Fricative spectral data are compared with articulatory data from electropalatographic (EPG) recordings in an investigation of coarticulatory effects on the acoustic signal. Data were taken from CV tokens produced by four female speakers of Australian English. Results are presented for the coronal fricatives /θ s ∫ ð z 3/in seven monophthong vowel contexts. The analysis consists of a comparison of spectral centre of gravity (COG) with EPG centre of gravity measured along the horizontal dimension. The correlation between the articulatory and the acoustic datais quitehigh. Overall, the sibilant fricatives show very little variability in production, while the nonsibilant dental shows a good deal of variability. This is reflected in the spectral output. It is also shown that the alveolar sibilants show more effectfrom vowel context than do the postalveolar sibilants. These results are interpreted as showing that coarticulatory resistance is indeed greater for sibilant fricatives, but that degree of tongue body raising inherent in the fricative's production must also be taken into account. The results for overall variability are discussed with reference to the Hyper- and Hypo- and Quantal Theories of speech production.It is suggested that sibilant fricatives do not lend themselves to the articulatory imprecision which, according to these theories, characterizes perceptually salient, and typologically common, speech sounds.
Baum, S., & McFarland, D. (1997). The development of adaptation to an artificial palate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2353-2359.
2.
Buder, E.H., Kent, R.D., Kent, J.F., Milenkovic, P., & Workinger, M. (1996). FORMOFFA: An automated formant, moment, fundamental frequency, amplitude analysis of normal and disordered speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics'10, 31-54.
3.
Butcher, A., & Weiher, E.( 1976).An electropalatographic investigation of coarticulation in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 4, 59-74.
4.
Byrd, D. (1994). Articulatory timing in English consonant sequences . Ph. D. thesis, published as UCLA Working Paper in Phonetics , 86.
5.
Carney, P.J., & Moll, K.L. (1971).A cine fluorographic investigation of fricative consonant-vowel coarticulation. Phonetica, 23, 193-202.
6.
Cassidy, S., & Harrington, J.M. (2001). Multi-level annotation in the EMU speech database management system. Speech Communication , 33, 61-77.
7.
Cox, F. ( 1997). An acoustic study of vowel variation in Australian English. Ph. D. thesis, Macquarie University.
8.
Dart, S.N. (1991). Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics , 79.
9.
Fant, G. (1960). Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.
10.
Flanagan, J. (1972). Speech synthesis, analysis and perception. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Fletcher, S.G. (1985). Speech production and oral motor skill in an adult with an unrepaired palatal cleft. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 254-261.
12.
Fletcher, S.G., & Newman, D.G. (1991). [s] and [∫] as a function of linguapalatal contact place and sibilant groove width. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 850-857.
13.
Forrest, K., Weismer, G., Milenkovic, P., & Dougall, R. (1988). Statistical analysis of word-initial obstruents: Preliminary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 84, 115-123.
14.
Hardcastle, W.J.( 1972). The use of electropalatography in phonetic research . Phonetica, 25, 197-215.
15.
Hardcastle, W.J., Gibbon, F., & Nicolaidis, K. (1991). EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 251-266.
16.
Harrington, J., & Cassidy, S. (1999). Techniques in speech acoustics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
17.
Harrington, J., Cassidy, S., Fletcher, J., & McVeigh, A.( 1993). The mu+ system for corpus based speech research . Computer Speech and Language, 7, 305-331.
18.
Harrington, J., Cox, F., & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic study of broad, general and cultivatedAustralian vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17, 155-184.
19.
Harrington, J., Fletcher, J., & Roberts, C. (1995). Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: Evidence from jaw movement data. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 305-322.
20.
Heinz, J.M., & Stevens, K.N. (1961). On the properties of voiceless fricative consonants . Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 589-596.
21.
Hoole, P., Nguyen-Trong, N., & Hardcastle, W. (1993). A comparative investigation of coarticulation in fricatives: Electropalatographic, electromagnetic and acoustic data. Language and Speech, 36, 235-260.
22.
Hoole, P., Ziegler, W., Hartmann, E., & Hardcastle, W. (1989). Parallel electropalatographicand acoustic measures of fricatives. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 3, 59-69.
23.
Hughes, G.W., & Halle, M. (1956). Spectral properties of fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 28, 303-310.
24.
Jongman, A., & Serano, J.A. (1995). Acoustic properties of nonsibilant fricatives . Proceedings International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences , 1995. Stockholm, 4, pp. 432-435.
25.
Keating, P. (1990). The window model of coarticulation: Articulatory evidence. In M. Beckman & J. Kingston (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Keating, P. (1991). Coronal places of articulation. In C. Paradis & J-F. Prunet (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology: The special status of coronals (pp. 29-48). San Diego: Academic .
27.
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust test for equality of variance. In I. Olkin, S. G. Ghurye, W. Hoeffding, W. G. Madow, & H. B. Mann (Eds.), Contributions to probability and statistics . California. Stanford University Press, 278-292.
29.
Lindblom, B. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In P. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 217-246). New York: Springer-Verlag .
30.
Lindblom, B.( 1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal(Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 403-439).Dordrecht: Kluwer .
31.
Lindblom, B. (1996). Role of articulation in speech perception: Clues from production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 99, 1683-1692.
32.
Lindblom, B., & Engstrand, O. (1989). In what sense is speech quantal?Journal of Phonetics, 17, 107-121.
33.
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
34.
Mann, V., & Repp, B. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception and Psychophysics , 28, 213-228.
35.
Moon S.-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40-55.
36.
Narayanan, S.S., Alwan, A.A., & Haker, K. (1995). An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1325-1347.
37.
Nguyen, N., & Hoole, P.( 1993). Frequency variations of the lowest main spectral peak in sibilant clusters. Proceedings of Eurospeech'93, pp. 81-84.
38.
Nguyen, N., Hoole, P., & Marchal, A. (1991). Articulatory-acoustic correlations in the productionof fricatives. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, 3, pp. 18-21.
39.
Nguyen, N., Hoole, P., & Marchal, A. (1994). Regenerating the spectral shapes of [s] and [∫] from a limited set of articulatory parameters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 33-39.
40.
Nittrouer, S. (1995). Children learn separate aspects of speech productionat differentrates: Evidence from spectral moments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 520-529.
41.
Nolan, F., Holst, T., & Kuhnert, B. (1996). Modeling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English . Journal of Phonetics, 24, 113-137.
42.
Ohman, S.E.G. (1966). Coarticulationcin VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America , 39, 151-168.
43.
Paradis, C., & Prunet J.-F. (1991). Phonetics and phonology: The special status of coronals. San Diego: Academic.
44.
Perkell, J. (1979). On the nature of distinctive features: Implications of a preliminary vowel production study. In B. Lindblom & S. Ohman (Eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research (pp. 365-380), New York: Academic.
45.
Recasens, D. (1984). V-to-C coarticulation in Catalan VCV sequences: An articulatory and acoustical study. Journal of Phonetics , 12, 61-73.
46.
Recasens, D. ( 1985). Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in Catalan CV sequences. Language and Speech, 28, 97-114.
47.
Shadle, C.H. (1985). The acoustics of fricative consonants . Ph. D. thesis, MIT.
48.
Shadle, C.H. (1990). Articulatory-acoustic relationships in fricative consonants. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (pp. 187-209). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
49.
Shadle, C.H. (1991). The effect of geometry on source mechanisms in fricative consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 409-424.
50.
Shadle, C.H., & Mair, S.J. (1996). Quantifying spectral characteristicsof fricatives . Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, 1521-1524.
51.
Shadle, C.H., Mair, S.J., & Carter, J.N. (1996). Acoustic characteristics of the front fricatives [f v T D]. Proceedings, 1st ESCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Speech Production Modeling, Autrans, 193-196.
52.
Shadle, C.H., & Scully, C. (1995).An articulatory-acoustic-aerodynamic analysis of [s] in VCV sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 53-66.
53.
Soli, S.D. (1981). Second formants in fricatives: Acoustic consequences of fricative-vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 976-984.
54.
Stevens, K. (1985). Evidence for the role of acoustic boundaries in the perception of speech sounds. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged. London: Academic , 243-255.
55.
Stevens, K. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3-45.
56.
Stevens, K.N. (1996). Critique: Articulatory-acoustic relations and their role in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1693-1694.
57.
Stevens, K.N., & Blumstein, S.E. (1975). Quantal aspects of consonant production and perception: A study of retroflex stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 3, 215-233.
58.
Stone, M., & Lundberg, A. (1996). Three-dimensional tongue-surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 3728-3737.
59.
Stone, M., Faber, A., Raphael, L., & Shawker, T. (1992). Cross sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [∫] and [l]. Journal of Phonetics , 20, 253-270.
60.
Strevens, P. (1960). Spectra of fricative noise in human speech. Language and Speech, 3, 32-49.
61.
Studdert- Kennedy, M. (1989). Feature-fitting: A comment on K. N. Stevens' "On the quantal nature of speech ."Journal of Phonetics, 17, 135-143.
62.
Tabachnik, B., & Fidell, L. (1996). Using multivariate statistics(3rd Edition). New York: Harper Collins .
63.
Tabain, M. (1998). Nonsibilant fricatives in English: Spectral information above 10 kHz. Phonetica, 55, 107-130.
64.
Tabain, M. (2000). Coarticulation in CV syllables: A comparison of Locus Equation and EPG data. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 137-159.
65.
Tabain, M. (1999). Articulatory and acoustic aspects of coarticulation in CV syllables. Ph. D. thesis, Macquarie University.
66.
Tabain, M., & Butcher, A. (1999). Stop consonants in Yanyuwa and Yindjibarndi: A locus equation perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 333-357.
67.
Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Soli, S.D.( 1981). Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: Perceptual evidenceof fricative- vowel coarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 966-975.
