Spanish Translation,Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis of a Short Version of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale in Chilean Public Workers

Abstract

Chile has been facing socio-cognitive, affective and cultural tensions and changes due to the constant increase of the migrant population in Chile over the last two decades. This means that local public policy workers must interact and achieve effective communication with migrant users living in their territories. Intercultural sensitivity is understood as the affective dimension of intercultural communication. This dimension facilitates the awareness that people differ in their behaviors, perceptions and feelings during intercultural communication processes, promoting acceptance and respect towards these differences. The aim of this paper was to analyze the factor structure, psychometric properties and invariance of the Intercultural Sensitivity scale (Chen & Starosta, 2000) in a sample of Chilean workers. The sample consists of 337 workers from five municipalities in two regions of Chile. The sample has a mean age of 42.8 years (SD = 10.4), and 62.9% report being female. To determine the factor structure, an unweighted least squares (ULS) parameter estimation method was used, which is recommended for relatively small sample sizes, as is the case in this study. The overall structure of the original scale, although showing adequate indicators in a confirmatory factor analysis, presented serious conflicts in the covariance matrix used. Therefore, the 5-factor structure seen in other studies is disconfirmed. Because of this, it was decided to construct an abbreviated version, but reducing the limitations encountered during the validation process. The final result is a 4-dimensional structure, corresponding to four of the original dimensions, with a total of 13 items. The goodness-of-fit indices (CFI, TLI, RMSEA and SRMR) had optimal levels. The Manifest and Subtle Prejudice scale was used for its divergent validity, presenting all the dimensions of the instrument, and its total score, inverse and significant correlations with manifest prejudice, subtle prejudice, and total prejudice, as expected.

Keywords

Intercultural sensitivity psychometric analysis council workers unweighted least squares parameter estimation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albiero

Matricardi

(2013). Empathy towards people of different race and ethnicity: Further empirical evidence for the Scale of Ethnocultural Empathy. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(5), 648–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.05.003.

Alonso

(2011). El impacto de la diversidad socio-cultural en la escuela primaria desde la perspectiva del docente: perfil psico-social y (re)construcción de significados. Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.

Aninat

Vergara

(Eds.). (2019). Inmigración en Chile: Una mirada multidimensional (Primera edición). Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bahar-Özvarış

Ş.

Güçiz-Doğan

Konşuk-Ünlü

Şanver

Susuz

Ç.

Sullivan

(2022). Adaptation of intercultural sensitivity scale for Turkish medical students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 88, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.04.010

Barreiro

Ungaretti

Etchezahar

(2019). Representaciones sociales y prejuicio hacia los indígenas en Argentina. Revista de Psicología, 37(2), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201902.007.

Bennett

M. J.

(1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90005-2.

Berry

J. W.

(1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.

Bhawuk

Sakuda

K. H.

Munusamy

V. P.

(2008). Intercultural competence development and triple-loop cultural learning: Toward a theory of intercultural sensitivity. In Van Dyne

S. A. y L.

(Ed.), Handbook of cultural intelligence. Routledge.

Bourhis

Dayan

(2004). Acculturation orientations towards Israeli arabs and Jewish immigrants in Israel. International Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000358.

10.

Bourhis

Moïse

Perreault

Senécal

(1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32(6), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075997400629.

11.

Cárdenas Castro

M. C.

(2010). Forms of ethnic prejudice: Assessing the dimensionality of a Spanish-language version of the blatant and subtle prejudice scale. Psicothema, 22(1), 118–124. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/727/72712699019.pdf.

12.

Chang

(2023). Validation of intercultural sensitivity and respect for diversity scale (RDS) in a Korean sample. Multicultural Education Review, 15(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615X.2023.2250712.

13.

Chen

(2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.

14.

Chen

G. M.

Starosta

(1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Communication Yearbook, 19(1), 353–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1996.11678935.

15.

Chen

G. M.

Starosta

W. J.

(1998). Foundations of intercultural communication. Allyn and Bacon. Retrieved from. https://books.google.fr/books?id=7QceAAAACAAJ.

16.

Chen

G. M.

Starosta

W. J.

(2000). The development and validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale. Human Communication, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/t61546-000

17.

Chen

Benet-Martínez

Harris Bond

(2008). Bicultural identity, bilingualism, and psychological adjustment in multicultural societies: Immigration-based and globalization-based acculturation. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 803–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00505.x.

18.

Cheung

G. W.

Cooper-Thomas

H. D.

Lau

R. S.

Wang

L. C.

(2023). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y. Avance en línea.

19.

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

20.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.

21.

Dejours

(1980). Trabajo y desgaste mental. Editorial Lumen.

22.

Doornik

J. A.

Hansen

(2008). An omnibus test for univariate and multivariate normality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(s1), 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00537.x.

23.

Dovidio

J. F.

Hewstone

Glick

Esses

V. M.

(2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n1

24.

D’Urso

De Roover

Vermunt

Tijmstra

(2022). Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches. Behavior Research Methods, 54(5), 2114–2145. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01690-7.

25.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.

26.

Galaz

Poblete

Frías

(2017). Las operaciones de exclusión de personas inmigradas a través de las políticas públicas en Chile. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 68, 169–204. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n68.a138

27.

Gil-Monte

P. R.

(2005). El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo: Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar. Pirámide.

28.

Gómez

Etchezahar

Albalá

M. A.

Maldonado

(2023). Validation of the intercultural sensitivity scale in the Spanish context. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1208081. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1208081

29.

Hammer

M. R.

Bennett

M. J.

Wiseman

(2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(03)00032-4.

30.

Henríquez

Mondaca

(2020). Niveles de prejuicio sutil y manifiesto en estudiantes universitarios aymaras y connacionales en la frontera norte de Chile. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(esp.13), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4292710.

31.

Henze

Zirkler

(1990). A class of invariant consistent tests for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics, 19(10), 3595–3617. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929008830400.

32.

Hernando

(2019). Es un largo camino todavía: inmigrantes, pobreza y vulnerabilidad en Chile. In Vergara

I. A. y R.

(Eds.), Inmigración en Chile: Una mirada multidimensional. Fondo de Cultura Económica – Centro de Estudios Públicos.

33.

Bentler

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

34.

Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas & Departamento de Extranjería y Migración (2023). Estimación de personas extranjeras residentes habituales en Chile. INE. Retrieved from. https://serviciomigraciones.cl/estudios-migratorios/estimaciones-de-extranjeros/#:∼:text=a%C3%B1o_de_estimaci%C3%B3n-,2022,-2021.

35.

Johnson

J. P.

Lenartowicz

Apud

(2006). Cross-cultural competence in international business: Toward a definition and a model. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400205.

36.

Klenner Loebel

M. P.

Gálvez-Nieto

J. L.

Beltrán-Véliz

J. C.

(2021). Factor structure of the Intercultural Sensitivity Scale (ISS) in a sample of university students from Chile. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.03.015.

37.

Lefringhausen

(2015). The extended acculturation model for locals: Validation, outcomes, and antecedents (Doctoral dissertation). Brunel University. Retrieved from. https://v-scheiner.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/11434.

38.

C.-H.

(2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093.

39.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

40.

Mardia

K. V.

(1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519.

41.

Martínez-Zelaya

Mera-Lemp

MJ.

Bilbao

(2021). Preferencias aculturativas y su relación con la sensibilidad intercultural y el bienestar. Revista de Psicología, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2020.55961

42.

Maynard-Moody

Portillo

(2010). Street level bureaucracy theory. In Durant

E. R. F.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.003.0011.

43.

McDonald

R. P.

(1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.

44.

Morales

Sanhueza

Friz

Riquelme

(2017). The intercultural sensitivity of Chilean Teachers serving an immigrant population in schools. Journal Of New Approaches In Educational Research, 6(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2016.8.173.

45.

Petrovic

Starcevic

Chen

G.-M.

Komnenic

(2015). Intercultural sensitivity scale: Proposal for a modified Serbian version. Psihologija, 48(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI1503199P.

46.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Meertens

R. W.

(1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420250106.

47.

Putnick

Bornstein

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

48.

Rothschild

(2009). Ayuda para el profesional de la ayuda. Psicofisiología de la fatiga por compasión y del trauma vicario. Desclée De Brouwer.

49.

Rueda

J. F.

Navas

(1996). Hacia una evaluación de las nuevas formas del prejuicio racial: Las actitudes sutiles del racismo. Revista de Psicología Social, 11(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1174/02134749660569314.

50.

Sanhueza-Henríquez

Cardona-Moltó

Friz-Carrillo

(2012). La sensibilidad intercultural en el alumnado de educación primaria y secundaria de la provincia de Alicante. Perfiles Educativos, 34(136), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2012.136.31754.

51.

Sapienza

Hichy

Guarnera

Nuovo

S. D.

(2010). Effects of basic human values on host community acculturation orientations. International Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207591003587978.

52.

Savalei

Rhemtulla

(2013). The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02049.x.

53.

Shi

Maydeu-Olivares

(2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164.

54.

Shi

Maydeu-Olivares

Rosseel

(2020). Assessing fit in ordinal factor analysis models: SRMR vs. RMSEA. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1611434.

55.

Sirlopú

Van Oudenhoven

J. P.

(2013). Is multiculturalism a viable path in Chile? Intergroup and acculturative perspectives on Chilean society and Peruvian immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 739–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.011.

56.

Snell

Zhou

(2015). Predicting acculturative orientations of American college students toward international students. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 44(3), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2015.1057860.

57.

Spencer-Rodgers

McGovern

(2002). Attitudes toward the culturally different: The role of intercultural communication barriers, affective responses, consensual stereotypes, and perceived threat. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(6), 609–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(02)00038-x.

58.

Stefoni

(2011). Perfil migratorio de Chile. Organización Internacional para las Migraciones OIM.

59.

Stephan

Lausanne Renfro

Esses

White Stephan

Martin

(2005). The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.011.

60.

Tamam

(2010). Examining chen and Starosta's model of intercultural sensitivity in a multiracial collectivistic country. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2010.534860.

61.

Vedder

Wenink

van Geel

(2016). Explaining negative outgroup attitudes between native Dutch and Muslim youth in The Netherlands using the integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 53, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.05.001

62.

Velasco González

Verkuyten

Weesie

Poppe

(2008). Prejudice towards Muslims in The Netherlands: Testing integrated threat theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x284443.

63.

Wang

Zhou

(2016). Validation of the short form of the intercultural sensitivity scale (ISS-15). International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.08.002

64.

Ward

Masgoret

A. M.

(2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration, and multiculturalism in New Zealand: A social psychological analysis. International Migration Review, 42(1), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00119.x.

65.

Xia

Yang

(2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2

66.

Yzerbyt

Demoulin

(2010). Intergroup relations. Handbook of social psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy00202.

67.

Zumbo

B. D.

Gadermann

A. M.

Zeisser

(2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1177992180.