This paper is motivated by the premise that little is known about the use of requestive strategies in request emails in Chinese English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) context. Specifically, the paper examines and compares requestive strategies in request emails between two groups of university students, namely English majors (EM) and non-English majors (NEM). It then explores whether the assessments of three situational factors: assessments of social distance, power and rank of imposition, either alone or combined, has a statistically significant effect on the choice of requestive strategies by the two groups. In reference to some existing similar research, the paper argues that both groups under study seemed to exhibit inadequate sociopragmatic competence and pragmalinguistic knowledge. The study thus sheds some light on Interlanguage Pragmatics research on the Chinese EFL context. The paper finally offers some pedagogical implications in foreign language settings.
Al-AliMSahawnehM (2008) An investigation into the generic features of American and Jordanian English requestive e-mail messages. LSP and Professional Communication8(2): 40-65.
2.
BaronNS (2000) Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where it’s Heading. New York: Routledge.
3.
Biesenbach-LucasS (2006) Making requests in email: do cyber-consultations entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium. In: Bardovi-HarligKFélix-BrasdeferFCOmarA (eds) Pragmatics and Language Learning. Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii, 81-108.
4.
Biesenbach-LucasS (2007) Students writing emails to faculty: an examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology11(2): 59-81.
5.
Blum-KulkaSHouseJKasperG (1989) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Request and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
Blum-KulkaSOlshtainE (1984) Requests and apologies: a cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics5(3):196-213.
7.
Bou-FranchPLorenzo-DusN (2005) Enough DCTs: moving methodological debate in pragmatics into the 21st century. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, Indiana University, Bloomington.
8.
BrownPLevinsonS (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChangYHsuY (1998) Requests on e-mail: a cross-cultural comparison. RELC Journal29(2): 121-51.
10.
ChenCFE (2001) Making e-mail requests to professors: Taiwanese vs. American students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, St. Louis, February 2001. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 461 299).
11.
ChenCFE (2006) The development of e-mail literacy: from writing peers to writing to authority figures. Language, Learning and Technology10(2): 35-55.
12.
CrystalD (2001) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Economidou-KogetsidisM (2008) Internal and external mitigation in interlanguage request production: the case of Greek learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research4(1): 111-38.
14.
Economidou-KogetsidisM (2010) Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behaviour: perceptions of social situations and strategic usage of request patterns. Journal of Pragmatics42(8). doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.00110.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.001.
15.
HartfordBBardovi-HarligK (1996) ‘At your earliest convenience:’ a study of written student requests to faculty. In: BoutonLF (ed.) Pragmatics and Language Learning7: 55-69.
16.
HendriksB (2010) An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in e-mails in English. Intercultural Pragmatics7(2): 221-55.
17.
KasperG (1997) Can pragmatic competence be taught?Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center. Available at: www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/
18.
KasperG (2000) Data collection in pragmatics research. In: Spencer-OateyH (ed.) Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London and New York: Continuum, 316-41.
19.
LeeCFK (2004) Written Requests in Emails Sent by Adult Chinese Learners of English. Language, Culture and Curriculum17(1): 58-71.
20.
LeechGN (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.
21.
LiaoCC (1997) Comparing Directives: American English, Mandarin, and Taiwanese English. Taipei: Crane Publishing Company.
22.
LinYH (2009) Query preparatory modals: cross-linguistic and cross-situational variations in request modification. Journal of Pragmatics41:1636-656.
23.
MurrayDE (1995) Knowledge Machines: Language and Information in a Technological Society. New York: Longman.
24.
O’NeillRColleyA (2006) Gender and status effects in student e-mails to staff. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning22: 360-67.
25.
RoseK (1994) Pragmatics conscious-raising in an EFL context. In: BoutonLKachruY (eds) Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph SeriesVol. 5, 52-63.
26.
RoseK (2000) An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic developmentStudies in Second Language Acquisition22(1): 27-67.
27.
SearleJ (1979) Expressions and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
TaguchiN (2011) Teaching pragmatics: trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics31: 289-30.
29.
TatayamaY (2001) Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines. In: RoseKKasperG (eds) Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 200-22.
WeasenforthDBiesenbach-LucasS (2001) Just a little bit longer: a contrastive pragmatic analysis of requests for late submission. In: The Annual Convention of the American Association of Applied Linguistics. St. Louis, MO.
32.
WoodfieldHEconomidou-KogetsidisM (2010) ‘I just need more time’: a study of native and non-native students’ requests to faculty for an extension. Multilingua29: 77-118.
33.
WorrelsDS (2002) Asynchronous distance learning: e-mail attachments used as the medium for assigned coursework. Atea Journal29(2): 4-6.
34.
YamashitaS (2008) Investigating interlanguage pragmatic ability: what are we testing. In: SolerEMartinez-FlorA (ed.) Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 201-23.
35.
Yeung LorritaNT (1997) Polite requests in English and Chinese business correspondence in Hong Kong. Journal of Pragmatics27: 505-22.
36.
ZhuW (2011) Managing rapport in Chinese and English requestive emails to university instructors. Paper presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference in Manchester, UK, 3-8 July 2011.
