In this mixed methods study, we examined the responses of 82 preservice teachers to the acclaimed documentary Which Way Home, a film that profiles unaccompanied adolescents who hitchhiked the train system of Central America and Mexico en route to the United States. Using pre- and post-surveys (n = 82) and focus group interviews (n = 13), we found that preservice teachers intellectually grappled with immigration counter-stories and demonstrated two shifts in their thinking about immigration and their future teaching. Nested in the frameworks of critical race methodology and Freire’s critical consciousness model, this study illustrates one approach to exploring immigration.
AgarwalR.EpsteinS.OppenheimR.OylerC.SonuD. (2010). From ideal to practice and back again: Beginning teachers teaching for social justice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 237-247.
2.
Baquedano-LopezP. (2004). Traversing the center: The politics of language use in a Catholic religious education program for immigrant Mexican children. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(2), 212-232.
3.
BartonK. C.LevstikL. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BickmoreK. (2008). Social justice and the social studies. In LevstikL. S.TysonC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 155-171). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BrownK. D.BrownA. L. (2010). Silenced memories: An examination of the sociocultural knowledge on race and racial violence in official school curriculum. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 139-154.
6.
BuchananL. B. (2014). From Freedom Riders to the Children’s March: Civil rights documentaries as catalysts for historical empathy. Social Education, 78(2), 91-95.
7.
BuchananL. B. (2015). Elementary preservice teachers’ navigation of racism and whiteness through inquiry with historical documentary film. Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(2), 137-154.
8.
BullockP. L.FreedmanD. M. (2005). (Re)visions to a secondary teacher education course: Trials and triumphs in attempting to disrupt hegemonic understandings and performances of education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 135-149.
9.
CammisaR. (2009). Which way home [Motion picture]. USA: HBO Films.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
11.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
FixM.PasselJ. S. (2003, January). U.S. immigration: Trends and implications for schools. Presentation at the National Association for Bilingual Education NCLB Implementation Institute, New Orleans, LA.
13.
FránquizM. E.SalinasC. (2013). Knowing English is not enough! Cultivating academic literacies among high school newcomers. The High School Journal, 96(4), 339-357.
14.
FreireP. (2008). Education for critical consciousness. London, England: Continuum. (Original work published 1973).
15.
GalmanS. A.Pica-SmithC.RosenbergerC. (2010). Aggressive and tender navigations: Teacher educators confront whiteness in their practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 225-236.
16.
GarciaE.AriasM. B.MurriN. J.SernaC. (2010). Developing responsive teachers: A challenge for demographic reality. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 132-142.
17.
GarrettH. G.SegallA. (2013). (Re)considerations of ignorance and resistance in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 294-304.
18.
GarrettH. J. (2011). The routing and re-routing of difficult knowledge: Social studies teachers encounter When the Levees Broke. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 320-347.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
20.
GoodwinA. L. (2002). Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Education and Urban Society, 34(2), 156-172. doi:10.1177/0013124502034002003
21.
HessD. E. (2007). From Banished to Brother Outsider, Miss Navajo to an Inconvenient Truth: Documentary films as perspective-laden narratives. Social Education, 71, 194-199.
22.
HessD. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
HilburnJ. (2014). Challenges facing immigrant students beyond the linguistic domain in a new gateway state. The Urban Review, 46(5), 1-27. doi:10.1007/s11256-014-0273-x
24.
HilburnJ. (2015). Asset-based Civics for, with, and by immigrant students: Three sites of enriched teaching and learning for immigrant and native-born students. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 372-404. doi:10.1080/00933104.2015.1064843
25.
HilburnJ.RongX. L.ParkhouseH.TurnerA. (2015). Teaching immigrants inclusively: Social studies in a new gateway state. Social Studies Research and Practice, 10(1), 41-64. Available from http://www.socstrpr.org
26.
IrvineJ. J. (2003). Educating teachers for a diverse society: Seeing with the cultural eye. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27.
JournellW. (2013). What preservice social studies teachers (don’t) know about politics and current events—and why it matters. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(3), 316-351.
28.
JournellW.BuchananL. B. (2013). Confronting educational politics with preservice teachers: Reactions to Waiting for Superman. Action in Teacher Education, 35, 252-271.
29.
KohliR.SolórzanoD. G. (2012). Teachers, please learn our names!: Racial microaggressions and the K-12 classroom. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 15, 441-462.
30.
KumarR.HamerL. (2013). Preservice teachers’ attitudes and beliefs toward student diversity and proposed instructional practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 162-177.
31.
LabareeD. (2004). The trouble with Ed schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159-165.
33.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education?Qualitative Studies in Education, 11, 7-24.
34.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211-247.
35.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (2006). Yes, but how do we do it? In LandsmanJ.LewisC. W. (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism (pp. 29-42). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. J. (2009). Race still matters: Critical race theory in education. In AppleM.AuW.GandinL. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 110-122). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
Ladson-BillingsG. J.TateW. F. (1995). Towards a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97, 47-68.
38.
MarcusA. S. (2007). Celluloid blackboard: Teaching history with film. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
39.
MarcusA. S.MetzgerS. A.PaxtonR.StoddardJ. D. (2010). Teaching history with film: Strategies for secondary social studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
MarcusA. S.StoddardJ. D. (2009). The inconvenient truth about teaching history with documentary film: Strategies for presenting multiple perspectives and teaching controversial issues. The Social Studies, 100, 279-284.
41.
MontgomeryK. (2013). Pedagogy and privilege: The challenges and possibilities of teaching critically about racism. Critical Education, 4, 1-21.
42.
ParkhouseH. (2015). Presenting Precious Knowledge: Using film to model culturally sustaining pedagogy and youth civic activism for social studies teachers. The New Educator, 11(3), 204-226.
43.
PasselJ. S.SuroR. (2005). Rise, peak and decline: Trends in U.S. immigration 1992-2004. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
Plano ClarkV. L.GarrettA. L.Leslie-PeleckyD. L. (2010). Applying three strategies for integrating quantitative and qualitative databases in a mixed methods study of a nontraditional graduate education program. Field Methods, 22, 154-174.
46.
PowersJ. M. (2014). From segregation to school finance: The legal context for language rights in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 38, 81-105.
47.
RongX. L. (2012). Advocacy-oriented teacher education in new gateway states. Teacher Education and Practice, 25(4), 580-584.
48.
RongX. L.PreissleJ. (2009). Educating immigrant students in the 21st century: What educators need to know (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
49.
SizerT. R.SizerN. R. (1999). The students are watching: Schools and the moral contract. Boston, MA: Beacon.
50.
SolórzanoD. G. (1997). Images and words that wound: Critical race theory, racial stereotyping and teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(3), 5-19.
51.
SolórzanoD. G.YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23-44.
52.
SoxA. K. (2009). Latino immigrant students in southern schools: What we know and still need to learn. Theory Into Practice, 48, 312-318.
53.
StevensL. P. (2012). Immigrant populations: Teacher preparation for diversity. In BanksJ. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (pp. 1132-1135). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
54.
StoddardJ. D. (2007). Attempting to understand the lives of others: Film as a tool for developing historical empathy. In MarcusA. (Ed.), Celluloid blackboard: Teaching history with film (pp. 187-214). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
55.
StoddardJ. D. (2009). The ideological implications of using “educational” film to teach controversial events. Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 407-433.
56.
StoddardJ. D. (2010). Socratic seminar: A model for film discussion in the social studies. In HeilmanE.AmthorR.MissiasM. (Eds.), Social studies and diversity education: What we do and why we do it (pp. 288-291). New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
StoddardJ. D. (2013). Hillary: The movie, The History Channel, and the challenge of the documentary for democratic education. Teachers College Record, 115, 1-32.
58.
TerrazasA.FixM. (2008). Gambling on the future: Managing the educational challenges of rapid growth in Nevada. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
59.
TrierJ. (2013). Challenging Waiting for Superman through detournement. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 41(2), 68-77.
60.
TysonC. A. (2003). A bridge over troubled water: Social studies, civic education, and critical race theory. In Ladson-BillingsG. (Ed.), Critical race theory perspectives on the social studies: The profession, policies, and curriculum (pp. 15-26). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
61.
UkpokoduO. N. (2003). The challenge of teaching a social studies methods course from a transformative and social reconstructionist framework. The Social Studies, 94(2), 75-80.
WileyT. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance?Review of Research in Education, 38, 1-32.
64.
YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race media literacy: Challenging deficit discourse about Chicanas/os. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 30(1), 52-62.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
