The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships of teaching effectiveness, ensemble performance quality, and selected rehearsal procedures to various measures of intrarehearsal achievement (i.e., musical improvement exhibited by an ensemble during the course of a single rehearsal). Twenty-nine high school bands were observed in two rehearsals of a common music selection. Separate panels of experts evaluated ensemble performance quality from audio recordings and teacher effectiveness from video recordings. Rehearsal frames were identified in second-day rehearsals, and “before” and “after” rehearsal trials for each target (N = 404) were extracted and evaluated for achievement. Selected rehearsal procedures within each frame also were measured. Results indicated no significant relationships between rehearsal effectiveness scores and any of five conceptualizations of intrarehearsal achievement. Significant, positive correlations were found between performance quality and three achievement computations, and between performance quality and rehearsal effectiveness. With one exception, none of the selected rehearsal procedures were associated with achievement differences within rehearsal frames. These findings suggest limitations of considering ensemble teacher evaluation in terms of student achievement. An ensemble’s extant skill level may contribute more to short-term rehearsal achievement than does the quality of its conductor’s rehearsing.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431–441. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431
2.
BergeeM. J. (1992). A scale assessing music student teachers’ rehearsal effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 40, 5–13. doi:10.2307/3345770
3.
BergeeM. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 1–14.
4.
BergeeM. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601–612. doi:10.2307/3345425
5.
BergeeM. J. (2005). An exploratory comparison of novice, intermediate, and expert orchestral conductors. International Journal of Music Education, 23, 23–26. doi:10.1177/0255761405050928
6.
BergeeM. J. (2007). Performer, rater, occasion, and sequence as sources of variability in music performance assessment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 344–358. doi:10.1177/0022429408317515
7.
BerlinerD. C. (1986). In pursuit of the expert pedagogue. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 5–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X015007007
8.
BlantonF. L. (1994). The relationships among band director rehearsal behaviors and subjective evaluations by panels of differing musical backgrounds. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(03), 857A.
9.
BrophyJ. (1987). Teacher effects research and teacher quality. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 22(1), 14–23.
10.
BurnsedV.HinkleD.KingS. (1985). Performance evaluation reliability at selected concert festivals. Journal of Band Research, 21(1), 22–29.
11.
CarpenterR. A. (1988). A descriptive analysis of relationships between verbal behaviors of teacher-conductors and ratings of selected junior and senior high school band rehearsals. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 7(1), 37–40.
12.
CavittM. E. (2003). A descriptive analysis of error correction in instrumental music rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 218–230. doi:10.2307/3345375
13.
ColpritE. J. (2003). Teacher verbalization of targets in Suzuki string lessons. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 157, 49–61.
14.
DerbyS. E. (2001). Rehearsal of repertoire in elementary, middle, and high school choirs: How teachers effect change in student performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(03), 954A.
15.
DukeR. A. (1994a). Bringing the art of rehearsal into focus: The rehearsal frame as a model for prescriptive analysis of rehearsal conducting. Journal of Band Research, 30(2), 78–95.
16.
DukeR. A. (1994b). Years later: Music teachers’ evaluations of videotaped episodes from their own student teaching. In DukeR. A. (Ed.), Texas music education research 1994(pp. 7–13). Austin: Texas Music Educators Association.
17.
DukeR. A. (1999/2000). Measures of instructional effectiveness in music research. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 143, 1–48.
18.
DukeR. A. (2005). Intelligent music teaching: Essays on the core principles of effective instruction. Austin, TX: Learning and Behavior Resources.
19.
DukeR. A.BlackmanM. D. (1991). The relationship between observers’ recorded teacher behavior and evaluation of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 290–297. doi:10.2307/3345748
20.
DukeR. A.ByoJ. L. (2008). The habits of musicianship: A radical approach to beginning band. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Center for Music Learning.
21.
DukeR. A.HenningerJ. C. (1998). Effects of verbal corrections on student attitude and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 482–495. doi:10.2307/3345345
22.
DukeR. A.PrickettC. A.JellisonJ. A. (1998). Empirical description of the pace of music instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 265–280. doi:10.2307/3345628
23.
DukeR. A.SimmonsA. L. (2006). The nature of expertise: Narrative descriptions of 19 common elements observed in the lessons of three renowned artist-teachers. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 170, 7–19.
24.
FiskeH. E.Jr. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186–196. doi:10.2307/3344643
25.
GonzalezL. S. (2001). Rehearsal effectiveness: An analytical study of rehearsal philosophies and procedures of selected public school and postsecondary wind band conductors. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(05), 1628A.
26.
GoodsteinR. E. (1987). An investigation into leadership behaviors and descriptive characteristics of high school band directors in the United States. Journal of Research in Music Education, 35, 13–25. doi:10.2307/3345165
27.
GoolsbyT. W. (1996). Time use in instrumental rehearsals: A comparison of experienced, novice, and student teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44, 286–303. doi:10.2307/3345442
28.
GoolsbyT. W. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers’ preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 174–187. doi:10.2307/3345722
29.
GrecheskyR. N. (1985). An analysis of nonverbal and verbal conducting behaviors and their relationship to expressive musical performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46A, 2956.
30.
HamannD. L.BakerD. (2004). Survey of teacher effectiveness. In HamannD. L.GillespieR. (Eds.), Strategies for teaching strings: Building a successful string and orchestra program (pp. 154–159). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
HamannD. L.BakerD. S.McAllisterP. A.BauerW. I. (2000). Factors affecting university music students’ perceptions of lesson quality and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 48, 102–113. doi:10.2307/3345569
32.
HancockG. R.KlockarsA. J. (1991). The effect of scale manipulations on validity: Targetting frequency rating scales for anticipated performance levels. Applied Ergonomics, 22, 147–154. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(91)90153-9
33.
HenningerJ. C. (2002). The effects of knowledge of instructional goals on observations of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 37–50. doi:10.2307/3345691
34.
HewittM. P.SmithB. P. (2004). The influence of teaching-career level and primary performance instrument on the assessment of music performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 314–327. doi:10.1177/002242940405200404
35.
HirschE. D.Jr. (1996). The schools we need and why we don’t have them. New York, NY: Doubleday.
36.
HouseR. E. (1998). Effects of expressive and nonexpressive conducting on the performance and attitudes of advanced instrumentalists. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59A, 4004.
37.
JuchniewiczJ. (2010). The influence of social intelligence on effective music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58, 276–293. doi:10.1177/0022429410378368
38.
KingG. (1998). Exemplary music educator: A case study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 137, 57–72.
39.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A. (1985). Behavioral training in music education: Perception of approval/disapproval in music education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 85, 119–130.
40.
MadsenC. K.DukeR. A. (1987). The effect of teacher training on the ability to recognize need for giving approval for appropriate student behavior. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 91, 103–109.
41.
MadsenC. K.GeringerJ. M. (1989). The relationship of teacher “on-task” to intensity and effective music teaching. Canadian Music Educator, 30, 87–94.
42.
MadsenK. (2003). The effect of accuracy of instruction, teacher delivery, and student attentiveness on musicians’ evaluation of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 38–50. doi:10.2307/3345647
43.
MadsenK.CassidyJ. W. (2005). The effect of focus of attention and teaching experience on perceptions of teaching effectiveness and student learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 222-233. doi:10.1177/002242940505300304
44.
MaranzanoC. (2000). Music teacher performance evaluation: A call for more inclusive models. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 267–274.
45.
MorrisonS. J.PriceH. E.GeigerC. G.CornacchioR. A. (2009). The effect of conductor expressivity on ensemble performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 57, 37–49. doi:10.1177/0022429409332679
46.
MossE. A. (2007). Characteristics of effective instrumental music teachers: Novice and experienced teachers’ perceptions of where the most important characteristics are acquired. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(04).
47.
NápolesJ. (2013). The influences of presentation modes and conducting gestures on the perceptions of expressive choral performance of high school musicians attending a summer choral camp. International Journal of Music Education, 31, 321–330. doi:10.1177/0255761411434823
48.
NápolesJ.MacLeodR. B. (2013). The influences of teacher delivery and student progress on preservice teachers’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 249–261. doi:10.1177/0022429413497234
49.
OlsonR. E. (2004). Education research can and must address “what works” questions. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 27–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X033001027
50.
PetersonK. (2004). Research on school teacher evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 88(639), 60–79. doi:10.1177/019263650408863906
51.
PriceH. E.ByoJ. L. (2002). Rehearsing and conducting. In ParncuttR.McPhersonG. E. (Eds.), The science and psychology of music performance (pp. 335–351). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
PriceH. E.ChangE. C. (2005). Conductor and ensemble performance expressivity and state festival ratings. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 66–77. doi:10.1177/002242940505300106
53.
PriceH. E.WinterS. (1991). Effect of strict and expressive conducting on performances and opinions of eighth-grade band students. Journal of Band Research, 27(1), 30–43.
54.
PrickettC. A.DukeR. A. (1992). Evaluation of music instruction by musicians and nonmusicians assigned differential observation tasks. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 113, 41–50.
55.
SidotiV. J. (1990). The effects of expressive and nonexpressive conducting on the performance accuracy of selected expressive markings by individual high school instrumentalists. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 3270A.
56.
SilveyB. A. (2011). The effect of ensemble performance quality on the evaluation of conducting expressivity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 162–173. doi:10.1177/0022429411406173
57.
StandleyJ. M.MadsenC. K. (1991). An observation procedure to differentiate teaching experience and expertise in music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 39, 5–11. doi:10.2307/3344604
58.
TaebelD. K. (1990). An assessment of the classroom performance of music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 38, 5–23. doi:10.2307/3344826
59.
TeachoutD. J. (1997). Preservice and experience teachers’ opinions of skills and behaviors important to successful music teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 41–50. doi:10.2307/3345464
60.
ThompsonS.WilliamonA. (2003). Evaluating evaluation: Musical performance assessment as a research tool. Music Perception, 21(1), 21–41. doi:10.1525/mp.2003.21.1.21
61.
WaymireM. D. (2011). Behavioral analysis of directors of high-performing versus low-performing high school bands. Dissertation Abstracts International, 73(02).
62.
WhitakerJ. A. (2011). High school band students’ and directors’ perceptions of verbal and nonverbal teaching behaviors. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 290–309. doi:10.1177/0022429411414910
63.
WorthyM. D. (2003). Rehearsal frame analysis of an expert wind conductor in high school vs. college band rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 156, 11–19.
64.
WorthyM. D. (2006). Observations of three expert wind conductors in college rehearsals. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 168, 51–61.
65.
WorthyM. D.ThompsonB. L. (2009). Observation and analysis of expert teaching in beginning band. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 180, 29–41.
66.
YarbroughC.HenleyP. (1999). The effect of observation focus on evaluations of choral rehearsal excerpts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 308–318. doi:10.2307/3345486
67.
YarbroughC.MadsenK. (1998). The evaluation of teaching in choral rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 469–481. doi:10.2307/3345344
68.
YarbroughC.PriceH. E. (1989). Sequential patterns of instruction in music. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 179–187. doi:10.2307/3344668
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
