English, the global lingua franca, enjoys a growing status worldwide. The high status of English is also linked to the increasing interest in teaching English to young learners (EYL), and is reciprocally linked to complex political, cultural and social forces. Research on the advantages of learning English at a young age is controversial and inconclusive, but despite uncertainties it seems that EYL will continue to be a growing trend. This study aimed to understand the forces that drive the EYL phenomenon and focuses on the analysis of parent’s discourse from a critical discursive sociocultural perspective. Findings illuminate the subtle, powerful ways in which parents’ discourse leads to the growing of EYL in Israel. Parents’ overenthusiasm to promote English in schools stems from their perceptions about the high value of English, global aspirations and their belief in the popular axiom ‘the younger the better’. Findings further suggest that decisions about EYL and its teaching are not necessarily based on professionals or academics but rather exist within the powers of the community, with parents being a dominant force.
Ben-RafaelE. (1994). Language, identity and social division: The case of Israel. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2.
Ben-RafaelE.SternbergY. (Eds.). (2001). Identity, culture and globalization. Leiden: Bill Publication.
3.
BialystokE. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 117–121.
4.
BialystokE.AbutalebiJ.BakT. H.BurkeD. M.KrollJ. F. (2016). Aging in two languages: Implications for public health. Ageing Research Reviews, 27, 56–60.
5.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (translated by NiceR).
6.
BourdieuP. (1991). Language and the symbolic power. Oxford: Polity Press.
7.
CarmelR. (2009). English for Young Learners (EYL) in Grades 1 and 2 in Israel: A critical discourse analysis. In
NikolovM. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 403–422). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
8.
CarmelR.BadashM. (2018). Views on attrition and retention among beginning English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers in Israel and implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 142–152.
9.
CoplandF.GartonS. (2013). Key themes and future directions in teaching English to young learners: Introduction to special issue. ELT Journal, 68, 223–230.
10.
CoplandF.GartonS.BurnsA. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 738–762.
11.
DewaeleJ.L.AlfawzanM. (2018). Does the effect of enjoyment outweigh that of anxiety in foreign language performance?Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 21–45.
12.
Donitsa-SchmidtS.ZuzovskyR. (2016). Quantitative and qualitative teacher shortage and turnover phenomenon. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 83–91.
13.
EdelenbosP.KubanekA. (2009). Early foreign language learning: Published research, good practice and main principles. In NikolovM. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 39–58). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
EneverJ.(Ed.). (2011). ELLiE. Early language learning in Europe. London: The British Council.
16.
EneverJ.MoonJ.RamanU. (Eds.). (2009). Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives. Reading: Garnet Education
17.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books (originally published as L’archéologie du savoir, 1969, Paris: Editions Gallimard).
18.
García MayoM.P.García LecumberriM.L.S (Eds.). (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19.
GartonS.CoplandF.BurnsA. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. Aston University: British Council.
20.
GeeJ.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. London: Routledge.
21.
GeeJ.P. (2005). An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
22.
GeeJ.P. (2011). How to do discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.
23.
GeeJ.P.HullG.LankshearC. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalist. Boulder, CO: Westview / Harper Collins.
24.
HuY. (2007). China’s foreign language policy on primary English education: What’s behind it?Language Policy, 6, 59–82.
25.
Inbar-LourieO.ShohamyE. (2009). Assessing young language learners: What is the construct? In NikolovM. (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 83–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
26.
IngersollR.M. (1999a). Teacher turnover, teacher shortage and the organization of schools. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
27.
IngersollR.M. (1999b). The Problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26–37.
28.
JaskowR.J.EllisM. (Eds.) (2018). Early instructed second language acquisition: Pathway to competence. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
29.
MannS. (2016). The research interview: Reflexive practice and reflexivity in the research process. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
Martijn WillemseT.M.ThompsonI.VanderlindeR.MuttonT. (2018). Family-school partnerships: A challenge for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44, 252–257.
MoyerA. (2014). What’s age got to do with it? Accounting for individual factors in second language accent. Studies in Second language Learning and Teaching, 4, 433–464.
35.
MuñozC.SingletonD. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44, 1–35.
36.
NikolovM. (2016). Trends, issues, and challenges in assessing young language learners. In NikolovM. (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1–18). New York: Springer.
37.
NikolovM.Mihaljević DjigunovićJ. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234–260.
38.
NikolovM.Mihaljević DjigunovićJ. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95–119.
39.
NunanD. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 589–612.
40.
OlshtainE. (2008). Parents demand! English from grade 1. In KashtiO., Haaretz Newspaper, 7February 2008. Retrieved first on 2.2.2012 and on 1.11.2018.
41.
OlshtainE.Inbar-LourieO. (2014). Survey of the teaching of English in Israel: 2012–2013. Commissioned by the Clore Israel Foundation Board of Trustees. The NCJW Research Institute of Innovation in Education. Available at: http://www.knesset.gov.il/mmm/data/pdf/m03491.pdf [Hebrew].
42.
OrI.ShohamyE. (2017). English education policy in Israel. In KirkpatrickR. (Ed.), English language education policy in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 63–75). Cham: Springer International.
43.
PfenningerS.E.SingletonD. (2017). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning: Revisiting the age factor. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
44.
PhilpJ.OliverR.MackayD. (Eds.), (2008). Second language acquisition and the younger learner child’s play?Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45.
PillayH.GoddardR.WillsL. (2005). Well-being, burnout and competence: Implications for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 22–33.
TalmyS. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128–148.
48.
TalmyS.RichardsK. (2011). Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 1–5. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amq045.
49.
TamarizM.BlasiD.E. (2016). Consequences of bilingual education in primary and secondary schools in the Madrid region (Comunidad de Madrid). Madrid: Consejeria de Education, Juvendud y Deporte, Comunidad de Madrid. Available at: https://pureapps2.hw.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/14113573/Tamariz_Blasi_2016.pdf (accessed October 2019).
Van DijkA.T. (2002). Critical discourse analysis. In SchiffrinD.TannenD. (Eds.). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
Van DijkA.T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis and context. Unpublished presentation at the first Annual International Conference of Critical Discourse Analysis, Valencia, Spain.
VysvalaiE. (2017). Limudei anglit bagil harah ubakitot hanemuchot shel beit sefer hayesodi[English for Young Learners in the Elementary school]. Report submitted to the committee for children’s rights, meeting on 13.2.2017. Available at: http://fs.knesset.gov.il//20/Committees/20_cs_bg_368533.pdf [Hebrew] (accessed October 2019).
55.
WodakR. (Ed.) (2013). Critical discourse analysis: Four volumes. London: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
