Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background: Accurate force control is essential for daily and sports performance, yet individuals differ in their ability to match intended and actual force. Little is known about how external feedback influences this ability or how individual differences can be quantified. Purpose: This study examined individual differences in matching intended grip force with actual force and clarified how repeated feedback affects accuracy across force levels. Research Design: A repeated-measures design was used in which participants performed multiple trials of a perceptually guided grip force task with external feedback. Study Sample: Forty-nine healthy young men completed 11 trials at three target forces (25%, 50%, and 75% of maximum voluntary contraction). Data Collection and Analysis: Accuracy was evaluated using the absolute value of the grip error (AE). A mixed-effects model assessed fixed effects of force level and trial number and random effects reflecting individual differences in accuracy and learning rate. Results: AE decreased across trials at all force levels, indicating improved accuracy with external feedback. Improvement varied by force level: AE was initially largest and decreased most at 75%, whereas 50% showed the slowest reduction. Random-effects analysis indicated differences in the force level at which participants were most accurate, suggesting preferred control levels. In contrast, individual differences in learning rates were small. Conclusions: Individuals vary in the force levels at which they perform most accurately, yet improvement through repeated external feedback is robust. These findings advance understanding of force control and individual differences in perceptually guided motor tasks.

Keywords

sense of effort grip force intended force individual differences force control motor learning repeated trials external feedback

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blazevich

Babault

(2019). Post-activation potentiation versus post-activation performance enhancement in humans: Historical perspective, underlying mechanisms, and current issues. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01359

Carter

M. J.

Carlsen

A. N.

Ste-Marie

D. M.

(2014). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance: A replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005). Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01325

Chiviacowsky

Wulf

(2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner’s performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 76(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2005.10599260

Christensen

M. S.

Lundbye-Jensen

Geertsen

S. S.

Petersen

T. H.

Paulson

O. B.

Nielsen

J. B.

(2007). Premotor cortex modulates somatosensory cortex during voluntary movements without proprioceptive feedback. Nature Neuroscience, 10(4), 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1873

Cooper

D. F.

Grimby

Jones

D. A.

Edwards

R. H.

(1979). Perception of effort in isometric and dynamic muscular contraction. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 41(3), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00430009

Davies

Marioni

R. E.

Liewald

D. C.

Hill

W. D.

Hagenaars

S. P.

Harris

S. E.

Ritchie

S. J.

Luciano

Fawns-Ritchie

Lyall

Cullen

Cox

S. R.

Hayward

Porteous

D. J.

Evans

McIntosh

A. M.

Gallacher

Craddock

Pell

J. P.

, …, & Deary

I. J.

(2016). Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank (N = 112 151). Molecular Psychiatry, 21(6), 758–767. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.45

Demetrashvili

Wit

E. C.

Heuvel van den

E. R.

(2016). Confidence intervals for intraclass correlation coefficients in variance components models. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(5), 2359-2376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280214522787

Enoka

R. M.

Stuart

D. G.

(1992). Neurobiology of muscle fatigue. Journal of Applied Physiology, 72(5), 1631–1648. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1992.72.5.1631

Erskine

R. M.

Jones

D. A.

Williams

A. G.

Stewart

C. E.

Degens

(2010). Inter-individual variability in the adaptation of human muscle specific tension to progressive resistance training. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 110(6), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1601-9

10.

Gomes

Gonçalves

A. D.

Pezarat-Correia

Mendonca

G. V.

(2025). Changes in H-reflex, V-wave, and contractile properties of the plantar flexors following concurrent exercise sessions—the acute interference effect. Journal of Applied Physiology, 138(2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00680.2024

11.

Haggard

Whitford

(2004). Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.018

12.

Harris

C. M.

Wolpert

D. M.

(1998). Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature, 394(6695), 780–784. https://doi.org/10.1038/29528

13.

Hayashi

Takahashi

Hayami

(2019). Effects of exercise experience during each educational stage on the coordination ability in grip strength of university students. Human Performance Measurement, 18, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.14859/jjtehpe.18.35

14.

Ingham

S. A.

Whyte

G. P.

Pedlar

Bailey

D. M.

Dunman

Nevill

A. M.

(2008). Determinants of 800-m and 1500-m running performance using allometric models. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(2), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a83dc

15.

Ito

Muraki

(2005). The effect of subjective effort on speed, stride frequency and length and movement in sprint running. The Japanese journal of sport methodology, 18(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.24776/jcoaching.18.1_61

16.

Ito

Sanjoh

(1985). The relationship between expected magnitude and produced magnitude in production of force and running time. Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences, 29(4), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003392165

17.

Jackson

A. W.

Dishman

R. K.

Martin

S. B.

(2002). Perceived leg extension and flexion forces of young adult men and women: Comparison to previous findings. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 73(2), 225–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2002.10609013

18.

Jackson

A. W.

Ludtke

A. W.

Martin

S. B.

Koziris

L. P.

Dishman

R. K.

(2006). Perceived submaximal force production in young adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 77(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2006.10599331

19.

John

E. B.

Liu

Gregory

R. W.

(2009). Biomechanics of muscular effort: Age-related changes. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(2), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181884480

20.

Jones

L. A.

Hunter

I. W.

(1982). The relation of muscle force and EMG to perceived force in human finger flexors. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 50(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00952251

21.

Kern

D. S.

Semmler

J. G.

Enoka

R. M.

(2001). Long-term activity in upper- and lower-limbmuscles of humans. Journal of Applied Physiology, 91(5), 2224–2232. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.2224

22.

Kumar

Simmonds

Lechelt

(1994). Maximal and graded effort perception by young females in stoop lifting, hand grip and finger pinch activity with comparisons to males. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 13(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)90059-0

23.

Kuppens

Van Mechelen

Nezlek

J. B.

Dossche

Timmermans

(2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment. Emotion, 7(2), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.262

24.

Lafargue

Sirigu

(2006). The nature of the sense of effort and its neural substrate. Revue Neurologique, 162(6-7), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0035-3787(06)75067-6

25.

Lee

Park

Lee

J. Y.

Park

(2024). Effect of Warm-Up exercise on functional regulation of motor unit activation during isometric torque production. Journal of Human Kinetics, 92(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.5114/jhk/185157

26.

K. W.

(2011). Assessment of grip force and subjective hand force exertion under handedness and postural conditions. Applied Ergonomics, 42(6), 929–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.001

27.

Martos-Moreno

G. A.

Chowen

J. A.

Argente

(2010). Metabolic signals in human puberty: Effects of over and undernutrition. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 324(1-2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2009.12.017

28.

McCloskey

D. I.

Macefield

Gandevia

S. C.

Burke

(1987). Sensing position and movements of the fingers. News in Physiological Sciences, 2(6), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1152/physiologyonline.1987.2.6.226

29.

Min

K. E.

Lee

Park

(2021). Changes in spinal-reflex excitability during static stretch and/or explosive contraction. Applied Sciences, 11(6), 2830. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062830

30.

Miyamoto

Kizuka

Ono

(2020). Influence of preceding muscle activity on perceptually guided force production during superimposed ballistic contraction. Physiology & behavior, 222, Article 112933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.112933

31.

Mooses

Haile

D. W.

Durussel

Kaasik

Pitsiladis

Y. P.

(2015). Dissociation between running economy and running performance in elite Kenyan distance runners. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.926384

32.

Morrin

N. M.

Stone

M. R.

Swaine

I. L.

Henderson

K. J.

(2018). The use of the CR-10 scale to allow self-regulation of isometric exercise intensity in pre-hypertensive and hypertensive participants. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 118(2), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3774-y

33.

Oliveira

J. H.

Gomes

J. S.

Bauer

Pezarat-Correia

Vaz

J. R.

(2025). Force fluctuations regulation and the role of neurophysiological mechanisms throughout different isometric contraction intensities. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 28442. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14543-6

34.

Onneweer

Mugge

Schouten

A. C.

(2016). Force reproduction error depends on force level, whereas the position reproduction error does not. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 9(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2015.2508799

35.

Pincivero

D. M.

Coelho

A. J.

Campy

R. M.

Salfetnikov

Suter

(2003). Knee extensor torque and quadriceps femoris EMG during perceptually-guided isometric contractions. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00096-2

36.

Preston

Wegner

D. M.

(2009). Elbow grease: When action feels like work. In Morsella

Bargh

J. A.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of human action. Social cognition and social neuroscience (pp. 569–586): Oxford University Press.

37.

Proske

Gandevia

S. C.

(2012). The proprioceptive senses: Their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiological Reviews, 92(4), 1651–1697. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2011

38.

Rewitz

Schindler

Wolff

(2023). Examining the alignment between subjective effort and objective force production. PsyArXiv. [Preprint]. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/vr2gn_v1

39.

Rizzato

Cantarella

Basso

Paoli

Rotundo

Bisiacchi

Marcolin

(2024). Relationship between intended force and actual force: Comparison between athletes and non-athletes. PeerJ, 12, Article e17156. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17156

40.

Sadamoto

Ohtsuki

(1977). Accuracy of output control in jumping: Characteristics in grading and reproduction of distance jnmped. Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences, 22(4), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.KJ00003392573

41.

Sakurada

Hirai

Watanabe

(2016). Optimization of a motor learning attention-directing strategy based on an individual's motor imagery ability. Experimental Brain Research, 234(1), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4464-9

42.

Salmoni

Schmidt

R. A.

Walter

C. B.

(1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355

43.

Schmidt

R. A.

Wulf

(1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872097778667979

44.

Seki

Nagashima

Yanagawa

Matsumoto

Yasui

(2010). The experience of exercise changes a grading ability of grip strength. Regional Studies, 7(1), 133–139.

45.

Shea

C. H.

Kohl

R. M.

(1990). Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 61(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1990.10608671

46.

Shea

J. B.

Morgan

R. L.

(1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179

47.

Stevens

J. C.

Cain

W. S.

(1970). Effort in isometric muscular contractions related to force level and duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(4), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210214

48.

Takahashi

Grove

P. M.

(2020). Use of stroop test for sports psychology study: Cross-over design research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 614038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614038

49.

Thompson

Gregory

J. E.

Proske

(1990). Errors in force estimation can be explained by tendon organ desensitization. Experimental Brain Research, 79(2), 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00608246

50.

Watanabe

Kanauchi

Ida

(2005). Reproducibility of grip strength in different posture and elbow position. The Journal of the Japanese Clinical Orthopaedic Association, 40(6), 665–671. https://doi.org/10.11477/mf.1408100122

51.

Weilharter

Rewitz

Halperin

Wolff

(2024). The relationship between prescribed ratings of perceived exertion and force production in repeated isometric contractions. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73, Article 102657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102657

52.

West

S. J.

Smith

Lambert

E. V.

Noakes

T. D.

St Clair Gibson

(2005). Submaximal force production during perceptually guided isometric exercise. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 95(5-6), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-0004-9

53.

Wiktorin

Selin

Ekenvall

Kilbom

Alfredsson

(1996). Evaluation of perceived and self-reported manual forces exerted in occupational materials handling. Applied Ergonomics, 27(4), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(96)00006-3

54.

Winstein

C. J.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677

55.

Wulf

Höß

Prinz

(1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601334

Quantifying Individual Differences in the Relationship Between Intended and Actual Force Across Repeated Trials With External Feedback

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References