For more than 100 years, case-based instruction (CBI) has been an effective instructional method for building problem-solving skills in learners. While class discussion is often included as part of the CBI learning process, the impact on learning is unclear. Furthermore, little research has focused on how specific facilitation strategies influence the development of learners’ problem-solving skills. This study examined the impact of case discussion facilitation strategies on the development of preservice teachers’ problem-solving skills. Specifically, two discussion formats were compared: instructor-facilitated (class discussions guided by instructor-crafted prompts and an active facilitator) and instructor-supported (discussions guided by instructor-crafted prompts only). Results indicated that while preservice teachers’ problem-solving skills improved in both sections of the course, individuals in the instructor-facilitated section demonstrated significantly higher scores on course activities and designed instructional activities at higher cognitive levels compared with preservice teachers who participated in the instructor-supported discussions. Results underscore the importance of an active facilitator in CBI.
AdejumoO.FakudeL.LindaN. (2014). Revisiting innovative approaches to teaching and learning in nursing programmes: Educators’ experiences with the use of a case-based teaching approach at a nursing school. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(6), 1694-1707.
2.
AndrewsL. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27-35.
3.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Part of a Special Section on: Normative Assessment, 6, 284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
4.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
DagostinoL.CarifioJ.BauerJ. D. C.ZhaoQ.HashimN. H. (2014). Assessment of a reading comprehension instrument as it relates to cognitive abilities as defined by Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Current Issues in Education, 17(1), 1-15.
ErtmerP. A.KoehlerA. A. (2014). Online case-based discussions: Examining coverage of the afforded problem space. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(5), 617-636.
8.
ErtmerP. A.KoehlerA. A. (2015). Facilitated versus non-facilitated online case discussions: Comparing differences in problem space coverage. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27, 69-93.
9.
ErtmerP. A.NewbyT. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-72. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
10.
ErtmerP. A.NewbyT. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71. doi:10.1002/piq.21143
11.
ErtmerP. A.StepichD. A. (2002). Initiating and maintaining meaningful case discussions: Maximizing potential of case-based instruction. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 13(2/3), 5-18.
12.
ErtmerP. A.StepichD. A. (2005). Instructional design expertise: How will we know it when we see it?Educational Technology, 45(6), 38-43.
13.
ErtmerP. A.StepichD. A.FlanaganS.Kocaman-KarogluA.ReinerC.ReyesL.. . . UshigusaS. (2008). Impact of guidance on the problem-solving efforts of instructional design novices. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(4), 117-132. doi:10.1002/piq.20041
14.
EseryelD.GeX.IfenthalerD.LawV. (2011). Dynamic modeling as a cognitive regulation scaffold for developing complex problem-solving skills in an educational massively multiplayer online game environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(3), 265-286.
15.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
16.
FeldonD. F.KafaiY. B. (2008). Mixed methods for mixed reality: Understanding users’ avatar activities in virtual worlds. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(5-6), 575-593.
GeX.PlanasL. G.ErN. (2010). A cognitive support system to scaffold students’ problem-based learning in a web-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 4(1), 30-56.
19.
GoezeA.ZottmannJ. M.VogelF.FischerF.SchraderJ. (2014). Getting immersed in teacher and student perspectives: Facilitating analytical competence using video cases in teacher education. Instructional Science, 42(1), 91-114.
20.
GravettS.de BeerJ.Odendaal-KroonR.MersethK. K. (2017). The affordances of case-based teaching for the professional learning of student-teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 369-390.
21.
HallgrenK. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34.
22.
HammernessK.Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ.BerlinerD.Cochran-SmithM.McDonaldM.ZeichnerK. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In Darling-HammondL. B. (Ed.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358-389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
HerreidC.SchillerN. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
24.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.BarrowsH. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21-39.
25.
Hmelo-SilverC. E.NagarajanA.DayR. S. (2002). “It’s harder than we thought it would be”: A comparative case study of expert-novice experimentation strategies. Science Education, 86, 219-243.
26.
JonassenD. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
JonesK. A.JonesJ.VermetteP. J. (2011). Six common lesson planning pitfalls: Recommendations for novice educators. Education, 131(4), 845-864.
28.
KimH.HannafinM. J. (2011). Developing situated knowledge about teaching with technology via Web-enhanced case-based activity. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1378-1388. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.008
29.
KleinJ. D. (1991). Preservice teacher use of learning and instructional design principles. Educational Technology Research & Development, 39(3), 83-89.
30.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
31.
LachnerA.JarodzkaH.NücklesM. (2016). What makes an expert teacher? Investigating teachers’ professional vision and discourse abilities. Instructional Science, 44(3), 197-203.
32.
LearyH.WalkerA.SheltonB. E.FittH. (2013). Exploring the relationships between tutor background, tutor training, and student learning: A problem-based learning meta-analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(1), 40-66.
33.
LevinB. B. (1995). Using the case method in teacher education: The role of discussion and experience in teachers’ thinking about cases. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 63-79.
34.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
McNeilR. C. (2011). A program evaluation model: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to identify outcome indicators in outcomes-based program evaluations. Journal of Adult Education, 40(2), 24-29.
36.
MorseJ. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123.
37.
NgC. S. L.TanC. (2006). Investigating Singapore pre-service teachers’ ill-structured problem-solving processes in an asynchronous online environment: Implications for reflective thinking. New Horizons in Education, 54, 1-15.
38.
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
39.
RusznyakL. L. R.WaltonE. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teachers: A scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Education as Change, 15(2), 271-285.
40.
SaveryJ. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 8-20.
41.
SmithJ. J.DobsonE. (2011). Beyond the book: Using Web 2.0 tools to develop 21st century literacies. Computers in the Schools, 28(4), 316-327.
42.
SmithP. L.RaganT. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
43.
SoslauE. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 768-779. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.009
44.
StepichD. A.ErtmerP. A. (2009). “Teaching” instructional design expertise: Strategies to support students’ problem-finding skills. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 7(2), 147-170.
45.
StepichD. A.ErtmerP. A.LaneM. M. (2001). Problem-solving in a case-based course: Strategies for facilitating coached expertise. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 53-69.
46.
SultanaQ.KleckerB. M. (1999, November). Evaluation of first-year teachers’ lesson objectives by Bloom’s Taxonomy. Paper presented at the meeting of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Point Clear, AL.
47.
SvihlaV.ReeveR. (2016). Facilitating problem framing in project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2), available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol10/iss2/10/
48.
TawfikA. A.JonassenD. (2013). The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61(3), 385-406. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9294-5
49.
TawfikA. A.KolodnerJ. L. (2016). Systematizing scaffolding for problem-based learning: A view from case-based reasoning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(1), available at https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol10/iss1/6/
50.
WirkalaC.KuhnD. (2011). Problem-based learning in K-12 education: Is it effective and how does it achieve its effects?American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1157-1186.
51.
YadavA.BarryB. E. (2009). Using case-based instruction to increase ethical understanding in engineering: What do we know? What do we need?International Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 138-143.
52.
YewE. H. J.YongJ. J. Y. (2014). Student perceptions of facilitators’ social congruence, use of expertise, and cognitive congruence in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 42(5), 795-815
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
