We used latent class analysis to identify profiles of midlife and older Chinese adults’ preferences regarding involvement in three dimensions of end-of-life care: information exchange, deliberation, and decisional control. Data are from 548 urban and rural Shanghai residents aged 50+. We used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate associations between individual- and family-oriented beliefs and latent class membership. We identified four profiles. Lead decision-makers (49%) prefer to take charge of information exchange and final decisions, while valuing collaborative discussions. Autonomous decision-makers (19%) prefer making decisions without others’ input. Delegating decision-makers (16%) prefer that family or doctors decide. Acquiescent decision-makers (15%) prefer to follow their family’s wishes if discrepant preferences exist. Among family-oriented values, only strong extended familism beliefs were associated with delegating decision-making. Individuals’ desire for a “good death” was strongly linked to independent decision-making. Practitioners should assess, understand, and develop practices to ensure decision-making preferences are met in Chinese families.
BeanF. D.Curtis JrR. L.MarcumJ. P. (1977). Familism and marital satisfaction among Mexican Americans: The effects of family size, wife’s labor force participation, and conjugal power. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(4), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.2307/350480
2.
BirkelandS.BismarkM.BarryM. J.MöllerS. (2023). ‘My doctor should decide’–Predictors for healthcare users’ stated preferences regarding medical decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling, 114(2023), Article 107825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2023.107825
3.
BlairM. J. (1972). An evaluation of the bardis familism scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 34(2), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/350796
4.
BromL.PasmanH. R. W.WiddershovenG. A.van der VorstM. J.ReijneveldJ. C.PostmaT. J.Onwuteaka-PhilipsenB. D. (2014). Patients’ preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: Qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients. PLoS One, 9(6), Article e100435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100435
5.
CaoX.MaC.ZhengZ.HeL.HaoM.ChenX.LiuZ.GillT. M.LevineM. E. (2022). Contribution of life course circumstances to the acceleration of phenotypic and functional aging: A retrospective study. eClinicalMedicine, 51, 101548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101548
6.
CaoY.MaZ. F.ZhangY.Author (2022). Evaluation of lifestyle, attitude and stressful impact amid COVID-19 among adults in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 32(5), 1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2020.1841887
7.
CharlesC.GafniA.WhelanT. (1999). Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Social Science & Medicine, 49(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8
8.
ChenC.ChengG.ChenX.YuL. (2023). Information disclosure to cancer patients in mainland China: A meta‐analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 32(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6085
9.
ChenX.FanR. (2010). The family and harmonious medical decision making: Cherishing an appropriate Confucian moral balance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 35(5), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhq046
10.
ChewningB.BylundC. L.ShahB.AroraN. K.GueguenJ. A.MakoulG. (2012). Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004
11.
CooneyT. M.ShapiroA.TateC. E. (2019). End-of-life care planning: The importance of older adults’ marital status and gender. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 22(8), 902–907. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2018.0451
12.
CoronaK.CamposB.ChenC. (2017). Familism is associated with psychological well-being and physical health: Main effects and stress-buffering effects. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 39(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316671297
13.
Fernández-NiñoJ. A.BojorquezI.Becerra-AriasC.Astudillo-GarciaC. I. (2019). Religious affiliation and major depressive episode in older adults: A cross-sectional study in six low-and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6806-1
14.
FlynnK. E.SmithM. A.VannessD. (2006). A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. Social Science & Medicine, 63(5), 1158–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030
15.
GanY.ZhengL.YuN. X.ZhouG.MiaoM.LuQ. (2018). Why do oncologists hide the truth? Disclosure of cancer diagnoses to patients in China: A multisource assessment using mixed methods. Psycho-Oncology, 27(5), 1457–1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4545
16.
GeorgeN. R.KryworuchkoJ.HunoldK. M.OuchiK.BermanA.WrightR.GrudzenC. R.KovalerchikO.LeFebvreE. M.LindorR. A.QuestT. E.SchmidtT. A.SussmanT.VandenbrouckeA.VolandesA. E.Platts-MillsT. F. (2016). Shared decision making to support the provision of palliative and end‐of‐life care in the emergency department: A consensus statement and research agenda. Academic Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 23(12), 1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13083
17.
GhazarianS. R.SuppleA. J.PlunkettS. W. (2008). Familism as a predictor of parent–adolescent relationships and developmental outcomes for adolescents in Armenian American immigrant families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17(4), 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-007-9177-7
18.
GuX.-F.XuH.-F.LiuY.LiL.YuY.-Q.ZhangX.WangX.-H.WangW.-J.DuL.-B.DuanS.-X.CaoH. L.ZhaoY. Q.HuangJ. X.CaoJ.FanY. P.FengC. Y.LianX. M.QiaoY. L. (2023). Involvement in treatment decision-making and self-reported efficacy among patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Oncology, 13, Article 1168078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1168078
19.
HaishanH.HongjuanL.TieyingZ.XuemeiP. (2015). Preference of Chinese general public and healthcare providers for a good death. Nursing Ethics, 22(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733014524760
20.
Institute of Medicine. (2015). Dying in America: Improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life. Military Medicine, 180(4), 365–367. https://doi.org/10.17226/18748
21.
KimM. J. (2010). End-of-life decision-making in Korean American families. University of Illinois at Chicago, Health Sciences Center.
22.
LaiP. S. M.MudriS. M.ChinnaK.OthmanS. (2016). The development and validation of the advance care planning questionnaire in Malaysia. Bmc Medical Ethics, 17(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0147-8
23.
LeeM. C.HindererK. A.KehlK. A. (2014). A systematic review of advance directives and advance care planning in Chinese people from eastern and Western cultures. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 16(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/njh.0000000000000024
24.
LeydonG. M.BoultonM.MoynihanC.JonesA.MossmanJ.BoudioniM.McPhersonK. (2000). Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: In depth interview study. BMJ, 320(7239), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7239.909
25.
LiJ.YuanX. L.GaoX. H.YangX. M.JingP.YuS. Y. (2012). Whether, when, and who to disclose bad news to patients with cancer: A survey in 150 pairs of hospitalized patients with cancer and family members in China. Psycho-Oncology, 21(7), 778–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1979
LiuJ.ChanS. W.-C.GuoD.LinQ.HunterS.ZhuJ.LeeR. L. T. (2025). Decisional conflict, patient involvement, and the associated psychological factors relating to mastectomy decisions among women with breast cancer: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Nursing, 48(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000001256
28.
LiuL.MaL.ChenZ.GengH.XiL.McClementS.GuoQ. (2021). Dignity at the end of life in traditional Chinese culture: Perspectives of advanced cancer patients and family members. European Journal of Oncology Nursing: The Official Journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 54, Article 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102017
29.
LouY.LiuJ.CarrD. (2022). To tell or not: Chinese older adults’ preferences for disclosing or concealing serious illness diagnoses. The Gerontologist, 63(6), 1049. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac167
30.
MaoS.CaoQ.LiQ.WuY.ZhangX.JiangJ.ZengL. (2024). Experiences of conflicting decision-making by surrogate decision-makers in neurocritical care in China: A descriptive qualitative study. PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4305952/v1
31.
MoormanS. M. (2011). Older adults’ preferences for independent or delegated end-of-life medical decision making. Journal of Aging and Health, 23(1), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264310385114
Nylund-GibsonK.GarberA. C.SinghJ.WitkowM. R.NishinaA.BellmoreA. (2023). The utility of latent class analysis to understand heterogeneity in youth coping strategies: A methodological introduction. Behavioral Disorders, 48(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211067214
34.
PaillaudE.Canoui-PoitrineF.VarnierG.Anfasi-EbadiN.GueryE.Saint-JeanO.GisselbrechtM.AparicioT.Bastuji-GarinS.LaurentM.CailletP. (2017). Preferences about information and decision-making among older patients with and without cancer. Age and Ageing, 46(4), 665–671. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw256
35.
RietjensJ. A.SudoreR. L.ConnollyM.van DeldenJ. J.DrickamerM. A.DrogerM.KorfageI. J.HeylandD. K.HouttekierD.JanssenD. J. A.OrsiL.PayneS.SeymourJ.JoxR. J.European Association for Palliative Care. (2017). Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: An international consensus supported by the european association for palliative care. The Lancet Oncology, 18(9), e543–e551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X
36.
RuiD. (2015). A family-oriented decision-making model for human research in mainland China. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40(4), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv013
37.
SayR.MurtaghM.ThomsonR. (2006). Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision making: A narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling, 60(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003
38.
SinuffT.DodekP.YouJ. J.BarwichD.TaylerC.DownarJ.HartwickM.FrankC.StelfoxH. T.HeylandD. K. (2015). Improving end-of-life communication and decision making: The development of a conceptual framework and quality indicators. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 49(6), 1070–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.007
39.
SteelA.OwenL. (2022). Advance care planning—factors influencing stability of preferences. Age and Ageing, 51(12), afac294. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac294
40.
StocklassaS.ZhangS.MasonS.ElsnerF. (2022). Cultural implications for disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis toward terminally ill cancer patients in China: A literature review. Palliative & Supportive Care, 20(2), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521000535
41.
TieyingZ.HaishanH.MeizhenZ.YanL.PengqianF. (2011). Health professionals’ attitude towards information disclosure to cancer patients in China. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011398096
WallerA.Sanson-FisherR.NairB. R.EvansT. (2020). Preferences for end-of-life care and decision making among older and seriously ill inpatients: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 59(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.003
44.
WangS.-Y.ChenC.-H.ChenY.-S.HuangH.-L. (2004). The attitude toward truth telling of cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00566-X
45.
WinterL. (2013). Patient values and preferences for end-of-life treatments: Are values better predictors than a living will?Journal of Palliative Medicine, 16(4), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2012.0303
46.
WinzelbergG. S.HansonL. C.TulskyJ. A. (2005). Beyond autonomy: Diversifying end‐of‐life decision‐making approaches to serve patients and families. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(6), 1046–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53317.x
47.
XiaoL.PengM.LiuY.ZhangL. (2021). Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision‐making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 24(5), 1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13312
48.
YanY. (2021) Chinese families upside down: Intergenerational dynamics and neo-familism in the early 21st century (42). Brill.
49.
YangH.LuY.HouX.GuoR.WangY.LiuL.GuY.SunH. (2019). Nurse‐rated good death of Chinese terminally ill patients with cancer: A cross‐sectional study. European Journal of Cancer Care, 28(6), Article e13147. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13147
50.
YangY.QuT.YangJ.MaB.LengA. (2022). Confucian familism and shared decision making in end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), Article 10071. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610071
51.
YeungG. T.FungH. H. (2007). Social support and life satisfaction among Hong Kong Chinese older adults: Family first?European Journal of Ageing, 4(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-007-0065-1
52.
ZafarW.HafeezH.JamshedA.ShahM. A.QuaderA.YusufM. A. (2016). Preferences regarding disclosure of prognosis and end-of-life care: A survey of cancer patients with advanced disease in a lower-middle-income country. Palliative Medicine, 30(7), 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315625810
53.
ZhangM.ChengQ. (2024). Becoming a self-reliant elder: Fading intergenerational reciprocity and pursuing active aging among middle-class seniors in urban China. Sage Open, 14(2), Article 21582440241259161. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241259161
54.
ZhuT.LiuD.van der HeideA.KorfageI. J.RietjensJ. A. (2023). Preferences and attitudes towards life-sustaining treatments of older Chinese patients and their family caregivers. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 18, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S395128
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
