Given the value of student engagement and its impact on academic performance, it is critical to identify factors that influence student engagement in different educational contexts. To do so, we examined the contributions of perceived teacher autonomy support and school climate in English as a foreign language (EFL) students’ learning engagement. We conducted online surveys of 331 Chinese intermediate English learners. We substantiated the validity of the survey scales for measuring these three latent variables through confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and we employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to identify interrelationships in these variables of interest. Both perceived teacher autonomy support and school climate were significantly and positively related to student engagement, with school climate more strongly correlated than teacher autonomy support. These findings suggest that teacher autonomy support and a positive school climate are important contributors to student engagement in EFL classrooms, and we discussed practical implications of these discoveries for EFL teachers.
AhmadiA.NoetelM.ParkerP.RyanR. M.NtoumanisN.ReeveJ.LonsdaleC. (2023). A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783
2.
AkramH.LiS. (2024). Understanding the role of teacher-student relationships in students’ online learning engagement: Mediating role of academic motivation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241248709
3.
AliverniniF.LucidiF. (2011). Relationship between social context, self-efficacy, motivation, academic achievement, and intention to drop out of high school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Education Research, 104(4), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003728062
4.
AndermanL.AndrzejewskiC. E.AllenJ. (2011). How do teachers support students’ motivation and learning in their classrooms?Teachers College Record, 113(5), 969–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300502
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
7.
BlumbergP.PontiggiaL. (2011). Benchmarking the degree of implementation of learner-centered approaches. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-010-9168-2
8.
BradshawC. P. (2015). Translating research to practice in bullying prevention. American Psychologist, 70(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039114
9.
ChirkovV. I.RyanR. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in Russian and US adolescents: Common effects on well-being and academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032005006
10.
CohenJ.GeierV. K. (2010). School climate research summary: January 2010. School Climate Brief, 1(1), 1–6.
11.
ConchasG. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino school engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.71.3.280w814v1603473k
12.
ConnellJ. P.WellbornJ. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes.
13.
DerakhshanA. (2022a). Revisiting research on positive psychology in second and foreign language education: Trends and directions. Language Related Research, 13(5), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.52547/LRR.13.5.1
14.
DerakhshanA. (2022b). The “5Cs” positive teacher interpersonal behaviors: Implications for learner empowerment and learning in an L2 context. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/9783031165276
15.
DerakhshanA.DewaeleJ.-M.Azari NoughabiM. (2022a). Modeling the contribution of resilience, well-being, and L2 grit to foreign language teaching enjoyment among Iranian English language teachers. System, 109, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102890
16.
DerakhshanA.FathiJ.PawlakM.KrukM. (2022b). Classroom social climate, growth language mindset, and student engagement: The mediating role of boredom in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407
17.
DerakhshanA.GreenierV.FathiJ. (2023). Exploring the interplay between a loving pedagogy, creativity, and work engagement among EFL/ESL teachers: A multinational study. Current Psychology, 42, 22803–22822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03371-w
DewaeleJ. M.ChenX.PadillaA. M.LakeJ. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
20.
DewaeleJ. M.SaitoK.HalimiF. (2022). How teacher behaviour shapes foreign language learners’ enjoyment, anxiety and attitudes/motivation: A mixed modelling longitudinal investigation. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221089601
21.
DisethÅ.DanielsenA. G.SamdalO. (2012). A path analysis of basic need support, self-efficacy, achievement goals, life satisfaction and academic achievement level among secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 32(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2012.657159
FathiJ.MohammaddokhtF. (2021). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety as the correlates of the ideal L2 self in the English as a foreign language context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 790648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790648
24.
FatouN.KubiszewskiV. (2018). Are perceived school climate dimensions predictive of students’ engagement?Social Psychology of Education, 21(2), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9422-x
25.
FinnJ. D.ZimmerK. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
26.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
27.
FredricksJ. A.FilseckerM.LawsonM. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
28.
FredricksJ. A.McColskeyW. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
29.
GaoY.WangX.FanP. (2024a). Exploring male English major’s motivation trajectory through complex dynamic systems theory. Current Psychology, 43(10), 9089–9100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05062-6
30.
GaoY.WangQ.WangX. (2024b). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: a study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173
31.
GestS. D.WelshJ. A.DomitrovichC. E. (2005). Behavioral predictors of changes in social relatedness and liking school in elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 43(4), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.06.002
32.
GuoY.WangY.Ortega-MartínJ. (2023). The impact of blended learning-based scaffolding techniques on learners’ self-efficacy and willingness to communicate. Porta Linguarum, 40(2), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi40.27061
33.
GutiérrezM.TomásJ. M. (2019). The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students’ academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educational Psychology, 39(6), 729–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1566519
34.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
35.
HanrahanM. (1998). The effect of learning environment factors on students’ motivation and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200609
36.
HiverP.Al-HoorieA. H.VittaJ. P.WuJ. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
37.
HospelV.GalandB. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001
38.
HuL.WangY. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychol11, 318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x
39.
HughesJ. N.ChenQ. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student–peer relatedness: Effects on academic self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005
40.
JiangL.MengH.ZhouN. (2021). English learners’ readiness for online flipped learning: Interrelationships with motivation and engagement, attitude, and support. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211027459
41.
JoeH. K.HiverP.Al-HoorieA. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005
42.
KarabchukT.RoshchinaY. (2022). Predictors of student engagement: The role of universities’ or importance of students’ background?European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2035240
43.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.) Guilford Press.
44.
KonoldT.CornellD.JiaY.MaloneM. (2018). School climate, student engagement, and academic achievement: A latent variable, multilevel multi-informant examination. Aera Open, 4(4), 2332858418815661. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418815661
45.
KonoldT.CornellD.ShuklaK.HuangF. (2017). Racial/ethnic differences in perceptions of school climate and its association with student engagement and peer aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0576-1
46.
LeeJ. S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.006
47.
LeeM.LouisK. S. (2019). Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.001
48.
LiC.WeiL. (2022). Anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom in language learning amongst junior secondary students in rural China: How do they contribute to L2 achievement?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000250
49.
LiS. (2022). Chinese English as a foreign language teachers’ immunity and mindfulness as predictors of their work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 874356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874356
LiS.AkramH. (2023). Do emotional regulation behaviors matter in EFL teachers’ professional development? A process model approach. Porta Linguarum An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi2023c.29654
52.
LiS.WuH.WangY. (2024). Positive emotions, self-regulatory capacity, and EF L performance in Chinese senior high school students. Acta Psychologica, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104143
LietaertS.RoordaD.LaeversF.VerschuerenK.De FraineB. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095
55.
LinJ.WangY. L. (2024). Unpacking the mediating role of classroom interaction between student satisfaction and perceived online learning among Chinese EFL tertiary learners in the normal of post-COVID-19. Acta Psychologica, 245(2024), 104233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104233
LumsdenL. S. (1994). Student motivation. Research Roundup, 10(3), n3.
58.
MaJ.LiY.GrundishN. S.GoodenoughJ. B.ChenY.GuoL.WanL. J. (2021). The 2021 battery technology roadmap. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 54(18), 183001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abd353
59.
MartinD. P.Rimm-KaufmanS. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math?Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001
MohammadiS.AliakbariM. (2018). Students’ perceived classroom climate and their achievement goal orientations in an Iranian EFL context. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 6(23), 129–145.
63.
MvududuN.LarocqueM. (2008). Hope, faith, and statistics: An examination of the relationship. Christian Higher Education, 7(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363750801891069
64.
Mystkowska-WiertelakA. (2022). Teachers’ accounts of learners’ engagement and disaffection in the language classroom. Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1800067
65.
NomnianS.ArphattananonT. (2018). A qualitative study on factors influencing achievement of English language teaching and learning in Thai government secondary schools. Asian EFL Journal, 20(6), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.2.04
66.
Oga-BaldwinW. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128
67.
Oga-BaldwinW. Q.NakataY.ParkerP.RyanR. M. (2017). Motivating young language learners: A longitudinal model of self-determined motivation in elementary school foreign language classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.01.010
68.
PajaresM. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
69.
PanZ.WangY.DerakhshanA. (2023). Unpacking Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement and psychological well-being: The roles of language teachers’ affective scaffolding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1799–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09974-z
70.
ParkerJ. S.ParrisL.LauM.DobbinsA.ShatzL.PorushS.WilkinsB. (2021). Perceived teacher autonomy support and self-determination skill expression: Predictors of student engagement among african American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 47(6), 445–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984211009190
71.
ParsonsJ.TaylorL. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1).
PatallE. A.DentA. L.OyerM.WynnS. R. (2013). Student autonomy and course value: The unique and cumulative roles of various teacher practices. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9305-6
74.
PatrickH.RyanA.KaplanA. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
75.
PawlakM.DerakhshanA.MehdizadehM.KrukM. (2021). The effects of class mode, course type, and focus on coping strategies in the experience of boredom in online English language classes. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211064944
76.
Pérez-GonzálezA. M.Valero-ValenzuelaA.Moreno-MurciaJ. A.Sánchez-AlcarazB. J. (2019). Systematic review of autonomy support in physical education. Apunts. Educació Física i Esports, 138, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.5672/apunts.2014-0983.cat.(2019/4).138.04
77.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.AllenJ. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
78.
PongS. L.ZeiserK. L. (2012). Student engagement, school climate, and academic achievement of immigrants’ children. https://doi.org/10.1037/13094-009
79.
QuJ.WangY. (2024). Modelling the interaction between EFL teachers' personality traits, emotion regulation strategies, and teachers' depression: A structural equation approach. European Journal of Education, e12727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12727
80.
RababahL. (2022). Overcoming barriers to student engagement online: Voices from L2 instructors. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 4, 685–693.
81.
ReeveJ. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
82.
ReeveJ. (2013). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
83.
ReeveJ.JangH.CarrellD.JeonS.BarchJ. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
84.
ReyesM. R.BrackettM. A.RiversS. E.WhiteM.SaloveyP. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268
85.
RiceL.BarthJ. M.GuadagnoR. E.SmithG.McCallumD. M. (2013). The role of social support in students’ perceived abilities and attitudes toward math and science. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1028–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9801-8
86.
RinehartS. J.EspelageD. L. (2016). A multilevel analysis of school climate, homophobic name-calling, and sexual harassment victimization/perpetration among middle school youth. Psychology of Violence, 6(2), 213. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039095
87.
RoordaD. L.KoomenH. M.SpiltJ. L.OortF. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
88.
RuzekE. A.HafenC. A.AllenJ. P.GregoryA.MikamiA. Y.PiantaR. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
89.
RyanA. M.PatrickH. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038002437
90.
SadoughiM.HejaziS. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 70, 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101060
91.
ScottT. M.HirnR. G.AlterP. J. (2014). Teacher instruction as a predictor for student engagement and disruptive behaviors. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(4), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2013.787588
92.
SinatraG. M.HeddyB. C.LombardiD. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
93.
SkinnerE.FurrerC.MarchandG.KindermannT. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840
94.
SolhiM.DerakhshanA.ÜnsalB. (2023). Associations between EFL students’ L2 grit, boredom coping strategies, and emotion regulation strategies: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2175834
95.
StefanouC. R.PerencevichK. C.DiCintioM.TurnerJ. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
96.
SuY. L.ReeveJ. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
ThapaA.CohenJ.GuffeyS.Higgins-D’AlessandroA. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
99.
TilgaH.HeinV.KokaA. (2017). Measuring the perception of the teachers’ autonomy-supportive behavior in physical education: Development and initial validation of a multi-dimensional instrument. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 21(4), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2017.1354296
100.
TsengW. T.SchmittN. (2008). Toward a model of motivated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning, 58(2), 357–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00444.x
101.
TuX. (2021). The role of classroom culture and psychological safety in EFL students' engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760903
102.
WangX.SunF.WangQ.LiX. (2022a). Motivation and affordance: a study of graduate students majoring in translation in China. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1010889. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1010889
103.
WangM. M.WangY. L. (2024a). A structural equation modeling approach in examining EFL students’ foreign language enjoyment, trait emotional intelligence, and classroom climate. Learning and Motivation, 86, 101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.101981
104.
WangM. T.DegolJ. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
105.
WangM. T.EcclesJ. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
106.
WangX.GaoY.SunF.WangQ. (2023a). Unveiling the tapestry of teacher belief research: Tracing the present and forging the future through bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05546-5
107.
WangX.ReynoldsB. L. (2024). Beyond the books: Exploring factors shaping Chinese English learners’ engagement with large language models for vocabulary learning. Education Sciences, 14(5), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050496
108.
WangY. (2023). Probing into the boredom of online instruction among Chinese English language teachers during the Covid-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04223-3
109.
WangY.DerakhshanA. (2023). Enhancing Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ willingness to attend classes: The role of teacher confirmation and caring. Porta Linguarum, 39(1), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.23625
110.
WangY.DerakhshanA.PanZ. (2022b). Positioning an agenda on a loving pedagogy in second language acquisition: Conceptualization, practice, and research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 894190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894190
111.
WangY.DerakhshanA.ZhangL. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
112.
WangX.GaoY.WangQ.ZhangP. (2024a). Relationships between self-efficacy and teachers’ well-being in middle school English teachers: The mediating role of teaching satisfaction and resilience. Behavioral Sciences, 14(8), 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14080629
113.
WangY.GuanH. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica, 29(1), 851.
114.
WangY. L.KrukM. (2024). Modeling the interaction between teacher credibility, teacher confirmation, and English major students’ academic engagement: A sequential mixed-methods approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38418
115.
WangX.WangS. (2024b). Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with large language models: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation, 87, 102014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102014
116.
WangY. L.WangY. X.PanZ. W.Ortega-MartínJ. L. (2023b). The predicting role of EFL students’ achievement emotions and technological self-efficacy in their technology acceptance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00750-0
117.
WangY.WuH.WangY. (2024b). Engagement and willingness to communicate in the L2 classroom: identifying the latent profiles and their relationships with achievement emotions. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2379534
WuH.WangY. S.WangY. L. (2024). How burnout, resilience, and engagement interplay among EFL learners: A mixed-methods investigation in the Chinese senior high school context. Porta Linguarum, 193–213. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viIX.29878
120.
WuH. W.WangY. L.WangY. S. (2023). What do we know about L2 teachers’ emotion regulation? A bibliometric analysis of the pertinent literature. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.2012
121.
YuS.ZhouN.ZhengY.ZhangL.CaoH.LiX. (2019). Evaluating student motivation and engagement in the Chinese EFL writing context. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 62, 129–141.
122.
ZakariyaY. F.GoodchildS.BjørkestølK.NilsenH. K. (2019). Calculus self-efficacy inventory: Its development and relationship with approaches to learning. Education Sciences, 9(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030170
123.
ZareJ.Aqajani DelavarK.DerakhshanA. (2023). The impact of altruism on the emotions and English summary writing skills of second language learners: An intervention study in light of positive psychology. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231151632
124.
ZhangH.SunC.LiuX.GongS.YuQ.ZhouZ. (2020). Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680
125.
ZhouS. A.HiverP. (2022). The effect of self-regulated writing strategies on students’ L2 writing engagement and disengagement behaviors. System, 106, 102768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102768
