This study examines 10 preservice teachers’ use of Freiberg’s Person-Centered Learning Assessment (PCLA), a self-assessment measure. The PCLA serves as an individualized resource for educators to assess their classroom teaching and learning particularly in the affective domain. Study findings indicate that the 10 student teachers identified future pedagogical changes as a result of utilizing the PCLA, with eight student teachers specifically identifying changes in their classrooms prior to completion of the study. As explored in this study, self-assessments seem to provide novice educators with a unique form of feedback and have the potential to lead to deeper levels of pedagogical self-reflection and resulting changes.
AllenC. E. (2017). Teacher self-assessment: A facilitative process for principal instructional support (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Houston, Houston, TX.
2.
AloeA. M.AmoL. C.ShanahanM. E. (2014). Classroom management self-efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101-126.
3.
AndersonJ. B.FreibergH. J. (1995). Using self-assessment as a reflective tool to enhance the student teaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 22, 77-91.
4.
ArendsR. I. (2006a). Performance assessment in perspective: History, opportunities, and challenges. In CastleS.ShakleeB. (Eds.), Assessing teacher performance: Performance-based assessment in teacher education (pp. 3-22). Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
5.
ArendsR. I. (2006b). Summative performance assessments. In CastleS.ShakleeB. (Eds.), Assessing teacher performance: Performance-based assessment in teacher education (pp. 93-123). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
6.
BorkoH.MayfieldV. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 501-518. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00008-8
7.
BrookhartS. M. (2009). Exploring formative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CooperJ. E.HeY. (2012). Journey of “becoming”: Secondary teacher candidates’ concerns and struggles. Issues in Teacher Education, 21, 89-108.
10.
Cornelius-WhiteJ. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113-143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563
11.
CrichtonH.GilF. V. (2015). Student teachers’ perceptions of feedback as an aid to reflection for developing effective practice in the classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 512-524. doi:10.1080/02619768.2015.1056911
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
14.
Feiman-NemserS. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. The Teachers College Record, 103, 1013-1055.
15.
FlandersN. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
17.
FreibergH. J. (1976). An investigation of the effects of verbal teacher-student interaction of similar and different ability groups in secondary classrooms. Classroom Interaction Newsletter, 11(2), 34-45.
18.
FreibergH. J. (1987). Teacher self-evaluation and principal supervision. NASSP Bulletin, 71(498), 85-92. doi:10.1177/019263658707149814
19.
FreibergH. J. (1994-2017). CUIN 6370 Affective instruction class syllabus: Person-Centered Learning Assessment (Doctoral dissertation). College of Education, University of Houston, TX.
20.
FreibergH. J. (2013). Classroom management and student achievement. In HattieJ.AndermanE. (Eds.), International guide to student achievement (pp. 228-230). New York, NY: Routledge.
FreibergH. J.LambS. M. (2009). Dimensions of person-centered classroom management. Theory into Practice, 48, 99-105. doi:10.1080/00405840902776228
23.
FreibergH. J.WaxmanH. C. (1988). Alternative feedback approaches for improving student teachers’ classroom instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 8-14. doi:10.1177/002248718803900403
24.
FullerF. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226. doi:10.3102/00028312006002207
25.
GohP. S.MatthewsB. (2011). Listening to the concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 92-103.
26.
GohP. S.MatthewsB. (2013). Concerns of student teachers: Identifying emerging themes through self-assessment. In M. M. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 297-310). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
27.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
HooverN. L.CarrollR. G. (1987). Self-assessment of classroom instruction: An effective approach to inservice education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 179-191. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(87)90002-3
29.
HoustonW. R.WarnerA. R. (2000). Inquiry and reflection: Twin needs for improved teacher education. In D. J. MacIntyre & D. M. Byrd (Eds.), Research on effective models for teacher education (pp. 72-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
MarshallK. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
PotterR. B. (2016). Artisans, architects, and apprentices: Valuing the craft of teacher education. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 9, 5-22.
34.
PurkeyW. W.AspyD. N. (1988). The mental health of students: Nobody minds? Nobody cares?Person-centered Review, 3, 41-49.
35.
RodmanG. J. (2010). Facilitating the teaching-learning process through the reflective engagement of pre-service teachers. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 352(2), 20-34. doi:10.14221/ajte.2010v35n2.2
36.
RogersC. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
37.
RogersC. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
38.
RogersC. R. (1982). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
39.
RogersC. R.FreibergH. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
RosenshineB. (2015). Jere Brophy: An appreciation. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 50(2), 89-92.
41.
RossJ. A.BruceC. D. (2007). Teacher self-assessment: A mechanism for facilitating professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 146-159. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.035
42.
SchonD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, England: Temple Smith.
43.
SeelyS. R.FryS. W.RuppelM. (2011). Information literacy follow-through: Enhancing preservice teachers’ information evaluation skills through formative assessment. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30, 72-84. doi:10.1080/01639269.2011.565405
44.
SmartJ.MarshallJ. (2013). Interactions between classroom discourse, teacher questioning, and student cognitive engagement in middle school science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 249-267. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9297-9
45.
Sosanya-TellezC. (2010). Transformative teacher evaluation: Self evaluation for high performing teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. (3404707).
46.
StallingsJ.FreibergH. J. (1991). Observation for the improvement of teaching. In WalbergH.WaxmanH. (Eds.), Effective teaching: Current research (pp. 107-133). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
47.
StallingsJ. A. (1986). Using time effectively: A self-analytic approach. In ZumwalkK. (Ed.), Improving teaching: 1986 ASCD yearbook (pp. 15-27). Alexandria, VA: Association of Curriculum and Supervision.
48.
WadeB. (1972, November7). Teachers learn by doing in free school for them. Providence Journal, p. 14.
49.
WiensP. D.HessbergK.LoCasale-CrouchJ.DeCosterJ. (2013). Using a standardized video-based assessment in a university teacher education program to examine preservice teachers knowledge related to effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 24-33.
50.
WinkJ.WinkD. (2004). Teaching passionately: What’s love got to do with it?Boston, MA: Pearson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
