Death is a ubiquitous theme in television dramas and we argued that mediated depictions of end-of-life experiences have the potential to provide glimpses into the ways in which characters experience real-life issues and can serve as conversation starters within family viewers. The study aimed to identify how a popular television drama, This is Us, depicted end-of-life communication. Analysis of season one revealed 54 conversations about end-of-life, two explicit death scenes, and three implied death scenes. Results also illustrate how the storyline within the show clearly depicts the impact end-of-life has on the family system, emphasizing the ongoing interdependence, hierarchy, and boundary (re)negotiation as a result of death. Findings advance understanding of how mediated narratives can illustrate end-of-life scenarios and conversations within the family system and can provide observational opportunities for modeling end-of-life communication behaviors within their families.
AltheideD. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. SAGE.
2.
BeckC. S.AubuchonS.SimmonsN.TenzekK. E.RuhlS. (2015). Celebrity health narratives and the public health. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers.
3.
BowenM. (1978). Family reaction to death. In BowenM. (Ed.), Family therapy in clinical practice (pp. 321–335). Jason Aronson.
4.
BuchanB.GibsonM.EllisonD. (2011). Reflection on the death scene. Cultural Studies Review, 17(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.5130/csr.v17i1
5.
CarrD.KhodyakovD. (2007). Health care proxies: Whom do young old adults choose and why?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 48(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650704800206. PMID: 17583273.
6.
CassellC.SymonG. (1994). Qualitative research in work contexts. In CassellC.SymonG. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research, a practical guide (pp. 1–13). SAGE.
7.
ChoiS. W.MurdockN. L. (2017). Differentiation of self, interpersonal conflict, and depression: The mediating role of anger expression. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9397-3
8.
ColmanI.KingsburyM.WeeksM.AtaullahjanA.BelairM.-A.DykxhoornJ.HynesK.LoroA.MartinM. S.NaickerK.PollockN.RusuC.KirkbrideJ. B. (2014). Cartoons kill: Casualties in animated recreational theater in an objective observational new study of kids’ introduction to loss of life. BMJ, 349(dec16 8), g7184. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7184
9.
CoxM.GarrettE.GrahamJ. A. (2005). Death in Disney films: Implications for children’s understanding of death. Omega—Journal of Death and Dying, 50(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.2190/Q5VL-KLF7-060F-W69V
10.
DanielE.WestermanD. (2017). Valar morghulis (all parasocial men must die): Having nonfictional responses to a fictional character. Communication Research Reports, 34(2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1285757
11.
DeGrootJ.LeithA. (2018). R.I.P. Kutner: Parasocial grief following the death of a television character. Omega, 77(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222815600450
12.
EllisC. (1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Temple University Press.
FitzgeraldK.FrancemoneC., & GrizzardM. (2020). Memorable, meaningful, pleasurable: An exploratory examination of narrative character deaths. OMEGA- Journal of Death and Dying, 1–23.
15.
FossK. A. (2020). Death of the slow-cooker or #CROCK-POTISINNOCENT? This is Us, parasocial grief, and the crock-pot crisis. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 44, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859919826534
16.
FreytagJ. (2012). Barriers that define a genre of shared decision making in palliative care communication. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 5(2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807612Y.0000000011
17.
FreytagJ.RamasubramanianS. (2019). Are television deaths good deaths? A narrative analysis of hospital death and dying in popular medical dramas. Health Communication, 34(7), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1434735
18.
GalvinK. M.DicksonF. C.MarrowS. R. (2006). Systems theory: Patterns and (w)holes in family communication. In BraithwaiteD. O.BaxterL. A. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 309–324). SAGE.
19.
GenerousM. A., & KeeleyM. (2017). Wished for and avoided conversations with terminally ill individuals during final conversations. Death Studies, 41(3), 162–172.
20.
GenerousM. A.KeeleyM. P. (2014). Creating and validating the final conversations (FCs scale: A measure of end of life relational communication with dying loved ones. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 10(3), 257–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15524256.2014.938892.
GrahamJ. A.YuhasH., & RomanJ. L. (2018). Death and coping mechanisms in animated disney movies: A content analysis of disney films (1937–2003) AND disney/pixar films (2003–2016). Social Sciences, 7(10), 199https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7100199
KeeleyM. P.GenerousM. A.BaldwinP. K. (2014). Exploring children/adolescents’ final conversations with dying family members. Journal of Family Communication, 14(3), 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.908198
25.
KeeleyM. P.YinglingJ. (2007). Final conversations: Helping the living and the dying talk to each other. VanderWyk & Burnham.
26.
MeceM. (2015). Impact of family structure changes on child wellbeing. Balkan Social Science Review, 6, 109–137.
OzcakirA.BilgelN. (2014). Education medical students about the personal meaning of terminal illness using the film, “wit”. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 17(8), 913–917. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0462
29.
Perry-FraserC.FraserR. (2018). A qualitative analysis of the stepparent role on transition days in blended families. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(8), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2018.68020
30.
SchrodtP.BraithwaiteD. O.SolizJ.Tye-WilliamsS.MillerA.Lamb NormandE.Marko HarriganM. (2007). An examination of everyday talk in stepfamily systems. Western Journal of Communication, 71(3), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310701510077
31.
ScottA. M.CaughlinJ. P. (2014). Enacted goal attention in family conversations about end-of-life health decisions. Communication Monographs, 81(3), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.925568
32.
SegrinC.FloraJ. (2011). Family communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
33.
SilveiraM. J.DiPieroA.GerrityM. S.FeudtnerC. (2000). Patients’ knowledge of options at the end of life: Ignorance in the face of death. JAMA, 284(19), 2483–2488.
34.
TenzekK. E.DepnerR. M. (2017). Still searching: A meta-synthesis of a good death from the family perspective. Special issue family communication at the end-of-life. Behavioral Sciences, 7(4), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020025
35.
TenzekK. E.NickelsB. (2019). End-of-Life (EOL) in Disney and Pixar films: An opportunity for engaging in difficult conversation. Omega, 80(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817726258
TildenV. P.TolleS. W.NelsonC. A.FieldsJ. (2001). Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. Nursing Research, 50(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200103000-00006
39.
TreesA. R.OhsJ. E.MurrayM. C. (2017). Family communication about end-of-life decisions and the enactment of the decision-maker role. Behavioral Sciences, (Basel, Switzerland), 7, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7020036
40.
WallaceC. L. (2015). Family communication and decision making at the end of life: A literature review. Palliative and Supportive Care, 13(3), 815–825.
41.
YektatalabS.OskoueeF. S.SodaniM. (2016). Efficacy of Bowen theory on marital conflict in the family nursing practice: A randomized controlled trial. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 38, 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/016128401261210
