Although previous research indicates that Japanese speakers’ second language (L2) perception and production of English /ɹ/ may improve with increased L2 experience, relatively little is known about the fine phonetic details of their /ɹ/ productions, especially during the early phase of L2 speech learning. This cross-sectional study examined acoustic properties of word-initial /ɹ/ from 60 Japanese learners with a length of residence of between one month and one year in Canada. Their performance was compared to that of 15 native speakers of English and 15 low-proficiency Japanese learners of English. Formant frequencies (F2 and F3) and F1 transition durations were evaluated under three task conditions—word reading, sentence reading, and timed picture description. Learners with as little as two to three months of residence demonstrated target-like F2 frequencies. In addition, increased LOR was predictive of more target-like transition durations. Although the learners showed some improvement in F3 as a function of LOR, they did so mainly at a controlled level of speech production. The findings suggest that during the early phase of L2 segmental development, production accuracy is task-dependent and is influenced by the availability of L1 phonetic cues for redeployment in L2.
BakerW. (2010). Effects of age and experience on the production of English word-final stops by Korean speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 263–278.
2.
BakerW.TrofimovichP. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44, 231–250.
3.
BestC.TylerM. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In BohnO.MunroM. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
4.
BoersmaP.WeeninkD. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org.
5.
BohnO.-S. (1995). Cross-language perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 379–410). Timonium, MD: York Press.
6.
BohnO.-S.FlegeJ. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303–328.
7.
BongaertsT.PlankenB.SchilsE. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In: SingletonD.LengyelZ. (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8.
BradlowA. R. (2008). Training non-native language sound patterns. In HansenJ.ZampiniM. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 287–308). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
9.
BradlowA.PisoniD. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener- and item-related factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2074–2085.
10.
CebrianJ. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.
DeKeyserR. (2001). Automaticity and automatization. In RobinsonP. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 125–151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DeKeyserR. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In LongM.DoughtyC. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J. (2013) The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A seven-year study. Language Learning, 63, 163–185.
15.
DerwingT. M.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I. (2008) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359–380.
16.
DerwingT. M.RossiterM.J.MunroM. J.ThomsonR. I. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655–679.
17.
DohlusK. (2008). The role of phonology and phonetics in loanword adaptation: German and French front rounded vowels in Japanese. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
18.
EllisR. (2002). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 223–236.
19.
Espy-WilsonC. Y. (1992). Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 736–757.
20.
Espy-WilsonC. Y.BoyceS. E.JacksonM.NarayananS.AlwanA. (2000). Acoustic modeling of American English /ɹ/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 343–356.
21.
FlegeJ. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.
22.
FlegeJ. (1993). Production and perception of a novel second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 1589–1608.
23.
FlegeJ. (1995). Second language speech learning. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross–language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
24.
FlegeJ. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In MeyerA.SchillerN. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 319–355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
25.
FlegeJ.BohnO-S.JangS. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.
26.
FlegeJ. E.FletcherK. L. (1992) Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.
27.
FlegeJ.LiuS. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.
28.
FlegeJ.MunroM.MacKayI. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.
29.
FlegeJ.MunroM.SkeltonL. (1992). Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin and Spanish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 128–143.
30.
FlegeJ.TakagiN.MannV. (1995). Japanese adults learn to produce English /ɹ/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.
31.
FlegeJ. E.TakagiN.MannV. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English-language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/ and /l/. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1161–1173.
32.
FlegeJ.WangC. (1990). Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 299–315.
33.
GottfriedT. L.SuiterT. L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin tones, Journal of Phonetics, 25, 207–231.
34.
GuionS.FlegeJ.Ahahane-YamadaR.PruittJ. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2725.
35.
HattoriK.IversonP. (2009). English /r/-/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469–479.
36.
IversonP.HazanV.BannisterK. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /ɹ/-/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.
37.
IversonP.KuhlP.Akahane-YamadaR.DieschE.TohkuraY.KettermannA.SiebertC. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, 847–857.
38.
IngvalsonE. M.HoltL. L.McClellandJ. L. (2012). Can native Japanese listeners learn to differentiate/r–l/on the basis of F3 onset frequency?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 255–274.
39.
JiangN. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 57, 1–33.
40.
KennedyS.TrofimovichP. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459–489.
41.
KrashenS. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
42.
KuhlP. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 11850–11857.
43.
LadefogedP.MaddiesonI. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44.
Larson-HallJ. (2006). What does more time buy you? Another look at the effects of long-term residence on production accuracy of English /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese speakers. Language and Speech, 49, 521–548.
45.
LeeB.GuionS.G.HaradaT. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition28, 487–513.
LottoA. J.SatoM.DiehlR. L. (2004). Mapping the task for the second language learner: The case of Japanese acquisition of /ɹ/ and /l/. In SlifkaJ.ManuelS.MatthiesM. (Eds.), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. C381-C386). Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT.
48.
MajorR. (2001) Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49.
McAllisterR.FlegeJ.PiskeT. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.
50.
MoyerA. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.
51.
MunroM.DerwingT. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502.
52.
NishiK.Kewley-PortD. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1496–1509.
53.
PetersonG. E.LehisteI. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296.
54.
PiskeT.FlegeJ.MeadorD. (2011). Investigating native and non-native vowels produced in conversational speech. In WrembelM.KulM.Dziubalska-KołaczykK (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New sounds 2010 (pp. 195–205). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
55.
PiskeT.MacKayI.FlegeJ. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.
56.
RauD.ChangA.TaroneE. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59, 581–621.
57.
SaitoK. (2013). Age effects on late bilingualism: The production development of /ɹ/ by high-proficiency Japanese learners of English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 546–562.
58.
SaitoK. (in press). Communicative focus on L2 phonetic form: Teaching Japanese learners to perceive and produce English /ɹ/ without explicit instruction. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000271
59.
SchroederM. R.AtalB. S.HallJ. L. (1979). Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1647–1652.
60.
SegalowitzN. (2003) Automaticity and second languages. In DoughtyC.LongM. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 382–408). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
61.
SpadaN.TomitaY. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.
62.
Statistics Canada. (2008). 2006 Census of Canada topic based tabulations, ethnic origin and visible minorities tables: Ethnic origin, for population, for Canada, provinces and territories, 2006 census. (Catalogue number 97–562-XWE2006002). Retrieved from Statistics Canada: http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/hlt/97–562/index.cfm?Lang=E
63.
TrofimovichP.BakerW. (2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.
64.
TraunmüllerH. (1990). Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 97–100.
65.
UnderbakkeM.PolkaL.GottfriedT. L.StrangeW. (1988). Trading relations in the perception of /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 90–100.
66.
VanceT. (1987). An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
67.
YamadaR. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /p/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 305–320). Timonium, MD: York Press.
68.
YangB. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.
