Marketers frequently create social media content (i.e., firm-generated content; FGC) to ignite interest in new movies. Thus, there is a clear need to understand the magnitude and heterogeneity of the effect of FGC on movie demand and associated user-generated content (UGC). The authors empirically examine the complex interactions among FGC, UGC, and sales using social media (tweet) data that are normally available to firms. They investigate two potential mechanisms by which FGC may drive box office revenues: (1) a direct mechanism, such that users who see FGC directly drive revenue, and (2) an indirect “ripple effect,” by which FGC increases movie-related UGC, which then drives consumption. By analyzing 145,502 firm-generated and 5.9 million user-generated Twitter posts associated with 159 movies, the authors find a positive and significant effect of FGC on movie sales, which UGC fully mediates, which supports the indirect ripple effect reasoning. Impressions of FGC by followers of firm accounts, as opposed to nonfollowers of firm accounts, mainly drive the effect of FGC on UGC. In addition, FGC by movie accounts is more effective than that by actors and studios. Firms’ regular posts with a movie-specific hashtag are more effective than replies, retweets, and posts without the hashtag. The finding of the ripple effect suggests that movie executives should focus on creating FGC that sparks conversations among followers when new movies are released.
AinslieAndrewDrèzeXavierZufrydenFred (2005), “Modeling Movie Life Cycles and Market Share,” Marketing Science, 24 (3), 508–17.
2.
AppelGilGrewalLaurenHadiRhondaStephenAndrew T. (2020), “The Future of Social Media in Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48 (1), 79–95.
3.
ArellanoManuelBondStephen (1991), “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277–97.
4.
AsurSitaramHubermanBernardo A. (2010), “Predicting the Future with Social Media,” in 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology.IEEE,492–99.
5.
BaronReubenKennyDavid A. (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.
6.
BassFrank M. (1969), “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables,” Management Science, 15 (5), 215–27.
7.
BergerJonah (2014), “Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586–607.
8.
BermanRonMelumadShiriHumphreyColmanMeyerRobert (2019), “A Tale of Two Twitterspheres: Political Microblogging During and After the 2016 Primary and Presidential Debates,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (6), 895–917.
9.
BorahAbhishekTellisGerard J. (2016), “Halo (Spillover) Effects in Social Media: Do Product Recalls of One Brand Hurt or Help Rival Brands?” Journal of Marketing Research, 53 (2), 143–60.
BruceNorris I.FoutzNatasha ZhangKolsariciCeren (2012), “Dynamic Effectiveness of Advertising and Word of Mouth in Sequential Distribution of New Products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (4), 469–86.
12.
ChevalierJudith A.MayzlinDina (2006), “The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (3), 345–54.
13.
ChintaguntaPradeep K.GopinathShyamVenkataramanSriram (2010), “The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregating Across Local Markets,” Marketing Science, 29 (5), 944–57.
14.
ColicevAnatoliMalsheAshwinPauwelsKoenO’ConnorPeter (2018), “Improving Consumer Mindset Metrics and Shareholder Value Through Social Media: The Different Roles of Owned and Earned Media,” Journal of Marketing, 82 (1), 37–56.
15.
CulottaAronCutlerJennifer (2016), “Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks,” Marketing Science, 35 (3), 343–62.
16.
DanaherPeter J.DaggerTracey S. (2013), “Comparing the Relative Effectiveness of Advertising Channels: A Case Study of a Multimedia Blitz Campaign,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 517–34.
17.
DharVasantChangElain A. (2009), “Does Chatter Matter? The Impact of User-Generated Content on Music Sales,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23 (4), 300–307.
18.
DuanWenjingGuBinWhinstonAndrew B. (2008a), “Do Online Reviews Matter? An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data,” Decision Support Systems, 45 (4), 1007–16.
19.
DuanWenjingGuBinWhinstonAndrew B. (2008b), “The Dynamics of Online Word-of-Mouth and Product Sales—An Empirical Investigation of the Movie Industry,” Journal of Retailing, 84 (2), 233–42.
20.
EscandonRosa (2020), “The Film Industry Made a Record-Breaking $100 Billion Last Year,” Forbes(March 12), https://www.forbes.com/sites/rosaescandon/2020/03/12/the-film-industry-made-a-record-breaking-100-billion-last-year.
21.
FossenBeth L.SchweidelDavid A. (2017), “Television Advertising and Online Word-of-Mouth: An Empirical Investigation of Social TV Activity,” Marketing Science, 36 (1), 105–23.
22.
FossenBeth L.SchweidelDavid A. (2019), “Social TV, Advertising, and Sales: Are Social Shows Good for Advertisers?” Marketing Science, 38 (2), 274–95.
23.
GodesDavidMayzlinDina (2004), “Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication,” Marketing Science, 23 (4), 545–60.
24.
GodesDavidMayzlinDina (2009), “Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test,” Marketing Science, 28 (4), 721–39.
25.
GoelSharadWattsDuncan J.GoldsteinDaniel G. (2012), “The Structure of Online Diffusion Networks,” in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce.Association for Computing Machinery,623–38.
26.
GohKhim-YongHengCheng-SuangLinZhijie (2013), “Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content,” Information Systems Research, 24 (1), 88–107.
27.
GoldenbergJacobHanSangmanLehmannDonald R.HongJae Weon (2009), “The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (2), 1–13.
28.
GongShiyangZhangJuanjuanZhaoPingJiangXuping (2017), “Tweeting as a Marketing Tool: A Field Experiment in the TV Industry,” Journal of Marketing Research, 54 (6), 833–50.
29.
GopinathShyamChintaguntaPradeep K.VenkataramanSriram (2013), “Blogs, Advertising, and Local-Market Movie Box Office Performance,” Management Science, 59 (12), 2635–54.
30.
GopinathShyamThomasJacquelyn S.KrishnamurthiLakshman (2014), “Investigating the Relationship Between the Content of Online Word of Mouth, Advertising, and Brand Performance,” Marketing Science, 33 (2), 241–58.
HayashiFumio (2000), Econometrics. Princeton University Press.
33.
Hennig-ThurauThorstenWiertzCarolineFeldhausFabian (2015), “Does Twitter Matter? The Impact of Microblogging Word of Mouth on Consumers’ Adoption of New Movies,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (3), 375–94.
34.
HewettKellyRandWilliamRustRoland T.van HeerdeHarald J. (2016), “Brand Buzz in the Echoverse,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (3), 1–24.
35.
HomburgChristianEhmLauraArtzMartin (2015), “Measuring and Managing Consumer Sentiment in an Online Community Environment,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 629–41.
36.
KimHoBruceNorris I. (2018), “Should Sequels Differ from Original Movies in Pre-Launch Advertising Schedule? Lessons from Consumers’ Online Search Activity,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35 (1), 116–43.
37.
KimHoHanssensDominique M. (2017), “Advertising and Word-of-Mouth Effects on Pre-Launch Consumer Interest and Initial Sales of Experience Products,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37, 57–74.
38.
KumarAshishRam BezawadaRishikaJanakiramanRamkumarKannanP.K. (2016), “From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm-Generated Content in Social Media on Customer Behavior,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (1), 7–25.
39.
LambertonCaitStephenAndrew T. (2016), “A Thematic Exploration of Digital, Social Media, and Mobile Marketing: Research Evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an Agenda for Future Inquiry,” Journal of Marketing, 80 (6), 146–72.
40.
LambrechtAnjaTuckerCatherineWiertzCaroline (2018), “Advertising to Early Trend Propagators: Evidence from Twitter,” Marketing Science, 37 (2), 177–99.
41.
LanzAndreasGoldenbergJacobShapiraDanielStahlFlorian (2019), “Climb or Jump: Status-Based Seeding in User-Generated Content Networks,” Journal of Marketing Research, 56 (3), 361–78.
42.
LiuYong (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” Journal of Marketing, 70 (3), 74–89.
43.
LovettMitchell J.PeresRenanaShacharRon (2013), “On Brands and Word of Mouth,” Journal of Marketing Research, 50 (4), 427–44.
44.
MaLiyeSunBaohongKekreSunder (2015), “The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease: An Empirical Analysis of Customer Voice and Firm Intervention on Twitter,” Marketing Science, 34 (5), 627–45.
45.
MahajanVijayMullerEitanKerinRoger A. (1984), “Introduction Strategy for New Products with Positive and Negative Word-of-Mouth,” Management Science, 30 (12), 1389–404.
46.
MillerAmalia R.TuckerCatherine (2013), “Active Social Media Management: The Case of Health Care,” Information Systems Research, 24 (1), 52–70.
47.
NickellStephen (1981), “Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects,” Econometrica, 49 (6), 1417–26.
48.
The Numbers (2018), “Domestic Movie Theatrical Market Summary 1995 to 2018,” (accessed February 1, 2021), https://www.the-numbers.com/market/.
49.
OnishiHiroshiManchandaPuneet (2012), “Marketing Activity, Blogging and Sales,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (3), 221–34.
50.
OrhunA. YeşimVenkataramanSriramChintaguntaPradeep K. (2016), “Impact of Competition on Product Decisions: Movie Choices of Exhibitors,” Marketing Science, 35 (1), 73–92.
51.
PeresRenanaMullerEitanMahajanVijay (2010), “Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models: A Critical Review and Research Directions,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27 (2), 91–106.
52.
PortalSivanAbrattRussellBendixenMichael (2018), “Building a Human Brand: Brand Anthropomorphism Unravelled,” Business Horizons, 61 (3), 367–74.
53.
RandWilliamRustRoland T. (2011), “Agent-Based Modeling in Marketing: Guidelines for Rigor,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28 (3), 181–93.
54.
RuiHuaxiaLiuYizaoWhinstonAndrew (2013), “Whose and What Chatter Matters? The Effect of Tweets on Movie Sales,” Decision Support Systems, 55 (4), 863–70.
55.
SeilerStephanYaoSongWangWenbo (2017), “Does Online Word-of-Mouth Increase Demand? (And How?) Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” Marketing Science, 36 (6), 838–61.
56.
ShiZhanRuiHuaxiaWhinstonAndrew B. (2014), “Content Sharing in a Social Broadcasting Environment: Evidence from Twitter,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 38 (1), 123–42.
57.
StephenAndrew T.GalakJeff (2012), “The Effects of Traditional and Social Earned Media on Sales: A Study of a Microlending Marketplace,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (5), 624–39.
58.
ToubiaOlivierStephenAndrew T. (2013), “Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?” Marketing Science, 32 (3), 368–92.
XiongGuiyangBharadwajSundar (2014), “Prerelease Buzz Evolution Patterns and New Product Performance,” Marketing Science, 33 (3), 401–21.
62.
YazdaniElhamGopinathShyamCarsonSteve (2018), “Preaching to the Choir: The Chasm Between Top-Ranked Reviewers, Mainstream Customers, and Product Sales,” Marketing Science, 37 (5), 838–51.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
