Effects of Handwear and Hand Posture on Four Performance Measures in Foil Fencing

Abstract

In foil fencing, an adequate amount of hand forces and dexterity is extremely important in manipulating the foil and thus affecting the performance of a fencer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of handwear of fencing gloves and posture on four performance measures in foil fencing. Eight male fencers were tested in an experiment. Four measures of fencing performance were collected and analyzed. They were the grip and pinch forces under four hand postures and the hitting scores and motion time under a fundamental attacking scenario. Analysis of variance was conducted. Duncan's multiple range tests were conducted if a significance level of 0.05 was reached. The results showed that both the handwear condition and posture were significant on the grip force. The effects of posture on grip and pinch forces were both significant. Handwear affected hitting accuracy significantly. The effect of handwear on pinch force was not significant. The hitting scores for both the glove I and II conditions were significantly higher than the bare hand condition. The results in this study supported that selection of the thinnest glove resulted in relatively better performance for the fencers.

Keywords

glove materials grip force pinch force foil fencing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

S. K.

Peterson

P. J.

(1988), Maximum voluntary hand grip torque for circular electrical connectors, Human Factors 30(6), 733–745.

Batra

Bronkema

L.A.

Wang

M. J.

Bishu

R. R.

(1994). Glove attribute: Can they predict performance International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 14:201–209.

Bellingar

T. A.

Slocum

A. C.

(1993). Effect of protective gloves on hand movement: An exploratory study. Applied Ergonomics, 29, pp. 1055–1062.

Bensel

C. K.

(1993). The effects of various thickness of chemical protective gloves on manual dexterity. Ergonomics, 36(6), pp. 687–696.

Bradley

J.V.

(1969), Effect of gloves on control operation time. Human Factors 11, 13–20.

Buhman

D.C.

Cherry

J.A.

Bronkema-Orr

Bishu

(2000), Effects of glove, orientation, pressure, load, and handle on submaximal grasp force, Int J Ind Erg 25, 247–256.

Caldwell

L. S.

(1974). A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 35:201–206.

Crosnier

(1961). Fencing With the Electric Foil. Faber And Faber Ltd, London.

Hallbeck

M. S.

Mcmullin

D. L.

(1993). Maximal power grasp and three-jaw chuck pinch force as a function of wrist position, age, and glove type Int J Indl Erg, 11, pp. 195–206.

10.

Muralidhar

Bishu

R. R.

(1994). Glove evaluation: A lesson from impaired hand testing. Advance in Industrial Ergonomics and safety VI (edited by Aghazadeh

), Taylor and Francis, pp. 619–625.

11.

Plummer

Stobbe

Ronk

Myers

Kim

Jaraiedi

(1985). Manual dexterity evaluation of gloves used in handling hazardous materials. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29^th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, California, pp. 819–823.

12.

Shih

Y.C.

S.L.

Wang

M.J.

(1995), The effect of gloves on force exertions in the workplaces. J Occu Safety and Health 3(1), 1–16.

13.

Swanson

A. B.

Matec

I. B.

de Groot (1970). The strength of the hand, Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, pp. 145–153.

14.

Terrell

Purswell

(1976). The influence of forearm and wrist orientation on static grip strength as a design criterion for hand tools, Proceeding of the International Ergonomics Association, IEA College Park, Maryland, 1976: 28–32.

15.

Tsaousidis

Freivalds

(1983), Effects of gloves on maximum force and the rate of force development in pinch, wrist flexion and grip. Int J Ind Erg 21, 353–360.