Exploring the Connection Between End-of-Life Relational Communication and Personal Growth After the Death of a Loved One

Abstract

The purpose of the current investigation was to examine associations between final conversations (FCs; i.e., relational communication with a terminally ill individual from the moment of terminal diagnosis to death) with the outcome of personal growth (PG). A total of 236 individuals who had previously engaged in FCs with a deceased loved one participated in an online survey. Analyses revealed significant, positive associations between the six FCs factors (i.e., messages of love, messages of spirituality/religion, messages of identity, everyday talk and routine interactions, difficult relationship talk, and instrumental death talk) with the PG factors. Implications are discussed along with limitations and future directions.

Keywords

final conversations end-of-life communication health communication personal growth interpersonal communication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron

E. N.

Smollan

(1992). Inclusion of other in the self-scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596

Booth-Butterfield

Wanzer

M. B.

Weil

Krezmien

(2014). Communication of humor during bereavement: Intrapersonal and interpersonal emotion management strategies. Communication Quarterly, 62, 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2014.922487

Burgoon

J. K.

(1985). Nonverbal signals. In Knapp

M. L.

Miller

G. R.

(Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344–390). SAGE.

Bussolari

Habarth

Kimpara

Katz

Carlos

Chow

Osada

Carmack

B. J.

Field

N. P.

Packman

(2019). Posttraumatic growth following the loss of a pet: A cross-cultural comparison. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 78, 348–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222 817690403

Generous

M. A.

Keeley

M. P.

(2014). Creating the final conversations (FCs) scale: A measure of end of life relational communication with terminally ill loved ones. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 10, 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2014.938892

Generous

M. A.

Keeley

M. P.

(2017). Wished for and avoided conversations with terminally ill individuals during final conversations. Death Studies, 41(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2016.1236850

Goldsmith

Ragan

(2017). Palliative care and the family caregiver: Trading mutual pretense (empathy) for a sustained gaze (compassion). Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020019

Horan

S. M.

Martin

M. M.

Weber

(2012). Understanding emotional response theory: The role of power and justice messages. Communication Quarterly, 60, 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.66932

Jerga

A. M.

Shaver

P. R.

Wilkinson

R. B.

(2011). Attachment insecurities and identification of at-risk individuals following the death of a loved one. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510397987

10.

Joseph

Linley

P. A.

(2005). Positive adjustment to threatening event: An organismic valuing theory of growth through adversity. Review General Psychology, 9, 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.3.262

11.

Keeley

M. P.

(2007). Turning toward death together’: The functions of messages during final conversations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407507075412

12.

Keeley

M. P.

(2009). Comfort and community: Two emergent communication themes of religious faith and spirituality evident during final conversations. In Wills

(Ed.), Speaking of spirituality: Perspectives on health from the religious to the numinous (pp. 227–248). Hampton Press Health Communication Series.

13.

Keeley

M. P.

Generous

M. A.

(2015). The challenges of final conversations: Dialectical tensions during end-of-life family communication from survivors’ retrospective accounts. Southern Communication Journal, 80, 377–387. https://doi.org/101080/1041794X.2015.1081975

14.

Keeley

M. P.

Generous

M. A.

(2017). Final conversations: Overview and practical implications for patients, families, and healthcare workers. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020017

15.

Keeley

M. P.

Generous

M. A.

Baldwin

P. K.

(2014). Exploring children/adolescents’ final conversations with dying family members. Journal of Family Communication, 14, 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.908198

16.

Keeley

M. P.

Yingling

(2007). Final conversations: Helping the living and the dying talk to each other. VanderWyk & Burnham.

17.

Kubler-Ross

(1997). Living with death and dying. Simon & Schuster.

18.

McQuail

(1987). Functions of communication: A nonfunctionalist overview. In Berger

C. R.

Chaffee

S. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of communication science (pp. 327–349). SAGE.

19.

McQuellon

R. P.

Cowan

M. A.

(2000). Turning toward death together: Conversation in mortal time. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 17, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910001700508

20.

Metzger

P. L.

Gray

M. J.

(2008). End-of-life communication and adjustment: Pre-loss communication as a predictor of bereavement-related outcomes. Death Studies, 32, 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180801928923

21.

Mroz

E. L.

Bluck

Sharma

(2020). Loss in the life story: Remembering death and illness across adulthood. Psychological Reports, 123, 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119854175

22.

Nishi

Usuda

(2017). Psychological growth after childbirth: An exploratory prospective study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 38, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1233170

23.

Patterson

M. L.

(1992). A functional approach to nonverbal exchange. In Feldman

R. S.

Rime

(Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 458–495). Cambridge University Press.

24.

Rohrbaugh

Jessor

(1975). Religiosity in youth: A personal control against deviant behavior. Journal of Personality, 43, 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00577.x

25.

Rosenbach

Ronneberg

(2008). Positive change after severe burn injuries. Journal of Burn Care Research, 29, 638–643. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e31817de275

26.

Rossetto, K. R., Lannutti, P. J., & Strauman, E. C. (2015). Death on Facebook: Examining the roles of social media communication for the bereaved. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 974–994. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514555272

27.

Shavitt

Nelson

(2002). The role of attitude functions in persuasion and social judgment. In Dillard

Pfau

(Eds.), The persuasion handbook (pp. 137–153). SAGE.

28.

Svetina

Nastran

(2012). Family relationships and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients. Psychiatria Danubina, 3, 298–306.

29.

Tedeschi

R. G.

Calhoun

L. G.

(1996). Posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090305

30.

Wittenberg-Lyles

Goldsmith

Ragan

S. L.

Sanchez-Riley

(2010). Dying with comfort. Hampton Press, Inc.