Smartphones have become an integral part of daily life, yet their impact on the attentional and affective system remains uncertain. This study investigates whether using smartphones during breaks between cognitive tasks influences subsequent performance and mind wandering compared to sitting quietly. Using a within-subjects design, participants completed a 2-back task and took short breaks during which they either used their smartphones or sat quietly without using their smartphones. We measured task performance and mind wandering frequencies during the 2-back task as well as mind wandering during breaks, participants’ mood before and after the breaks, and their tendency to check their smartphones spontaneously in daily life. The results revealed no significant differences in mind wandering frequency during the two types of breaks. Additionally, there were no significant differences in subsequent task performance or mind wandering frequency between smartphone and no-smartphone breaks. However, participants felt more positive after smartphone than no-smartphone breaks, and their tendency to check their smartphones spontaneously was positively correlated with this positive mood improvement. These findings suggest that brief smartphone use during breaks may enhance mood, but do not affect performance or mind wandering in a subsequent cognitive task.
BerntsenD.HoyleR. H.MøllerD. M.RubinD. C. (2023). Digital daydreaming: Introducing the spontaneous smartphone checking scale. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.4034
2.
BradleyA. H. M.HowardA. L. (2023). Stress and mood associations with smartphone use in university students: A 12-Week longitudinal study. Clinical Psychological Science, 11(5), 921–941. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026221116889
3.
BradleyM. M.LangP. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
7.
FergusonC. J. (2025). Longer-term interventions to reduce social media time do not improve mental health: A reply to Thrul et al. (2025). Psychology of Popular Media, 14(2), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000592
8.
FergusonC. J.KayeL. K.Branley-BellD.MarkeyP. (2024). There is no evidence that time spent on social media is correlated with adolescent mental health problems: Findings from a meta-analysis. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 56(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000589
9.
HalperinJ. M.SharmaV.GreenblattE.SchwartzS. T. (1991). Assessment of the continuous performance test: Reliability and validity in a nonreferred sample. Psychological Assessment, 3(4), 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.4.603
10.
HeitmayerM.LahlouS. (2021). Why are smartphones disruptive? An empirical study of smartphone use in real-life contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 116(106637). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106637
HeltonW. S.RussellP. N. (2017). Rest is still best. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 59(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816683509
KaneM. J.GrossG. M.ChunC. A.SmeekensB. A.MeierM. E.SilviaP. J.KwapilT. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1271–1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617706086
15.
KaneM. J.SmeekensB. A.MeierM. E.WelhafM. S.PhillipsN. E. (2021). Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports. Behavior research methods, 53(6), 2372–2411. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x
16.
KangS.KurtzbergT. R. (2019). Reach for your cell phone at your own risk: The cognitive costs of media choice for breaks. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 8(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.21
17.
KawashimaI.HinumaT.TanakaS. C. (2023). Ecological momentary assessment of mind-wandering: Meta-analysis and systematic review. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29854-9
18.
KhayretdinovaM. (2022). Mind wandering in a smartphone world: The impact of pervasive smartphone usage on mind wandering and attentional restoration. Harvard University Division of Continuing Education. Unpublished Master's thesis.
MarkowitzD. M.HancockJ. T.BailensonJ. N.ReevesB. (2019). Psychological and physiological effects of applying self-control to the mobile phone. PLoS One, 14(11), Article e0224464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224464
23.
McVayJ. C.KaneM. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 35(1), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014104
24.
MinichM.MorenoM. (2024). Real-world adolescent smartphone use is associated with improvements in mood: An ecological momentary assessment study. PLoS One, 19(5), Article e0298422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298422
OlsonJ. A.SandraD. A.ColucciÉ. S.BikaiiA. A.ChmoulevitchD.NahasJ.RazA.VeissièreS. P. (2021). Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta analysis of 24 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 129(107138). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107138
27.
RalphB.SmithA. C.SeliP.SmilekD. (2020). Yearning for distraction: Evidence for a trade-off between media multitasking and mind wandering. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000186
28.
RummelJ.BoywittC. D. (2014). Controlling the stream of thought: Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0580-3
29.
RummelJ.HagemannD.SteindorfL.SchubertA. (2022). How consistent is mind wandering across situations and tasks? A latent state–trait analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 48(10), 1385–1399. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001041
30.
RummelJ.WöstenfeldF. O.SteindorfL.RöerJ. P. (2023). Effects of cognitive load on perceived internal and external distraction and their relationship with attentional control. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576
31.
SheltonJ. T.ElliottE. M.EavesS. D.ExnerA. L. (2009). The distracting effects of a ringing cell phone: An investigation of the laboratory and the classroom setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.001
32.
SimorP.VékonyT.FarkasB. C.SzalárdyO.BogdányT.BrezóczkiB.CsifcsákG.NémethD. (2025). Mind wandering during implicit learning is associated with increased periodic EEG activity and improved extraction of hidden probabilistic patterns. Journal of Neuroscience, 45(19), Article e1421242025. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.142124.2025
SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2014). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
35.
StothartC.MitchumA.YehnertC. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100b
36.
Van DoornJ.Van Den BerghD.BöhmU.DablanderF.DerksK.DrawsT.EtzA.EvansN. J.GronauQ. F.HaafJ. M.HinneM.KucharskýŠ.LyA.MarsmanM.MatzkeD.GuptaA. R. K. N.SarafoglouA.StefanA.VoelkelJ. G.WagenmakersE. (2020). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
ZanescoA. P.DenkovaE.JhaA. P. (2024). Mind-wandering increases in frequency over time during task performance: An individual-participant meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 151(2), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000424
