The Influence of Probe Frequency on Self-Reported Mind Wandering During Tasks With Different Cognitive Loads

Abstract

The use of thought-probe methodologies during tasks with varying loads has become commonplace. The current study aimed to investigate whether there exists an interaction between probe frequency and task load on responses of mind wandering episodes, using within-subject designs. In Experiment 1, We performed 0-back, 1-back, and 3-back tasks, in which low-frequency and high-frequency thought probes were presented to the participants. The results indicated that fewer probes led to more reported mind wandering episodes during 0-back and 1-back tasks. Conversely, a significant increase in mind wandering was observed in the 3-back task when higher-frequency probes were used. Experiment 2 introduced the probe relatedness dimension to the medium- and high-load tasks. Both experiments demonstrated that increasing probe frequency reduced mind wandering during the low- and medium-load tasks, but increased it during the high-load task. Additionally, Experiment 2 revealed that higher probe frequency resulted in more probe-related mind wandering during the high-load task, but not during the medium-load task. The current findings reveal the interaction effect of probe frequency and task load on mind wandering and offer possible explanations.

Keywords

Mind wandering thought probe task demand task performance interaction effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axelrod

Rees

Lavidor

Bar

(2015). Increasing propensity to mind-wander with transcranial direct current stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(11), 3314–3319. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421435112

Bertossi

Ciaramelli

(2016). Ventromedial prefrontal damage reduces mind-wandering and biases its temporal focus. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(11), 1783–1791. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw099

Brainard

D. H.

(1997). The psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 433–436.

Christoff

Gordon

A. M.

Smallwood

Smith

Schooler

J. W.

(2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–8724. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900234106

Christoff

Mills

Andrews-Hanna

J. R.

Irving

Z. C.

Thompson

Fox

K. C. R.

Kam

J. W. Y.

(2018). Mind-wandering as a scientific concept: Cutting through the definitional haze. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(11), 957–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.07.004

Forster

Lavie

(2009). Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. Cognition, 111(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006

Greve

Was

C. A.

(2022). Mind wandering probes as a source of mind wandering depends on attention control demands. Consciousness and Cognition, 103, 103355–103355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2022.103355

Jordano

M. L.

Touron (2018) How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 25(4): 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1490-1

Y.-J.

Lien

Y.-W.

(2018). Who is prone to wander and when? Examining an integrative effect of working memory capacity and mindfulness trait on mind wandering under different task loads. Consciousness and Cognition, 63, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.06.006

10.

Kahneman

Krueger

A. B.

Schkade

D. A.

Schwarz

Stone

A. A.

(2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103572

11.

Kam

J. W.

Handy

T. C.

(2014). Differential recruitment of executive resources during mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.03.002

12.

Kane

M. J.

Brown

L. H.

McVay

J. C.

Silvia

P. J.

Myin-Germeys

Kwapil

T. R.

(2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychological Science, 18(7), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01948.x

13.

Kane

M. J.

Meier

M. E.

Smeekens

B. A.

Gross

G. M.

Chun

C. A.

Silvia

P. J.

Kwapil

T. R.

(2016). Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(8), 1017–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000184

14.

Killingsworth

M. A.

Gilbert

D. T.

(2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330(6006), 932–932. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439

15.

Kline

R. B.

(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.

16.

Konishi

Brown

Battaglini

Smallwood

(2017). When attention wanders: Pupillometric signatures of fluctuations in external attention. Cognition, 168, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.006

17.

Konishi

McLaren

D. G.

Engen

Smallwood

(2015). Shaped by the past: The default mode network supports cognition that is independent of immediate perceptual input. Plos One, 10(6), e0132209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132209

18.

Krimsky

Forster

D. E.

Llabre

M. M.

Jha

A. P.

(2017). The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory. Cognition, 169, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.006

19.

Kucyi

Esterman

Riley

C. S.

Valera

E. M.

(2016). Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13899–13904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611743113

20.

Levinson

D. B.

Smallwood

Davidson

R. J.

(2012). The persistence of thought: Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science, 23(4), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611431465

21.

Marcusson-Clavertz

Cardeña

Terhune

D. B.

(2016). Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering: Integrating two hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000180

22.

McVay

J. C.

Kane

M. J.

(2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and schooler (2006) and watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018298

23.

McVay

J. C.

Meier

M. E.

Touron

D. R.

Kane

M. J.

(2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006

24.

Robison

M. K.

Miller

A. L.

Unsworth

(2019). Examining the effects of probe frequency, response options, and framing within the thought-probe method. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01212-6

25.

Ruby

Smallwood

Sackur

Singer

(2013). Is self-generated thought a means of social problem solving? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00962

26.

Rummel

Boywitt

C. D.

(2014). Controlling the stream of thought: Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(5), 1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0580-3

27.

Schooler

J. W.

Reichle

E. D.

Halpern

D. V.

(2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). MIT Press.

28.

Schubert

A. L.

Frischkorn

G. T.

Rummel

(2020). The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing. Psychological Research, 84(7), 1846–1856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01194-2

29.

Seli

Carriere

J. S. A.

Levene

Smilek

(2013). How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 430–430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430

30.

Seli

Kane

M. J.

Smallwood

Schacter

D. L.

Maillet

Schooler

J. W.

Smilek

(2018). Mind-wandering as a natural kind: A family-resemblances view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(6), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.03.010

31.

Shulley

L. J.

Shake

M. C.

(2016). Investigating the relationship between bilingualism, cognitive control, and mind wandering. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28, 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1128438

32.

Smallwood

Obonsawin

Reid

(2002). The effects of block duration and task demands on the experience of task unrelated thought. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.2190/TBML-N8JN-W5YB-4L9R

33.

Smallwood

Schooler

J. W.

(2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946

34.

Smallwood

Schooler

J. W.

(2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331

35.

Teasdale

J. D.

Dritschel

B. H.

Taylor

M. J.

Proctor

Lloyd

C. A.

Nimmo-Smith

Baddeley

A. D.

(1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory and Cognition, 23(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197257

36.

Weinstein

(2018). Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 642–661. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9

37.

Wiemers

E. A.

Redick

T. S.

(2019). The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(1), 367–373. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1529-3

38.

Zavagnin

Borella

De Beni

(2014). When the mind wanders: Age-related differences between young and older adults. Acta Psychologica, 145, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.016