We describe the process and outcomes of a project aimed at bringing together a set of diverse experts to generate a set of design recommendations for what should be considered when creating, sustaining, and assessing professional development systems to support the Common Core State Standards in mathematics. Although the recommendations were generated in mathematics, the underlying guiding principles for professional development are generalizable to other disciplines. As such, we discuss implications for professional development more broadly.
BorkoH.KoellnerK.JacobsJ. (2011). Meeting the challenges of scale: The importance of preparing professional development leaders. Teachers College Record. Available from http://www.tcrecord.org
2.
CarpenterT. P.FennemaE.PetersonP. L.ChiangC.LoefM. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499-531.
3.
ChapinS.O’ConnorC.AndersonN. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, grades K-6 (2nd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
4.
CobbP.SmithT. (2008). The challenge of scale: Designing schools and districts as learning organizations for instructional improvement in mathematics. In KrainerK.WoodT. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 3. Participants in mathematics teacher education: Individuals, teams, communities and networks (pp. 231-254). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
5.
Darling-HammondL.WeiR. C.AndreeA.RichardsonN.OrphanosS. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas, TX: National Staff Development Council.
6.
DedeC.KetelhutD. J.WhitehouseP.BreitL.McCloskeyE. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8-19.
7.
DesimoneL. (2009). How can we best measure teacher’s professional development and its effects on teachers and students?Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
8.
ElliottR.KazemiE.LesseigK.MummeJ.CarrollC.Kelley-PetersenM. (2009). Conceptualizing the work of leading mathematical tasks in professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 364-379.
9.
ElmoreR. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
10.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
11.
GaretM. S.WayneA. J.StancavageF.TaylorJ.EatonM.WaltersK.DoolittleF. (2011). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011-4024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
12.
GaretM. S.WayneA. J.StancavageF.TaylorJ.WaltersK.SongM.DoolittleF. (2010). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2010-4009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD.RonfeldtM.ShahanE.WilliamsonP. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross- professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100.
14.
GuskeyT. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
GuskeyT. R.YoonK. S. (2009). What works in professional development?Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
HillH. C.BallD. L. (2004). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330-351.
18.
LampertM.BeasleyH.GhousseiniH.KazemiE.FrankeM. L. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In SteinM. K.KucanL. (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129-141). New York, NY: Springer.
SmithM. S.SteinM. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 344-350.
21.
SmithM. S.SteinM. K. (2011). The five practices for organizing productive mathematical discussions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22.
SztajnP.MarrongelleK.SmithM.MeltonB. (2012). Supporting implementation of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Raleigh: The College of Education at the North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://psztajn.ced.ncsu.edu/pdrapid/full-report/
23.
WiliamD.ThompsonM. (2007). Integrating assessment with instruction: What will it take to make it work? In DwyerC. (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
