The implementation of the Common Core State Standards has posed a number of challenges for school leaders. This study applies a policy implementation conceptual framework to analyze data gathered from 46 interviews in six states. Findings suggest the existence of multiple barriers to Common Core State Standards implementation. To promote implementation, states need to increase local capacity, build will to implement, and engage in information campaigns that promote the Common Core beyond an audience of educators and to the public at large.
ArmstrongD.GoslingA.WeinmanJ.MarteauT. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31, 597-606.
2.
Center on Education Policy. (2011). States’ progress and challenges in implementing Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
DiamondJ. B. (2015). Implementing the Common Core: How individuals, organizational resources, and instructional practice matter. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 25-33). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Education Commission of the States. (2015). Core Commons: Emerging strategies and issues in implementing the Common Core. Denver, CO: Author.
6.
FirestoneW. A. (1989). Using reform: Conceptualizing district initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 151-164.
7.
FowlerF. C. (2013). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
8.
GlaserB. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
9.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2008). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research (3rd ed.). Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
10.
GrossN.GiacquintaJ. B.BernsteinM. (1971). Implementing organizational innovations. New York, NY: Basic.
11.
JochimA.LaveryL. (2015). The evolving politics of the Common Core: Issues in governance studies (No. 69). Washington, DC: Brookings.
12.
KoberN.RentnerD. S. (2011). Common Core State Standards: Progress and challenges in school districts’ implementation. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
13.
LeeC. D. (2015). The infrastructure and conceptual challenges of the Common Core State Standards: English Language Arts as a case. In J. A. SupovitzSpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 15-23). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
LovelessT. (2015). How well are American students learning?Washington, DC: Brookings.
15.
McDermottK. A. (2015). Implementation politics and the Common Core. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 155-164). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
16.
McDonnellL. M.ElmoreR. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 133-152.
17.
McGuinnP. (2015). Core confusion: A practitioner’s guide to understanding its complicated politics. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 145-153). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
McLaughlinM. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171-178.
19.
McLaughlinM. W.GlaabL.CarrascoI. H. (2014). Implementing Common Core State Standards in California: A report from the field. Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education.
20.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
O’DayJ. A. (2015). A window of opportunity: The politics and policies of Common Core implementation on California. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 35-43). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
PolikoffM. (2014). Common Core State Standards assessments: Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
25.
PolikoffM. S. (2015). Overcoming the challenges of choosing curriculum materials: A systematic approach to evaluating Common Core alignment. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 59-68). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
PorterW.RileyR.TowneL.ChalkS. M.HightowerA. M.LloydS. C.. . . SwansonC. B. (2013). Moving forward: A national perspective on state’s progress in Common Core State Standards implementation planning. Seattle, WA: Education First and Editorial Projects in Education.
27.
RemillardJ.TatonJ. (2015). Rewriting myths about curriculum materials and teaching to new standards. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 49-58). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
SmithJ.GasparianH. (forthcoming). Development of a 50-state typology of education governance. International Journal of Educational Reform.
30.
SpillaneJ. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.
31.
SpillaneJ. P.CallahanK. A. (2000). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 401-425.
32.
SpillaneJ. P.HopkinsM. (2015). School-subject variation in educational infrastructures: A cautionary implementation tale. In SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P. (Eds.), Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core (pp. 35-43). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
33.
SupovitzJ. A.SpillaneJ. P., (Eds.). (2015). Challenging Standards: Navigating conflict and building capacity in the era of the Common Core. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
34.
ThierM.SmithJ.PittsC.AndersonR. (2016). Influential spheres: Examining actors’ perceptions of education governance. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 11(8). Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/682
35.
WillisG. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
