The purpose of this study was to determine relationships among pacing, teacher effectiveness, and teacher intensity in the context of a realistic teaching situation. A scripted stimulus video was created in which the teacher demonstrated predefined pacing lapses to measure their effects on observers’ ratings of teacher effectiveness, teacher intensity, teacher pacing, and general perceptions. Participants (N = 164 college students) were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 41) to evaluate ongoing teacher effectiveness, teacher intensity, teacher pacing, or general perceptions (control group). Participants evaluated the teacher on their assigned construct using both continuous (Continuous Response Digital Interface) and summative measures (Likert-type scale). Results showed that the constructs had strong positive linear correlations with each other. The pacing group evidenced a greater response magnitude than the other three groups (effectiveness, intensity, control), suggesting that participants in the pacing group may have been reacting differently to some aspect of the teaching demonstration compared to the other groups.
AbramiP. C.LeventhalL.PerryR. P. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research, 52, 446–464. doi:10.3102/00346543052003446
2.
ArthurJ. R. (2002). Experienced teachers’ use of time in choral rehearsals of beginning and advanced choirs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.
3.
BlairT. R. (1984). Teacher effectiveness: The know-how to improve student learning. Reading Teacher, 38, 138–142.
4.
BlocherL.GreenwoodR.ShellahamerB. (1997). Teaching behaviors of middle school and high school band directors in the rehearsal setting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 457–469. doi:10.2307/3345539
5.
BrandM. (1985). Research in music teacher effectiveness. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 3(2), 13–16.
6.
BrendellJ. K. (1996). Time use, rehearsal activity, and student off-task behavior during the initial minutes of high school choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 6–14. doi:10.2307/3345409
7.
BrittinR. V.DukeR. A. (1997). Continuous versus summative evaluations of musical intensity: A comparison of two methods for measuring overall effect. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 245–258. doi:10.2307/3345584
8.
BrophyJ. (1986). Research linking teacher behavior to student achievement: Potential implications for instruction of Chapter 1 students. In WilliamsB. I.RichmondP. A.MasonB. J. (Eds.), Designs for compensatory education: Conference proceedings and papers (pp. 122–179). Washington, DC: Research and Evaluation Associates.
9.
BrophyJ. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3–21.
10.
BrophyJ. E. (2000). Teaching: Educational practice series–1. Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.
11.
BrophyJ. E.EvertsonC. M. (1976). Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
CarpenterH. (2003). Benjamin Britten: A biography. New York, NY: Faber & Faber.
13.
CassidyJ. W. (1990). Effect of intensity training on preservice teachers’ instruction accuracy and delivery effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 164–174. doi:10.2307/3345180
14.
ColwellC. M. (1995). The effect of teaching setting and self-evaluation on teacher intensity behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 6–21. doi:10.2307/3345788
15.
CoxJ. (1986). Choral rehearsal time usage in a high school and a university: A comparative analysis. Contributions to Music Education, 13, 7–22.
16.
CoxJ. (1989). Rehearsal organizational structures used by successful high school choral directors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 201–218. doi:10.2307/3344670
17.
DavisA. P. (1998). Performance achievement and analysis of teaching during choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 496–509. doi:10.2307/3345346
18.
DukeR. A. (1987). Observations of applied music instruction: The perceptions of trained and untrained observers. In MadsenC. K.PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of research in music behavior (pp. 115–124). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
19.
DukeR. A. (1999–2000). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 1–48.
20.
DukeR. A.BensonC. (2004). Steering from the caboose: Setting the pace of group piano instruction according to the least skilled students in the class. Update: Applications for Research in Music Education, 23(1), 41–53. doi:10.1177/87551233040230010106
21.
DukeR. A.PrickettC. A.JellisonJ. A. (1998). Empirical description of the pace of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 265–280. doi:10.2307/3345628
22.
FredricksonW. F. (1994). Band musicians’ performance and eye contact as influenced by loss of a visual and/or aural stimulus. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 306–317. doi:10.2307/3345738
23.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K.GregoryD. (2004). A fifteen-year history of the Continuous Response Digital Interface: Issues relating to validity and reliability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 1–15.
24.
GoolsbyT. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286–303. doi:10.2307/3345442
25.
GregoryD. (1995). The continuous response digital interface: An analysis of reliability measures. Psychomusicology, 14, 197–208. doi:10.1037/h0094083
26.
GuerriniS. (2008). Open letter to student music teachers: An equation for success. Canadian Music Educator, 50(2), 27–29.
27.
HancockC. B. (2003). An examination of preservice teaching intensity in relation to in-service teacher retention and attrition. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 166–178. doi:10.2307/3345849
28.
HendelC. (1995). Behavioral characteristics and instructional patterns of selected music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 182–203. doi:10.2307/3345635
29.
HoadleyU. (2003). Time to learn: Pacing and the external framing of teachers’ work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29, 265–274. doi:10.1080/0260747032000120141
30.
JumpL. (2011). Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: A systematic review. Learning, Media, and Technology, 36, 55–68. doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.521509
31.
KaiserK. A. (1998). The effect of differentiated high versus low intensity teaching on band musicians’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.
32.
KellyS. N. (2003). A time-use analysis of student intern verbal and non-verbal teaching behavior. Contributions to Music Education, 30(1), 55–68.
33.
KoonJ.MurrayH. G. (1995). Using multiple outcomes to validate student ratings of overall teacher effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 61–81.
34.
KouninJ. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
35.
LychnerJ. A. (1998). An empirical study concerning terminology relating to aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303–319. doi:10.2307/3345630
36.
MadsenC. K. (1988). Intensity as an attribute of effective teaching. In KempA. (Ed.), Research in music education: A festschrift for Arnold Bentley (2nd ed., pp. 45–52). London, UK: International Society for Music Education.
37.
MadsenC. K. (1990). Measuring musical response. Music Educators Journal, 77(3), 26–28. doi:10.2307/3397835
38.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A. (1985). Observation of approval/disapproval in music: Perception versus actual classroom events. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 205–214. doi:10.2307/3344807
39.
MadsenC. K.MadsenC. H. (1998). Teaching/Discipline: A positive approach for educational development (4th ed.). Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Company of Raleigh.
40.
MadsenC. K.StandleyJ. M.ByoJ. L.CassidyJ. W. (1992). Assessment of effective teaching by instrumental music student teachers and experts. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 10(2), 20–24. doi:10.1177/875512339201000206
41.
MadsenK. (2003). The effect of accuracy of instruction, teacher delivery, and student attentiveness on musicians’ evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 38–50. doi:10.2307/3345647
42.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
MooreR. S. (1981). Comparative use of teaching time by American and British elementary music specialists. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 66–67, 62–68.
44.
MurrayH. G.RenaudR. D. (1995). Disciplinary differences in classroom teaching behaviors. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64, 31–39. doi:10.1002/tl.37219956406
45.
RubinL. J. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York, NY: Random House.
46.
ShavelsonR.Dempsey-AtwoodN. (1976). Generalizability of measures of teaching behavior. Review of Educational Research, 46, 553–611. doi:10.3102/00346543046004553
47.
SiebenalerD. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6–20. doi:10.2307/3345462
48.
SimpsonR. E. (2009). The effect of performance errors on perceptions of performance quality in J. S. Bach’s Bourée from the Suite for Unaccompanied Cello #3 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, Tallahassee.
49.
SingleN. A. (1990). An exploratory study of pacing in the instrumental music rehearsal. Contributions to Music Education, 17, 32–43.
50.
StandleyJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1987, Summer). Intensity as an attribute of effective therapist/client interaction. Quodlibet, pp. 15–20.
51.
StodolskyS. S. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 11–18.
52.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W.HoyW. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248. doi:10.3102/00346543068002202
53.
WagnerM. J.StrulE. P. (1979). Comparisons of beginning versus experienced elementary music educators in the use of teaching time. Journal of Research in Music Education, 27, 113–125. doi:10.2307/3344897
54.
WangC. C.SoginD. W. (1997). Self-reported versus observed classroom activities in elementary general music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 444–456. doi:10.2307/3345538
55.
WaxmanH. C.EashM. J. (1983). Utilizing students’ perceptions and context variables to analyze effective teaching: A process-product investigation. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 321–325.
56.
WhitakerJ. A. (2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 290–309. doi:10.1177/0022429411414910
57.
WyneM. D.StuckG. B. (1982). Time and learning: Implications for the classroom teacher. Elementary School Journal, 83, 67–75.
58.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134–146. doi:10.2307/3345286
59.
YarbroughC. (1988). Content and pacing in music teaching. In FlowersP. J. (Ed.), Current issues in music education: Vol. 13. Student and teacher competencies: Interacting for success. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
60.
YarbroughC.DunnD. E.BairdS. L. (1996). A longitudinal study of teaching in a choral rehearsal. Southeastern Journal of Music Education, 8, 7–31.
