The purpose of this replication and extension study was to examine how teacher delivery and student progress influenced experienced teachers’ perceptions of overall teaching effectiveness. Participants (N = 60 experienced music teachers) viewed 12 private lesson excerpts that included four separate conditions: (a) high teacher delivery and more student progress, (b) high teacher delivery and less student progress, (c) low teacher delivery and more student progress, and (d) low teacher delivery and less student progress. Participants rated teacher delivery, student progress, student musicianship, teacher knowledge of subject matter, and overall teaching effectiveness for each private lesson excerpt. Teaching excerpts with high teacher delivery were rated as more effective than excerpts with low teacher delivery, irrespective of student progress. Results of a multiple regression indicated that teacher delivery was the largest predictor for experienced teachers’ ratings of overall teaching effectiveness, followed closely by student progress.
BergeeM. J. (1992). A scale assessing music student teachers’ rehearsal effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 5-13. doi:10.2307/3345770
2.
BergeeM. J. (2005). An exploratory comparison of novice, intermediate, and expert orchestral conductors. International Journal of Music Education, 23, 23–26. doi:10.1177/0255761405050928
3.
DukeR. A. (1994). Bringing the art of rehearsal into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30, 78-95.
4.
DukeR. A. (1999/2000). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 1-48.
5.
HamannD. L.BakerD. S.McAllisterP. A.BauerW. I. (2000). Factors affecting university music students’ perceptions of lesson quality and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 102-113. doi:10.2307/3345569
6.
MadsenC. K. (1988). The relationship of teacher on-task to perceived teacher effectiveness. Proceedings of the Current Issues in Music Education Symposium, 13, 2-8.
7.
MadsenC. K.StandleyJ. M.CassidyJ. W. (1989). Demonstration and recognition of high and low contrasts in teacher intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 85-92.
8.
MadsenK. (2003). The effect of accuracy of instruction, teacher delivery, and student attentiveness on musicians’ evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 38-50. doi:10.2307/3345647
9.
MarshH. W.WareJ. E.Jr. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 126-134.
10.
MeierR. S.FeldhusenJ. F. (1979). Another look at Dr. Fox: Effect of stated purpose for evaluation, lecturer expressiveness, and density of lecture content on student ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 339-345.
11.
MontemayorM. (2006). Rehearsal achievement in high school bands and its relationship to performance quality, selected rehearsal procedures, and evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3241934)
12.
MorrisonS. J.MontemayorM.WiltshireE. S. (2004). The effect of a recorded model on band students’ performance self-evaluations, achievement, and attitude. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 116-129. doi:10.2307/3345434
13.
NaftulinD. H.WareJ. E.Jr.DonnellyF. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 630-635.
14.
NapolesJ.MacLeodR. B. (2013). The influences of teacher delivery and student progress on preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 249-261. doi:10.1177/0022429413497234
15.
PaulS. J. (1998). The effects of peer teaching experiences on the professional teacher role development of undergraduate instrumental music education majors. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 137, 73-92.
16.
PerryR. P.AbramiP. C.LeventhalL. (1979). Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness and lecture content on student ratings and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 107-116.
17.
ReddingJ. B. (2011). The effect of choral conductor intensity on the perception of teacher effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (3483596)
18.
SiebenalerD. J. (1997). Analysis of teacher-student interactions in the piano lessons of adults and children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 6-20. doi:10.2307/3345462
19.
WareJ. E.Jr.WilliamsR. G. (1975). The Dr. Fox effect: A study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction. Journal of Medical Education, 50, 149-156.
20.
WareJ. E.Jr.WilliamsR. G. (1977). Discriminant analysis of student ratings as a means for identifying lecturers who differ in enthusiasm or information-giving. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 627-639.
21.
WilliamsR. G.WareJ. E.Jr. (1977). An extended visit with Dr. Fox: Validity of student satisfaction with instruction ratings after repeated exposures to a lecturer. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 449-457.
22.
YarbroughC. (1975). Effect of magnitude of conductor behavior on students in selected mixed choruses. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 134-146. doi:10.2307/3345286
23.
YarbroughC.MadsenK. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469-481. doi:10.2307/3345486
