The purpose of this study was to examine preservice and inservice teachers’ perceptions of pacing in ensemble rehearsal settings. We used Silveira’s definition of pacing as our conceptual framework: “the continuous flow of instruction without unnecessary interruptions and/or unnecessary sounds and without presentation of irrelevant material.” Participants were 23 preservice and 25 inservice music teachers. They viewed four excerpts of ensemble rehearsals and moved a Continuous Response Digital Interface dial to indicate their perceptions of fast and slow pacing. Based on our findings, we largely confirmed Silveira’s definition regarding pacing but suggest amending the definition for music rehearsal contexts to include student engagement and teacher talk. We propose the following revised definition of pacing: “the continuous flow of instruction without unnecessary interruptions and/or unnecessary sounds, without excessive teacher talk, and with presentation of relevant material while maintaining student engagement.”
ArthurJ. A. (2003). Experienced teachers’ use of time in choral rehearsals of beginning and advanced choirs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Florida State University, Tallahassee.
2.
BerlinerD. C. (1976). Impediments to the study of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 5–13. doi:10.1177/002248717602700103
3.
BiddleB. J.EllenaW. J. (1964). Contemporary research on teacher effectiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4.
BlairT. R. (1984). Teacher effectiveness: The know-how to improve student learning. The Reading Teacher, 38, 138–142.
5.
BlocherL.GreenwoodR.ShellahamerB. (1997). Teaching behaviors of middle school and high school band directors in the rehearsal setting. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 457–469. doi:10.2307/3345539
6.
BrittinR. V. (2005). Preservice and experienced teachers’ lesson plans for beginning instrumentalists. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 26–39. doi:10.1177/002242940505300103
7.
BrittinR. V.DukeR. A. (1997). Continuous versus summative evaluations of musical intensity: A comparison of two methods for measuring overall effect. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 245–258. doi:10.2307/3345584
8.
BrophyJ. E. (2000). Teaching: Educational practice series-1. Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.
9.
ByoJ. L. (1990). Recognition of intensity contrasts in the gestures of beginning conductors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 157–163. doi:10.2307/3345179
10.
CangelosiJ. S. (1986). Evaluating teaching within a teacher advancement plan. The Clearing House, 59, 405–409.
11.
ChaffinC. R. (2009). Perceptions of instrumental music teachers regarding the development of effective rehearsal techniques. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 181, 21–36.
12.
ColwellC. M. (1995). The effect of teaching setting and self-evaluation on teacher intensity behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 6–21. doi:10.2307/3345788
13.
DavisA. P. (1998). Performance achievement and analysis of teaching during choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 496–509. doi:10.2307/3345346
14.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DoyleW. (1981). Research on classroom contexts. Journal of Teacher Education, 32(6), 3–6.
16.
DoyleW. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In WittrockM. C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York, NY: Macmillan.
17.
FenstermacherG. D.SoltisJ. F. (1992). Approaches to teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
18.
FraserB. J.WalbergH. J.WelchW. W.HattieJ. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 147–252.
19.
GeringerJ. M.MadsenC. K.GregoryD. (2004). A fifteen-year history of the Continuous Response Digital Interface: Isues relating to validity and reliability. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 160, 1–15.
20.
GoolsbyT. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44(4), 286–303. doi:10.2307/3345442
21.
GoolsbyT. W. (1997). Verbal instruction in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of three career levels and preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(1), 21–40. doi:10.2307/3345463
22.
GregoryD. (1995). The continuous response digital interface: An analysis of reliability measures. Psychomusicology, 14, 197–208. doi:10.1037/h0094083
23.
GrobeR. P.PettiboneT. J. (1975). Effect of instructional pace on student attentiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 131–134.
24.
HarlanJ. C.RowlandS. T. (2002). Behavior management strategies for teachers (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
25.
JohnsonC. MFredricksonW. E. (1995). The effect of aural commentary, written comments, and behavioral self-assessment on conductor intensity. Journal of Band Research, 30(2), 27–38.
26.
KellyS. N. (2003). A time-use analysis of student intern verbal and non-verbal teaching behavior. Contributions to Music Education, 30, 55–68.
27.
KrippendorffK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
29.
LychnerJ. A. (1998). An empirical study concerning terminology relating to aesthetic response to music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 303–319. doi:10.2307/3345630
30.
MadsenC. K. (1990a). Measuring musical response. Music Educators Journal, 77(3), 26–28. doi:10.2307/3397835
31.
MadsenC. K. (1990b). Teacher intensity in relationship to music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 104, 38–46.
32.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher “on-task” to intensity and effective music teaching. Canadian Journal of Research in Music Education, 30, 87–94.
33.
MadsenC. K.MadsenC. H. (2016). Teaching/discipline: A positive approach for educational development (5th ed.). Raleigh, NC: Contemporary Publishing Company of Raleigh.
34.
MadsenC. K.StandleyJ. M.CassidyJ. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85–92. doi:10.2307/3344700
35.
MurrayH. G.RenaudR. D. (1995). Disciplinary differences in classroom teaching behaviors. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64, 31–39.
36.
PeckC. A.GallucciCSloanT. (2010). Negotiating implementation of high-stakes performance assessment policies in teacher education: From compliance to inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 451–463. doi:10.1177/0022487109354520
37.
PriceH. E.ByoJ. L. (2002). Rehearsing and conducting. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance: Creative strategies for teaching and learning (pp. 335–352). New York, NY: Oxford.
38.
SaldañaJ. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage
39.
SilveiraJ. M. (2014). The perception of pacing in a music appreciation class and its relationship to teacher effectiveness and teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0022429414542978
40.
SingleN. (1990). An exploratory study of pacing in the instrumental music rehearsal. Contributions to Music Education, 17, 32–43.
41.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
43.
ThorpeL. P. (1958). Learning theory and music teaching. In Henry (Ed.), Basic concepts in music education (pp. 163–194). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
44.
WhitakerJ. A. (2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 290–309.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
