A valuable goal for correctional settings is the application of workforce development education for incarcerated individuals as they prepare for the reentry process. Exploring the transitional bridge from prison to society signifies the need for “employment skills” that empower the formerly incarcerated to achieve employment success and avoid recidivism. The U-Work Program student volunteers teach reentry classes focused on workplace employment skills, including financial literacy, communications, resume writing, interviewing, and technology. This article showcases the themes that emerged from incarcerees’ responses in an exploratory study of the U-Work Program at a low-security federal facility in the Northeast, illustrating the importance of workforce development education in the reentry process.
Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1995). American ambivalence towards abortion policy: Development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1055–1082.
BozickR.SteeleJ.DavisL.TurnerS. (2018). Does providing inmates with education improve postrelease outcomes? A meta-analysis of correctional education programs in the United States. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(4), 389–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-018-9334-6
4.
ClarkM. (2022). Department of Justice ten-year recidivism study. Prison Legal News, 60.
5.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 27, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1086/652198
6.
DavisL. M.BozickR.SteeleJ. L.SaundersJ.MilesJ. N. V. (2013). A meta-analysis of programs that provide education to incarcerated adults. Bureau of Justice Assistance. Washington D.C.: Rand Corporation.
7.
FeldmanS. ((2003)). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). Oxford University Press.
8.
GarlandB.WodahlE.SchuhmannR. (2013). Value conflict and public opinion toward prisoner reentry initiatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411424081
9.
GillC.WilsonD. B. (2017). Improving the success of reentry programs: Identifying the impact of service-need fit on recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(3), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816682408
10.
KoschmannM. A.PetersonB. L. (2013). Rethinking recidivism: A communication approach to prisoner reentry. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(2), 188–208.
11.
KrisbergB.MarchionnaS. (2006). Attitudes of U.S. views toward prisoner rehabilitation and reentry policies.National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
12.
LappasC.SmithJ. (2022). Research on the effectiveness of reentry treatments. UNC School of Government.
13.
LattimoreP. K.VisherC. A. (2013). The impact of prison reentry services on short-term outcomes: Evidence from a multi-site evaluation. Evaluation Review, 37(3-4), 274–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13519105
14.
LongJ. S.SullivanC.WooldredgeJ.PompocoA.LugoM. (2017). Matching needs to services: Prison treatment program allocations. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 674–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818807952
15.
LugoM.WooldredgeJ.PompocoA.SullivanC.LatessaE. J. (2017). Assessing the impact of unit management programs on institutional misconduct and prison “returns.”. Justice Quarterly, 36(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.101080/07418825.2017.1357741
16.
McNeeleyS. (2022). A long-term follow-up evaluation of employment assistance reentry program. Justice Evaluation Journal, 5(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1965494
17.
MourãoA.SousaM.FerreiraM.GonçalvesL.CaridadeS.CunhaO. (2025). Beyond recidivism: A systematic review exploring comprehensive criteria for successful reintegration after prison release. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 52(8), 1173–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548251335322
18.
MuentnerL.CharlesP. (2020). A qualitative exploration of reentry service needs: The case of fathers returning from prison. Child Family Social Work, 25(Suppl 1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12714
19.
OgloffJ. R. P.DavisM. R. (2004). Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions or the risk-needs-responsivity approach. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662735
RussoJ.PetersonS.VermeerM.WoodsJ. D.JacksonD.AB. (2023). Improving employment outcomes for the federal bureau of prisons’ returning citizens. RAND Corporation, RR-A108-18.https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA108-18.html.
22.
TaxmanF. S.ByrneJ. M.YoungD. (2002). Offender’s views of reentry: Implications, processes, programs, and services. National Institute of Justice.
23.
VargheseF. P.CummingsD. L. (2012). Introduction: Why apply vocational psychology to criminal justice populations?The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 961–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012459363
24.
VisherC. A.TravisJ. (2011). Life on the outside: Returning home after incarceration. The Prison Journal, 91(3suppl), 1025–1195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415228
25.
WilsonD. B.GallagherC. A.MacKenzieD. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. Journal of Researchin Crime & Delinquency, 37(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037004001
