This study aimed to analyze measurement invariance of the Behavioral Regulation Sports Questionnaire (BRSQ) across gender and four different sports. In addition, we examined nomological validity via basic psychological needs satisfaction. Participants totaled 1,812 Portuguese athletes (1,220 males and 592 females; aged 15–59 years, Mage = 17.72, SD = 5.51) from football (n = 596), basketball (n = 273), swimming (n = 800), and parasport (n = 143). The BRSQ measurement model was invariant across gender and these four sports. The scale confirmed nomological validity in that satisfaction of basic psychological needs positively predicted autonomous forms of motivation and negatively predicted more controlled motivation and amotivation as suggested by self-determination theory. In light of this evidence for BRSQ construct validity, composite reliability, nomological validity, and invariance across gender and four different sports, this scale is a useful tool for coaches of the aforementioned sports in their efforts to evaluate their athletes' motivation.
ÁlvarezM.BalaguerI.CastilloI.DudaJ. (2012) The coach-created motivational climate, young athletes' well-being, and intentions to continue participation. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology6(2): 166–179. doi:10.1123/jcsp.6.2.166.
2.
AssorA.VansteenkisteM.KaplanA. (2009) Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology101: 482–497. doi:10.1037/a0014236.
3.
BanackH.SabistonC.BloomG. (2011) Coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation of paralympic athletes. Research Quarterly for Sport and Exercise82(4): 722–730. doi:10.1080/027011367.2011.10599809.
4.
ByrneB. (2010) Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
5.
ChanD.HaggerM.SprayC. (2011) Treatment motivation for rehabilitation after a sport injury: Application of the trans-contextual model. Psychology of Sport and Exercise12(1): 83–92. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.08.005.
6.
ChenF. (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling14(3): 464–504.
7.
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E., … Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1.
ClancyR.HerringM.CampbellM. (2017) Motivation measures in sport: A critical review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology8: 348, . doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348.
10.
CostaR.ProbstM.BastosT.VilhenaE.SeabraA.CorredeiraR. (2017) Behavioural regulation in Exercise Questionnaire in people with schizophrenia: Construct validity of the Portuguese versions. Disability and Rehabilitation22: 1–8. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.134227.
11.
DeciE.RyanR. (2000) The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
12.
DeciE.RyanR. (2008) Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology49(3): 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801.
13.
FornellC.LarckerD. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
14.
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2014) Multivariate data analysis, (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
HancoxJ.QuestedE.VilladrichC.DudaJ. (2015) Examination of the internal structure of the behavioural regulation in sport questionnaire among dancers. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology13: 382–397. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2014.999347.
16.
HowardJ.GagnéM.BureauJ. (2017) Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin143: 1346–1377. doi:10.1037/bul0000125.
17.
JõseaarH.HeinV.HaggerM. (2012) Youth athlete's perception of autonomy support from the coach, peer motivational climate and intrinsic motivation in sport setting: One-year effects. Psychology of Sport and Exercise12: 257–262. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.12.001.
18.
LiuL.LiC.ZhuD. (2012) A new approach to testing nomological validity and its application to a second-order measurement model of trust. Journal of the Association for Information Systems13(12): 950–975.
19.
LonsdaleC.HodgeK.RoseE. (2008) The Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology30(3): 323–355. doi:10.1123/jsep.30.3.323.
20.
MarshH.HauK.WenZ. (2004) In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling11(3): 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
21.
MonteiroD.MarinhoD.MoutãoJ.CoutoN.AntunesR.CidL. (2016) Adaptation and validation of the Basic Psychological Needs Exercise Scale to the sport domain and invariance across soccer and swimming. Motricidade12(4): 51–61. doi:10.6063/motricidade.9372.
22.
MonteiroD.MoutãoJ.CidL. (2018) Validation of the Behavioral Regulation Sport Questionnaire in Portuguese athletes. Revista de Psicologia del Deporte27: 145–150.
23.
Moreno-MurciaJ.MarzoJ.Martínez-GalindoC.MarínL. (2011) Validación de la Escala de “Satisfacción de las Necesidades Psicológicas Básicas” y del Cuestionario de la “Regulación Conductual en el Deporte” al contexto español [Validation of Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise Scale and the Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire to the Spanish context]. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte7(26): 355–369. doi:10.5232/ricyde2011.02602.
24.
NevittJ.HancockG. (2001) Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling8(3): 353–377. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_2.
25.
PelletierL.FortierM.VallerandR.BrièreN. (2001) Association among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion25(4): 279–306. doi:10.1023/A:1014805132406.
26.
PelletierL.FortierM.VallerandR.TusonM.BriéreM.BlaisR. (1995) Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology17(1): 35–53. doi:10.1123/jsep.17.1.35.
27.
PelletierL.RocchiA.VallerandR.DeciE.RyanR. (2013) Validation of the revised Sport Motivation Scale (SMS-II). Psychology of Sport and Exercise14(3): 329–341. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.002.
28.
RyanR.DeciE. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist55: 68–78. doi:10.1037110003-066X.55.1.68.
29.
RyanR.DeciE. (2017) Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
30.
RyanR.ConnellJ. (1989) Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(5): 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022.3514.57.5.749.
31.
SarrazinP.VallerandR.GuilletE.PelletierL.CuryF. (2002) Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology32: 395–418. doi:10.1002/ejsp.98.
32.
SassD. (2011) Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a confirmatory factor analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment29: 347–363. doi:10.1177/0734282911406661.
33.
StenlingA.IvarssonA.LindwallM.GucciardiD. F. (2018) Exploring longitudinal measurement invariance and the continuum hypothesis in the Swedish version of the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ): An exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise36: 187–196. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.03.002.
34.
TsitskariE.VernadakisN.ForidouA.BebetsosE. (2015) Assessing adolescents. Sport participation motives: Psychometric evaluation of BRSQ. Motricidade11: 64–77. doi:10.6063/motricidade.3194.
35.
Villadrich, C., Appleton, P., Quested, E., Duda, J., Alcaraz, S., … Ntoumanis, N. (2013). Measurement invariance of the Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire when completed by young athletes across five European countries. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 384–394. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2013.830434.
36.
VilladrichC.TorregrosaM.CruzJ. (2011) Calidad psicométrica de la adaptación española del Cuestionario de Regulación Conductual en el Deporte [Psychometric quality supporting the Spanish adaptation of the Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire]. Psicothema23: 786–794. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2013.830434.
