Rhotic sounds are some of the most challenging sounds for L2 learners to acquire. This study investigates the production of English rhotic sounds by Mandarin–English bilinguals with two English proficiency levels. The production of the English /ɹ/ by 17 Mandarin–English bilinguals was examined with ultrasound imaging and compared with the production of native English speakers. The ultrasound data show that bilinguals can produce native-like bunched and retroflex gestures, but the distributional pattern of tongue shapes in various contexts differs from that of native speakers. Acoustically, the English /ɹ/ produced by bilinguals had a higher F3 and F3–F2, as well as some frication noise in prevocalic /ɹ/, features similar to the Mandarin /ɹ/. Mandarin–English bilinguals did produce language-specific phonetic realizations for the English and Mandarin /ɹ/s. There was a positive correlation between language proficiency and English-specific characteristics of /ɹ/ by Mandarin–English bilinguals in both articulation and acoustics. Phonetic similarities facilitated rather than hindered L2 speech learning in production: Mandarin–English bilinguals showed better performance in producing the English /ɹ/ allophones that were more similar to the Mandarin /ɹ/ (syllabic and postvocalic /ɹ/s) than producing the English /ɹ/ allophone that was less similar to the Mandarin /ɹ/ (prevocalic /ɹ/). This study contributes to our understanding of the mechanism of speech production in late bilinguals.
AhnS. (2018). The role of tongue position in laryngeal contrasts: An ultrasound study of English and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 451–467.
2.
AoyamaK.FlegeJ. E.GuionS. G.Akahane-YamadaR.YamadaT. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00036-6
Articulate Instruments Ltd. (2012). Articulate assistant advanced user guide: Version 2.14.
5.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
6.
BestC. T.StrangeW. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20(3), 305–330.
7.
BestC. T.TylerM. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In BohnO.-S.MunroM. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 1–47). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
8.
BoersmaP. (2002). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
9.
BohnO. S.FlegeJ. E. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 131–158.
10.
BoyceS. E.CombsS.Rivera-CamposA. (2011). Acoustic and articulatory characteristics of clinically resistant /r/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), 2625–2625.
11.
BoyceS. E.Espy-WilsonC. Y. (1997). Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3741–3753.
12.
BoyceS. E.HamiltonS. M.Rivera-CamposA. (2016). Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(3–5), 174–201. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2015.1127999
13.
BradlowA. R. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418276
14.
BradlowA. R.Akahane-YamadaR.PisoniD. B.TohkuraY. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(5), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911
15.
BradlowA. R.PisoniD. B.YamadaR.TohkuraY. (1995). The effect of training in /r/-/l/ perception on /r/-/l/ production by Japanese speakers. Proceedings XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 4, 562–565.
16.
ChaoY. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.
17.
ChenS. (2020). Production and perception of English rhotic sounds by Mandarin-English bilinguals [PhD dissertation]. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
18.
ChenS.MokP. (2021). Articulatory and acoustic features of Mandarin /ɹ/: a preliminary study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP). IEEE.
19.
ChenW. R.TiedeM.ChenS. (2017, October4–6). An optimization method for correction of ultrasound probe-related contours to head-centric coordinates [Oral presentation]. Ultrafest VIII, Potsdam, Germany.
ChungH.PollockK. E. (2021). Acoustic characteristics of rhotic vowel productions of young children. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica73(2), 89–100.
22.
DalstonR. M. (1975). Acoustic characteristics of English /w, r,l/ spoken correctly by young children and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57(2), 462–469.
FlegeJ. E. (1992). The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. Intelligibility in Speech Disorders: Theory, Measurement, and Management, 1, 157–232.
27.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). York Press.
28.
FlegeJ. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In SchillerN. O.MeyerA. S. (Eds.), Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities (pp. 319–358). De Gruyter Mouton.
29.
FlegeJ. E.BohnO. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In RatreeW. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press.
30.
FlegeJ. E.TakagiN.MannV. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(2), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414884
31.
FoulkesP.DochertyG. J. (2000). Another chapter in the story of /r/: “Labiodental” variants in British English. Journal of Social Phonetics, 4(1), 30–59.
32.
FuM. (1956). Phonemes and Pinyin symbols in the Beijing Speech. Zhongguo Yuwen, 5, 3–12.[北京话的音位和拼音字母. 中国语文 5, 3–12.]
33.
GickB.BacsfalviP.BernhardtB. M.OhS.StolarS.WilsonI. (2007). A motor differentiation model for liquid substitutions in children’s speech. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 1(2008), 060003. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2951481
34.
GickB.CampbellF.OhS.Tamburri-WattL. (2006). Toward universals in the gestural organization of syllables: A cross-linguistic study of liquids. Journal of Phonetics, 34(1), 49–72.
GuC. (2014). Smoothing spline ANOVA models: R package gss. Journal of Statistical Software, 58(5), 1–25.
37.
HagiwaraR. (1995). Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men [UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics No. 90]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8779b7gq
38.
HarperS.GoldsteinL. M.NarayananS. S. (2016). L2 acquisition and production of the English rhotic pharyngeal gesture. In MorganN. (Ed.), Proceedings of Interspeech 2016 (pp. 208–212). University of Southern California.
39.
HeyneM.WangX.DerrickD.DorreenK.WatsonK. (2020). The articulation of /ɹ/ in New Zealand English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 50(3), 366–388. https://doi:10.1017/S0025100318000324
40.
HuF. (2020). The vowel: A general introduction with reference to Chinese data [元音研究]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
41.
HuangJ.HsiehF.ChangY. (2020). Er-Suffixation in Southwestern Mandarin: An EMA and Ultrasound Study (pp. 661–665). Interspeech 2020.
42.
HuangT.ChangY.LiH. (2022, 3-5November). Variable articulation for the Taiwanese Mandarin rhotic liquid /r/ [Paper presentation]. UltrafestX, Manchester.
43.
HussainQ.MielkeJ. (2021). An acoustic and articulatory study of rhotic and rhotic-nasal vowels of Kalasha. Journal of Phonetics, 87, 101028.
44.
IdemaruK.HoltL. L. (2013). The developmental trajectory of children’s perception and production of English /r/-/l/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(6), 4232–4246. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4802905
45.
IngvalsonE. M.McClellandJ. L.HoltL. L. (2011). Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.003
46.
JiangS.ChangY.HsiehF. (2019a, May24–25). A Cross-dialectal Comparison of er-suffixation in Beijing Mandarin and Northeastern Mandarin: An Electromagnetic Articulography Study [Conference session]. HISPhonCog 2019: Hanyang International Symposium on Phonetics & Cognitive Sciences of Language, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
47.
JiangS.ChangY.HsiehF. (2019b). An EMA study of er- suffixation in Northeastern Mandarin monophthongs. In CalhounS.EscuderoP.TabianM.WarrenP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 3617–3621). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.
48.
JunS.-A.CowieI. (1994). Interference for ‘new’ versus ‘similar’ vowels in Korean speakers of English. Ohio State University Working Paper, 43, 117–130.
49.
KarlgrenB. (1915–1926). Studies on Chinese Phonology [Etudes sur la phonologie chinoise]. K.W. Appelberg.
50.
KingH.FerragneE. (2020). Loose lips and tongue tips: The central role of the /r/-typical labial gesture in Anglo-English. Journal of Phonetics, 80, 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2020.100978
51.
KingH.LiuA. (2017, October4–6). An ultrasound and acoustic study of the rhotic suffix in Mandarin [Paper presentation]. Ultrafest VIII, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
52.
KleinH. B.ByunT. M.DavidsonL.GrigosM. I. (2013). A multidimensional investigation of children’s /r/ productions: Perceptual, ultrasound, and acoustic measures. American Journal of Speech—Language Pathology, 22(3), 540–553. https://doi.org.easyaccess1.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0137)
53.
KnightR.DalcherC. V.JonesM. J. (2007). A real-time case study of rhotic acquisition in Southern British English [Conference session]. Proceedings of ICPHS XVI, Saarbrücken, Germany.
54.
KochetovA.SreedeviN.KasimM.ManjulaR. (2014). Spatial and dynamic aspects of retroflex production: An ultrasound and EMA study of Kannada geminate stops. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.07.003
55.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP.ChristensenR. (2017). ImerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.
56.
LadefogedP.MaddisonI. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell.
57.
LawsonE.ScobbieJ. M.Stuart-SmithJ. (2011). The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00464.x
58.
LawsonE.ScobbieJ. M.Stuart-SmithJ. (2013). Bunched /r/ promotes vowel merger to schwar: An ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish sociophonetic variation. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.004
59.
LawsonE.Stuart-SmithJ.ScobbieJ. M. (2018). The role of gesture delay in coda /r/ weakening: An articulatory, auditory and acoustic study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(3), 1646–1657.
60.
LeeW.-S. (2005). A phonetic study of the “er-hua” rimes in Beijing Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 1093–1096). International Speech Communication Association (ISCA).
61.
LeeW.-S. (1999). An articulatory and acoustical analysis of the syllable-initial sibilants and approximant in Beijing Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 413–416). International Phonetic Association.
62.
LeeW.-S.ZeeE. (2003). Standard Chinese (Beijing). Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(1), 109–112.
63.
Lee-KimS. I. (2014). Revisiting Mandarin “apical vowels”: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(3), 261–282.
LiY. (1996). Discussion on Mandarin er-hua and its phoneme. Yuwen Yanjiu, 59, 21–26. [论普通话儿化韵及儿化音位. 语文研究 59, 21–26.]
66.
LiaoR.ShiF. (1987). An experimental study on the sound quality of the r consonant of Mandarin Chinese. Language Research, 2, 146–160. [汉语普通话r声母音质的实验研究. 语言研究2, 146–160]
67.
LinX.WangL. (2013). A course in phonetics (2nd ed.). [语音学教程(增订版)] Peking University Press.
68.
LinY. (1989). Autosegmental treatment of segmental process in Chinese phonology. University of Texas PhD dissertation.
LinY. H. (2007). The sounds of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
71.
LindauM. (1985). The story of /r/. In FromkinV. A. (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics. Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged (157–168). Academic Press.
72.
LuoS. (2020). Articulatory tongue shape analysis of Mandarin alveolar–retroflex contrast. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(4), 1961–1977.
MacKainK. S.BestC. T.StrangeW. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009796
75.
McAllister ByunT.TiedeM. (2017). Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLOS ONE, 12(2), Article e0172022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172022
76.
McgowanR. S.NittrouerS.ManningC. J. (2004). Development of [r] in young, Midwestern, American children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(2), 871–884. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1642624
77.
MielkeJ. (2015). An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 2858–2869. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4919346
78.
MielkeJ.BakerA.ArchangeliD. (2010). Variability and homogeneity in American English /r/ allophony and /s/ retraction. Laboratory Phonology, 10, 699–730.
79.
MielkeJ.BakerA.ArchangeliD. (2016). Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/. Language, 92(1), 101–140. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0019
80.
MunroM. J.FlegeJ. E.MacKayI. R. (1996). The effects of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17(3), 313–334.
81.
NoirayA.RiesJ.TiedeM.RubertusE.LaporteC.MénardL. (2020). Recording and analyzing kinematic data in children and adults with SOLLAR: Sonographic & optical linguo-labial articulation recording system. Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 14.
82.
PapageorgiouS.TannenbaumR. J.BridgemanB.ChoY. (2015). The association between TOEFL iBT test scores and the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) Levels. Educational Testing Service. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-15-06.pdf
83.
PrestonJ. L.EdwardsM. L. (2007). Phonological processing skills of adolescents with residual speech sound errors. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 38(4), 297–308.
ScobbieJ. M.WrenchA. A.LindenM. (2008). Head-probe stabilisation in ultrasound tongue imaging using a headset to permit natural head movement. In SockR.FuchsS.LaprieY. (Eds.), Proceedings of 8th International Seminar on Speech Production (pp. 373–376). INRIA.
86.
ShaoB.RidouaneR. (2023). On the nature of apical vowel in Jixi-Hui Chinese: Acoustic and articulatory data. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 53(3), 977–1002.
87.
SheldonA.StrangeW. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001417
ShribergL. D.KwiatkowskiJ. (1994). Developmental phonological disorders I: A clinical profile. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37(5), 1100–1126.
90.
SmitA. B.HandL.FreilingerJ. J.BernthalJ. E.BirdA. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(4), 779–798.
91.
SmithJ. G. (2010). Acoustic properties of English /l/ and /r/ produced by Mandarin Chinese speakers. University of Toronto.
92.
TakagiN.MannV. (1995). The limits of extended naturalistic exposure on the perceptual mastery of English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(4), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400066005
TiedeM. K.BoyceS. E.Espy-WilsonC. Y.GraccoV. L. (2010). Variability of North American English /r/ production in response to palatal perturbation. In MaassenB.van LieshoutP. (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech V (pp. 53–67). Oxford University Press.
95.
TwistA.BakerA.MielkeJ.ArchangeliD. (2007). Are “Covert” /ɹ/ Allophones Really Indistinguishable?University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 13(2), Article 16.
WangZ. (1993). The geometry of segmental features in Beijing Mandarin [PhD dissertation]. University of Delaware.
98.
WangJ. (2005). An integrated discussion of er-hua. Yuyan Wezi Yingyong, 3, 46–54. [儿化规范综论. 语言文字应用].
99.
WestburyJ. R.HashiM.LindstromM. J. (1998). Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/. Speech Communication, 24, 203–225.
100.
WhalenD. H.IskarousK.TiedeM.OstryD. J.Lehnert-LeHouillierH.Vatikiotis-BatesonE. S.HaileyD. S. (2005). HOCUS, the Haskins optically-corrected ultrasound system. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 543–553.
XingK. (2021). Phonetic and phonological perspectives on rhoticity in Mandarin [PhD dissertation]. University of Manchester.
104.
YuanJ. (1960). A Survey of the Chinese Dialects. [汉语方言概要] Wenzi Gaige Press.
105.
ZeeE.LeeW. S. (2001, September3–7). An acoustical analysis of the vowels in Beijing Mandarin. In DalsgaardP.LindbergB.BennerH.TanZ. (Eds.), EUROSPEECH 2001 Scandinavia, 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, 2nd INTERSPEECH Event (pp. 643–646). International Speech Communication Association.
106.
ZhouX.Espy-WilsonC. Y.BoyceS.TiedeM.HollandC.ChoeA. (2008). A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of “retroflex” and “bunched” American English /r/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4466–4481.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
