Examining the concept of epistemic violence and its two antecedents, three strategies—developing Indigenous constructs and theories, going beyond the search for universals, and eliminating structural causes of violence—are proposed to generate dialogue between researchers for epistemic harmony.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
2.
BarashD. P. (1995). [Review of the book Race, evolution, and behavior, by J. Philippe Rushton]. Animal Behaviour. 49(4), 1131–1133.
3.
BennettM. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10(2), 179–196.
4.
BhawukD. P. S. (2003). Culture’s influence on creativity: The case of Indian spirituality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 1–22.
5.
BhawukD. P. S. (2008a). Globalization and Indigenous cultures: Homogenization or differentiation?International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.06.002
6.
BhawukD. P. S. (2008b). Science of culture and culture of science: Worldview and choice of conceptual models and methodology. The Social Engineer, 11(2), 26–43.
7.
BhawukD. P. S. (2009). Intercultural training for the global workplace: Review, synthesis, and theoretical explorations. In BhagatR. S.SteersR. (Eds.), Handbook of culture, organization, and work (pp. 462–488). Cambridge University Press.
BhawukD. P. S. (2017). lajjA in Indian psychology: Spiritual, social, and literary perspectives. In VanderheidenE.MayerC.- H. (Eds.), The value of shame–Exploring a health resource across cultures (pp. 109–134). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53100-7_5
10.
BhawukD. P. S. (2020). śraddhā: Construct definition from the Bhagavad-Gītā. Psychology and Developing Societies, 32(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971333620906758
11.
BrownD. E. (2000). Human universals and their implications. In RoughleyN. (Ed.), Being humans: Anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 156–174). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
GaltungJ. (1964). A structural theory of aggression. Journal of Peace Research, 1(2), 95–119.
14.
HeldB. S. (2020). Epistemic violence in psychological science: Can knowledge of, from, and for the (othered) people solve the problem?Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319883943
15.
HwangK. K. (2019). Positivism versus realism: Two approaches of Indigenous psychologies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000117
16.
KimU.YangK. S.HwangK. K. (2006). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. Springer.
17.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498.
18.
MarsellaA. J. (1998). Toward a “global-community psychology”: Meeting the needs of a changing world. American Psychologist, 53(12), 1282–1291.
19.
MisraG. (2004). Emotions in modern psychology and Indian thought. In JoshiK.CornelissenM. (Eds.), Consciousness, Indian psychology and yoga (pp. 426–435). Centre for Studies in Civilizations.
20.
ParanjpeA. C. (1998). Self and identity in modern psychology and Indian thought. Plenum.
21.
ParanjpeA. C. (2004). Building tall on solid foundations: Directions for Indigenous personality research in India. Psychological Studies, 49, 6–13.
22.
ParekhB. (2000). Rethinking multiculturalism (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
23.
RaoK. R. (2017). Foundations of yoga psychology. Springer.
SinhaJ. B. P. (2014). Psycho-Social analysis of the Indian mindset. Springer.
26.
SoamesS. (2010). Philosophy of language. Princeton University Press.
27.
SundararajanL. (2015). Understanding emotion in Chinese culture: Thinking through psychology. Springer.
28.
TakahashiJ. (1983). Porteus Hall 1974: Energy crisis and a controversy over naming. In KobayashiV. (Ed.), Building a rainbow (pp. 156–160). University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
29.
TriandisH. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. Wiley.
30.
TriandisH. C. (1990). Theoretical concepts of use to practitioners. In BrislinR. W. (Ed.), Applied cross-cultural psychology (pp. 34–55). SAGE.
31.
TriandisH. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. McGraw-Hill.
32.
YamaguchiS. (2004). Further clarifications of the concept of amae in relation to dependence and attachment. Human Development, 47(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000075367
