Relationships of Transformational and Paternalistic Leadership Styles With Follower Needs,Multidimensional Work Motivations and Organizational Commitment: A Mediated Model
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2026
Relationships of Transformational and Paternalistic Leadership Styles With Follower Needs,Multidimensional Work Motivations and Organizational Commitment: A Mediated Model
Paternalistic Leadership (PL) style is suggested to be an emic manifestation of Transformational Leadership (TL) in cultural contexts characterized by high power distance and collectivism. The present study investigated the effects of TL and PL behaviors on employees’ multidimensional work motivation and organizational commitment and the mediating effects of satisfaction of psychological needs (needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in these relationships. Data were collected from 423 white-collar employees and analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling. The findings revealed that TL was significantly related to employees’ autonomous and controlled work motivations as well as amotivation via its association with the satisfaction of employees’ needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness. PL was associated with employees’ autonomous work motivations and amotivation via satisfaction of employees’ need for relatedness. Autonomous motivations were positively associated with affective commitment; whereas controlled motivations were positively related to normative commitment. Amotivation was negatively associated with all types of commitment. The findings are discussed in terms of theoretical and practical implications as well as suggestions for future research.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
2.
AlturiqiA. S. (2019). Exploring the relationship between the components of transformational leadership and the satisfaction of the followers’ basic psychological needs in the public sector (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow.
3.
ArunK.GedikN. K.OkunO.SenC. (2021). Impact of cultural values on leadership roles and paternalistic style from the role theory perspective. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 17(3), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-10-2020-0128
4.
AsbariM.SantosoP. B.PrasetyaA. B. (2020). Elitical and antidemocratic transformational leadership critics: Is it still relevant? (A literature study). International Journal of Social Policy and Law, 1(1), 12–16.
5.
AvolioB. J. (1999). Full leadership development. Sage.
6.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (2001). Developing potential across a full range of leadership Tm: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
7.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317999166789
8.
AycanZ. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In YangK. S.HwangK. K.KimU. (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (pp. 445–466). Sage.
9.
AycanZ.SchynsB.SunJ. M.FelfeJ.SaherN. (2013). Convergence and divergence of paternalistic leadership: A cross-cultural investigation of prototypes. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(9), 962–969. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.48
10.
BakkerA. B.HetlandJ.OlsenO. K.EspevikR. (2022). Daily transformational leadership: A source of inspiration for follower performance?European Management Journal, 41(5), 700–708. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.04.004
11.
BassB. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
BonoJ. E.JudgeT. A. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040649
13.
BrunelleE.FortinJ. A. (2021). Distance makes the heart grow fonder: An examination of teleworkers’ and office workers’ job satisfaction through the lens of self-determination theory. Sage Open, 11(1), Article 215824402098551. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020985516
14.
BučiūnienėI.ŠkudienėV. (2008). Impact of leadership styles on employees’ organizational commitment in Lithuanian manufacturing companies. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10033-008-0015-7
15.
Cem ErsoyN.BornM. P.DerousE.van der MolenH. T. (2012). The effect of cultural orientation and leadership style on self-versus other-oriented organizational citizenship behaviour in Turkey and The Netherlands. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2012.01380.x
16.
ÇetinC.ToylanV. N.ÇakırelA. Ö.ÇakırelY. (2017). Paternalistic leadership and psychological well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. FSM Scholarly Studies Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (10), 81–113.
17.
ChiangC. F.WangY. Y. (2012). The effects of transactional and transformational leadership on organizational commitment in hotels: The mediating effect of trust. Journal of Hotel & Business Management, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0286.1000103
18.
ChoongY. O.LauT. C.WongK. L. (2011). Intrinsic motivation and organizational commitment in the Malaysian private higher education institutions: An empirical study. Researchers World, 2(4), 91.
19.
CongerJ.KanungoR. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.
20.
CredeM.JongJ.HarmsP. (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(3), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-11-2018-0506
21.
DeciE. L.OlafsenA. H.RyanR. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
22.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
23.
DönmezS. (2014). Developing a Likert-type measure to assess transformational and transactional leadership styles in Turkey. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University.
24.
ErbenG. S.GüneşerA. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9605-z
25.
EyalO.RothG. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
26.
FarhJ. L.ChengB. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
FarhJ. L.ChengB. S.ChouL. F.ChuX. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in China. In TsuiA. S.BianY.ChengL. (Eds.), China’s domestic private firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance (pp. 230–260). Sharpe.
28.
GagnéM.ChemolliE.ForestJ.KoestnerR. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organisational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48(2-3), 219. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb-48-2-3-219
29.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.Van den BroeckA.AspeliA. K.BelleroseJ.BenabouC.ChemolliE.GüntertS. T.HalvariH.IndiyastutiD. L.JohnsonP. A.MolstadM. H.NaudinM.NdaoA.OlafsenA. H.RousselP.WangZ.WestbyeC.HalvariH. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2013.877892
30.
GeorgeL.SabapathyT. (2011). Work motivation of teachers: Relationship with organizational commitment. Canadian Social Science, 7(1), 90–99.
31.
GilalF. G.ZhangJ.GilalN. G.GilalR. G. (2019). Linking self‐determined needs and word of mouth to consumer e‐waste disposal behaviour: A test of basic psychological needs theory. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1744
32.
GöncüA.AycanZ.JohnsonR. E. (2014). Effects of paternalistic and transformational leadership on follower outcomes. The International Journal of Management and Business, 5(1), 36–58.
33.
Göncü KöseA.MetinU. B. (2019). Hangi lider, kurumda kalmayı nasıl sağlıyor? Çok boyutlu iş motivasyonunun aracı rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 34(Özel Sayı), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320190402x000031
34.
Gözükaraİ.ŞimşekO. F. (2015). Linking transformational leadership to work engagement and the mediator effect of job autonomy: A study in a Turkish private non-profit university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195(3), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.274
35.
HaivasS.HofmansJ.PepermansR. (2014). “What motivates you doesn’t motivate me”: Individual differences in the needs satisfaction–motivation relationship of Romanian volunteers. Applied Psychology, 63(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00525.x
36.
HakimianF.FaridH.Nazari IsmailM.Arif IsmailI. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment. International Journal of Management Excellence, 3(1), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.17722/ijme.v3i1.148
37.
HebdaJ. M.VojakB. A.GriffinA.PriceR. L. (2007). Motivating technical visionaries in large American companies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2007.900791
38.
HetlandH.HetlandJ.Schou AndreassenC.PallesenS.NotelaersG. (2011). Leadership and fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs at work. Career Development International, 16(5), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431111168903
39.
HillerN. J.SinH. P.PonnapalliA. R.OzgenS. (2019). Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.003
HofstedeG.BondM. H. (1984). Hofstede’s culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002184015004003
42.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.
43.
ImamogluE. O.Karakitapoglu-AygunZ. (2004). Self-construals and values in different cultural and socioeconomic contexts. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130(4), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.3200/MONO.130.4.277-306
44.
JacksonT. (2016). Paternalistic leadership: The missing link in cross-cultural leadership studies?International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 16(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595816637701
45.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2017). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074017699470
46.
KirkmanB. L.ChenG.FarhJ. L.ChenZ. X.LoweK. B. (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744–764. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669971
47.
KovjanicS.SchuhS. C.JonasK. (2013). Transformational leadership and performance: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of basic needs satisfaction and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(4), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12022
48.
KovjanicS.SchuhS. C.JonasK.QuaquebekeN. V.Van DickR. (2012). How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self‐determination‐based analysis of employees’ needs as mediating links. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1771
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.57.9.705
51.
Madi OdehR. B.ObeidatB. Y.JaradatM. O.Masa'dehR. E.AlshuridehM. T. (2023). The transformational leadership role in achieving organizational resilience through adaptive cultures: The case of dubai service sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(2), 440–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-02-2021-0093
52.
ManaloR. A.de CastroB.UyC. (2020). The mediating role of job satisfaction on the effect of motivation to organizational commitment and work engagement of private secondary high school teachers in Metro-Manila. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(1), 133–159.
53.
ManikE. (2016). The influence of transformational leadership on achievement motivation and organizational climate and employee performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2522
54.
MansurJ.SobralF.GoldszmidtR. (2017). Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.06.003
55.
MartinezP. G. (2005). Paternalism as a positive form of leadership in the Latin American context: Leader benevolence, decisionmaking control and human resource management practices. In ElviraM.DavilaA. (Eds.), Managing human resources in Latin America: An agenda for international leaders (pp. 75–93). Routledge.
56.
MertS. I.KeskinN.BasT. (2010). Leadership style and organizational commitment: Test of a theory in Turkish banking sector. Journal of Academic Research in Economics, 2(1), 1–20.
57.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace. Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications.
58.
MeyerJ. P.ParfyonovaN. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 20(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.09.001
59.
NalM.BektaşG.TarımM. (2021). The effect of paternalist leadership on organizational citizenship behavior. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.836029
60.
ÖtkenA. B.CenkciT. (2012). The impact of paternalistic leadership on ethical climate: The moderating role of trust in leader. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1108-2
61.
ÖzçelikG.CenkciT. (2014). Moderating effects of job embeddedness on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and in-role job performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150(Special Issue), 872–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.096
62.
ParfyonovaN. M. (2009). Employee motivation, performance, and well-being: The role of managerial support for autonomy, competence and relatedness needs. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Western Ontario.
63.
PasaS. F.KabasakalH.BodurM. (2001). Society, organizations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: International Review, 50(4), 559–589.
64.
PellegriniE. K.ScanduraT. A.JayaramanV. (2007). Generalizability of the paternalistic leadership concept: A cross-cultural investigation (working paper). University of Missouri–St. Louis.
65.
Ping-yingH. (2017). The correlation between need satisfaction and learning motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v8i5.1888
66.
PradhanS.PradhanR. K. (2015). An empirical investigation of relationship among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment, and contextual performance. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 19(3), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262915597089
67.
RenX.CangX.RyderA. G. (2021). An integrated ecological approach to mapping variations in collectivism within China: Introducing the triple-line framework. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15(1), Article 183449092199143. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921991436
68.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guildford Press.
69.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194
70.
RyanW. S.RyanR. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162
71.
SelmaA. (2011). Job motivation and organizational commitment among the health professionals: A questionnaire survey. African Journal of Business Management, 5(21), 8601–8609. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.1086
72.
ShamirB.HouseR. J.ArthurM. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
73.
StenlingA.TafvelinS. (2014). Transformational leadership and well-being in sports: The mediating role of need satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 26(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2013.819392
74.
SungurC.ÖzerÖ.SaygiliM.UğurluoğluÖ. (2019). Paternalistic leadership, organizational cynicism, and intention to quit one’s job in nursing. Hospital Topics, 97(4), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2019.1655509
75.
ThomasD. C.LiaoY.AycanZ.CerdinJ. L.PekertiA. A.RavlinE. C.StahlG. K.LazarovaM. B.FockH.ArliD.MoellerM.OkimotoT. G.Van De VijverF. (2015). Cultural intelligence: A theory-based, short form measure. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(9), 1099–1118. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.67
76.
ThuyB.ThiN.VanY.NgocP. D. (2020). Employee commitment to organizational change with the role of job satisfaction and transformational leadership. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v2i1.51
77.
Van den BergheL.SoenensB.AeltermanN.CardonG.TallirI. B.HaerensL. (2014). Within-person profiles of teachers' motivation to teach: Associations with need satisfaction at work, need-supportive teaching, and burnout. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.04.001
78.
Van den BroeckA.FerrisD. L.ChangC. H.RosenC. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
79.
Van den BroeckA.HowardJ. L.Van VaerenberghY.LeroyH.GagnéM. (2021). Beyond intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis on self-determination theory’s multidimensional conceptualization of work motivation. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(3), 240–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211006173
80.
Van den BroeckA.VansteenkisteM.De WitteH.SoenensB.LensW. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work‐related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x481382
81.
WastiS. A. (1999, August). A cultural analysis of organizational commitment and turnover intentions in a collectivist society. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1999(1), B1–B6, https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.1999.27611264
82.
YuklG.Van FleetD. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 147–197). Consulting Psychologists Press.
83.
YüzbaşioğluN.DoğanO. (2018). Relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment in hospitality industry: Case of Antalya, Turkey. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(1), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2018-0017
