Results from experimental and nonexperimental studies have shown that teachers differ in their effectiveness. In addition, evidence from nonexperimental studies has indicated that teacher effects last for 3 years in elementary grades. This study uses data from Project STAR and its follow-up study, the Lasting Benefits Study, to examine whether teacher effects from kindergarten to fifth grade can simultaneously affect sixth grade achievement. Teacher effects are defined as teacher-specific residuals adjusted for student background and treatment effects. Findings indicate that the teacher effects persist through sixth grade in mathematics, reading, and science. The findings also suggest that teacher effects are important and that their cumulative effects on student achievement are considerable.
BallouD.SandersW.WrightP. (2004). Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 37–65.
2.
BormanG. D.KimballS. M. (2005). Teacher quality and educational equality: Do teachers with higher standards-based evaluation ratings close student achievement gaps?Elementary School Journal, 106, 3–20.
3.
BraunH. (2005). Value-added modeling: What does due diligence require? In LissitzR. (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and applications (pp. 19–38). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
4.
BrimerA.MadausF. G.ChapmanB.KallaghanT.WoodR. (1978). Sources of difference in school achievement. Windsor, UK: NFER.
5.
BrophyJ. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 10, 1069–1077.
6.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VidgorJ. L. (2006). Teacher-student matching and the assessment of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Human Resources, 41, 778–820.
7.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VidgorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.
8.
FreedmanD. A. (2006). Statistical models for causation. What inferential leverage do they provide?Evaluation Review, 30, 691–713.
9.
GallagherH. A. (2004). Vaughn Elementary’s innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement?Peabody Journal of Education, 79, 79–107.
10.
GoldhaberD. D.BrewerD. J. (1997). Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 505–523.
11.
GoodT. (1979). Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school. Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 52–64.
12.
GoodT.BrophyJ. (1987). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
13.
GoodT.GrouwsD. (1977). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 49–54.
14.
GreenwaldR.HedgesL. V.LaineR. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361–396.
15.
HanushekE. A. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement: Estimation using micro data. American Economic Review, 61, 280–288.
16.
HanushekE. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141–1177.
17.
HanushekE. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143–163.
18.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1999). Changes in the Black-White gap in achievement test scores. Sociology of Education, 72, 111–135.
19.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 172–177.
20.
HongG.RaudenbushS. W. (2008). Causal inference of time-varying instructional treatments. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 333–362.
21.
KonstantopoulosS. (2008). Do small classes reduce the achievement gap between low and high achievers? Evidence from Project STAR. Elementary School Journal, 108, 275–291.
22.
KruegerA. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497–532.
23.
KruegerA. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. Economic Journal, 113, 34–63.
24.
McCaffreyD. F.LockwoodJ. R.KoretzD.LouisT. A.HamiltonL. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67–101.
25.
MurnaneR. J.PhillipsB. R. (1981). What do effective teachers of inner-city children have in common?Social Science Research, 10, 83–100.
26.
NyeB.HedgesL. V.KonstantopoulosS. (1999). The long term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127–142.
27.
NyeB.HedgesL. V.KonstantopoulosS. (2000). Effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123–151.
28.
NyeB.KonstantopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.
29.
PedersenE.FaucherT. A.EatonW. W. (1978). A new perspective on the effects of first grade teachers on children’s subsequent status. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 1–31.
30.
PorterA. C.SmithsonJ.BlankR.ZeidnerT. (2007). Alignment as a teacher variable. Applied Measurement in Education, 20, 27–51.
31.
RaudenbushS. W. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice?Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 121–129.
32.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
RaudenbushS. W.WilmsJ. D. (1995). The estimation of school effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 307–335.
34.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.
35.
RowanB.CorrentiR.MillerR. J. (2002). What large scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525–1567.
36.
SandersW. L.RiversJ. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
37.
SchmidtW. H.HouangR. T.McKnightC. C. (2005). Value-added research: Right idea but wrong solution? In LissitzR. (Ed.), Value-added models in education: Theory and applications (pp. 145–165). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.
38.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
