Can country leaders improve citizens’ ethnic outgroup views by changing ethnic representation in government? Years of pressure from the international community calling for leaders to make particularly their cabinets more ethnically representative seems to suggest that ethnic representation—conceptualized as descriptive and substantive representation and ministerial cooperation—is key to improving citizens’ outgroup views. I argue that increasing ethnic representation influences majority and minority citizens differently; minority citizens’ outgroup views will become more favorable, while majority citizens’ views will worsen. Using a pre-registered vignette experiment with ethnic Albanians and Macedonians in North Macedonia, I show that ethnic representation does not provide the improvements in outgroup relations that many have hoped. Both groups’ affect toward and perceptions of the cabinet change somewhat, but increasing ethnic representation does not improve overall outgroup attitudes. These results suggest that ethnic representation alone does not lead to more productive interethnic relationships.
AndradeEBArielyD (2009) The Enduring Impact of Transient Emotions on Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes109 (1): 1–8.
2.
AndreADepauwS (2017) The Quality of Representation and Satisfaction with Democracy: The Consequences of Citizen-Elite Policy and Process Congruence. Political Behavior39 (2): 377–397.
3.
ArnesenSPetersY (2018) The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions. Comparative Political Studies51 (7): 868–899.
4.
ArnesenSDuellDJohannessonMP (2019) Do Citizens Make Inferences from Political Candidate Characteristics When Aiming for Substantive Representation?Electoral Studies57: 46–60.
5.
ArriolaLR (2009) Patronage and Political Stability in Africa. Comparative Political Studies42 (10): 1339–1362.
6.
BahryDKosolapovMKozyrevaP, et al. (2005) Ethnicity and Trust: Evidence from Russia. American Political Science Review99 (4): 521–532.
7.
BaldwinKHuberJD (2010) Economic Versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision. American Political Science Review104 (4): 644–662.
8.
BanducciSADonovanTKarpJA (2004) Minority Representation, Empowerment, and Participation. The Journal of Politics66 (2): 534–556.
9.
BarnesTDSaxtonGW (2019) Working-Class Legislators and Perceptions of Representation in Latin America. Political Research Quarterly72 (4): 910–928.
10.
BizumicBDuckittJ (2018) Investigating Right Wing Authoritarianism with a Very Short Authoritarianism Scale. Journal of Social and Political Psychology6 (1): 129–150.
11.
BlondelJMuller-RommelF (eds) (1993) Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BogaardsM (2019) Consociationalism and Centripetalism: Friends or Foes?Swiss Political Science Review25 (4): 519–537.
13.
BoggildT (2020) Politicians as Party Hacks: Party Loyalty and Public Distrust in Politicians. Journal of Politics82 (4): 1516–1529.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaEDietrichD (2011) The Sweet Enchantment of Color-Blind Racism in Obamerica. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science634 (1): 190–206.
15.
BoyerMMAalderingLLechelerS (2020) Motivated Reasoning in Identity Politics: Group Status as a Moderator of Political Motivations. Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 21 November. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720964667.
16.
BrownRHewstoneM (2005) An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology37: 255–343.
17.
BrunnbauerU (2002) The Implementation of the Ohrid Agreement: Ethnic Macedonian Resentments. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe3 (1): 4.
18.
CameronCEpsteinDO’HalloranS (1996) Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review90 (4): 794–812.
19.
CampbellRCowleyPVivyanN, et al. (2019) Legislator Dissent as a Valence Signal. British Journal of Political Science49 (1): 105–128.
20.
CanelasCGisselquistRM (2018) Horizontal Inequality as an Outcome. Oxford Development Studies46 (3): 305–324.
21.
CarlsonE (2015) Ethnic Voting and Accountability in Africa: A Choice Experiment in Uganda. World Politics67 (2): 353–385.
22.
CasellasJPWallaceSJ (2015) The Role of Race, Ethnicity, and Party on Attitudes Toward Descriptive Representation. American Politics Research43 (1): 144–169.
23.
CedermanL-EWeidmannNBGleditschKS (2011) Horizontal Inequalities and Ethnonationalist Civil War: A Global Comparison. American Political Science Review105 (3): 478–495.
24.
CekaB (2018) Macedonia: A New Beginning?Journal of Democracy29 (2): 143–157.
25.
CelisKMazurAG (2012) Hanna Pitkin‘s “Concept of Representation” Revisited. Politics & Gender8 (4): 508–512.
26.
ChandraK (2004) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
CharnyshV (2015) Historical Legacies of Interethnic Competition: Anti-semitism and the EU Referendum in Poland. Comparative Political Studies48 (13): 1711–1745.
28.
CheesemanN (2011) The Internal Dynamics of Power-Sharing in Africa. Democratization18 (2): 336–365.
29.
CheesemanNTendiB-M (2010) Power-Sharing in Comparative Perspective: The Dynamics of “unity Government” in Kenya and Zimbabwe. The Journal of Modern African Studies48 (2): 203–229.
30.
ChildsSKrookML (2006) Do Women Represent Women? Rethinking the “Critical Mass” Debate. Politics & Gender2 (4): 522–530.
31.
ChildsSKrookML (2009) Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government and Opposition44 (2): 125–145.
32.
ClaytonAO’BrienDZPiscopoJM (2019) All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science63 (1): 113–129.
33.
CrowleyJE (2004) When Tokens Matter. Legislative Studies Quarterly29 (1): 109–136.
34.
CrowtherW (2017) Ethnic Condominium and Illiberalism in Macedonia. East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures31 (4): 739–761.
35.
CutlerF (2002) The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice. The Journal of Politics64 (2): 466–490.
36.
DinasEFoukaVSchlapferA (2021) Family History and Attitudes Toward Outgroups: Evidence from the European Refugee Crisis. The Journal of Politics. Epub ahead of print 8 April. DOI: 10.1086/710016.
37.
FeddesARMannLDoosjeB (2015) Increasing Self-Esteem and Empathy to Prevent Violent Radicalization: A Longitudinal Quantitative Evaluation of a Resilience Training Focused on Adolescents with a Dual Identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology45 (7): 400–411.
38.
FisherSDHeathAFSandersD, et al. (2015) Candidate Ethnicity and Vote Choice in Britain. British Journal of Political Science45 (4): 883–905.
39.
FontJWojcieszakMNavarroCJ (2015) Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes. Political Studies63 (S1): 153–172.
40.
ForgasJP (1995) Mood and Judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin117 (1): 39–66.
41.
FortunatoDStevensonRT (2013a) Perceptions of Partisan Ideologies: The Effect of Coalition Participation. American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 459–477.
42.
FortunatoDStevensonRT (2013b) Performance Voting and Knowledge of Cabinet Composition. Electoral Studies32 (3): 517–523.
43.
FrancoisPRainerITrebbiF (2015) How Is Power Shared in Africa?Econometrica83 (2): 465–503.
44.
FredricksonBL (2001) The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology: The Broaden-And Theory of Positive Emotions. American Psychologist56 (3): 218–226.
45.
GaertnerSLDovidioJ (2000) Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
46.
GayC (2002) Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship between Citizens and Their Government. American Journal of Political Science46 (4): 717–732.
47.
GublerJRKarpowitzCF (2019) Mixed Affective States and the Fundamental Challenge of Persuasion. In: Annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 5 April, Chicago, IL.
48.
GublerJRHalperinEHirschbergerG (2015) Humanizing the Out-Group in Contexts of Protracted Intergroup Conflict. Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (1): 36–46.
49.
HabyarimanaJHumphreysMPosnerDN, et al. (2007) Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?American Political Science Review101 (4): 709–725.
50.
HanniM (2017) Responsiveness—To Whom? Why the Primacy of the Median Voter Alienates Minorities. Political Studies65 (3): 665–684.
51.
HartzellCHoddieM (2003) Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management. American Journal of Political Science47 (2): 318–332.
52.
HawkesworthM (2003) Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions. American Political Science Review97 (4): 529–550.
53.
HeathRMSchwindt-BayerLATaylor-RobinsonMM (2005) Women on the Sidelines: Women’s Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures. American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 420–436.
54.
HewstoneMBrownR (eds) (1986) Contact and Conflict in Intergroup Encounters. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
55.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
HislopeR (1998) Ethnic Conflict and the “Generosity Moment.”Journal of Democracy9 (1): 140–153.
57.
HislopeR (2003) Between a Bad Peace and a Good War: Insights and Lessons from the Almost-War in Macedonia. Ethnic and Racial Studies26 (1): 129–151.
58.
HomolaJPereiraMMTavitsM (2020) Legacies of the Third Reich: Concentration Camps and Out-Group Intolerance. American Political Science Review114 (2): 573–590.
59.
HowellSEFaganD (1988) Race and Trust in Government: Testing the Political Reality Model. Public Opinion Quarterly52 (3): 343–350.
60.
JackmanMR (1977) Prejudice, Tolerance, and Attitudes Toward Ethnic Groups. Social Science Research6 (2): 145–169.
61.
JohnsonEJTverskyA (1983) Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45 (1): 20–31.
62.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica47 (2): 263–292.
63.
KasaraK (2013) Separate and Suspicious: Local Social and Political Context and Ethnic Tolerance in Kenya. The Journal of Politics75 (4): 921–936.
64.
KaufmanSJ (1996) Spiraling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in Moldova’s Civil War. International Security21 (2): 108–138.
65.
KellyL (2019) Overview of Research on Far Right Extremism in the Western Balkans. Technical Report Institute of Development Studies, Brighton.
66.
KiforduHA (2011) Ethnic Politics, Political Elite, and Regime Change in Nigeria. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism11 (3): 427–450.
67.
KingESamiiC (2018) Minorities and Mistrust: On the Adoption of Ethnic Recognition to Manage Conflict. Journal of Peace Research55 (3): 289–304.
68.
KoterD (2013) King Makers: Local Leaders and Ethnic Politics in Africa. World Politics65 (2): 187–232.
69.
KrookML (2015) Empowerment Versus Backlash: Gender Quotas and Critical Mass Theory. Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (1): 184–188.
70.
LaverMShepsleKA (eds) (1994) Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71.
LernerJSLiYValdesoloP, et al. (2015) Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology66 (1): 799–823.
72.
LetkiN (2008) Does Diversity Erode Social Cohesion? Social Capital and Race in British Neighbourhoods. Political Studies56 (1): 99–126.
73.
LiebermanESSinghP (2012) The Institutional Origins of Ethnic Violence. Comparative Politics45 (1): 1–24.
74.
LublinD (1999) Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critique of “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?”American Political Science Review93 (1): 183–186.
75.
McConnaughyCMWhiteIKLealDL, et al. (2010) A Latino on the Ballot: Explaining Coethnic Voting Among Latinos and the Response of White Americans. The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1199–1211.
76.
McDermottML (1998) Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections. Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
77.
McIntoshMMac IverMAAbeleDG, et al. (1995) Minority Rights and Majority Rule: Ethnic Tolerance in Romania and Bulgaria. Social Forces73 (3): 939–967.
78.
MansbridgeJ (1999) Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes. The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–657.
79.
MiodownikDNirL (2016) Receptivity to Violence in Ethnically Divided Societies: A Micro-level Mechanism of Perceived Horizontal Inequalities. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism39 (1): 22–45.
80.
MironovaVWhittS (2014) Ethnicity and Altruism After Violence: The Contact Hypothesis in Kosovo. Journal of Experimental Political Science1 (2): 170–180.
81.
ObergPOskarssonSSvenssonT (2011) Similarity Vs. Homogeneity: Contextual Effects in Explaining Trust. European Political Science Review3 (3): 345–369.
82.
O’BrochtaW (2020) Ethnic Diversity in Central Government Cabinets. Politics, Groups, and Identities. Epub ahead of print 7 May. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2020.1756360.
83.
OSCE (2012) The Ljubljana Guidelines on Integration of Diverse Societies & Explanatory Note. Technical Report OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, The Hague.
84.
OstbyG (2008) Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict. Journal of Peace Research45 (2): 143–162.
85.
PantojaADSeguraGM (2003) Does Ethnicity Matter? Descriptive Representation in Legislatures and Political Alienation Among Latinos. Social Science Quarterly84 (2): 441–460.
86.
PiacentiniAM (2019) State Ownership and State-Sharing: The Role of Collective Identities and the Sociopolitical Cleavage between Ethnic Macedonians and Ethnic Albanians in the Republic of North Macedonia. Nationalities Papers47 (3): 461–476.
87.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
88.
ReillyB (2012) Institutional Designs for Diverse Democracies: Consociationalism, Centripetalism and Communalism Compared. European Political Science11 (2): 259–270.
89.
RekaA (2008) The Ohrid Agreement: The Travails of Inter-Ethnic Relations in Macedonia. Human Rights Review9 (1): 55–69.
Ruiz-RufinoR (2013) Satisfaction with Democracy in Multi-ethnic Countries: The Effect of Representative Political Institutions on Ethnic Minorities. Political Studies61 (1): 101–118.
92.
SchildkrautDJ (2017) White Attitudes about Descriptive Representation in the US: The Roles of Identity, Discrimination, and Linked Fate. Politics, Groups, and Identities5(1):84–106
SiskTD (1996) Power Sharing and International Mediation in Ethnic Conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
95.
SomerM (2001) Cascades of Ethnic Polarization: Lessons from Yugoslavia. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science573 (1): 127–151.
96.
SpearsIS (2000) Understanding Inclusive Peace Agreements in Africa: The Problems of Sharing Power. Third World Quarterly21 (1): 105–118.
97.
SriramCLZaharM-J (2009) The Perils of Power-Sharing: Africa and Beyond. Africa Spectrum44 (3): 11–39.
98.
SteenAKuklysM (2010) Democracy by Elite Co-optation: Democratic Elitism in Multi-ethnic States. In: HigleyJBestH (eds) Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives Democratic Elitism. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, pp.193–209.
99.
StewartB (2019) From Adversaries to Allies: Ethnic Gerrymandering and Ethnic Party Behaviour in Local Elections in Macedonia. Nations and Nationalism25 (1): 318–339.
100.
StokesSCDunningTNazarenoM, et al. (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101.
StolleDSorokaSJohnstonR (2008) When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions. Political Studies56 (1): 57–75.
TateK (2003) Black Faces in the Mirror. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
104.
TezcurGMGursesM (2017) Ethnic Exclusion and Mobilization: The Kurdish Conflict in Turkey. Comparative Politics49 (2): 213–234.
105.
TougasFVeilleuxF (1988) The Influence of Identification, Collective Relative Deprivation, and Procedure of Implementation on Women’s Response to Affirmative Action: A Causal Modeling Approach. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement20 (1): 15–28.
106.
UlbigSG (2007) Gendering Municipal Government: Female Descriptive Representation and Feelings of Political Trust. Social Science Quarterly88 (5): 1106–1123.
107.
Van der MeerTTolsmaJ (2014) Ethnic Diversity and Its Effects on Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology40: 459–478.
108.
Van DijkTA (1992) Discourse and the Denial of Racism. Discourse & Society3 (1): 87–118.
109.
VillarrealA (2002) Political Competition and Violence in Mexico: Hierarchical Social Control in Local Patronage Structures. American Sociological Review67 (4): 477–498.
110.
WhitingMBauchowitzS (2020) The Myth of Power-Sharing and Polarisation: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Political Studies. Epub ahead of print 12 September. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720948662.
111.
WilsonMC (2020) A Closer Look at the Limits of Consociationalism. Comparative Political Studies53 (5): 700–733.
112.
YooS-j (2010) Two Types of Neutrality: Ambivalence Versus Indifference and Political Participation. The Journal of Politics72 (1): 163–177.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
