Signaling High Sensitivity to Influence Others: Initial Evidence for the Roles of Reinforcement Sensitivity,Sensory Processing Sensitivity,and the Dark Triad

Abstract

Signaling high sensitivity to others may help individuals with heightened sensitivity to stimuli to craft their social relations to a preferred activation level (“assertive signaling of specific needs” hypothesis). Signaling sensitivity could be also a deceptive strategy helping to extract resources or obtain the desired treatment (“deceptive signaling” hypothesis). The study presents the construction of the measure of signaling high sensitivity to influence others and an initial test of both hypotheses. Two hundred and one participants ranging in age from 18 to 67 (M = 25.6; SD = 7.03) reported on their reinforcement sensitivity (behavioral approach and inhibition system), sensory processing sensitivity, and the Dark Triad. Signaling high sensitivity to influence others was weakly, but significantly, associated with behavioral inhibition system sensitivity, which was consistent with the “assertive signaling of specific needs” hypothesis. The behavioral approach system was positively correlated with signaling high sensitivity, which indicated that this influence strategy could be treated as an assertive self-presentational strategy helping in achieving social rewards for individuals with high reward responsiveness. Narcissism and psychopathy accounted for an additional amount of variance in signaling high sensitivity over and beyond reinforcement sensitivity. This was consistent with the “deceptive signaling” hypothesis. Signaling high sensitivity could be regarded as a strategy to achieve social goals using deception rather than as an expression of sensitive personality.

Keywords

Highly sensitive person reinforcement sensitivity sensory processing sensitivity the dark triad social influence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alberti

R. E.

Emmons

M. L.

(1970). Your perfect right: A guide to assertive behavior. San Luis Obispo.

Arabi

(2020). The highly sensitive person’s guide to dealing with toxic people: How to reclaim your power from narcissists and other manipulators. New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

Aron

(2010). Psychotherapy and the highly sensitive person: Improving outcomes for that minority of people who are the majority of clients. Taylor and Francis.

Aron

E. N.

Aron

(1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345

Aron

E. N.

Aron

Jagiellowicz

(2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: A review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213

Back

M. D.

Küfner

A. C. P.

Dufner

Gerlach

T. M.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Denissen

J. J. A.

(2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431

Baryła-Matejczuk

Poleszak

Porzak

(2021). Short polish version of the highly sensitive person scale – exploring its multidimensional structure in a sample of emerging adults. In: Current issues in personality psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.107339

Belsky

Pluess

(2009). Beyond diathesis stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 135(6), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017376

Buss

D. M.

(1992). Manipulation in close relationships: Five personality factors in interactional context. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00981.x

10.

Buss

D. M.

Gomes

Higgins

D. S.

Lauterbach

(1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219

11.

Campbell

Manning

(2018). The rise of victimhood culture: Microaggressions, safe spaces, and the new culture wars. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70329-9

12.

Carver

S. White

L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319

13.

Choi

J. J.

Green

D. L.

Kapp

S. A.

(2010). Victimization, victims’ needs, and empowerment in victim offender mediation. International Review of Victimology, 17(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975801001700302

14.

Cooper

Gomez

(2008). The development of a short form of the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward Questionnaire. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(2), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.90

15.

Corr

P. J.

(2016). Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045

16.

Costa-López

Ferrer-Cascales

Ruiz-Robledillo

Albaladejo-Blázquez

Baryła-Matejczuk

(2021). Relationship between sensory processing and quality of life: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(17), 3961. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173961

17.

Dickinson

K. A.

Pincus

A. L.

(2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146

18.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

19.

Gerson

Plagnol

A. C.

Corr

P. J.

(2017). Passive and active Facebook use measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to the reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034

20.

Gibson

Sachau

(2000). Sandbagging as a self-presentational strategy: Claiming to be less than you are. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200261006

21.

Gomez

Stavropoulos

Watson

Brown

T. M.

Corr

P. J.

(2022). Unique associations of revised-reinforcement sensitivity theory constructs with social anxiety. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(5), 2838–2850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-021-00552-9

22.

Gray

J. A.

(1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behaviour and Brain Sciences, 5(3), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00013066

23.

Guadagnoli

Velicer

W. F.

(1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265

24.

Hart

Tortoriello

G. K.

Richardson

Breeden

C. J.

(2019). Profiles and profile comparisons between Dark Triad constructs on self-presentation tactic usage and tactic beliefs. Journal of Personality, 87(3), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12411

25.

Henson

R. K.

Roberts

J. K.

(2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485

26.

Heym

Ferguson

Lawrence

(2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013

27.

Iimura

(2021). Highly sensitive adolescents: The relationship between weekly life events and weekly socioemotional well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 112(4), 1103–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12505

28.

Iimura

Yano

Ishii

(2022). Environmental sensitivity in adults: Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the highly sensitive person scale 10-item version. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2047988

29.

Jauk

Knödler

Frenzel

Kanske

(2022). Do highly sensitive persons display hypersensitive narcissism? Similarities and differences in the nomological networks of sensory processing sensitivity and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 228–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23406

30.

Jonason

P. K.

Lyons

Baughman

H. M.

Vernon

P. A.

(2014). What a tangled web we weave: The Dark Triad traits and deception. Personality and Individual Differences, 70, 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.038

31.

Jonason

P. K.

Webster

G. D.

(2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023

32.

Jones

N. Paulhus

L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105

33.

Jung

W. H.

Lee

T. Y.

Kim

Lee

Lho

S. K.

Moon

S. Y.

Kwon

J. S.

(2021). Sex Differences in the behavioral inhibition system and ventromedial prefrontal cortex connectivity. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 17(6), 571–578 https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab118

34.

Koenig

A. M.

(2018). Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01086

35.

Konrad

Herzberg

P. Y.

(2019). Psychometric properties and validation of a German high sensitive person scale (HSPS-G). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(3), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000411

36.

Lee

S. J.

Quigley

B. M.

Nesler

M. S.

Corbett

A. B.

Tedeschi

J. T.

(1999). Development of a self-presentation tactics scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(4), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00178-0

37.

Lionetti

Aron

E. N.

Burns

G. L.

Jagiellowicz

Pluess

(2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: Evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0090-6

38.

Lionetti

Pastore

Moscardino

Nocentini

Pluess

(2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.05.013

39.

McNaughton

Corr

P. J.

(2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.0

40.

Miller

J. D.

Hoffman

B. J.

Gaughan

E. T.

Gentile

Maples

Keith Campbell

(2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x

41.

Nikitin

Freund

M. (2010). When wanting and fearing go together: The effect of co-occurring social approach and avoidance motivation on behavior, affect, and cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 783–804.

42.

Nitschinks

Tobin

S. J.

Vanman

E. J.

(2022). The dark triad and online self-presentation styles and beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, 111641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111641

43.

Qian

Strejcek

Aquino

(2021). Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1634–1661. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000329

44.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737

45.

Paulhus

D. L.

Curtis

S. R.

Jones

D. N.

(2018). Aggression as a trait: The dark tetrad alternative. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007

46.

Paulhus

D. L.

Williams

K. M.

(2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6

47.

Pluess

(2015). Individual differences in environmental sensitivity. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12120

48.

Pluess

Belsky

(2013). Vantage sensitivity: Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030196

49.

Rogoza

Cieciuch

(2019). Structural investigation of the short dark triad Questionnaire in polish population. Current Psychology, 38(3), 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9653-1

50.

Schütz

(1998). Assertive, offensive, protective, and defensive styles of self-presentation: A taxonomy. The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989809599293

51.

Semenyna

S. W.

Honey

P. L.

(2015). Dominance styles mediate sex differences in Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.046

52.

Smith

H. L.

Sriken

Erford

B. T.

(2019). Clinical and research utility of the highly sensitive person scale. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.3.03

53.

Smolewska

K. A.

McCabe

S. B.

Woody

E. Z.

(2006). A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “big five. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022

54.

Tucker

R. K.

Weaver

R. L.

Redden

E. M.

(1983). Differentiating assertiveness, aggressiveness, and shyness: A factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.607

55.

Włodarska

K. A.

Zyskowska

Terebus

M. K.

Rogoza

(2021). The dark triad and BIS/BAS: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 40(11), 5349–5357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00467-8

56.

Wolf

van Doorn

G. S.

Weissing

F. J.

(2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(41), 15825–15830. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805473105

57.

Worthington

R. L.

Whittaker

T. A.

(2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127

58.

Wytykowska-Kaczorek

Białaszek

Ostaszewski

(2015). Psychometric parameters of the Polish short version of sensitivity to punishment and reward scale. Studia Psychologiczne, 53(2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10167-010-0083-6

59.

Żemojtel Piotrowska

M. A.

Piotrowski

J. P.

Cieciuch

Calogero

R. M.

Van Hiel

Argentero

Baltatescu

Baran

Bardhwaj

Bukowski

Chargazia

Clinton

Halik

M. H. J.

Ilisko

Khachatryan

Klicperova-Baker

Kostal

Kovacs

Wills-Herrera

(2017). Measurement of psychological entitlement in 28 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000286

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.51 MB