Preparing, recruiting, and retaining high-quality teachers into the profession has been a concern of policy makers and practitioners for some time. Teacher attrition is problematic and costly for schools and districts. However, relatively few studies have investigated the relationship between preservice teacher quality and teacher attrition. In this study, we analyze data from an apprenticeship-style teacher preparation program to understand the relationship between a measure of preservice teacher quality—student teachers’ observational scores—and their decisions to (a) enter into the profession, and (b) stay in the profession within the first 2 years after graduation. We find that more qualified student teachers are more likely to enter into the profession and stay in the profession, even after controlling for student teachers’ demographic characteristics and their academic achievement.
BarnesG.CroweE.SchaeferB. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. Retrieved from http://nctaf.org/wp-content/uploads/CTTFullReportfinal.pdf
BenjaminW. J. (2002, April1-5). Development and validation of student teaching performance assessment based on Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
4.
BerlinerD. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205-213.
5.
BoeE. E.BobbittS. A.CookL. H. (1997). Whither didst thou go? Retention, reassignment, migration, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective. The Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 371-389.
6.
BormanG. D.DowlingN. M. (2008). Teacher attrition: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367-409.
7.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education, 1, 176-216.
8.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2007). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. Available from www.teacherpolicyresearch.org
9.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RonfeldtM.WyckoffJ. (2011). The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications-to-transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1), 88-110.
10.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). Analyzing the determinants of the matching of public school teachers to jobs: Disentangling the preferences of teachers and employers. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(1), 83-117.
11.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.RockoffJ. (2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2593-2632.
12.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ.RockoffJ. (2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economics Review, 104(9), 2633-2679.
13.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673-682.
14.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS.AikenL. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Florence, KY: Routledge.
15.
CohenP.CohenJ.AikenL.WestS. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 315-346.
16.
College Research and Evaluation Services Team. (2016). Reliability of performance assessment and professionalism rubric (Technical Report). Arizona State University, Tempe AZ.
17.
CorcoranS. P.EvansW. N.SchwabR. M. (2004). Women, the labor market, and the declining relative quality of teachers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 449-470.
GoldhaberD.CowanJ.TheobaldR. (2016). Evaluating prospective teachers: Testing the predictive validity of the edTPA. Journal of Teacher Education. Published online May, 2017.
24.
GoldhaberD. D.GrossB.PlayerD. (2007). Are public schools really losing the “best”? Assessing the career transitions of teachers and their implications for the quality of the teacher workforce. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509666.pdf
25.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
26.
GuarinoC.SantibanezL.DaleyG. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173-208.
27.
HanushekE. (2011). Valuing teachers: How much is a good teacher worth?Education Next, 11(3), 40-45.
28.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.O’BrienD. M.RivkinS. G. (2005). The market for teacher quality (Working Paper 11154, NBER Working Paper Series). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w11154
29.
HarrisD. N.AdamsS. (2007). Understanding the level and causes of teacher turnover: A comparison with other profession. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 325-337.
30.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 798-812.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534.
33.
IngersollR. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/133/
34.
IngersollR.SmithT. (2004). What are the effects of mentoring and induction on beginning teacher turnover?American Education Research Journal, 41, 681-714.
35.
IngleW. (2009). Teacher quality and attrition in a U.S. school district. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(5), 557-585.
36.
JacobB.RockoffJ. E.TaylorE. S.LindyB.RosenR. (2016). Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC Public Schools (No. 22054). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
37.
JeraldC. D.Van HookK. (2011). More than measurement: The TAP system’s lessons learned for designing better teacher evaluation systems. Santa Monica, CA: National Institute for Excellence in Teaching. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533382.pdf
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York city. Economics of Education Review, 27, 615-631.
KriegJ. W. (2006). Teacher quality and attrition. Economics of Education Review, 25, 13-27.
42.
LankfordM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
43.
LevyA.JoyL.EllisP.JablonskiE.KarelitzT. (2012). Estimating teacher turnover costs: A case study. Journal of Education Finance, 38(2), 102-129.
44.
LuekensM. T.LyterD. M.FoxE. E.ChandlerK. (2004). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the Teacher Follow-Up Survey, 2000-2001. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004301.pdf
45.
MilanowskiA. (2004). The relationship between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33-53.
46.
MilanowskiA. T. (2011). Validity research on teacher evaluation systems based on the framework for teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED520519
47.
MorganG. B.HodgeK. J.TrepinksiT. M.AndersonL. W. (2014). The stability of teacher performance and effectiveness: Implications for policies concerning teacher evaluation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(95). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n95.2014
48.
MurnaneR. J.OlsenR. J. (1989). The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: Evidence from Michigan. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 347-352.
49.
MurnaneR. J.SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1989). The influences of salaries and “opportunity costs” on teachers’ career choices: Evidence from North Carolina. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 325-346.
OddenA. (2004). Lessons learned about standards-based teacher evaluation systems. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 126-137.
52.
PodgurskyM.MonroeR.WatsonD. (2004). The academic quality of public school teachers: An analysis of entry and exit behaviors. Economics of Education Review, 23(5), 507-518.
53.
ReiningerM. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127-145.
54.
RiceJ. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
55.
RockoffJ. E.JacobB. A.KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2011). Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one?Education, 6, 43-74.
56.
RockoffJ. E.SperoniC. (2010). Subjective and objective evaluations of teacher effectiveness. The American Economic Review, 100, 261-266.
57.
RoegmanR.GoodwinA.ReedR.Scott-McLaughlinR. (2016). Unpacking the data: An analysis of the use of Danielson’s (2007) framework for professional practice in a teaching residency program. Educational Assessment and Evaluation Association, 28, 111-137.
58.
RonfeldtM.CampbellS. C. (2016). Evaluating teacher preparation using graduates’ observational ratings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(4), 603-625.
SartainL.StoelingaS. R.BrownE. R. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-teacher conferences, and district implementation. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
61.
SingerJ.WillettJ. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62.
StinebricknerT. R. (2001). A dynamic model of teacher labor supply. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(1), 196-230.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Improving on teacher preparation: Building on innovation. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/teacherprep
65.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
66.
WilsonS.FlodenR. (2003). Creating effective teachers: Concise answers for hard questions. New York, NY: The American Association of Colleges for Teachers.
67.
WilsonS.FlodenR.Ferrini-MundyJ. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
