vellenga, 2004). This is because instead of making use of language samples that native speakers actually produce, many textbooks have drawn on native speakers’ intuition about language use, which might not always be reliable (Wolfson, 1989a). This article reports on the finding of a study which aims to analyze and evaluate the pragmatic content of a recently developed series of textbooks intended for use in Vietnam’s upper-secondary schools. Specifically, the article examines how speech acts are linguistically presented in the textbooks and whether adequate contextual and meta-pragmatic information is provided to facilitate the learning of these speech acts. The article also draws implications regarding the writing of ESL/EFL materials for developing intercultural communicative competence in the context of English as a Global Language.
Bachman L. ( 1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
2.
Bachman L., Palmer A. ( 1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
3.
Bardovi-Harlig K. ( 2001) Evaluating the empirical evidence: grounds for instruction in pragmatics? In: Rose K , Kasper G (eds) Pragmatics in Language Teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13-32.
4.
Bardovi-Harlig K., Hartford B., Mahan-Taylor R., Morgan M., and Reynolds D. ( 1991) Developing pragmatic awareness: closing the conversation . ELT Journal45(1): 4-15.
5.
Bardovi-Harlig K., Mahan-Taylor R. ( 2003) Teaching Pragmatics. Washington DC : U.S. Department of State Office of English Language Programs.
6.
Beebe LM, Takahashi T. ( 1989) Sociolinguistic variation in face-threatening speech acts: chastisement and disagreement. In: Eiseinstein M (ed.) The Dynamic Interlanguage. New York: Plenum, 199-218.
7.
Beebe L., Cummings M. ( 1996) Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: how data collection method affects speech act performance. In: Gass S, Neu J (eds) Speech acts across cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65-86.
8.
Billmyer K. ( 1990) ‘I really like your lifestyle’: ESL learners learning how to compliment. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics6(2): 31-48.
9.
Bouton LF ( 1996) Pragmatics and Language Learning. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: Division of English as an International Language.
10.
Boxer D., Pickering L. ( 1995) Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: the case of complaints. ELT Journal49(1): 44-58.
11.
Brown P., Levinson S. ( 1978) Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena . In: Goody E (ed.) Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 56-289.
12.
Brown P., Levinson S. ( 1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Brumfit C. ( 2003) Individual Freedom in Language Teaching: Helping Learners to Develop a Dialect of their Own. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Burns A. ( 1998) Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics18: 102-23.
15.
Canale M., Swain M. ( 1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics1(1): 1-47.
16.
Canale M. ( 1983) On some dimensions of language proficiency. In: Oller JW (ed.) Issues in Language Testing Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House , 332-42.
17.
Cohen A., Olshtain E., and Rosenstein D. ( 1986) Advanced EFL apologies: what remains to be learned ? International Journal of the Sociology of Language62: 51-74.
18.
Crandall E., Basturkmen H. ( 2004) Evaluating pragmatics-focused materials. ELT Journal58(1): 38-49.
19.
Crawford J. ( 2006) Becoming an L2 user: implications for identity and culture in the language classroom. Studies about languages8: 70-76.
20.
Ellis R. ( 1997) The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials . ELT Journal51(1): 36-42.
21.
Ellis R. ( 2008) The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Eslami-Rasekh Z. ( 2005) Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners . ELT Journal59(3): 199-208.
23.
Gass S., Houck N. ( 1999) Interlanguage Refusals. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
24.
Giles H., Coupland J., and Coupland N. ( 1991) Contexts of Accommodation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
25.
Graddol D. ( 2006) English Next. London: British Council.
26.
Grant L., Starks D. ( 2001) Screening appropriate teaching materials: closing from textbooks and television soap operas. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching39(1): 39-50.
27.
Han C. ( 1992) A comparative study of compliment responses: Korean females in Korean interactions and in English interactions. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics2 (Fall): 17-31.
28.
Herbert RK ( 1989) The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: a contrastive sketch. In: Olesky W (ed.) Contrastive Pragmatics. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 3-35.
29.
Hinkel E. ( 1996) When in Rome: evaluations of L2 pragmalinguistic behaviour . Journal of Pragmatics26(1): 51-70.
30.
Holmes J., Brown DF ( 1987) Teachers and students learning about compliments . TESOL Quarterly21(3): 523-46.
31.
Holmes J. ( 1986) Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English . Anthropological Linguistics28(4): 485-508.
32.
House J. ( 2003) Teaching and learning pragmatic fluency in a foreign language: the case of English as a lingua franca. In: Martínez Flor A, Usó Juan E, and Fernández Guerra A (eds) Pragmatic competence and foreign language teaching. Castelló de la Plana, Spain: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 133-59.
33.
Kachru B. ( 1989) Teaching world Englishes. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics15(1): 85-95.
34.
Kachru B. ( 1999) Asian Englishes: contexts, constructs and creativity . Keynote address from the 12th world congress of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Tokyo.
35.
Kasper G. ( 1997) Can pragmatic competence be taught? Available at http: //www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/
36.
Kasper G., Rose K. ( 2002) Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
Leech G. ( 1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London : Longman.
38.
McKay S. ( 2002) Teaching English as an International Language: Rethinking Goals and Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
McKay S. ( 2003) Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics13(1): 1-22.
40.
Miles P. ( 1994) Compliments and gender. University of Hawaii Occasional Papers Series 26: 85-137.
41.
Myers-Scotton C., Bernstein J. ( 1988) Natural conversation as a model for textbook dialogue . Applied Linguistics9: 372-84.
42.
Nguyen MTT ( 2005) Criticizing and responding to criticisms in a foreign language: a study of Vietnamese learners of English. PhD thesis , University of Auckland, New Zealand, UMI Dissertation Services UMI No 3189280.
43.
Nguyen MTT ( 2007a) Textbook evaluation: the case of English textbooks currently in use at Vietnam’s upper-secondary school. Unpublished research report, RELC SEAMEO, Singapore .
44.
Nguyen MTT ( 2007b) Learning to Give and Respond to L2 Critical Feedback: A Case of EFL Criticisms and Responses to Criticisms. Munchen, Germany: LINCOM Europa.
45.
Nunn R. ( 2007) Redefining communicative competence for international and local communities. Asian EFL Journal9(4): 77-110.
46.
Olshtain E., Cohen AD ( 1991) Teaching speech act behavior to nonnative speakers . In: Celce-Murcia M (ed.) Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Cambridge, MA : Newbury House/Harper Collins , 154-65.
47.
Pearson E. ( 1986) Agreement/disagreement: an example of results of discourse analysis applied to the oral English classroom. International Review of Applied Linguistics74: 47-61.
48.
Richards J. ( 2005) The Role of Textbooks in a Language Program. Available at http://www.professorjackrichards.com/work.htm
49.
Rose K., Kasper G. ( 2001) Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
50.
Rose K. ( 2001) Compliments and compliment responses in film: implications for pragmatics research and language teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching39(4): 309-26.
51.
Siegal M. ( 1996) The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics17(3): 356-82.
52.
Sheldon LE ( 1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT Journal42(4): 237-46.
53.
Thomas J. ( 1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics4: 91-112.
54.
Tran GQ ( 2004) The nature and conditions of pragmatic and discourse transfer in cross-cultural interaction investigated through naturalized role-play. Unpublished PhD dissertation, TheUniversity of Melbourne, Australia.
55.
Vellenga H. ( 2004) Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: how likely?TESL-EJ8(2): 1-18. Available at http://www.-writing.berkeley.edu/TESLEJ/ej30/a3.html
56.
Wolfson N., Manes J. ( 1980) The compliment as a social strategy. Papers in Linguistics13(3): 389-410.
57.
Wolfson N. ( 1989a) Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
58.
Wolfson N. ( 1989b) The social dynamics of native and non-native variation in complimenting behavior. In: Eisenstein M (ed.) The Dynamic Interlanguage. Empirical Studies in Second Language Variation. New York: Plenum Press, 219-36.
59.
Wong J. ( 2002) ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching40(1): 37-60.
60.
Yano Y. ( 2001) World Englishes in 2000 and beyond. World Englishes20(2): 119-31.
